Is the man a thinking machine without any feelings?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Thinking about Gottfried Leibniz and his relationship with feelings is quite difficult. Gottfried Leibniz was the man, who made the worlds first mechanical computer. So in the Leibniz world was only one rule to think. For Leibniz, the human must be like some thinking machine, what doesn't let the feelings when the brains are working with some problem.


And some persons maybe should thank the god, that lobotomy was not invented in the time of Leibniz. By using the lobotomy could be possible to create the "thinking machine" who doesn't have any feelings for another person. Lobotomy could destroy the feelings of the human. And that could be the way to create the person, who doesn't have feelings at all.


 When we are talking about the morality and philosophy, we must understand that some philosophers might used cover identities during their life, because their work didn't always satisfy another person, and because all philosophers are quite liberal persons, they might get very bad troubles, if they were worked in the absolute monarchs in late 18th. century. In those days everything that didn't satisfy the kings were censored.  And then the person, who published awkward things about the way of rule the nations, the route would go to execution place. That's why the philosophers must live under the cover identity because they must avoid the hate of the rulers of the state.


When we are talking about the persons, who wrote the texts about the refinement of humans, they would get many letters from the religious people. This is the reason, why philosophers sometimes write their essays for the secret name, and then we will return to the things like the name of René Descartes. I believe that this very civilized man was actually normal Swedish person, who just studied French.


That language covered the identity of this man, who created the idea, the thinking is the thing, what makes the existence of the creature, and this is the nucleus of his famous phrase, what goes something like this: "I think, so I am". The thinking of abstraction is the key element of the mankind dominance of the planet Earth.  The abstraction makes possible to plan the houses and other things before. In the real world, the ability to think the abstract things is called the imagination.


When we are talking about the innovation, we are talking about the productive imagination. That makes us create new technology and new solutions. But when we are talking about the people like philosophers, we must say, that many of those people were quite liberal, and of course the liberalism and freedom of thinking are not always been satisfied for the kings and other rulers of the nation.


Freedom of thinking is freedom for speaking. And that freedom means the threat to dictators and the authoritarian governments. If the man thinks another way than others, that person will become dangerous. The thing is called the rebellion, and those rebellious persons are very dangerous for authoritarian governments, because those leaders have always some secrets, what they don't want to share.

People have right to be weird if they want

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are thinking about geniuses like Albert Einstein, we must say that they might be the little bit weird. And it is true that if the person thinks loudly and speaks to self that might clear this person’s thinking or how we must talk about that thing. People have right to be little abnormal if they want. And when we are talking about, talking or languages writing is also one way to communicate. The difference between talking and writing is that writing is making the kinetic worlds to the paper or in the screen of the computer. So the writing is one way to talk.


Why the thing that the person will talk alone is so negative, that this person must send to the psychiatrists? If somebody writes diaries, they don’t speak alone. They are writing the diary, what is full of the things, what might interest also somebody else and if that person who speaks alone writes the public diary on the Internet, would somebody think that this person is some kind of interesting or even intelligent person.


If somebody wants to read the diary, that person does that, if the reason to read is that writing is some kind of dangerous. Then the judge will give the permission to take the diary to the hands of the law. And the reason for that is the diary can involve the texts what shows that the writer is dangerous for other people. Of course, those things might be that person’s own. And if I will kick off the job, what I liked I would say that I could be very angry about it. In some courses of the psychology is the key element, that person writes the ideas to the memory. And that thing is very dangerous because the diaries are very wanted material for blackmailing.


If you write when you are angry, you might write something that makes other people scary, and in that case is the best way to keep the open diary. If somebody reads the open diary, will that person seem that this text is mentioned for public use? If I write something I will not usually try to prove anything. But when you, my dear friends are reading these texts, you might understand that I will not always write absolute truth. There is no absolute truth exist. The question about writing is that would be the very good way to let other people know what kind of person you are. In the closed diaries is the only question that how many pages have had been removed, when this diary will get to the hands of the judge.


Nobody ever tried to blackmail me by these texts, and I would not care how many times you, will share this material. I don’t hide anything, and I will not care what other people think about me. I don’t clear my blogs because I write something strange or the things what might look like weird. This is the thing what I like, and if you really want to know something about how I spend my working time, I must say that I sometimes write this kind of texts in the evening and publish them by the timer during my working day. Or did I lie to you, and do I even have a work? Or does my boss know about this and lets this action continue? Or am I sitting in some mental institute


Or am I just an ordinary unemployed who have lots of time to write texts on the internet? I ever wrote the diary, but why those texts what somebody writes to the paper are so interesting? If somebody will steal my diary, I would ask this person one question.  If I’m not the interesting person or my opinions and thoughts are not interested other people, why they even read this text? How many times more interesting could be some diary, what you might find under my bed? That would be very nice to read, that you could steal my diary from my home and show that to your friends, and then you made a decision to get me to the custody and mental institute.


But why did you read only two worlds of that diary? Did somebody else even saw that fictional diary, and the inscription inside it? How could they be sure in that fictional situation, that this particular diary was even mine? In this case, I will write about the situation, what could happen to anybody. In this text, the person whose diary was stolen is me myself and I. This ever happened to me, because I ever kept diaries, because I didn’t want to remember yesterday.

Http://ewao.com/2017/08/11/according-to-psychology-talking-to-yourself-is-a-sign-of-higher-intellect/

Why is body language so vital part of communication between people?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Why is body language so vital part of communication between people? That is a key element when we are investigating human intelligence. The human intelligence is the most fascinated and awesome thing of human being, and that thing makes us as human. But the intelligence of human organism makes human species the most dangerous animal on the planet. There are a people and situations where is extremely important to notice if some people are intelligent. One example is when somebody gets conviction about some crimes, and of course, there is the text in the law, that if the person's intelligent level is very low, he or she will get the soft penalty, because that person didn't understand what kind of crime he or she made. And that's the reason when some criminals play stupid in the courtroom.

About 80 percent of human communication is nonverbal. Even if the person is good to play something very liberal and funny things they might have the irreverent attitude for other person's way of life. That attitude will shine all around that person. The mark that this kind of person is sitting opposite you on the table, is that person is very calm.

They must show their adulthood with over calm attitude to another person. The behavior is for hiring the attitude that this target, and feeling that the attitude of being that this person might think that another one is less valuable than the speaker is. When some people have that attitude they must prove themselves, that other people are some kind of children and they start to play some kind of big brother or big sister. Those people have usually some training, what they think as very difficult. And of course, that makes them feel very strong against other persons.


Those people normally work with people who don't have any education, so they think that if some people have not been in school they are stupid, and that is not true. The education doesn’t make any person more intelligent than other, and this is the very important thing to know. If some person has an attitude that uneducated people are not intelligent, that might cause very great risk in some situations. The place where that attitude makes risks is the prison system. If prison guards don't realize that the person who sits behind doors might be clever, that situation might make the very bad risk to the public security. And if some people speak with slang, that doesn’t mean that this person might not have doctoral education, and some doctors like police investigators and judges don't always mention that they have doctoral grade education from some university.


 When we are talking about body language and nonverbal communication there is very easy to notice if somebody hides something. Those people will be some kind of closed and hostile persons, and if they have done something bad like setup another person to guilty for something what he or she probably would not do, they meet the bad disappointment, if that person will not kick off or put under arrest immediately. The disappointment will see all things, what that person does.


That person will become some kind of hostile, and that person will show the disappointment by being aggressive and some kind of closed or reserved. That disappointment of masterplan falling will shine all around that person. And if the person doesn’t usually get the wrong answers, what denies that person something, the result of that disappointment is very easy to detect. And this is the thing what everybody must notice if somebody has tried to set up some other person guilty of something.