What are mysterious islands, what are marked on maps, but what is not exist?

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/what-are-mysterious-islands-what-are.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are talking about islands, what has been on maps, but when the scientists or military went to the place, they would not find anything. The most famous of those exciting creatures are "Sandy island" and "Crocker island" what is marked to maps, but what does not exist.  The first one was marked in New Caledonia, and if that island would have existed, it belongs to French areas, what are beyond the sea.


The "Crocker" island is a place, what polar explorer Peary marked on the map, but this island is not actually existed. So why they are in the maps? The most common explanation for that mystery is that "Island" was the area, where naval vessels met their support ships for getting ammunition, powder and other merchandise. That rendezvous-area marked the island because the ships must find together in that area.


A quite small island would be good marking for the area, where the ships must wait for their opponents. The supply must be loaded in secrecy because if there were some kind of rebellion, those warships would not able to sail to harbors freely. And if the support ship would be uncovered, those cargo ships would be good targets for real warships. But when we are thinking about the lost islands in somewhere in the southern Pacific or Atlantic, we must understand that those islands, what are far away from civilization.


And if there would be tested some secret submarines or naval aircraft, those areas might be whipped off from Google maps. This thing helps keep those bases secret, and the conditions in the small islands are similar than in Aircraft carriers, but because there is no carrier crew, that would help to keep those planes secret. And in those islands can be set the cruise missiles, what can be quite big threat for ships in their range. Also, space rockets can be launched from those isolated islands. So that's why they might be erased from the maps. This could be some other explanation for missing islands.

Sandy Island

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sandy_Island,_New_Caledonia

Crocker Island

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crocker_Land_Expedition

Thoughts about the movie "Sphere"

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/thoughts-about-movie-sphere.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

"Sphere" is one of the most interesting SciFi-movies, what I have ever seen, and it is the tale of the thing, what comes from tomorrow, and makes all wishes to become true. This is the very good tale to make the nice little movie, but there is one other explanation, what could make those fictional cases, what happened in that movie. In the movie, those scientists face their worst nightmares, and near the end, they rise from the bottom of the sea to empty ship, where they wish that the mysterious "sphere" would leave the Earth.


This movie could also tell about government test, where those scientists would be connected with together by using EEG-machines, and the computer would deliver their thoughts to every member of the team by using brain core stimulation. This kind of fictional test would be made for creating the system, what is connecting human brains straight to computers. And one thing, what those computer specialists must make, is the filter, what cuts off the nightmares from that system.



So in this version, those scientists would be given anesthesia, and then their brains would be connected to the computers. If the system could not filter the fears, they would be delivered to every member of the team, and that would cause the ultimate Virtual Reality experience. If this kind of test would be done in the deep sea, it can be fully controlled. Every information, what is collected will travel thru the Navy, and nothing can be published without permission of the naval officers.


In this fictional test, those scientists can be put in the sleep in the midget submarine by using nitrous oxide, and they would ever be seen, that those people were in some kind of tests. So this kind of thoughts that movie brought in my mind. If we someday will put our brains straight connection with computers, we would make the ultimate computer, what can also create new things. The major problem with the computers is that they cannot make anything new, and they would not have any kind of imagination.

That's why computer's movements on the chessboard and other computer games are very well predictable, what is their biggest weakness. The human would win the computer in most computer games after a couple of training games because the gamer starts to remember the corners, where the opponent is coming. And this thing makes possible to win the computer, and play the game thru. In the same way, the gamer starts to remember the game areas in some action games, and this makes the person, who have tested those paintball tracks before very effective.

Technically we need only EEG-machine, decoder, and the electric shock equipment, what would make the brain core stimulation and allows two ways of communication between human and computer. And if we sometimes would make that machine, we can make the computer, what is so intelligent as we want. We can, in theory, connect even all mankind to supercomputers, but there would be many ethical and moral problems with that kind of advantage. Technology is the very interesting thing, and it would not always follow the moral or even the law.

The technology of the naval intelligence and recon submarines

Picture I

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.com/p/the-technology-of-naval-intelligence.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are talking about the delivering of the information, the U.S NAVY would not actually want that any of it vessel would not be in public more, than what is absolutely necessary. The thing is also the principle in other military forces around the world. We all know about spy planes because those vehicles are sometimes seen in the air, and that's why spy planes are the most things in intelligence, what are seen in public. But the submarines and other spy ships are more capable to get information than any spy plane can ever be. The submarines can stay at the same point in the sea even months if it uses nuclear power.


And in that position, it can record the messages, what enemy sends, and that information can be used to create new tactics against the predicted enemy. Modern submarines can also deliver drones and scuba-divers for installing the spy-systems in the underwater cables, and even the light cable can be broken. The system, what is needed is the extremely sensitive photocell, what can be put on the outer layer of the cable. This system needs absolute darkness for working, and that's why the light cells would put in the box, what would be set around the cable, and then the photocell can record the flashes inside the cable.


That data can send to the submarine by using underwater LRAD-modem or store in the USB-sticks, what can be changed by using small size underwater robots. And that data can be analyzed in the computer centers in the mainland. Those submarines can also have small size drones, what can travel to the gutter. Those systems can deliver small drones, what can flight and travel underwater, we are talking about systems that can eavesdrop houses and flats.


They can also deliver the explosives to the targeted sites, and cause very big trouble for the enemy if that ammunition would deliver to the ammunition warehouses. Modern submarines can also attack the targets with the drones, and the most modern killer robots can attack also against the sea-patrol aircraft. And those very sophisticated aircraft can also be destroyed by using the anti-aircraft missiles, what can be launched from the submerged submarine.


When we are talking about the intelligence, what the NAVY does, the U.S NAVY has also reconnaissance versions of the F/A-18 "Hornets". Those photo reconnaissance versions are named as the RF-18, and they are equipped with the camera packs and other sophisticated reconnaissance systems. This kind of tactical reconnaissance planes can be used in the similar missions as the U-2 spy planes, and the RF-18 flight altitude can be extremely high if the engine uses oxygenize or oxygen injection straight to the motor, what allows the aircraft operate in high altitude missions.

Sources:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wIbOoBtqA-I

http://www.businessinsider.com/us-navy-most-decorated-warship-sub-uss-parche-used-for-spy-missions-2018-6?r=US&IR=T&IR=T

https://www.globalsecurity.org/intell/systems/atars.htm

Picture I

https://cdni.rt.com/files/2017.10/article/59e31c17fc7e93195b8b4567.jpg

MQ-25 Tanker drone is giving the increase strike capacity for other drones and manned aircraft

Stingray
(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

MQ-25 is a new kind of drone. It is capable to give airborne refueling capacity for unmanned aircraft, and this will give more advantage to naval strike capacity. Normally small drones are so much smaller than normal aircraft, that they can refuel by F/A-18 Hornet fighter, what have the fuel tank with refueling system, but one thing is missing with those systems are one problem.


They cannot wait even for hours or days the aircraft for getting gasoline from tankers. The bigger drones like X-47B needs so much fuel than normal aircraft, and this is the reason, why navy needs the new type of drone tanker.  The Hornet's capacity to carry refueling petroleum is, of course limited.

F/A-18 Refuels E-2
(Picture 2)

And that's why in those airborne tank operations needs bigger aircraft than some fighters, what have extra fuel tanks for those operations. The question of airborne refueling is that the refueling aircraft are necessary when navy sends full loaded attack planes in missions, and when the airplane is sending from the aircraft carrier with heavy cargo, it will need refueling immediately after liftoff, because the fuel storage of those fighters is very small.


The problem with full-scale airborne tankers is that they can't operate from aircraft carriers and their trip to the operational area might take hours. And when the petroleum will go down, must those tankers fly to get another cargo of fuel. The airborne refueling aircraft are very good targets for enemy fighters, and that's why the risk of losing those tankers is very high.


Another way is to use smaller refueling aircraft, what can stay air shorter time, but what can fill their tanks from aircraft carriers. That's why some F/A-18 Hornets have this capacity. If the Navy can use F/A-18 Hornets as the refueling aircraft, those aircraft could have also the capacity for air combat and those aircraft doesn't take the room from carriers combat aircraft.

F/A-18F Refuels F/A-18 E
(Picture 3)

The space in the carrier is limited and if some other aircraft must take there, it takes place from carrier main strike force F/A-18 and X-47B.  But another reason to build the new kind of tanker for the navy is that the modern airborne tankers need STEALTH-technology for surviving their mission. Many parts of the modern air combat and especially so-called "deep hit" operations are made for STEALTH aircraft and the combat radius of those operations is very long, and if those aircraft will fly in enemy airspace, the normal refueling aircraft will be visible in enemy radar, and that will give warning to enemy, that strike team will come. And that is the reason, why navy needs a new tanker aircraft.

Sources

Picture 1

http://www.portaledifesa.it/repository/imgMail/stingray.jpg

Picture 2

http://www.crviewer.com/targets/060215/060215.htm

Picture 3

https://news.usni.org/2015/08/12/navy-getting-smarter-about-tanking-mission-as-super-hornets-approach-6000-hours