Skip to main content

North-Korea and bunker-busting weapons


Titan II ICBM
(USAF) 

Kimmo Huosionmaa

North-Korean authorities want to talk about the situation in the Korean peninsula, and this means that the leaders of that state are really afraid. Even if the North-Korean nuclear missiles has the strike capacity all over the USA, the fact is those nuclear weapons has only the terror-option. This means that they can destroy cities and civilian targets, but the commanding system is immune against those weapons, what possibly will detonate in the air by barometric-  or impact-detonation. Some of those warheads have probably the radar detonator, but in the real life, the working of that system is not very sure. And the North-Korea has limits of its nuclear power.


One of the reasons why this state has been created the nuclear weapons is the possibly little bit different than other states. Those warheads are maybe meant for supporting the power of Kim Jong-Un, and the rumors are that in his command train is one nuclear warhead for suicide, if this man will be surrounded by the people, who don't like his power. Also, there are rumors, that there are nuclear detonators under the official complex of Pyongyang, and if there is the rebellion, will those nuclear bombs were detonated.


There is a nuclear weapon in the world, what is meant for destroying the commanding bunkers, and the main targets for nuclear missiles, what are the product in Russia, China, and the western nuclear states, are another nuclear missiles. Those systems are made for attacking against the nuclear bases and commanding infrastructure, but those warheads need extremely sharp targeting that they could effectively strike against command centers. And I think that North-Korea doesn’t have that kind of technology for making that kind of weapons.


The targeting of those bunker-busting weapons will need the radar-satellites, what can track the bunker infrastructure from underground complexes. Those real-world command bunkers are behind very long tunnels, and that’s why those bunkers can survive, even if the nuclear weapon will strike at the door of the bunker. The targeting of the missile is very simple in theory. The system needs two points.


The point where the missile will be launched, and the point, where it should flight. And the flight computer will get the parameters hoe missile should flight to the target. The bunker busting weapon needs also radar, what gives the map for the target area, and then the computer inside the warhead compiles the picture, what radar gives with the picture what is in the memory of the system.


This picture has been taken by recon satellite, and the computer of the warhead and when they are precise one on the other, will that warhead strike precise to the direct point. The bunker busting system will work like many warheads strike in the same position, and then they will meet the roof of the bunker

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MIT's tractor beam can make the new types of SASER systems possible

   "This chip-based "tractor-beam," which uses an intensely focused beam of light to capture and manipulate biological particles without damaging the cells, could help biologists study the mechanisms of diseases."(Interesting Engineering, MIT’s Star Wars-inspired ‘tractor beam’ uses light to capture, manipulate cells) MIT's tractor beam can make the new types of SASER systems possible. The tractor beam just hovers the nanoparticle in air or medium, and then the laser or some other electromagnetic system transports oscillation into those particles. The ability to make cells and other particles hover in the system makes it possible to create particles whose energy level or resonance frequencies are accurately calculated things.  That thing makes it possible to create things that transmit wave movement accurately and cleanly. This is one version of the use of a tractor beam. Modern tractor beams are like acoustic tweezers where sound waves lock the object in its cr

The new observations tell that the thunderstorms form gamma-rays. That could make gamma-ray lasers possible.

  "An illustration of NASA’s research plane ER-2 flying over thunderstorms. Credit: University of Bergen / Mount Visual (CC BY 4.0), edited" (ScitechDaily, Surprising Discovery: NASA’s Retrofitted U2 Spy Plane Reveals Tropical Lightning Storms Are Radioactive) The new observations tell that the thunderstorms form gamma-rays. That could make gamma-ray lasers possible. The process has been observed by the NASA (Lockheed) ER-2 research plane, which is a modified U-2 spy plane. The gamma-ray formation in thunderstorms. Where lightning and electric fields release electrons that impact the air molecules and water droplets is an interesting thing. That thing opens the route to solving many mysteries.  "The general physics behind how thunderstorms create high-energy flashes of gamma radiation is not a mystery. As thunderstorms develop, swirling drafts drive water droplets, hail, and ice into a mixture that creates an electric charge much like rubbing a balloon on your shirt. Pos

Chinese innovations and space lasers are interesting combinations.

Above: "Tiangong is China's operational space station located in low Earth orbit. (Image credit: Alejomiranda via Getty Images)" (Scpace.com, China's space station, Tiangong: A complete guide) Chinese are close to making nuclear-powered spacecraft.  Almost every day, we can read about Chinese technical advances. So are, the Chinese more innovative than Western people? Or is there some kind of difference in culture and morale between Western and Chinese societies? The Chinese superiority in hypersonic technology is one of the things that tells something about the Chinese way of making things.  In China, the mission means. And the only thing that means is mission. That means that things like budgets and safety orders are far different from Western standards. If some project serves the Chinese communist party and PLA (People's Liberation Army) that guarantees unlimited resources for those projects. Chinese authorities must not care about the public opinion.  If we th