The natural explanation for energy vampire

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Some people believe that they are so-called "energy vampires", what sucks the life force from the people nervous system. So this so-called energy vampire steals electricity from the nervous, and that would cause tiredness and other physical problems. But in fact. we have met the energy vampires in the real life. The bosses, who give us too many jobs and working fellows, who always disturb people, while they have some important work, where the main role has the concentration are real-life energy vampires.


When those people are in the workplace, nothing would be done, and that might feel very bad. Also, the real-life energy vampires are persons, who harass other people in the work and make all working day feel uncomfortable. And of course, one version of this so-called physic vampire is neighbor, who keeps extreme nice parties just, when we must go to work in the morning.


But when we are thinking about the form of the supernatural energy vampire, we might think that this unbelievable creature could conduct the electricity from the human nervous system to the creatures own nervous system. This would çause low voltage in this system, and that is quite dangerous. Is this thing natural, or human-made machine is the thing, what everybody decides for themselves.


But in working place, we meet the vampire, what makes everybody feel uncomfortable. Without this person, every day would feel nice, but the problem is the persons, who behave like idiots. We all know those persons. When we see them in the morning, is our day ruined. Maybe we would not just like them, but sometimes the reason, why we don't like them, is that their attitude for comrades is disgusting.

Working life is not self-evident and kicks off from work doesn't mean the end of the life.

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/working-life-is-not-self-evident-and.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Racism is always mentioned as the European phenomenon, but this is not true. There is racism also among other ethnic groups like Arabs and Black Africans. Also between African tribes like Hutu and Tutsi. When we are talking about slavery, we always forget that hunting of the slaves was handle by Arabs and members of black tribes, who sold people to European slave markets for getting guns and other weapons. When slavery was officially prohibited in 19th. century, transferred European businessmen their cotton plantages to Africa, and that was, of course, needed men, who have guarded those places. The hate between Hutu and Tutsi is from that age because owners of the cotton plantages used another of those tribes for guarding the slaves.



That was because Europeans didn't want anybody knows, what was going on in those places, what could be called as near slavery. Slavery was officially prohibited because priests were justified the trade of humans very clear, but the slavery continued everywhere, where public eye didn't look. Europeans choose the tribe, what was used as guards, by using one method: they must be the minority in their area. That made them addicted to European firearms, and this was caused hate between people of Africa. Those plantages were like some concentration camps, and everywhere were only black persons, who worked in there. The guns were explained to be against predators, and if somebody would become suspicious, could that person shot and left to savanna, where scavengers would terminate the body in a couple of hours. We are living in the world, where every man should be free, and we wish to believe that the time of slavery would be over. But there is still marketplaces, where people are sold for work without payments. And now we are not talking about sex-slaves. There are a million of people in the world, who are working as the cleaners and other works, but they ever see their payments.


In some cases, the payment would go to those workers parents, and those workers would not even see their homes. Those parents have sold their children to the factories to get more money, and the under-aged worker's payroll goes to the pockets of the parents, who might live hundreds of kilometers away from that factory. There are also cases, where the company pays payments, but the money would get back to the pockets of the company owners.  In those cases, the employer says, that they would pay payments, but the worker should live in some "hotel", and then all money goes to living. The idea of this kind of slavery is that the company takes their workers only from some "hotels", what are actually some warehouses, and then the rent of those places would get all the money, what that company paid. It's sometimes kept by the bosses of the company, but sometimes the keeper of those hotels is some labor union guy, who might be the cousin of the owner of that company. Also sometimes the payroll would get back to the pockets of company owners by the very nasty way. The owner or work leader of the company tells that employee have made damages in the work, and then the company can ask payment for those destroyed stuff.


This has been the fate of some young workers even in the Western world.  But there is one model of slavery, what we might see everywhere. That is the psychiatric patients and handicapped people rehabilitation work. Those works are usually very dirty, and nobody wants to do them. And the payments of those works are poor, and they are under-ranked. Sometimes the attitude of those workers is, that their work is so bad, that they would need any payments. Also, their work has been delayed more often than normal workers, even if the quality of the work has been the same. The slavery, where payments would go to the pockets of the parents is the thing, what happens also in the western countries. In some cases, alcoholism or narcomaniacs would send their children for cleaning the roofs or delivering newspapers for getting drugs or alcohol. And those children even get food at home.


There is connecting the question of social media. When some employer claims that person would be kicked off because of the writings in social media, and if those writings were not made,  that person would be kept in the workplace. But this thing is a little bit suspicious. Is it really so, that the employer would be kept the worker in the work if this person would leave the social media? if the employer has isolated the worker, they would ever be allowed those workers to stay in their places. And if the employee writes to social media, would the kicks off be more easy that if that person would be quiet. There are people who claims that it would be easier to keep the mouth shut, but then I must ask one question: would it really easier to keep the mouth shut? And when we are thinking about the situation, that employee has been kicked off, why must that person hide those things?


I have had many work relationships what have been cut for many reasons, and I would say that I'm not an easy person, who just wants to comply everything, what the boss wants. And that have caused problems for me, but when I'm thinking about those situations, that some proud man has said that I'm not suitable in their workplace, I must say that kicks off have been easier than if I was not written about this stories. Sometimes those bosses have not dared to say everything, what they wanted. And the kicks have been coming anyway, so, why should I feel that this situation is some kind of "stigma" for me? If that is the stigma for some work instructor, that is that person's problem, not mine. This has been the nice morning to think about those things and let's go to face the new day and new challenges.

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/working-life-is-not-self-evident-and.html

Why must we have superiority for other persons every time, when something goes wrong?

https://sites.google.com/view/socialbehaviorsandselesteem/etusivu

http://marxjatalous.blogspot.fi/p/why-must-we-have-superiority-for-other.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are thinking about threats, the weak persons would normally treat to another people. Their purpose is to raise their weak self-esteem and inability to talk with other people about threats and violent behavior. Weak persons are unable to hear critics about themselves, and they are also unable to handle social situations. They are normal persons, who would always want to show their superiority to other people, and that means, they are unable to handle the social situation without looking the object downwards. They are always right in every case, and if they are in superior position for other person, they would show that to everybody. Weak persons are always want to talk with superiority and officials, if they are sometimes feel that they are right. 

People with bad self-esteem always call the boss, because they want only to show how important they are. And who cares about the person, who were responsible for the thing, what caused the violent situations. They want to show, how wealthy they are by using expensive jewelry and clothes. And of course those persons want to hear only things, what pleases them. And if the person, who is the target for hate is not even responsible for the thing, what caused the hate is same to those persons. The first thing, what those users of very expensive clothes make is to call the boss in the situation. 

This is the major problem in the everyday life. We all want to hear something, what we like. And if somebody doesn’t please us, we feel angry and hate. Sometimes I have thought that sometimes we are all those persons in expensive clothes. If some young person would make something wrong, we are lower tolerance level than with adult people. When some youngster yells to us, we would feel angry, and then we think that some 15 years old youngster is bad person. We cannot accept the situation, that some bicyclist would make scratches to our car, because this person just drives the cycle beside of our car. 

We want to call this persons parents and then call the police, who would give punishment to that youngster. But when some other adult makes the same thing to our car, we would accept the offer to repaint that piece of damaged painting. But why we must always be so adult, that we want to get some person in the court, because we want to show superiority for that person? Why we ever tell anything to some person self? Why we always must get authority from some official or superiority person, when we have some problems? The law says that we have not to tell anything to the underage person, but is it easier to give punishments behind the back? About need to be superior for other persons is clearly seen the situation, where some handicapped person makes some jobs. 

We want to see that the work, what this person does is somehow worse than our own work. This is the very interesting situation because the persons who are handicapped makes usually the same missions than so-called ”normal workers”, but their salary is normally extremely low. When some underage person would get punishment, would it be better than this person knows the reason for sending behind the bars? This might be the good thing that the person can change the behavior, but the most interesting way to get punishments is that the person would lock in some room, without telling the reason for that. 

And the learning of behavior needs that the person would know, why the punishment would given. This is the only thing, what makes person to understand where the target of the punishment made wrong movement? The philosophy of punishments is that they would be given for some reason. And when the punished person would know the reason, can this person fix the actions or behavior, and this is impossible if that person would not know the reason for punishment. But if the punishment would be automatically given, would that cause the situation, that this person doesn't even care about the behavior. 

If the punishment would come behaves that person good or bad way, would this person lost the care of the behavior. When I sometimes think about the situation, that the person would get punishment without the reason, would this also be the similar situation, that person would not be told about the reason for punishment. In some protective works the policy is, that if some person would not make the jobs well immediately, when this person came to work, the result would be kicking off. And in those cases the reason for kicks is almost ever mentioned to that person.

https://sites.google.com/view/socialbehaviorsandselesteem/etusivu

http://marxjatalous.blogspot.fi/p/why-must-we-have-superiority-for-other.html

All bosses of criminal organizations believe, that they are above their henchmen.

Kimmo Huosionmaa


When we are thinking about extremity crimes like "Holocaust", we must say that the most extreme crime in the world is the crime what is authorized by the government. And the criminal governments always work as some Nazi-government. We always forget, that Nazi criminals were actually normal criminals, who had uniform and government, what justified their crimes. Nazis were like some super equipped motorcycle gang, what had tanks and airplanes in use.


Those persons who worked in the government of Nazi-Germany knew that their work was not acceptable in the eyes of ordinary people. Inside human mind are mechanisms, what mission is to protect our species. And one of those mechanisms is that human being likes children. We always want to tolerate children, because they are so wonderful. Children are always righteous, and that was problematic for Nazi-authorities, who send them to death. In the home, their own children would ask, where their playmate disappeared.


Of course, those bureaucrats knew that their children were not accepted their actions, and that's why they needed propaganda machine to give all support, what they can get, and that is one mark of the criminal. Those persons cannot stand that somebody says something against them. They know that they do wrong, and some criminals want to believe, those nice clothes make them persons, who are above everything. That kind of persons believes, that they are not responsible for things, what they are ordering. They just fill forms and at same time leak some information to criminal organizations. They only follow their leaders without single excuse.


Today we have read the sad thing about medical doctor Hans Asperger, who was the inventor of "Asperger syndrome". He sends children to euthanasia clinic to death in the T-4 program. That is one of the saddest things in the world when some highly intelligent and educated person does skills to serve monsters. Sometimes I think what kind of person is criminal? In the cases like Hans Asperger and some other so-called "Nazi doctors" I must ask one thing: is the law always right? Is it prohibited to think in own head, that some things are against moral and ethics? Why is thinking prohibited?


Because if the person uses own brains, would that make that person an individual. Individuals are always hard persons for the totalitarians because they would rest in mind. What does the totalitarian government want to see? Behind every government is always a human being, who makes the papers and gives orders. So the totalitarian government wants to see so-called "grey mass" because the members of the government want to forget people, who they persecute. Here I must say that every government in the world owns little bit totalitarian shapes because laws are written for everybody, and that's why every government needs police to look, that laws are followed, and criminals would get their punishments.


When we are thinking about criminals, and as you might see Nazi government made crimes even in their own mind, and one crime was killing innocent people. The persons who ordered those crimes wanted to keep long distance to the persons, who made those crimes, and places, where those crimes happened.  And in this case, the persons, who gave orders to kill somebody just wrote papers, and then the victims send to death. And here we see the idea of criminal systems. The persons who order crimes think that they are somehow above the persons who are executing the crimes, what are ordered by somebody, who makes the papers, what authorizes those crimes. That is normal logic about criminal's thinking.


They believe that they have right to make those things, and when we are thinking about so-called normal criminals, we will face that the bosses of criminal organizations use suits and slips, because they want to show other people, that they are above the "street operators". That kind of person sits in the office and keeps the distance for the persons, who are following the orders. Bosses of the criminal organizations always want to show that they are above the persons who are making dirty work. Those bosses always look down their henchmen or the "field actors". Do you think that Nazis could make their crimes if there would be social media in the Nazi-Germany?

http://pimeakronikka.blogspot.com/p/all-bosses-of-criminal-organizations.html

About the working life and disappointments

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are hiring our employees, we might always forget one golden rule. We can't ever hire our bosses, we are always hiring our henchmen, and that is the reason, why we must ever make the mistake of hiring our friend to our company. When we are hiring somebody in the firm, we must understand, that this person is below us on the ranking list of that firm, and if we are the persons who made that recruitment, we are this person's superiorities.

And we must be sure, that person who is hired by the company does the jobs, and if this employee would not fit the team, we must kick this person off the firm. The problem of hiring the friend or member of the family is that if that employee would not follow the orders or our superiorities make the decision, that this is not the right person for the team, will that break our relationship with our friend.


If we promise too much, and we can't keep our promises, we will cause most terrifying disappointment, what the person can ever imagine. The thing about the working life is that we are human ourselves. We are not perfect, but if we are hiring somebody, we must be sure that the disappointment in the life is not too heavy. If the person is an adult, the person must stand for disappointments.


But too much is always too much. When we are talking about disappointment, we normally think that kick off the job is a big disappointment. We ever think that if our friend will become our boss, will that change our relationship forever. We can't visit our bosses home as we might want. And also other members of the working community might spurn us if we got our job from our family's friend. That is the reason, why we must always think if some of our friends send us the job application. In that case, we must remember, that become the boss of some our friends in the working life, will change our relationship forever.

Thinking about social life and skills of the people

Picture Internet
(Illustration)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Some personality disorders are the thing, what is learned part of the personality. The reason of those so-called learned personal disorders are an abusive feedback from those persons social relationship. If everybody just tells to the person, how bad person he or she is, this feedback is influential in the rest of that person's life. Same thing happens if the person will never hear anything negative in their life, and of course, that will raise their self-esteem in the stratosphere, but that might cause very negative thing in that person's personality.


If everything, what some person does is accepted, that will cause in this person's personality one very bad thing. This person can't show any self-criticism in their behavior. And if some persons don't have any self-critics he or she will become the very stressful person. When we are talking about narcissism, it's manifestation is that person want's to satisfy his or her boss in every situation. That person will show social skills by asking his or her boss as godparents for children.


What makes that behavior very stressful, is that person always treats other people like they are air to this kind of person. Only the bosses satisfactions means something to that kind of person, and other people's mission is just somewhere else,  where this particular person is. In this part of this issue must we notice that there is one very important thing, what the people must realize when they are talking about social skills. That thing is the person must not have any kind of social skills being social.


I mean the persons who will go to children parties with alcohol or who can't even ask is smoking allowed in some homes. Also, there are many people who are very social, if they have superiority position to other people. if they are sitting on some bosses seat, they can talk all the day, how "cool" they are. But they are unable to equal competitions between other people. Those people are talking like some tape recorders if they are above other persons in social rank. They always forget that other people are their henchmen.


And that will cause some uncomfortable situations in the workplace when this kind of person asks his or her henchmen to godparents for their children, so they are opposite people than that stressful personality, what is mentioned before in this text. There is one particular part of the people, who sometimes forget their position, and that is the teacher. Those people sometimes forget that they are leaders of their classes and the students must do what they will say. Same thing happens sometimes with military leaders, who give some orders without thinking that his henchmen do what he says, and that might cause very terrible situations.

Every encryption have vulnerabilities and now WPA2 (WiFi Protecting Access 2) algorithm has vulnerabilities

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Again hackers have made a good job and broke secrecy of the WPA2 (WiFi Protecting Access 2) algorithm. What made this good work, is that they published that data so all Internet community can begin to create new kind of secrecy, or prepare themselves that their private data can be stolen from their secured WEB-drives.  That action shows that we must keep going with creating new methods of encrypting data and keep our privacy so strong, that nobody sees our private data what is sent over the net. But as you might know, real-life hacking is more difficult than something that happens in media. Almost every kind of encryption has weakened, and one thing what creates much more vulnerabilities is human. If a person uses too difficult passwords he or she might need to write it down or in worst case use a text file, where that person copy-pastes those marks to password line.


And what makes that thing vulnerable for the system, is that somebody might take the only photograph from the screen, when that person opens his or her text file. And the question is did he or she remember to shut down the big screen if that person is giving training lessons to some audience. In that case, could the hacker get password very easily, only thing what that person need is taken photograph in the right moment, and after that hacker could slip in the system. Worst hacker-style is social hacking. The simplest way is just to find a boss of that target company and pump that person full of sodium-Amytal when those attackers are only asked for the password from that man or woman.


In that method hackers just get one director's phone in their hands, and simply ask people passwords from the telephone, and if people won't warned about that kind of hacking, could hackers steal very much information from their target system. Sometimes users of the system ask micro support to install some programs on their workstations, and that could cause terrible situation if a hacker is a member of the micro support team. That could cause information leak where hacker simply copies hard disks information to their USB-memories, and that could be very harmful to business secrets.


In those scenarios, hackers slip a man inside the system. There they can steal information for years if somebody wouldn't see what that person does. But when we are talking about cracking algorithms with the mathematical method, we must remember that modern computers speed and power have been grown from days when that WPA2 algorithm have been created. That makes that security vulnerable for modern computers when they use "brute force" attack against the system.