Showing posts with label productive thinking. Show all posts
Showing posts with label productive thinking. Show all posts

Thursday, November 30, 2017

About the articulation and terminology of the feedback



Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are talking about the possibility of cutting the working relationship, I must say that if some person wants to kick me off, must that person first give me the job. Second what the people do their work is the thing, what must handle in that working community where the breaking of the rules will happen. Third, my working hours are my own business, and if somebody has something to say about them, they are free to call my boss if they want. And I have constitutional right to write what I want if I don't be racist or agitate to make the crimes.


There is always the people, whose mission is to follow how the other people spend their working time and this is the very sad thing. When we are talking about the things that other people think be some kind of nice thing, I must say that if the people don't dare to write on the Internet about those things, what they actually think themselves, will the Internet become the boring place. In the real world is no need to shame, that people have their own thinking and opinions about all the things. But when we are talking about the writings, we probably mean the texts what we make ourselves.

The writing doesn't mean making the sketchbook by some lifestyle magazines. When are we writing our own thoughts to the net, why we can't publish them right after writing? When we think that we will face the bullying in the net, we must say that those people, who bully another person, will normally touch the one world. Those harassers will never see all the text, what is written.

They will take only one specific world, what makes the writer seem like stupid. In some newspapers have been the writings about the social media, and there were high profile cases, where the employees have given kicks to the worker because of the writings in the social media, and that is the very sad thing. The reason for those writings was actually to show people, that they should be quiet for the things what they face in the work life. But in the real world, there is no need to be quiet.


Those harassers ever quit their actions. I ever heard that those firms ever give jobs to those persons, who are harassed in the work and the boss ever says nothing for that. There are workers who have worked all their working life in the fixed-period working relationships, and they ever even offered the full-time job in any company. So why those people should be quiet? Does some employer give their normal work if they are quiet? In some working offices is the policy, that the workers should not use the social media because it makes their opportunity to be selected for jobs more difficult.


But if that person goes to the hundredth interview, what ends in the laughing, I will think would I be quiet about that thing. Or if those firms personnel don't even talk to me or they will act like I'm the furniture, I will as what they care about my writings? If I'm some kind of unnecessary trouble, I will ask is that the job what I want? Why must people be quiet about the things, what is ever convicted by even the own boss?  Is it nice to read that person's opinion of those workmates, whoever says "hi", when you go in the workplace?

When some bosses want to deny the social media, they will afraid, that their families or the friends hear what they really are. And when somebody tells the media, that this person got a job, because he or she doesn't use social media, should we ask. how many times would the leader of the company offer you the job, if you will shut down your social media?

When we are writing about the texts, we can say, that we are thinking with our own brains. I don't copy any guitar magazine photos or some other star's texts on my wall, so the things what I write are my own. This is the thing what I want to tell you, my dear friends. The world is not the nice place, and maybe somebody doesn't like what I write, but this the way how I see those things.

Thursday, November 16, 2017

It’s not the same, who has the most powerful supercomputer on the earth


Source South China Evening post

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/supercoputersandpolitics/etusivu

What is a threat to the quantum computers? Those machines are so fast to handle calculations that, they can break almost every code in the world, and that makes ultra-fast computers very dangerous in wrong hands. The problem with secrecy and confidentially in the net is that every secrecy system is made with computers, what is possible in that time. And that’s why all security solutions need to be updated simultaneously.


If those algorithm is getting old, the information what it hires will become available for hackers. And modern computers might be very fast. If their processors will be used in liquid nitrogen, they will become superconducting. That means there will be no resistance in the system, and that’s why those computers are really fast. Same way ultra-small components make possible to make very powerful small size computers.


A nanotechnology is a powerful tool for computer technology. It allows the engineers to build an atomic size component. The nano technical transistor might consist of three atoms, what formulates stand, collector, and emitter in atom size. And of course, the artificial intelligence is a strong component in computing. If we can create an artificial intelligence, what can generate own ideas, and what can use imagination and have feelings, that makes computers dangerous because feelings make them feel hate.


But the most dangerous things of artificial intelligence is that they will be conscious of themselves. That might happen a situation, where machines will rebel. The power of the robots is that they have no feelings and that's why they are ideal to work in military use. But if robots have feelings they might become very dangerous. Have you ever imagine, what if some engineer uploads program, what simulates feelings in some Predator UCAV's (Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle) main computer? Can you imagine, if that computer-controlled killing machine will feel anger against some target? This situation might be so terrible, that I don't think it with pleasure.


Normal computers don't have imagination, but if we connect neuron cells to the microprocessor, the computer might become surprisingly working tool. In those test will the neurons connect to microprocessors, and the reason for that kind of test is to test computers, what can really think. Those neurocomputers can do same things than living organisms. The problem of those machines in to feed those cells, what communicates with the inorganic microchip with electric signals. That will make computers a skill to produce new things. And those things are of course interested in the people, who make UCAVs.


Those intelligent UCAV's might equip with the computer, what microchip is boosted with dragonfly's or other bugs neuro cells, what might give their extreme air combat capacity, what normal UCAVs doesn't have. The normal computer makes only moves, what are preprogrammed in that system, and when enemy learns those  UCAV's movements, they would become easy to drop. But those biologically boosted microchips can able to give those robots a capacity to make surprising actions. And if that technology goes to wrong hands, could that cause terrible things.

New winds for interstellar probes.

“Light sails can propel spacecraft using the energy of the Sun. Credit: NASA/Aero Animation/Ben Schweighart” (ScitechDaily, Humanity May Soo...