Strange holes in polar ice cap might have many explanations

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/strange-holes-in-polar-ice-cap-might.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In the North is found strange holes on the northern icecap. And there is one very strange but the natural explanation for those strange forms. The nuclear missile submarines are patrolling under the polar icecap and they would sometimes practice the missile launches thru the ice. During those exercises, the submarine would launch torpedoes to the ice for making holes, and then the missiles would shoot thru that hole. Another way to make that route for missiles is to use the warm water, what is boiled in nuclear reactors.


That would allow shooting missiles thru the ice in the crises and war. Nuclear submarines would patrol under the polar ice cap because the ice would isolate those vessels from the infrared surveillance, what comes from satellites. Also, use of surface ships, airplanes and helicopters for uncovering the location of the ballistic missile and cruise missile submarines is more difficult thru the ice than in open water. Airplanes are equipment, what can patrol very large areas, and the uncovering the submarines would be difficult. The use of sonar-buoys and other sensors is very difficult thru the ice. Only one problem with operating under the ice is that laser communication between submarines and satellites is impossible thru the ice, and if submarine would use laser communication system, must it make the hole into ice.

Maybe those holes are made also for Navy Seals and SPETSNAZ-troops operations on the icecap. During those missions, those troops would set some weather or intelligence systems on the ice or maybe they would return some scientific or military capsules like cameras to the country, what send it to space. Those missions are normally not public, and we must only guess, why those troops operate on the ice. And maybe they are practicing to return material like dropped airplanes and lost warheads with nuclear material in those simulated missions, where some satellite capsules would be taken under the custody. And for those missions there would be needed to make holes thru the ice.



https://tekniikanmaailma.fi/nasa-julkisti-kuvan-jossa-pohjoisen-jaameren-jaassa-nakyy-erikoisia-reikia-tutkijoilla-ei-ole-selitysta/?shared=844144-1d2e43a5-999


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/strange-holes-in-polar-ice-cap-might.html

New kind of flying cranes might look like UFO:s

This picture is only as an example, what next-generation
flying cranes might look like
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7RQ7FZZJV8

Kimmo Huosionmaa


When we are thinking about UFO:s we might see, that the equipment, what is used in SAR (Special Air Rescue) missions. That equipment must be quiet and STEALTH, and that would make them look like very unusual. Also, the most modern building equipment, what might use to carry elements to high or isolated building sites might look very unusual. And in idealistic cases, same vehicles can use in many missions in civil and military sectors. So that means this kind of vehicles might call as "man-made UFO:s".


Below this text is a link to the film, what is portraying about  UFO. That film is from YouTube, and of course, it might be faked, but there could be some flying vehicle what flies over the people head. But it would not be difficult to fake by using cutting and other trick methods. This footage has been taken in China, and there is the very rare circular object, what is flying above people. We don't know about aliens, but maybe this craft is real. And when we are looking at this object really careful, we might see, that making of that kind of aerospace vehicle is not very difficult if the maker has right materials and enough money. In the conventional model would use the vertical jet engines or if we are sharp so-called turbofans to keep the craft on airborne, and then there might be horizontal jet engines what are installed radial formation in this craft.


The purpose of those radially installed turbofans would be moving that vehicle horizontal directions. That kind of aerospace vehicles might use in some kind of rescue vehicles, and they might also be used as flying cranes. The flying cranes might be useful when extreme high buildings are made, and the normal cranes would be too high. The answer might be flying crane, and also those vehicles could be noiseless. When we are thinking about this kind of devices, they are very useful in many operations, as for example the cases, where some airplane has been crashed in hostile territory.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y7RQ7FZZJV8

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/new-kind-of-flying-cranes-might-look.html

How hypersonic missiles work?

Boeing X-51 Waverider  is typical HCM
(Hypersonic Cruise Missile) candidate
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Hypersonic missiles are the fastest man-made cruise missiles in the world. The function of those weapons is normally, that ballistic missile would take those weapons to the ballistic trajectory, what allows enough speed, that the hypersonic ramjets would be launched, and those motors would give this missile the speed of Mach 12. But there are many problems with those missiles and USAF X-51 "Waverider" failed, and it couldn't start it hydrogen scramjet-motors in 2012.


The hypersonic cruise missiles are new kind of weapon, what is extremely dangerous even without the nuclear warhead. The kinetic energy of those missiles is extremely high, and if that thing hits any target, would the result be devastating. Also, the defense against those weapons is extremely difficult because the angle of incoming missiles is so variable. The nuclear warhead is of course very devastating things, but the hypersonic missiles are devastating without explosives.


Many states have the similar projects, and the most devastating version of those missiles is the nuclear-powered missile, where the burning process of fuel has been replaced with the nuclear reactor. This missile has extremely high speed and because of its big size, this weapon can cause more destruction than any existed weapon ever before. The hypersonic speed allows using the pressure blast of those weapons as a weapon.


The hypersonic flight allows to use the pressure spire as the weapon, what might make the track anywhere this weapon flies. That would give this devastating cruise missile extreme devastating capacity. The big size nuclear-powered missile can use hydrogen or water as the fuel. In this solution, the fuel would be injected into the reactor, what would give very powerful specific impulse. This kind of nuclear ramjet is not very sharp about the propellant, and the idea of this motor is, that the propellant and high speed would also cool the reactor, while this missile will travel across the airspace.


But the problem of those weapons is radioactive fallout. The radiation of the reactor would change the material, what travels thru the reactor also radioactive. That's the very bad problem with nuclear-powered aircraft. In the Cold War were many projects, where were investigated the use of nuclear power in many roles like in automobiles and aircraft. The best way to use nuclear reactors in aircraft is to use closed-cycle reactors, where the reactor would use to rotate the turbines. And the propellant would be heated by using electric arc. This would not deliver radioactive fallout into the atmosphere. But this is the only rumor and those test planes are highly classified.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear-powered_aircraft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-95LAL

https://geopoliticalfutures.com/hypersonic-weapons-fit-future-war/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Timberwind

http://knkx.org/post/hypersonic-waverider-failed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-51_Waverider

Picture 1:

https://img.newatlas.com/waverider-fourth-test.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&ch=Width%2CDPR&crop=entropy&fit=crop&h=347&q=60&w=616&s=2352e7434d7b1926023639a604c8a78c

What propaganda really means?

ALMAZ-Beriev A-60
Laser tesbed
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Propaganda is the term what means disinformation. The purpose of the disinformation is to minimize the damages if some top-secret aircraft have been shot down. In those cases will be claimed that the aircraft was only the "hoax" or it was mentioned to send in the hands of an enemy.  Those rumors, what are made in purpose, will state to claim that the STEALTH- or whatever aircraft what was sot down were "old model" or "trojan horse", what turns the public eye away from the "real stuff". This type of propaganda is meant for denying the enemy to get benefits about the wreck.


Modern military aircraft are combination what is equipped with sophisticated artificial intelligence, what can correlate the mistakes, what the pilots might do. Those artificial intelligence programs can launch chaff and flare, and begin the anti-missile actions automatically, what will decrease the stress of the pilot.


Many people want to believe, and this makes the analysis so difficult. In the real world, we must say, that human is is the toughest judge for self, but same time we are blind to our own weaknesses. Many western people want to believe, that F-15 would not be destructed or dropped by the rebellions of Yemen, but those rebels say that they are shot down F-15, what was operated by Saudi-Arabian Airforce. But who knows was the F-15 actually operated by Saudi-Arabia. There are rumors that sometimes USAF has been covered the losses by putting their airplanes to the name of some other nation.


The problem of the information of the military operations is that those operations were always colored by the propaganda, what hides the true operators and equipment what were effective in those maybe secret operations. The information warfare bases the thing that the effective equipment is in the background and in the front is the equipment, what was not so effective. And of course, we must realize, that any military force in the world doesn't show it best equipment for enemies. There is always the equipment what is reserved for the use of Russia's and USA's own personnel.


The second type of people who want to believe are the people, who want to believe, that Russian SU-35 is the best aircraft in the world, and those people want to believe, that USAF is some kind of grab. And in this situation will the rumors grow, that the dropped airplane was actually USAF operated F-15, and the government wants to deny the truth, that USAF airplanes are flying toys with full of software, and then the airplane what have been shot down starts to grow and at least one so-called "expert" will be seen to say, that the plane that was shot down was at least B-2 bomber.


The rumors are growing in the people's mind and the worst problem of those things of the information is that if somebody really wants to believe something, would that guy do everything to protect the thing, what this person believes. When this kind of person writes in some magazine, will the story go like this: The Russian airplanes were often got the position behind the other airplanes like that means that the target would be shot down straight away. The vertical and horizontal moving capacity is very important in the military aviation, and if the fighter has the laser weapon, there is much easier to shoot down the enemies. The laser can drop the enemy at any angle, and it can fire without limits of the ammunition. And if the target were pointed by the laser, it has no opportunity to escape, because powerful lasers can burn the trunk of the airplane in hundredth second. Above is the picture of Russian testbed with high energy laser weapons (Picture 1).


Or this is possible if the Russian fighters have got the laser weapons, what the Soviet Union and later Russia have tested since 1980's. In this situation would the Russian fighters capacity to shoot down any target, what they want. But when we are talking about rebels and multi-million dollar military aircraft, we must realize that the air defense missiles, what can be shot from the shoulder are extremely dangerous against an airplane, what this weapon will be pointed. The FIM-92 "Stinger" and SA-7/14 series of light man-portable missiles have revolutionized the warfare.



 And they can shoot down any airplane what comes too close. Also, normal reconnaissance drones can be equipped those missiles and laser weapons, and this is the thing, what we don't want to believe. Couple of hundred dollar equipment can have the same strike- and air combat capacity than those multi-million dollar aircraft. And if any aircraft would be equipped with laser weapons, they could destroy any so-called conventional fighter. Those laser weapons are extremely powerful, and they will cut their targets in pieces.

Sources:

Picture 1

http://www.ausairpower.net/VVS/Beriev-A-60-Laser-Testbed-7S.jpg

Robots are coming more and more common in the battlefield

X47B takes fuel from "Omega tanker"
(Northrop) 

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The news below shows clearly which way the military aviation is going to. Robot airplanes will replace manned pilots in many missions. If Northrop will put outset of robot air refueling system for UCAV:s, there might be more plans to make lethal military power more lethal for any operator in military forces. I think that Navy has been already tested robot versions of P-8 “Poseidon” ASW aircraft and other tactical systems like command posts.

https://www.defensenews.com/air/2017/10/25/northrop-pulls-out-of-mq-25-drone-competition/

The automatization of those long enduring platforms makes those long-term missions more comfortable for all operators of the navy. Because that set offer is Northrop we might think that there will be also robot-version of B-2 and B-52 bombers.  That will be the very dramatic thing for nuclear forces because robot planes can be airborne even months if their technology endures for that flight. And almost every other airplane can be operated as a robot very easy way.

The operators must just change programs in airplanes computers to the same kind of programs, what are used in “Predator” drones. Those drones might look like manned airplanes with chairs and cockpits, but there will no need for pilots. The use of this kind of airplane might be in assault roles in the situation like Afghanistan.

Those operators are sitting on the chair in some room, and if their working day ends in the middle of flights, operators just go home and evening shift will take a hand of those robots, like in some factories. Like some media persons say that is the very unfair way to fight against the enemy. Bur war is the very unfair thing, and the military commanders choice between own men or some enemies when they are calculating victims, their choice will be that better to kill enemies than making own casualties.

And there is one thing, what supports the use of unmanned combat vehicles in those operations is that drone operator has less psychiatric problems than men who fought in those mountains. If we are talking about real war, the question is who shoots first, and war is not any game with honor.

Robot aircraft have many advantages for piloted vehicles. If U.S military losses drones in some missions, the losses might never become public, because there will be not human victims, and that’s why those robot operations are easy to cover. And the most important thing about creating robot warplanes is that their pilot doesn’t need very expensive training, and all of those drone operations might be undercover.   

https://www.defensenews.com/air/2017/10/25/northrop-pulls-out-of-mq-25-drone-competition/