What is the purpose of the meeting between Putin and Trump? (And something about leadership)

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are meeting in Helsinki, sometimes we are thinking, what is the purpose of those meeting? Why those men are meeting in Helsinki and if they would not be made any concrete things, why they would travel to this town, and talk together? The problem of those leaders is simple, they need foreign treats, and many of their supporters are in the military industry. That industry need treats for selling their products to other countries.


The purpose of making investigations and developments in those products is to create even more and more superior technology, what would increase the strike capacity of those products. And the advantages of the technology would be guaranteed the markets for new military equipment. And every leader in the world want of course peace, but if they will send their men to war, those persons must tell to mothers of their nations, that their sons were dying in the field.


Presidents and other highest rank politicians need public support for their campaigns, and in the world is one rule: who would pay your salary is the person, who makes decisions, what sings you are singing. And this is why every leader in the world must look strong. If some leader would give another side opportunity to speak before that side would be destroyed, that thing is mentioned as a weakness. Only thing what confesses people is the use of power. Everybody who would not satisfied must be kicked off from work.


Why must the leader tolerate persons, who have different opinions than the leader have?  This is the normal attitude in some talking about leadership. When other people come to meeting the leader would start to tell, what would be next things, what would be done. And after that, this leader would tell, that the decision of this conference is something.


This is, of course, the very nice way to lead, but why this leader calls the meeting if that person would not want to know anything that is different than own ideas? Why this man or woman would not send orders of the action to workplaces and start to work? If the person has made the decision before, the meeting is only a waste of time.


And time is money because those persons need salaries. So why not send the orders to the subleaders and stop playing democracy. The leader is responsible for the decision, and that gives this person the right to make those decisions alone, but in that case, should the report marked that the decisions are made by the leader alone. This is one very interesting point of view of leadership.

We, humans, are aliens even together.

Is this UFO true or fake?
(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

We, humans, are aliens together if we think the relation between western civilization and as an example some Bushmen, who live in Kalahari-desert. Our airplanes and other machines are UFO:s to those people, who live in the stone-age. And this has caused ideas about the ancient state, what would be created very impressive technological advantages, and then they just disappeared. But this is only the hypothetical theory, and there are not many pieces of evidence that support it.  Here I must say, that writing is fun, and I thought that I would write something about UFO:s and their connection with mythical Atlantis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_people

Maybe those hypothetical members of the ancient civilization were moved to the Universe because the climate of the Earth changed by the meteorite, what destroyed dinosaurs. But there is no evidence about that civilization, and that's why this writing is pure fiction or philosophical thoughts. And as you see, philosophy would give us change to say imagination as the hypothesis, what gives title philosophical thinking for pure fiction.


I thought that I will write this text because there are many theories about the UFOs. And if we would look at the picture, what is above the text, we might notice, that if that saucer-shaped object, what might be some kind of STEALTH-drone, what is used by pumping electricity by using radio-masers, that craft would not explode, because there would not involve any  fuel, what can cause explosion.  Or of course, that picture might be the hoax, but it works as a good example of the thing "what could the UFO:s be?".


Of course, it can be some kind of demonstrator, what uses batteries and electric motors, and maybe it was used demonstrator for next-generation STEALTH-helicopters, what must operate without any noise.  Again Pentagon has released more UFO-files, and I have the opinion, that UFO phenomenon is caused by top secret military aircraft, weapon research or extraterrestrial visitors. In the UFO:s involved many incredible theories about ancient aliens, but there was no evidence of them in nature.


But sometimes I have got incredible thought in my mind, what is based on Plato's tale of mythical tale of the Atlantis. I sometimes read this thing from some book, but it consists the silly theory, that maybe somewhere in the past was one civilization on Earth. And that theory is not so silly, as we might first think. This theory or philosophical thought bases the thing, what we see around us in every day. We must say that modern humans are aliens to other humans. Or what would you like the situation, that some nations have Jumbo-Jets, and some people use still pikes and axes for hunting, and they live in the stone age?


They are living without any technology, those people are nomads and some of them are quite primitive like Bushmans, that live in Kalahari-desert. This difference between technical advantages people inside the human race has made kicks for theories, that in the past was the civilization on Earth, what had the very high level of technical advantages.  And for some reason, that ancient civilization left Earth, and maybe those members of that civilization were reptilians, that lived in the Yucatan area.  And then some meteorites came, and those ancient reptilians left to  Universe for looking new home.


This theory is not the worst of theories about UFO:s, and in this thought, the reptilians escaped from Earth, because of the climate change, what caused the meteorite, that hit the Yucatan area. There are many incredible thoughts about this so-called "ancient aliens", and in some theories, that civilization must be left from Earth, because that was attacked by some stronger civilization.


And when those aliens left the Earth they destroyed the bases, by using meteorites, for covering their existence. As we have seen, we are even today humanoids for other people. And when we are thinking our technical advantage compiling with people, who are living in stone-age, we must think, that are humanoids some people, who traveled to the universe? Maybe we would someday send the people to the other stars.


Because those people are of course highly intelligent, and they would have the very sophisticated technology in use, they might advantage their technology and their genomes would be replaced by some local genomes, and that means that those colonialists would advance and separate from original humans very fast, and then they might become aliens for ourselves.

Sources:

Picture I:

http://www.collective-evolution.com/2018/05/24/the-us-government-just-admitted-to-recovering-materials-from-ufos-here-are-the-latest-updates/

https://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/

If you want to be the top man, you must make sacrifices

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/if-you-want-to-be-top-man-you-must-make.html

https://sites.google.com/view/thereisnotextwithoutinfluence/etusivu

Kimmo Huosionmaa

If somebody believe, that is easy some top man of science or philosophy, that man is wrong. In this text term "philosopher" means also other writers, who write books that are not actually anything else than the production of images. When the person writes lots of things, those texts might involve very serious claiming about the things, what are meant for hidden in some archives. There are many persons who would see those top philosophers or scientists resting in final peace.


If we are thinking pure science, we must understand that there would be many persons, who would see that some vaccines, what is planned to use against cancer as prevention purpose as prohibited. Many medical companies live to make cancer medicines, and if some vaccine would make those medicals unnecessary, would the incoming money flow to that company decrease. And some persons have not so high morale, what we hope, and that is the reason that the persons, who are investigating those vaccines are sometimes afraid of their life.


Also, people who are taken part of the research what was about the unpolluted energy are sometimes faced the diagnoses, that they are somehow mentally ill. The reason why people still want to use fossil fuel and own car is simple. Big cars bring status to some people, and nobody wants to divest their privileges. That is seen in many times in many places, where is the ranking system. In those systems, persons keep their privileges more important than making the job done. I didn't invent that thing myself. There was a program on TV, where this thing was mentioned. There are also many philosophers, who said something, what made them very unpopular in the eyes of the people, who have power in the state. Even if the philosopher wants to follow the law all the time, this person would cause very embarrassing situations for the leaders or some other persons.


When we think that some kind of Voltaire would want to make himself known as the philosopher, this person must write many articles on the Internet. And when somebody writes lots of texts, would happen that this person writes something, what is not satisfy the leaders of the nation. In that case, Mr. Voltaire would want to give his dream about university teacher or official of the state away, because something bad was said against the leaders of the state. In this case, Mr. Voltaire should look for another job than some officer in that land. And in this case, we must understand that sometimes would be better, that nobody even knows, who actually that Philosopher actually is. If the wrong persons would find the real identity of some philosopher, that would sometimes cause the violence against philosopher.


Many persons do feel that they must satisfy all other people when they say something, and in this case, we must say, that we ever can satisfy everybody. And if we want that our texts are popular, we must write something, what makes people interested about those texts. And in that case, we must say, that nobody is interested in texts, what have no critiques against some powerful people. This is the very dangerous thing because is some of those powerful men would sit next to writer in the train, and that text is read for radios, and if some of those powerful men would turn red, will that uncover that critique had the influence to that person. This is why is very difficult to be a philosopher. All texts have some kind of influence on other people.


When philosopher writes much text, would those texts have influence, and as Descartes would say if somebody gets angry because those texts, would the writer existed. But what would that person look like? That is the key question of recognition. And if some texts cause the influence that some other writer goes to the presidential office for those writings, would that cause violations against the writer. And that's the reason, why writers sometimes want to stay undercover. If their identity would uncover, the results could be very painful for that writer. That is the reason, why some writers hide their identities from the public eye.


Mental disorders are the good method to shut the mouth of some persons, and of course, that can stop even the writing process. But when we are thinking of isolation and the way to write and innovation, we must say that world is always tougher than the sword. Like Napoleon Bonaparte, the most brilliant military mind said, who owns the mind of the army, owns the men and weapons of the nation. And as we know the most brilliant minds can make the decisions, what would first seem like mistakes, but then they would become the success.


That would make legends, what is told even today. The legends are born the way, that somebody makes something, what turns the way of history. History is nor of course written as those things were actually happening. The history is written to serve nations. And one way to teach military leaders was, of course, tell them stories of the fights of the past. That's why some battles ever happened in real life, and the stories of those battles are meant for educating the military leaders of the nations. The purpose of those stories would be to make the commanders of the armies analyze the methods what would be done in those situations.


In the medieval age and long after that was the teaching of the Kings quite difficult task, because if that majesty didn't want to learn anything, or the teacher would not pleased the ruler of the state, would that cause very the situation that the teacher were executed, if the King felt that somebody was not honor that unlimited ruler enough. And that is one reason, why we are living in the republic. The reason for supporting unlimited power of the King, was because the continuance were guaranteed in the state. But sometimes the King changed, and that might cause bloody cleanings and executions, when new majesty took the power in the state.


And those cases were very dramatic because many high-rank noblemen lost the head in those prescriptions. The purpose of those political killings was to make next ruler of the state independent. Same time was the purpose to show, what happens the persons, who try to blackmail royal court. One of the most well-known cleanings is when Roman emperor Septimius Severus's son Caracalla slaughtered his father's guards and all personnel of the court because they could tell the information about weaknesses of the new ruler of the Roman empire.


The official version is that Caracalla prosecuted those staff assassination of his father. Caracalla is told to be very brutal caesar, and somebody has been claimed that the stories of the massacre in Eboracum what is now named as York was told that people would afraid him, and maybe this claimed massacre with the assassination of his brother Greta caused fear in the mind of people, and then somebody killed Caracalla. Here we must remember that Caracalla was 22 years old when he became emperor with his brother.


And because of his young age, somebody claimed that his brother killed their father. Young men are the very good target for that kind of propaganda, because they have so little experience of life, and maybe Caracalla believed the stories about the assassination of Septimius Severus. And the isolation of the Severus, and that the bodyguards would not let Caracalla in the tent of dying emperor made him believe that somebody was poisoned his father. The reason for isolation was maybe ordered for quarantine, or because emperor wanted to rest. But they seemed the conspiracy in the eyes of Caracalla. Sometimes those majesty's were unable to stand disappointments.


When we are thinking about the royal policy of many nations, the real Kings had always lightning rod who was good to prosecute, if the wars went wrong. This was the reason, why the royal marshal of Sweden, Armfelt leaped to Russian side. He was afraid that the King would execute him, and that's why this man left to Russia and served the Emperor Alexander I in the committee of things of Finland. Another high-rank Swedish officer, who went to serve Russian emperor was Spengtsporten, who served as the governor-general of Finland in early 19th. century.

https://sites.google.com/view/thereisnotextwithoutinfluence/etusivu

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/if-you-want-to-be-top-man-you-must-make.html

The thoughts about the hypothetical situation that humanoids would land in the Central park of New York.

https://sites.google.com/view/nicesummerevening/the-thoughts-about-the-hypothetical-situation-that-humanoids-would-land-in

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-thoughts-about-hypothetical.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This evening was so calm and nice, that I started to think the hypothetical and very silly situation, where some humanoids from another planet would land to some public place. What would happen in that situation? Would the life of the human race transfer to something else? Probably normal people would not face so many changes than in some Sci-Fi-movies. In this case, the humanoids would not walk in the streets and they would stay in their bases because they would infect the bacteria of Earth if they would not have immunity against those organisms.


Maybe many things would change in international politics, and the humans would start to think, what would happen if those hypothetical humanoids would become hostile. In that case, the people of the Earth must defend they self. This case would be copied from the European colonization of the world. This case is very sad to read because it cost the life of many people in the Wold. In the colonization, the Europeans came first in peace and the explorers wanted to talk with natives, but the meaning of this action was to get information, who would ask for allies, and where would be found gold. After that came the conquistadors, who used force to make those people the slaves. If there would be some advanced civilizations in the Cosmos, I must hope, that they would not act like conquistadors.


In the worst scenario, those humanoids would just shoot the antimatter-ion ray to the center of our planet, what would explode immediately. This is the worst scenario, what we can ever imagine. When the center of the planet would explode, the shock wave would destroy the entire planet. Another version would be that humanoids would cover the Sun with millions of mirrors, and then those mirrors would cause the explode of the Sun because they would mirror return the light from the Sun back to the star. That could cause the exploding that star. When we are thinking about our position in the space, we must be lucky, because there might be not intelligent technical civilization near us, and that might save us from the war between civilizations.


But as we know the most important thing between the relationship between states and civilization is in the Latin phrase "Sic vas et Pacem Para Bellum". That means "If you want the peace, prepare for war. If we meet another civilization, we must be careful. That civilization would probably be peaceful until they would get enough power to make the invasion to the planet. So we must prepare for that before it's too late, says some physics and military leaders, or they are claimed to said.


But of course, we hope that there would be no contact with another civilization or that civilization would be very far away from us. This is the problem with our relationship with another civilization. Another way we would hope to meet the aliens from another star. And another way, we are afraid that hypothetical situation very much. In this case, we must remember, that we are sent very much synthetic radio transmissions to the universe. Most of them are from our radio-equipment, what are not send those radio signals in purpose.



Sometimes I think, what the humanoids would like us if they would see our TV-broadcasts. They might think that we are something "different" than they are. This is another way to think about our relationship with the one of the greatest question in history: why we are only one known civilization what have intelligence and technology? Why we ever met another civilization? In the case that there would be some cosmic council, what would tell civilizations when the contact to some technical civilization is possible because of it technical level has been advanced high enough, that they would know how to communicate with super-civilizations. But the question about those civilizations is, that what was the creator of the hypothetical cosmic council? What was the very first civilization, what took the level of super-civilization? This is the playing with thoughts nothing more or less. And the evening was beautiful, so I wrote this text in the evening.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-thoughts-about-hypothetical.html

https://sites.google.com/view/nicesummerevening/the-thoughts-about-the-hypothetical-situation-that-humanoids-would-land-in

The way to think is the key to creating texts

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/the-way-to-think-is-key-to-creating.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Philosophers are sometimes very interesting persons, and of course, they meet another interesting people. In the stories and writings, philosophers travel around Europe and meet many well-known artists and spend their time in European courts. They always have very much friends and they have of course many connections with European intelligent persons. But when we are thinking about the position of René Descartes as the member of the royal court of Sweden, we must say, that his position as the "crown's official philosopher" was the little bit extravagant.



Of course, philosophers want to be that kind of persons, who spend their life in courts of Europe, but then we must say something, if those philosophers would really live in the royal courts, their life would be very short because the rulers would not always like philosophers ideas. One of the ideas, what was not very popular when it was first introduced was the hidden way to use power. This way to rule the government is very nice for the ruler. In that hidden way to use power, the king or whoever gives public orders is actually a front man. The real power is in the hands of somebody else than public leaders.



Eminence-style way to use power is very attractive because in that model the real ruler of the nation would not ever get responsible for their actions. The possibility of eminence was also the reason, why Allied didn't murder Adolph Hitler during World War II. The only person during WWII who was assassinated by British intelligence by the special operation, what was targeted straight against that person was four stars SS-general Reinhard Heydrich the chief of RSHA, who was murdered or assassinated in "Operation Anthropoid". Here we must ask: "why Adolph Hitler has not targeted that kind of operation, what was accomplished by Allied intelligence.



In that time Allied intelligence didn't actually know, who was real ruler of the Third Reich, and also the mental condition of Hitler was probably in the knowledge of some intelligence officers. The rumors or stories, why allied forces didn't assassinate Hitler goes like this: "If Hitler were assassinated, there would raise some man who was mentally wealthy raise in the power, and that would cause that the war could get longer". But those are only rumors. The reason, why S.O.E (Service Operations Executive) didn't assassinate Hitler was probably burning in some oven after the WWII when British intelligence cleaned their archives.



It is also called as an "eminences". This kind of way to use power is sometimes existed in some companies, what is established by using the name of some famous person. Sometimes we would see eminences in the student unions of Universities. What makes us suspicious is the situation, that the student's union would work against their own interest, like in the case where students want to raise the tuition fees. That is the mark of the influence of eminence. When we are thinking about the situation, that some very public person would establish the company, we must same time realize, that if that person has not trained for leading the company, there must be somebody, who pulls the wires.



Here I'm talking about the firms, what is established by some formula drivers or ice-hockey players. There must find the persons, who have the lawyer or another kind of that background, what justifies them to lead the enterprise-class company. Sometimes we would see the persons, who are the very strong reformer. They always bring their agenda to the public knowledge with the very high profile. And of course, there is always very good ideas, why their agenda is better than others. If some person comes to say, that some system would be better than the existed system, the philosopher would ask one question from that great reformer.



The question is: "what is your position in that new system"?  When we are thinking about the situation, that some students wants to raise the level of the payments of some universities, we must first look at their student cards, and courses, what they are done. Then we must realize that there is always one question about payments: "do you like to pay any payments"? What those students actually want, when they want to get more payments? Are they the highly motivated students, who would get top grades from their courses?



Or are the students, who were motivated in the parties, but studies would not go forward? Sometimes I have to meet university student who wants to be the nurse or something like that. Those students agenda is always been some kind altruism, and they want to do something concrete to other persons, but when we are looking at their grades, those people would not have in the worst case a single course passed. When their student cards are full of failed courses, there would be the new idea in their head. They want to stop studies, and then move to the easier nursery school. And the reason for that new type of altruism is sometimes that this person would want to get access to narcotic medicines or easier place to study.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/the-way-to-think-is-key-to-creating.html

Let's make maps of the genomes

Kimmo Huosionmaa


Mapping the genomes is not very difficult in theory. In this process, the maker of the genome map only takes genomes from people, and then finds the simultaneous repeating sequences from the genomes. This is the method, to find out, what kind of sequences have some kind of people. The definition of the skin color or other ethnic background made for human genome mapping by collecting the DNA from different kind of people, and those samples were classified by ethnic background of the people, who gave those samples. And then the mapper just found the similar sequences of DNA, and that was allowed to make the genetic map, what uncovered the ethnic background of the people.


But this method can use by uncovered many genetic illnesses, and in this case, would the method be same, what is used in the finding of the ethnic background of people. And many genetic disorders have been mapped in "human genome project". This genetic map would uncover if the person has extreme low IQ, and that might happen with choosing some institute, what takes care about those patients, and then there would be looking for similarities of DNA. In that kind of mapping could use the method, where CP-handicapped sequences are filtered from the test, and that would allow uncovering the genomes, what makes very low IQ (Intelligence quotient).


And then this kind of test could be used also to uncover extreme intelligent persons, and this kind of testing goes like this: first we must find the graves of well-known scientists or some other canonical geniuses, and then their DNA would map to uncover the similarities. And then those DNA sequences would compare with other people. That can uncover those people, but then we must say something, there is a possibility, that those well-known geniuses were not made their texts by themselves. In the past era, the political atmosphere in Europe or even in the whole world were not very liberal. and sometimes those philosophers were even executed because they said or wrote something against the people, who kept power in their countries.


So in this kind of situation, those philosophers must hide their identity, and that's why there would be the sometimes handicapped person in their position. That means that they used shield-man to avoiding political arrests, and sometimes there was handicapped person buried in their grave because the families of those persons wanted to be protected against hate of the powerful people. And that's why the mapping of those genomes, what would use as compile elements of that test would be difficult. In that kind of operations would be needed real "genius-based" DNA to make the test trustworthy.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/in-future-we.html

Thoughts about the old milestone and old road in Espoo (Life is a road, I want to keep going)

The old milestone

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Many memories are connected to scenes or landscapes. And there are many marks about how the advancing of the city and growing population changes the area and the lines of the roads, but there are still marks from the past times when the cars were smaller and driving speed was lower. Above the text is a picture of the old milestone, what is at the side of the old footpath in the city of Espoo. Of course, that milestone can be carried that place from somewhere else, but maybe that brought some thoughts about chance in my mind. And writing is the nice hobby, and I would like to tell those thoughts to you.


That kind of milestones are not made anymore, or they are on the side of bigger roads, and this picture remains, that in the past the roads were quite different than today. Today this old road does not even have the snow plow in winter time, and it tells something, how the road lines are changed in history. In the past, this road had some kind of meaning because there is a milestone, but then everything changed, and today the line of the main road is in the different place.

The old road in Espoo
near the milestone

But that milestone remembers us, what kind of people lived in here near the capital in a couple of decades ago. The main roads were quite smaller than today, and this footpath is now only the memory from the times, where there were many agricultural fields. But then the price of the ground was raised, and that meant the farmers moved away and sold their farms to the city or building companies.


That meant the end of the agriculture here, near the capital of Finland, but there are many memories about those times, like straight ditches, what are still marking the places of the fields, even this area is now full of trees, and it's now forest area. But in the bottom of the forest is very easy to see the lines of ditches, what is filled with water in autumns and springs. This tells how long those marks of farms are staying in nature.

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/thoughts-about-old-milestone-and-old.html

I think I exist, and if I'm punished for my texts, I exist for some powerful man

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/i-think-i-am-existed.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

René Descartes said once, that if the human being thinks that makes this person existed. In his lifetime, normal or ordinary people did not exist for rulers of the nations. And everything, that said against the king or rulers was the straight attack against the god. If we think this way, everybody who says something against rulers exists only when they are punished.


When we are following the way of thinking, what Descartes followed, we must say that if somebody makes texts or makes speeches, what means nothing, we must ask a question "why this person would punish"? If writing means nothing, the consequences must be nothing? So what in some writings or speeches is so harmful, that the king gives the order to arrest that text maker. Why poor philosopher causes the situation, that all nation must change the laws in the country?


When people make the own writings,  this person must have the capacity to think about those things. And that kind of writings might be harmful to people, that believe that person must keep quiet when somebody would not ask something about that person. Only persons who have right to speak or write something, are superiority officers. And the role of henchmen is to keep their mouth shut, when their leaders are speaking.


When the person raises to a very high-rank official, would the orders, what this person gives become so-called common orders. This might cause some misunderstandings because that kind of person is above everything. Normal man or woman can't say or do anything, what might harm that superiority official.


And if some worker would say something bad about this very high-rank businessman, would that cause the situation, that this person must step down from the tower, and say something about this case to that worker. In this case would look very funny, that some main director of enterprise corporation kicks this worker off. And in this case, would happen that the director would give common orders, that the doors of the company will be closed for the person, who is from some city or state. This means that the director wants to make generic orders for hiring the position. Those high ranking officials of the private or public sectors might sometimes hide behind orders, what are given to all industry. This means, that this person would just walk away if somebody says or does something bad about that person who might be king of the state.


Soon comes to the orders to kick off 3000 persons from their working place, because somebody said that the slips, what this boss used was not very good looking. So that kind of thing might cause the situation, that thousands of workers would kick off or something like that would happen. This is how powerful men are working in real life. And also everybody, who writes about those things, should be quiet because they would not find the jobs from those companies.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/i-think-i-am-existed.html

What actually is ancient Greece in philosophy?

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/what.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Many times in philosophy have mentioned some persons from ancient Greece. That place and time were full of philosophers, who created many thoughts about things, like idealistic republic and atomic models, but people almost ever asked one simple questions about those philosophers. They ever ask "why those texts are made in long time ago"? In philosophy, the key thing is not proof anything like in some empiric investigations. And what means or what is the role of ancient Greece or philosophers of ancient Greece in that profession. Another question goes like this: what is the difference between the philosophical and historical Greece?


The element of philosophy is to use rhetorical argumentation, what makes those texts or speeches feeling right. And the problem of philosophy is that philosophers are professional thinkers, who sometimes say something, what is not pleased the persons who keep the force in their hands. And that's why is more comfortable to say that some ancient philosopher said those things before some Voltaire said those things in some place because in those cases Mr. Voltaire would be escorted in the cellar of that castle, and then the brutal extortion began.


In the time of Voltaire, there was one golden rule in making writings. The kings or other noblemen should not embarrassed, and the best way to embarrass those people was show that they were wrong. Kings were perfect people, what means the thing, that they could ever be wrong in many cases. But when we are going to meet the modern philosopher's relationship with some man, named Socrates or Plato, we must say that none of the modern philosophers could ever meet those persons from ancient Greece. And in the real life, we can't go and ask anything from Plato or Socrates.


Maybe in some day in tomorrow we could build a time machine, and then we could go to meet those great men from Greece, but before that, we can only use our imagination, why those philosophers claimed to say something, what might be the reason, that those philosophers have made so much claiming. Other philosophers have put their own texts to their name, and we can't go to ask those Greeks that what they really have said or written in some garden in ancient Greece at the beginning of history.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/what.html

Identity and personality are the great things

travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/15/identity-and-personality-are-the-great-things/

Thought about two abandoned houses

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In this text is only thinking, why some person works so no rational way, than in those pictures is done. Why somebody repairs the house, and then leave it empty? And why somebody hates milestones? Those questions might be interested some historians, and here I must say, that the purpose of this text is not to play some Sherlock Holmes. There is no mentioned that in those houses have done any criminal activities. So I just walked near them, and those houses interested me.


At the picture above this text is a picture of the house, and as you might see, this house is abandoned. The reason, why I write this text is, why the roof has got new sheets? When the owner of this house has left somewhere, this person has put new sheets on the roof and then abandoned this house.


The question is, why did this person do that thing? Did this person have too much money, or why this house got the new roof before abandoned? When the normal person leaves the house, is very unusual that the roof would be repaired. And there is something more about this house because there is another house near the first one, why does is didn’t get stainless plates on the roof?

If those houses have been abandoned at the same time, why only another has got stainless steel sheet. Another house has rusty plates on the roof, and that house is also abandoned, but if we think this group of houses carefully, the bigger one is, of course, the main building, but why those stainless steel plates have been put on the smaller one.


This text is only thinking about those houses, and at the second photograph is the milestone, what is destroyed. The reason for the destruction might be something like the sledgehammer, and the destruction might be made for the purpose. But who hates milestones? This is the very good question because those things are quite expensive. And if somebody sees that action, would that interested by police. But those houses are empty, and I was writing this text only for thinking, why those repairs are made just before leaving.

Stephen Hawking’s party for time travelers

Kimmo Huosionmaa


This is philosophical writing about time travel, and it is meant for causing thinking about this fascinating theory, that it is someday possible. If that thing would be possible in someday, we would see, what kind of animals were dinosaurs. But there would also be risks in that technology. What if some neo-nazi would get the time machine in hand, and travels to the past with a couple of history books, and helps Adolph Hitler to victory in the Second World War. That kind of risk would be possible if that technology would transform real, and somebody would make the time machine.

Stephen Hawking was very well known about his coups. And in 2009 he kept the party for time travelers in his home. Nobody visited, and I think that the idea of those parties was the joke, but when I want to write something more about this party, I can’t write the “certainly nobody came” and I must write this text in the mode of the detective story. In this text, I think that I would act like some police detective, in some novel.


So I must say that maybe those time-travelers visited those parties, but does they have knowledge about the ALS syndrome of that man? In this scenario, the time traveler visited in the Hawking’s party, but this man was sitting back to the door, and then the time travelers would think that this man was sleeping and decided not to disturb him. So they saw the situation and went out.


In this text, I would write the things, like there really would be time travelers, what I don’t do in real world. Or sometimes I believe that those fictional characters would be true, and sometimes I think that they are only hoax or joke. But in real-world scientist and investigators cannot say that they are sure about anything. If we think that the time-machine could be real, we cannot say, how sharp it could be. And maybe those time travelers arrived at the parties at the night time.


And in theory, the time traveling could be possible. This phenomenon would happen in the situation, where the speed of the particles would rise to extremely high speed. Near the speed of light, the time would start to go slower. Another way to travel in time would increase the mass of the particle by pumping energy to it. If there would pump enough electrons to some object, it can transform the bite into the small black hole, what “drops” thru the time to the wormhole. This kind of time machine would be possible in someday, but we must wait for the technological advantages little bit more time. The time machine would take the crew to one way trip in the distant future.


Another way to look at this problematic time traveler case could be that those persons thought that that was the trap. And then the time travelers would avoid this area because they might think that some military men try to steal their secrecy. That’s why they would not come to that party.

Sources:

Hawking's party:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=elah3i_WiFI

Mad scientist's paradox:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUqxzH0652w

Train ride to the future:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZ0gQevrPTo

It's not prohibited to use own brains

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When he was at Swedish court René Descartes wrote a book, what has a very strange name "Rules for the direction of the natural intelligence". Sometimes I have thought that René Descartes was not this man real name, and I certainly believe that this man was not even visited in the court of Stockholm, and there are many stories about those famous philosophers what are not true. The name of that book will tell everything about the life and the soul of that man. The nucleus of this book is, that in every decision the person must remember, that independent way of thinking is not prohibited. This is seen very often when people are talking about defending the country.


When the superpowers like the USA and the Soviet Union made their nuclear arsenals, the leaders of those nations forgot, that everything, what the physics can create is not necessary to make in full function model. And this is the reason, why those nations have more nuclear weapons than another nation, and the bad thing is that they pushed many more nations to the "nuclear club". And then there would become the situation, that nuclear disarmament is not any more realistic answer.


And the most comical thing is that the USA and Russia, what is replaced the Soviet Union are the first states, what are talking about the nuclear weapons. But when we are going back to think about the name of the book, what Descartes wrote, we must think that there is nothing more dangerous thing than the human mind, what makes something in the impulsive condition, and those things might often be very devastating. When the human makes decisions, must this leader able to listen to another persons, when the orders are given.


In this scenario, I don't mean that the leader must do what the henchmen say, and the decision might stand, but the modal askings about the opinions of the action are not the bad thing at all. Of course, the leader makes the decision alone, but if other persons are heard, that would give the information, what might be very important. And if the landscape or water area is polluted, the price could be decreased for this reason. When he was in Swedish court Descartes sees what means absolute monarchy and the absolute power.


The king could execute anybody by given orders to execute some person, and if this man was angry, the results could be devastating for all nation. "What bigger the ruler is, that bigger is the damage, what the ruler can cause for the nation", is old fashion wisdom, and if the king were executed all his generals would that cause little problem in the military forces. When Descartes made that book, he probably got the king angry. The name of that book was mentioned, that someone in the kingdom needed instructions to use their own brains, and maybe the king was one of those people.


Who knows about the relationship with the Descartes and court. There are many things what is written about those men, and probably great philosopher René Descartes was actually some Gunnar Eriksson, who even saw the court of Stockholm. Sometimes I believe that this famous philosopher might be the artistic name, what was used the ordinary man, who spoke and wrote very good French, and that was the reason, why the king would not able to find that man.

The little writing about existence.

Kimmo Huosionmaa

What means “exist"? For Réne Descartes that word means thinking, but what that means for bugs or computer programs? Those things also exist, but the last one has no physical form, so should we think that existing or being needs the physical form of the material. And if we want to put the challenge too great Réne Descartes we must ask what is the sleeping person? Is this person lost the existence because this person sleeps? The form of the existence is the very old question. Some philosophers have written that they have thought if the humans and Universum exist only in some computers databases, and the argument for that thesis is that the universe is too ordered to be spontaneously created.


In the lone houses were sit long period to think, what means the world "exist", and then we must think that does the existence means that every particle in the universe must have some rights? Do the stones need rights because they exist? Or they are excited if some überphilosopher will strike their toe to that stone. Or does the thing exist if they are the thoughts in my head?


Those are quite exciting questions, what gives the bread and butter for some philosophers. Every philosopher in the world is some kind of strange because those people are professional thinkers, who do not need to prove their words by the empirical way like "real scientists", who operate with kinetic things. Philosopher can let their mind fly, and that makes them very hard to fall. The atomic model where the material could be brake until it cannot anymore divide is functional even today, even if Aristoteles made that model over 2300 years ago. The names of those particles have changed as the bosons and electrons.


But there is still the point, where the particles of material cannot divide until there will build the new particle accelerator, what will bring to our eyes even smaller more high energical and short aged particles than Higgs bosons ever can be. But that means that there must build the new accelerator, what uses more electric power and more powerful magnetic fields than "The Hadron" accelerator in CERN uses.


And those modern philosophers think that Universum is the central computer, what have this reality in it mass memories. If we will start to let our mind fly, we must say that if we are some bytes in the computer memory, that will explain the Holy Bible extremely well. If we would be part of some computer program, that will give many explanations about the thing, what we are calling as “the reality". Of course, this is only thinking, but if we are living in the memory of the supercomputer, we must make the question, what would be the purpose of this computer.


And why there is the program like this. Then we must go to the toilet and begin the second part of thinking about the reality, and the purpose of existing. Why are we exist is the main question of philosophy? What is the reason, why we are living? If we are asking this from the person, who lived in the Medieval time, this person would say that the purpose of life is to serve the king.


But then we must ask what is the purpose of the life of the king? If this person answers that serving the God is the purpose of the life of the king, we must ask does the king probably know the god, or how this person knows how to serve the master? Does this man got some rules about the way of serving this creature, what normal people would not meet until at the gates of Heaven.


But when we are thinking about the technology, we must say, that the reality is what we want it is, and this would give some Scifi-writers the ideas, that the human been is actually sleeping in some spaceships hypothermal coffin and all the things, what will happen in that virtual space, will make to please the journey of those travellers. In those very nice fictionary books those space travelers are connected with the spaceships central computer and those travelers would give their brain capacity for that imaginational mission.

The brains what were connected to the central computer would give the productivity and imagination for the use of those computers. That would be the very good choice when somebody wants to create computer what really can think. This system would give the computer the capacity to imagine the things, and if the computer can create something new, would that make the mission easier. In some books, that kind of trip was already made, and the solution how the organization could hide that action was that they cloned those persons, who will go to space. That would be cover the trip to the distant target.

https://sites.google.com/view/writingaboutexistence/etusivu

Steiner and theosophical methodology

The first Goetheanum
Picture 1

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Rudolf Steiner was the great thinker, in many ways, and when we are talking about the relationship with the Steiner's pedagogy and another world, we might see that there are some harmful parts of his theories. One is his relationship with medication, and I think that this man was wrong if he meant that some real sickness is medicates with some therapy. In this case, this thinker is wrong, if he meant that ordinary medicals can be replaced with some natural thing. His idea that cancer is some kind of parasite, was probably given the ideas of the surgeries, that the tumor can be killed by closing it blood vessels by some wire is awesome, but Steiner was not the doctor of medicine. And don't take this text or some text from Wikipedia as the scientific truth. His methodology will be emphasized as the studies, not in some medical care. Those persons like Rudolf Steiner are very complicated, and we probably ever understand their ideas, but as we might see the methodology, what this man used was not very scientific.


He looked at the things from horoscopes and something like that. When we are talking about the religion and theosophical way of thinking, we always think that this thin is some kind of religion, and this is how somebody handles it in the writings. Steiner himself was mentioned, that Theosophy is not religion. And in sometimes I thought that this Theosophy is meant for the equipment, what this man used when he handled the things like religion. This man was the doctor of philosophy, and those persons are quite difficult.


Their way to speak and think is very abstract, and when we are talking about the religion, we are facing the thing, that religion is also one of the forms of the philosophy. And when we are talking what kind of attitude some people have with the religion, we are facing the phenomenon, that religion is one way to force the people in the same mode, and the religion is also the good way to say "Shut up" for another people.


The idea of the Steiner-pedagogy is that when the person will get the esoteric information enough, will this information get the implosion like happened in the fusion test, wherein the same point will pump very much energy, and then the energy will work like that piece will start to generate the independent energy. And the same thing is in the key role of Steiner-pedagogy. In this pedagogy, the person will predispose the knowledge, until this person starts to produce own ideas and information. When lots of information will put in the person's head, will it work like in some fusion test: start to make and publish own ideas.


The road to the individualism goes thru the groups, and until the person has been in some collective, can this person realize what means the freedom to be alone. And only the person, who has been in the authoritarian and totalitarian country can respect the freedom to be different than the other people around this person are. The question of to be different is the question of the right to be individual. And only the individualists dared to make new ideas and other things.


They want to be different, and also they always want to be over the top. There are limits for the individualist, and real individualist dares to use their own imaginations for making products and bringing their thinking public. They are the professionals in one thing, what is called as the thinking. Thinking is not the very easy way to earn the brad to the table, and some people don't dare to bring up their own ideas. In this chapter, I must say, that everybody can copy another people writings, but only real thinker dares to write own thoughts and ideas as other people can read them.


The idea of day books is sometimes that they are used as the blackmailing material. But now my dear readers I must ask, why those people keep their day books secret? Why don't they publish their writings to another person, and keep that day book public, because then everybody can see how maniac that person is. When some person will keep their day books open, there will be no change to censor it, and then other people will get all texts what this writer have done.


They can't select only one sentence from some day book, and this is the way to show to other people what is full image of that writer. And in here we must say that the persons who will attack against other people are normally used the one or two sentences of the texts that are in the 100 pages day book. Then they will show that the person, who owns the day book, would be some kind of different than they are, by using two sentences as the argument.


When we are talking about Rudolf Steiner and his way to look the world, we must say, that the person is never an expert in everything in the world. There is no so-called common genius and in 19th. century, there was very little hope if the person gets cancer. In the studies method, Steiner might be the genius, but in the medical things, this PhD. was only the ordinary person, even if he hunted ghosts in them and talked the astral creatures. When Steiner talked about those creatures, I think that this person meant the memories or something like that.

Sources

Picture 1

https://www.goetheanum.org/fileadmin/_processed_/c/5/csm_1goefarbig_01_32fb9271bd.jpg

How are the ancient gods made?

Picture 1

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are talking about the gods, this world doesn’t always mean that the god is nothing else than the person, who have some skills, what makes this person necessary for the community. In some cases, those skills, what the god had might seem like some supernatural things, but in the real world, the background of those things is almost every time some usually very simple technology. If some person controlled the irrigation system, he must be the person, who got very much respect from other people.


This thing is notable, when the god of ice is mentioned in some texts. This person might have skills to make the ice. In the realistic way that person had skills to build the temperature pump, and that thing might make the very good impression for some people, who saw the nasty stick and the wind, what caused the cold and white stuff formation in the surface of the artificial hill or house. In this text, the words “artificial hill”, means the muddy hump, what is used to store the ice.


Even if they didn’t know the temperature pump, the person who bought the ice from the mountains was very important part of society. The ice must be packed under the mud, and then bought from upriver of Eufrat to the front of the people. And if those ice bites, what is covered with the mud were used as the material of the dams, those dams will break, and then all irrigations would be left below the water. But when we are thinking about the ancient landlords, whose positions changed as the pharaohs and kings, we must realize that if some person controlled the dam in some Mesopotamian river, and this person orders to destroy that structure, could people die in the flooding.


And if those people wouldn't allow the freeing the water release to the agriculture, the people would die of hunger. I don’t know did those people know about the polluted water, but if they knew the methodology, what happens if the flesh was left too long in the closed pot with the mud, would that create botulinum in that food. And it would be caused the death. The electrical vortexes are very impressive, and of course, the Mesopotamian were noticed, that the lightning strikes almost every time to the tallest place on the place.


And maybe some of them accidentally left two copper or golden plates in the temple on the wooden statue, where were good isolator between them, and if the lightning strikes to that structure, it will store the electricity. If those people knew how to produce electricity with the batteries, where is copper and iron in some acid, they might test how to make hydrogen and oxygen with the electrolysis. In this theory have known the galvanic battery, that ancient scientist might notice the strange feeling when they touched those things with tongue, with the way that tongue touched both electrodes at the same time. And if they knew the electrolysis process, they might make nice explosions in the air.


The ancient people didn’t have the knowledge of the electrons, but they knew electricity as the phenomenon. The Greek philosophers thought that when we will cut the material enough, we will face the situation, where the material was cut in so small particles, that it will get the point known as the Greek word “atomos”. When the material gets this condition, it cannot break anymore. When we are talking about the flying with the balloons, the ancient Chinese knew how to fly with the paper balloons, where was the small burning piece of cloth below it.

Sources: Picture 1

https://www.realmofhistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/10-ancient-mesopotamian-gods-goddesses-facts.jpg

The imagination is always freedom for thinking, so don't be so serious about those things.

The asteroid from another star system
(ESA-picture)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The asteroid from another solar system is only an asteroid, what is lucky for us. This kind of pieces will always stimulate mankind's imagination and always will become some space theorist, who will say that this kind of asteroid is actually an aliens space probe, what was so-called "sleeper". In the intelligence world, the term "sleeper" means that the space probe or intelligence craft will travel across the target with their active electronic communication system shut-down. The thinking is a freedom, and people have the freedom to think anything, what they want. So don't be so serious, when you read this kind of texts. They are mentioned for philosophical thinking, not for the scientific fact.


And until the probe has traveled the necessary distance of the target, it will send the data to the makers of that probe with the laser-communication system. This means that the probe is silent, until it takes the coded message, that the central computer must begin the transmission. In this scenario, the probe is meant for SETI-missions, and its mission is not to disturb the target planet.


So this kind of thoughts will be in my mind, and there is freedom of thinking. But with this kind of asteroids is really important, that those pieces can be investigated in the very sharp way because they might give the tips, where we can probably find extraterrestrial life form. If those on asteroids surface will have some chemical elements, there is a possibility to find some kind of life form from the star, where that asteroid is coming from.


The trick is that other chemical relativity will compile with the stars, and this analyses bases that every star has a dust cloud around them, and the dust has the unique chemical fingerprint. The plasma spectrometer can uncover those chemicals, and then the star, where that asteroid is coming from can be found. But in real life, there are billions of stars in the universe, and that's why the looking for the origin of that piece can take a very long time.


But if there are a very heavy chemical elements inside that asteroid, means that the piece is coming from the space near nova or supernova, and when the star has been exploded, that asteroid what might be the piece of a destroyed planet can fly thru space. In this kind of question, we might say that "don't be so serious". There is a room for different opinions than the "official opinion" is. And there is millions and millions of particles in the universe, and somebody might claim, that the astronomers have looked the wrong piece.

The Dragon's egg and thinking about extraordinary civilizations

Artist's impression of the strange planet
Picture 1

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This writing is mentioned in philosophical writing about some of the most extreme possibility of life form. There is one SciFi-book, what I wanted to mention, and the name of that book is “The Dragon’s egg”. The original story is about the species, what lives on the Neutron star, and because the gravity of that star is extremely high, will the time run on it surface very slow, if we compare this with the universe, what grounds that small piece.  There is a small possibility, that there will be some kind of life forms on the lonely and cold neutron star, and in some cases might that species overtake the limit of the intelligence.


And as we know space is the very strange place, where can live anything, what mankind can imagine. So in this hypothetical situation, the neutron star has somehow got the oxygen field around it or those aliens might live by the nuclear reactions. That kind of species could be so different than we are, that we even can’t imagine how they create their energy or would they be the threat for the Earth. In this writing, my purpose is to think, what might be the most extreme civilization on Earth. And this writing is pure imagination.


If that species gets the spark from another civilization, would that thing get the level of technical civilizations, and that way become the power of the galaxy. Those aliens might be the species, what uses nuclear power or they might eat pure energy, and maybe they would not like any other spectacular civilizations. In this writing, I will start the theory that for creating the technology need the civilization do something with those things. And if there will drop some material of intelligent life from the universe, that would give the reason for that fictional civilization to create technology for protecting themselves. Without that trigger, the civilization would let the technology development without notices.


If the civilization doesn’t get this kind of trigger, it would feel that it won’t need new kind of technological advantages. The problem with that kind of extraordinary civilization is that it will be more uncommon than the other intelligent civilizations, but if that kind of extreme civilization would exist they will have more time to create their technology. And maybe on someday, those spectacular civilizations might use the technology, what allows them to change the size of the pierces or elements in the universe.


And while I was writing this text, I thought, that maybe there is a civilization, what have the technology, how they can adjust the size of the electronic cores of the atoms, by increasing the electric capacity of the nucleus of the atoms. If that civilization also could decrease that capacity, they could adjust the size of the atoms. In some of the wildest imaginations, there will be civilization, what could shrink their entire planet as the size of the egg, when they will feel that something is threatening them.


When the threat will go away, those aliens can swell their planet as the normal size. In the wildest dreams, this civilization could shrink their home planet as the size of tennis ball, and lay it down from space to the surface of another planet. And if that civilization has the planet-scale anti-gravity systems, what denies the effect of the massive gravity that will suck destruction for large areas, there is one fictional possibility, that the alien planet will float in the basement of some people. This is only the dream-like version of the super-civilization, and if we are honest, we must say, that we don’t know any other intelligent civilizations.

Picture source

Picture 1
https://img.newatlas.com/space-art-1.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&fit=max&h=670&q=60&w=1000&s=c40ac1700907532b60e9a84f046061e5

Thinking about the danger, what the alien can cause to human race

Artists impression of alien spacecraft
(Image from YouTube)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The scientists found two exoplanets from another star system, and this will bring the change to find extraterrestrial life closer than ever before. The problem with the scientist is that they must proof everything, what they say. Philosophers should not prove anything so this is the philosophical text about the aliens and their relationship to the human being.  The problem with the extraterrestrial life form is, that life form might be dangerous for the mankind and all of our civilization.


We might face two kinds of aliens, the intelligent life form, what as higher technological level than we have, or we might face the bacteria or viruses, what will be even more lethal than the intelligent aliens might be. The bacteria or the viruses might be the biological weapons, what the aliens use when they want to change our planet for suitable for their invasion. Or they can deliver spontaneously by some ice meteorite, what have been traveled from another star system.


In the deep space is not radiation and the temperature is not over absolute zero points. In this temperature, the molecules oscillation will end, and that´s the reason why organisms are not getting older. And if the ice bite is big enough, the bacteria or some other bugs might survive from the heat of the atmosphere, and then the epidemic will begin. In this kind of scenario is same for us, is this ice bite made for the purpose or is it deliver from the planet, what might lose it hemisphere to space. In this scenario, the planet what surface is covered by the ocean will hit by the asteroid, what will throw the massive bites of ice into space.

If the ice bites will be cooled fast enough and they will fall into space in the shadow of the planet, there might be some bacteria or bugs, what will survive of this catastrophic situation. The shadow of the planet might cover those ice bites from the radiation of the central star, and then the bacteria might deliver to the base. But if the hypothetical aliens wanted to colonize our planet, they would need to deliver viruses or bacteria, to destroy our own biomass, because if they will land in our planet without preparation, they will die for an attack of our bacteria. So in this scenario, the humanoids will deliver the virus to our hemisphere to change our organisms to the same kind of, what is found on their own planet. If they don´t do that action, they must wear the bio-protective suit on this planet.


But if somebody thinks that SETI (Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence) is safe, that person has the very limited way to think. If we think about extraterrestrial intelligence, we don´t know is there an alien, who is observing us. In the real life, we can´t be sure is there an intelligent life, even if the Fermi paradox gives us the signal that there is nobody in the universe. If the humanoids think the same way of the things, what we do they will observe this civilization very carefully before they make their decisions, what to do with us. And of course, they will not know anything about us. And if they will travel here with the spaceship what have been traveled in the universe even the centuries, they might be very careful before they make the decision of the landing on our planet.

But they can bring very strong advantages to our technology, and science and that´s why we might hope that those aliens would be friendly for us, and give their highest technology to us. In some scenarios, the superpowers will shoot the humanoid spaceship down, but this will be very risky because if we are hostile to them, they might attack against Earth. And we don´t know what is their relationship to the violence. They might be civilization, what will revenge this kind of actions with some kind of death star, and in this case that will cause the end of the world, if we can´t use nuclear warheads against that spacecraft. Then we should hope, that this ship doesn't get time for sending the alarm-message, what will bring their other spaceships to our solar system.

https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/nasa-telescope-reveals-largest-batch-of-earth-size-habitable-zone-planets-around

Though about the revenge

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There is nice thing about the hate and anger in the Holy Bible. The thing is about that the revenge will stand for two or three generations from the crime. This is the thing, what many poet and historians and philosophers have thought. Why are the words set like this? Doesn’t those people who wrote those worlds can mark the thing on the papyrus, what can stand a long time?  Or why the revenge will not happen example in five generations? Is there some reason for the limit that revenge in three generations?


Of course, I can imagine the situation, where somebody kills the grandfather of the family, and in that kind of case, there were three generations, what knew this person. The grandfathers son, the grandson of this grandfather and if this man had own son, there is a possibility, that the grandson’s son will become the avenger for the crime, in the case that the grandson has made his son in very early age, and all the persons who are in this list have gone marrier in the young age. In this case, three generations below the victim have the personal relationship with him, and the real hate needs personal relation in the case for becoming the real revengers.


But this case is very marginal, even if that text had been written in the Roman empire, where people were younger when they get to married. If the reason for the revenge might be some text in the archives, but if those texts were stored properly, they might stand generations and even the modern investigators can read those texts, and the question is what kind of files will be terminated in three generations?


Is it some special chemical papers, what could stand for only 180 years, before air will terminate the text of the papers? There is one great weakness in this particular theory. The people must be sure, that the papers are real, but even in this case will most of those people lost their personal relationship with the victim makes that kind of revenge good example of the performed hate against some people, by the people who don’t even know the victim.


Another explanation is very weird, and I don’t even believe that myself. The thing is that there is some kind of electromagnetic record, what is recorded to the iron wire what is stored in the Baghdad battery, and when the record will be lost it will not have the function of the motivation of the avenger, but this is only one philosophical writing. Of course, that thing is not ever happening, but in some SciFi-books is mentioned, that maybe some priests or leading class members took the EEG for the investigative and educational purposes, and if one of the leading class people will die in violent situations, those memories will transfer to another person, because this thing needs revenge. But this part of this writing goes too far from the real life.