Little writing of Tourette syndrome and the family of Vasa

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/little-writing-of-tourette-syndrome-and.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Above the text is a photograph, where one vegetable is different than other, and that vegetable or flower doesn't have to shame the difference for other flora. This means that being different is not same than being worse than others. Individualism is the thing, what would make people invent new things in the world and every great inventor has been different than other people. Also, many great statesmen were so-called "difficult personalities", that means that they had their strange behaviors.


When we are thinking about mental illness and individualism, we must remember one of the most powerful royal families in history. I sometimes have thought that the mental illness of that family was actually Tourette syndrome, and when we are thinking about that family, we remember them as outstanding military leaders and very creative persons, who made many things for their nation. And if that family had the Tourette-syndrome in their genomes, would that cause the isolation and fear against those people. When we are thinking about members of that family, we can say, that they are a good example, why those people who are working with Tourette- or other patients should keep their mouth shut in that kind of things, and everybody must not know about this kind of things.


The family of Vasa began national independence of Sweden in 1523, and in that family were members, who were so-called mentally unstable. That thing caused violent behavior but at the same time the very high level of intelligence and quality of being the artist. Many members of that family were genius in warfare, but the problem with those persons was violent behavior. And when I think about this family, I sometimes remember one tsar in the history, who was known as the violent man. This tsar was Ivan the Terrible, ruler of Russia, who murdered his own son during the hate episode. And then I must ask again one question of the family of Vasa.


That is are they married to some member of the Tsar Ivan the Terrible's family. And is their anger episodes from that family. When we are talking about the royal family of Vasa, we must say that those persons are the good example that the difference between mental illness and being genius is like the line in the water. When we are thinking about those excellent military leaders and statesmen, we must think about the mental illness and it's the influence on the behavior of the members of that family. That family must have problems to get spouses if that mental illness was commonly known. But what kind of mental illness was in this case?


That thing must have influence if somebody would tell that to everybody, and that's why princess of other courts might avoid that family. I sometimes think that this mental illness was Tourette-syndrome, what might seem like the violent behavior, and the bad way to talk. This syndrome makes the patient seem violent, and it could be very isolating. And many Tourette patients are very good in languages, but the problem is that the syndrome causes the situation, that many of them have seen unable to grow children. Also, the period of the spasm causes that the patient seems very frightened and demonic in the eyes of other people.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tourette_syndrome

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/little-writing-of-tourette-syndrome-and.html

Glass and the bottle of Suze (Pablo Picasso,1912)

Glass and the bottle of Suze Pablo (Picasso,1912)
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Cubism is a very strange style of art. It's different than so-called "photographic art". And somebody hates it and somebody loves it, that is the question of the taste. Everybody has right to have their own opinions about the art. Somebody believes that cubism is the only couple of lines on the paper, but some other person sees those lines as the sign of genius mind, what makes the hand as the instrument of God. Those paintings are like whispers from the 1970's, even if they are painted earlier. They make the picture of yellow furniture and bright colored clothes with graphical pictures in my mind.


The masterpiece of cubist art is the portrait, what Pablo Picasso painted in 1912. The name of this masterpiece is "Glass and the bottle of Suze", where the painter has involved the newspapers and the mosaiced picture of those things, what are listed in the name of the painting. In the painting seems to be the head of the eagle, what looks to the looker of the painting. As we probably know, there are many levels in this painting, and that's why the translation of this picture needs the deeper way of thinking than just looking at it. In the name of the painting are the worlds, what might symbolize family.


If the person is an alcoholic, the alcohol and glass are everything in the life. In this painting is also small sarcasm about the thing, what the people are talking in the restaurants during the war, what was, of course, the First Balkan war. Those newspapers were told about the war at Balkan peninsula, and of course, that was the main role of talks in the restaurants. And if persons drink too much, the speech will translate to the patriotic, and this might be very humorous to hear.


And in the restaurants were sitting the famous painter, who would become the avatar of the cubist painting style, and one of the greatest and most respected painters of 20th. century. The cubism is one version of abstract art, and it is something so different than other art. The paintings are actually looking like very simple, but they are different than so-called "photographic art". They would bring many thoughts in the observer's mind, and the role of the picture is only a road to master's mind. The abstract art brings the images in the observer's mind and it lefts room for imagination, what like feeds the lost pieces of the picture.


The artist has many ways to make the work and the idea of the artists like Picasso is, that they left the final decisions of art for an observer. Those painters paintings are only frames and the picture is creating in the mind of the observers. So the painting is like simulation, what will begin the mind-storming of some observers, and they simulate the productive way of thinking. Imagination is the beginning of the process, what brings the picture in the artist's mind, and then the stimulation must be transferred to the paper. The painter actually makes synthetic pictures, and even if they are portraits of something, the colors could be different in nature, what they are in the picture. This is one way to make an art, and it's very different than some other styles of art.

Sources

Picture 1

https://www.wikiart.org/en/pablo-picasso/glass-and-bottle-of-suze-1912

Who actually was Vincent Van Gogh? And who ripped his ear?

Vincent Van Gogh
(1853-1890)
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Vincent Van Gogh (1853-1890) was one of the most well-known artists in the world, but this reputation and the respect of this man’s art have raised after his death. And in some stories is mentioned, that this man never sold any of his works during the artist's life. When we are looking for the life of Vincent Van Gogh, we must notice on the thing. Vincent is the very unusual name in the Netherlands, and that means Vincent has maybe some family members in Great Britain. But we can’t be sure about that thing, but as we might know, the name Vincent is a British name. In this text, I must make one question of that artist. If he didn’t sell any of his paintings during his life, who paid his costs?


 When we are looking about the younghood of that artist, we must notice, that he had the same name, what was given to elder brother who died a couple of years earlier than Vincent was born.  His childhood was very cold, and in every day he must walk by the gravestone, where were his names, and that must not feel good in this man’s heart. When we are looking for his four years younger brother Theo, we must realize, that Vincent lived always in the shadow of his dead brother. Was Theo actually his brother, or did Vincent just imagine that this man was his brother, because if Vincent was always live with his dead brother, might he want somebody, who he will show the feelings and tell about his emotions? In real life, Vincent might be without attention, and that’s why he needed somebody, who cares him.


And the better question is, why this person paid the bills of Vincent Van Gogh? And the thing, what makes this artist so interesting, is why the doctor of the mental hospital gave the flat to that patient? In official story Vincent van Gogh got financial support from his brother Theo Van Gogh, but why Theo gave him that money? When Vincent died in 1890, Theo died very soon after him, and in this case, somebody thinks that Theo committed suicide. So did Theo made business with faked art, what was made by Vincent? Or why did he died 6 months after his brother? When we are looking about the life of those brothers, we must notice, that Theo rented the big apartment in Paris for his brother, and here I must say that did the brothers sell the faked art and did Vincent do the artwork and Theo the shopping of those paintings?


In the stories that man had a brother, who paid all the bills what this artist made, but when we are looking about his life, we must see that this artist was in the mental institute, and in that time was very unusual, that family members kept contact of those persons. The one thing, what is very interesting part of Van Gogh’s life, is that his ear was ripped, but in the portrait of this man is no sign of the ripping, so that is a secret, what kind of injury that self-injuring made to that artist. Some letters were mentioned that this artist separated all ear from the head, but some rumors say, that this ripping was made by somebody else.

Starry Night
1889

Probably the person, who ripped that ear was some other mental patient but officially that was made by Vincent himself. In some wildest rumors and theories, the ear of Van Gogh was ripped of the man who began to know as "Jack the Ripper". The man who made seven brutal murders in 1888 London's Whitechapel. But somebody claims that the personnel of that institute did break their orders to observe the patients and that was a reason for the cutting that artists ear. And that would explain the behavior of one of the institute's doctor. This doctor gave the department to Vincent, and probably the reason of that kindness was to cover the mistakes, what happened in that mental institute. The art of Vincent Van Gogh is very unusual, because of the techniques, what he used in the paintings.


The use of the instruments is very sharp because all parts of the artwork are similar to their surfaces, but the use of the brush is very rare because the stripes are made for a purpose. When we get back to the life of that artist, we must look at his portrait, and in that painting, the clothes what this man used were not cheap or bad, and that means this man had financial support. And when we are looking at the painting, what he made, we must be sure that he used the time for those works. When we are looking for the famous work ”Starry night”, we must be sure that this work is a portrait of some village at somewhere else than in Netherlands or Belgium. Actually, the painting is made in Saint-Rémy, but there is also the believes that this picture is representing the village somewhere in Germany because the church is different than the Saint-Rémy church.


It is the vision, what this man saw from mental hospitals window in 1889, but here I must ask one question. Why this man allowed to keep the painting equipment in that mental institute? What kind of conditions did he live in that hospital? Did he have own room, or why that equipment didn’t take off his hands? There is a photograph of the bed of Vincent Van Gogh, but there is one strange element of this story of the artist, who was closed in the mental institute. The symptoms of Vincent were hallucinations and the lost of contact with the reality. And that kind of person might be always dangerous. If the reason for the mental disorder was syphilis, would somebody give that to Vincent by injection?


And was the reason for that injection the painting what was named as the ”Starry Night”? Did that painting made from some drawings, and then somebody wanted to silent that artist, who made the painting. And was the story about him in some magazine reason to kill that man, because of the faked art? If Vincent would speak, all business would be uncovered, and then those men made dissection to kill him. And when Vincent was killed, Theo was useless, and then he has killed for silent this man.


The strange thing is the doctor Paul Gachet was given the department of the Vincent Van Gogh and started to give him the medical attention. And the question is, why did this man do that thing? Because if Vincent was some kind of dangerous person, he must be under the surveillance all the time. Was that flat a price of something, what this artist made in somewhere else. When Vincent died in 1890, the question is, why this man allowed to keep the pistol in his hands? If he were somehow dangerous, why this doctor didn’t take him to the mental institute?



Picture 1

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4c/Vincent_van_Gogh_-_Self-Portrait_-_Google_Art_Project_%28454045%29.jpg

Picture 2
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Starry_Night

https://www.vangoghmuseum.nl/en/vincent-van-goghs-life-and-work

About the working life and disappointments

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are hiring our employees, we might always forget one golden rule. We can't ever hire our bosses, we are always hiring our henchmen, and that is the reason, why we must ever make the mistake of hiring our friend to our company. When we are hiring somebody in the firm, we must understand, that this person is below us on the ranking list of that firm, and if we are the persons who made that recruitment, we are this person's superiorities.

And we must be sure, that person who is hired by the company does the jobs, and if this employee would not fit the team, we must kick this person off the firm. The problem of hiring the friend or member of the family is that if that employee would not follow the orders or our superiorities make the decision, that this is not the right person for the team, will that break our relationship with our friend.


If we promise too much, and we can't keep our promises, we will cause most terrifying disappointment, what the person can ever imagine. The thing about the working life is that we are human ourselves. We are not perfect, but if we are hiring somebody, we must be sure that the disappointment in the life is not too heavy. If the person is an adult, the person must stand for disappointments.


But too much is always too much. When we are talking about disappointment, we normally think that kick off the job is a big disappointment. We ever think that if our friend will become our boss, will that change our relationship forever. We can't visit our bosses home as we might want. And also other members of the working community might spurn us if we got our job from our family's friend. That is the reason, why we must always think if some of our friends send us the job application. In that case, we must remember, that become the boss of some our friends in the working life, will change our relationship forever.