Dangers of the antibiotics resistant bacteria

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Anthrax is very easy to detect as the biological weapon. That kind of stuff can be delivered by using letters. and sometimes I have thought that could somebody send that kind of letter to the targeted persons, and be clever enough to avoid the authorities? The only needed thing for that is that the person has got the vaccine against that bacteria. The production of vaccine would happen by killing the bacteria by using UV-lamps, and the core antigen of that bacteria would make the immune system to detect and fight against those organisms.

The problem with this method, where the bacteria or viruses DNA would be destroyed is that this method can be used to make new kind of biological weapons by using natural organisms, what is the breed for resisting the antibiotics. This methodology would allow creating more deadly and unseen biological weapons by using bacteria, what are classified as the harmless because the antibiotics have been effective against them. In nature, this kind of population of Tuberculosis is forming in Africa, because people would not eat their antibiotics as they are meant. And because the period of using medicine would finish too early, would that leave the strongest bacteria alive. And that makes the population of bacteria, what is resistant to antibiotics.  Bacteria is more suitable for biological weapons than viruses because controlling those organisms is easier than controlling viruses.

Stealth biological weapons are harder to detect. They are bacteria like Tuberculosis, what are only made strengthen by using UV-radiation or antibiotics for creating the population, what is immune for antibiotics. In that operation would weak individuals of the population killed by giving them medicines or radiation, and that kind of organism would be absolutely lethal, and also it's hard to discover as the biological weapon.

Making super dangerous bacteria is happening to give the population UV-radiation. That radiation would kill the bacteria, what are genetically weak, After that the strong bacteria is left in population. And this makes those organisms very lethal. By using this method, could somebody make strikes, what is very hard to notice as the biological weapon, In this case, even the Streptococcus would be turned as the perfect biological weapon, what is very hard to separate as the weapons. Use of natural organisms is a dangerous method, because the strikes, what are made with bioweapons can be hidden from the public audience.

The strange thing about some letters, what sends in those cases, is that the used organism was Anthrax, what is profiled as a biological weapon. This makes some of those strikes very interesting because if somebody wants to kill some other person, there would be more suitable weapons for that thing, and those weapons are harder to track. Botulinum and Phosgene are easier to get, and the making of those chemicals is easier than handling Anthrax. Only thing, what the producer need to get is grass or meat with earth, and the drum, what can be closed airtight. And in anaerobic conditions, the organisms would make those chemicals, if the murdered man wants to use poison,

But protection against those chemicals is harder than protection against Anthrax. If the handler would have vaccine or antibiotics would that organism not to infect that person. But the key element is, if that person, who wants to make murder does have Vaccine, and the right conditions for making that weapon, would the Anthrax very effective way to give the signal, that nobody is safe.

About the skepticism and the meeting between Kim Jong Un and Donald Trump

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/about-skepticism-and-meeting-between.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Skepticism is always the good thing, but also optimism is important when we are talking about the meetings like North Korean and the United States leaders. The major part of the philosophy of defense is that nations should believe in the peace, but prepare for war. This is the thing with the relationships between those two states, what have nuclear power behind their leaders. When we are thinking about positivism and the normalizing the relationships between nations, we must say that positivism would tempt the North Korean government start to make changes in their country, and in this situation, the best way to act is to encourage this advantage.


But also there is also very many contracts in history, what the North Korean leaders have put their names in the papers, and then they have broken those promises. The most well-known case about that kind of politics has been re-beginning of the nuclear program of that nation. This program was given results, what we all know. And in the real world, there is many frighten weapons of mass destruction than some nuclear weapons can ever be.

Ranges of North Korea's missiles
Picture II

The biological weapons are more deadly than nuclear weapons, and North Korea has probably those organisms in their laboratories. The delivering of the organisms like Ebola is easier than launching nuclear weapons. The structure of delivering system would be lighter, and then delivering that kind of organisms can be made by dropping the test tubes from satellites. This is one of the worst nightmares in the world.


If North Korea would break the contract, and deny the meetings, we must face the similar problems than before. And the North Korean leaders would be stronger than ever before because they can use nuclear weapons in the shield of internal politics. There are rumors, that there is hiding nuclear weapons in the Pyongyang, what is ready to explode if the leaders of that country are in danger. But when we are talking about the nuclear weapons of the United States arsenal, we must also face the truth, that this nation has more threats than North Korea, and if it would start to disarming its systems, must the Russia and China also cutting their strike capacity.


And they would not go in that process, because those nations feel that India, Pakistan, Great Britain and France are also the threat to those nations, and there would be more nations in the nuclear club,because the membership in this group of the nation guarantees the respective handling of those nations in the international areas. And that's why many nations want those weapons for protecting their interests in the global environment.

Picture I

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ct-0YyoSOsU/maxresdefault.jpg

Picture II

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DCDEHZjXoAAERzk.jpg

Complex political triangle in the international politics, authoritarian governments, great natural resources and nuclear weapons

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Most of the wars are reasons the economic conditions.The war of natural resources was also Hitler excuse for Barbarossa. And before that for the attack to Poland. "Lebensraum" was the excuse for the attack to Poland. But real reasons were the oil of Bessarabia. For that object must German army open the door to the Soviet Union. And the German people were told that those attacks are caused by the need to connect those areas, where was living German people in Germany. If the oil fields would be attacked by nuclear weapons, what would use against troops what are fighting in that area, would the destruction be very total, the troops that are serving in that area would be eliminated, but the infrastructure would also be destroyed. That would because many problems when the oil production would be restarted. Those problems would be that this area is polluted by radioactive material, and also the oil production systems what have been in that area should rebuild.


Those nations that are targeted to strike have many times dictatorship or the authoritarian way to control the people in their model of leading the state. The situation of the political leadership, the model of leading the nation is not so simple as people normally thinks. Many people ask why those governments would not be fallen by military forces, but those actions would make many deaths in those areas. And of course the western pilots and other military personnel, who operates in that are are always in danger. If the nuclear weapons are used in those countries, would those weapons sweep the opposing military forces out of the area, but those weapons would also destroy the oil refineries from those areas.


Dictatorship is the model of the state in many nations, what have very much natural resources. And that makes them perfect target for military actions, but also we must remember that those countries are independent nations, and the great natural resources of their area are always causing the problems because those national leaders can choose their own supporters. The problem of those authoritarian leaders of the nation is that those governments are actually confessed in United Nations.


And this makes the situation very difficult and complex. Those nations the social and economic differences are very strong. And some cases normal person, who lives in those countries cannot even write their own name. And the only book, what they have ever kept in their hands is Koran. That makes those people very good target for provocateurs, who would promise them the place in paradise if they would join terrorist groups.


The problem with dictatorship is that those nations have no opposite force for their leaders, who would not get information of the consequence of their orders. Or they would get information, what involves only positive things about their decisions. They would not see the other side of their orders, what could cause something, what they won't even think. If the maker for decision would not see every side of the thing, the decision would be someway unthinkable.


Every leader of the nation needs the opposition, that those leaders see another part of the problem, what might be more complex than the rulers ever thought. Then we are thinking of the situation when the Soviet Union was a collapse, the world was tuned right. There was not socialism anymore, and workers were lost their supporter, was the message, what was told to people. When we are starting to think the opinions of the working people, they would not get support from the Soviet Union as much as people thought. The reason for turning right was that the fear of the Soviet Union was dammed many things in the society to the left wing, and in rumors, every mayday parade was caused by the Soviet Union.


The laws changed to right, and the society works like some kind of water. When people would transfer the water to another side of the pool,  there would be a giant wave. The collapse of the Soviet Union released the wave, what fell to the right side of society. In that time the socialism was fallen, and this thing caused the social room, where the only real ideology was marketing economy. That thing caused the situation, where nobody had power in parliament to say nothing against the right wing laws, what was not very well organized.


Because opposition was weak, there would be no reason to listen to their opinions. Many persons believe, that left-wing opposition presenter were protected by Soviet nuclear weapons.Why the government should ever hear other opinions of the laws, what it has right to adjust? In that situation, many people saw, that opposition was led by the Soviet Union, and when that supporter was left, there were no reasons to listen to opposition arguments. Now we can see the results of that kind of politics. In that time the Soviet Union was gone in history. There was not the boogeyman for media, what would use as the silencer. There was an intuition, that nothing was allowed to say against the Soviet Union, because if the leaders of that country would start nuclear attack immediately if some writings don’t support it.


This is left the very bad thing in our political commonwealth. The fear of nuclear strike has given us the journals, where is sometimes glamorize the Russian nuclear arsenal. That arsenal is of course very large, but in those writings the only thing, what is mentioned is that Russia has the world's largest Nuclear weapons, and that’s it. If the leaders of that nation would not like the writings, it would use its nukes immediately. And this is very short-term way of thinking. The war is the cause of the economic situation or attempts to get economic advantages of those areas.


And if somebody would use nuclear weapons against the targeted country, the results would be, that all infrastructure of that nation would be destroyed. In this case, the nuclear weapons would cause the situation, that all cities of the opponent are rumbled to dust. Also, large land areas would be polluted, and that causes that the nuclear weapons make those land areas dangerous to use. The cleaning of those areas would take very long period, and the economy of that area would be the break. So the financial advantages could be very small from those areas where nuclear weapons have been used. So this limits sometimes the will of using those ultimate weapons against some nations.

Using chemical weapons is against international law

British Soldiers in gas exercise
with their Vickers machine gun
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There was suspected gas-attack in the Middle-East, and the gas what was used is probably chlorine. This is normal procedure when someone wants to create chemical weapons. The development of those chemicals is against international law, but the chlorine is and other that kind of chemicals are problematic because they are needed for cleaning the water of swimming pools. Production of the chlorine is very easy and cheap. The electrolytic process will break the salt molecules, and then there will release the chlorine and sodium, and the production of that gas, what was used already in the First World War.



The use of chemical agents in the war is very effective, but the problem with those weapons is, that they have no effect against military personnel. The military personnel has normally the protective clothes and the gas masks, and of course, they can get atropine what protects them against the nerve-agents like VX. The gas strike is normally the strike, where is used two types of chemical, the conventional chemical gas like chlorine or phosgene and the same time the enemy will target by nerve-agents.  The gas mask protects against the most chemical agents, what will destroy lungs, and the protective suit protects normally against mustard gas. But the nerve agent will kill the person because it can infect the target straight thru the protective gear and the dose what comes thru the skin will kill the target in the seconds.

The idea of this strike is that the atropine must be taken by nail, and in the gas, the strike will have more killing effect if the protective suit will be broken. But nowadays there would be systems, what protects the personnel from the gas. The most effective way to protect the person from nerve gasses is to give the military personnel same kind of atropine capsule, what is used in the cure for drug addiction and alcoholism. Those capsules look like Antabuse-capsules, but they will release atropine in the blood vessels.


Those capsules are created against the poison of sea snakes, what has the same effect than nerve gasses. Also, the modified insulin-pumps are tested against those feared chemicals. Those insulin-pumps are the same kind of things that are used by persons, who have diabetes but who want to hobby sports. Those pumps are equipped with the gas detectors, and they will give the atropine to the blood immediately after the gas is delivered to the area. The reason, why the military forces have dropped gas-weapons out the arsenal is probably that those weapons will not leave marks for killing to the bodies.


And if the army will lay down after the chemical attack, and then the soldiers will raise up and start to fight in the middle of attackers, would the result be devastating. Also, the chemicals could be flying by the wind to the attacker's own lines, and that would cause own casualties. The gas weapon is only the terror weapon, what is effective only against civilians. There have been made investigations, where the nerve gas molecule is tried to connect to the iron atom, what allows the control of the gas with magnet fields.


That might be one of the worst scenarios, what the international law ever faced. The developing of those weapons is strictly prohibited, but CIA and some other intelligence services have been investigated the snake poison in the poison bullets and poisoned arrows, what can be shoot with the same kind of guns, what are used to sleep the animals. And of course the air-guns are interested those intelligence and espionage personnel, and the sea-snakes poison can be shoot to the target used very sharp nail and airgun. The poison is very lethal, and it can kill the target in the seconds.

Sources


http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-42675657

Picture 1

https://i.pinimg.com/474x/9d/03/7d/9d037d7c92f96e54e5d8670a00e5c8a4.jpg

"Chimera-virus" the most horrified organism on the Earth

Kimmo Huosionmaa

One of the most deadly weapons in the world is known as the  CHIMERA  The original virus is created in the Soviet military laboratories in 1980´s  by the genetic engineering. The difference between CHIMERA and the conventional biological weapons like Ebola and other viruses is that CHIMERA is the so-called retrovirus, what infects the cells of the people. The structure of this virus is the same kind that AIDS-virus, what will infect the white blood cells.


But the CHIMERA does something, what makes the most dangerous virus in the world. It changes the blood cell as the anthrax-bacteria, what has the same kind of surface-structure than AIDS-virus. This kind of structure will make the normal immunological reaction impossible, and because the bacteria deliver the virus to the body of the victim, the macrophages infect this virus. This kind of virus is created in the use of modifying normal cells as the produce the biological weapons, but it self-became the most horrifying thing, what the mankind ever created.


 The CHIMERA is the program, what investigates the use of retroviruses as the biological weapon, and the effect of these viruses is that they can change the human body cells to another cell, what can be bacteria. The other way to use this lethal virus is to manipulate it genomes with the same genome, what controls the production of snakes poison, and then the person owns blood cells became the factories of the most lethal poisons in the world. Another and more lethal way is to produce the virus, what changes the cell as the botulinum bacteria, and in the anaerobic environment, this bacteria start to produce the most powerful neural toxin in the world.


This kind of viruses can be used as the STEALTH-killing operations. In this horrifying situation, this virus will be put in the victims drinking water, and it will change the stomach bacteria as the botulinum bacteria. This might cover the real reason for death, as the food poisoning. So this is the thing, what we must pay for science. The same virus can be used to modify the cells to begin the insulin production in the people body and millions of good purposes, but it is still the most deadly organism on the earth.

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/featured/10-most-dangerous-weapons-ever-created.html/2