What kind of person doesn't make difference between gangs and official law enforcement?

(Picture: Pixabay)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

All of the people have sometimes faced the person, who doesn't even know what the word "customer service" actually means. This kind of person just sits behind the desk and looks at some screens or reads the books, when some customer wants to ask something. When will we start to think, "what kind of person is that, does that person wants to be kicked off the job"? In this kind of things, we must realize, that this person will not do those things the first time of the working career. They are done those things somewhere before, and somebody must give those people an example of that kind of service. In some cases, those people are recognized as the members of some gangs.


And the attitude what those people has is that they can do anything that they want because of their organization is so frightened, that it's members have right to do anything that they want.   Sometimes I read the newspapers about the things when some policeman or another kind of person will write threats against some persons. Or this kind of actions is defended by the journalist. Those newspaper stories are full of things, where the gangsters and another kind of gang members are defended with supporting the violence.


Those writers believe, that those actions are not seen by the officials, and they believe, that there will happen nothing if they show everybody, that they are some kind of members of some gangs. In the real world, those writings are very unthinking actions, because if somebody owns illegal guns or deliver the ammunition for illegal purposes, will that bring law enforcement to this person door. This is the thing, what will happen if somebody threats another person in the newspaper.


If we are talking about the gangs and membership in some motorcycle gangs, the membership is not criminalized, but if the person is some kind of "weapon sergeant" or weapon deliver, who will give weapons for illegal actions, will that process too far. If some gang uses collective weapons and keeps some part of the city as some kind of "no-go zone" must the officials do something about it. If we pay taxes, we have right to get protection against the violence.


But when we will return the bad customer service, I sometimes wonder does all cab and bus-drivers in the western relationships with some kind of an MC-clubs if they can't drive their vehicles. I have faced this kind of things all the cities, where I visited, and there were problems with the drivers. Very often they claim that they are "full members of the MC's". And sometimes the reporters write that there will be trouble if somebody mentions about those things.

Who benefits the crime is a key to find terrorist back forces

Picture: Internet

Kimmo Huosionmaa


Investigation of terrorism is similar than any other criminal investigation. The investigator's mission is to find out real criminals, and after that, the government can focus their mission on those persons, who will want to take in the court of law for crimes, what they have made. But as we see, the investigation of crimes begins the question, who benefits the crime.


Anybody in the world can yell "Allah Akbar" when he kills somebody, and in those cases, I think that some of those brutal actions are made for some other reasons than bringing the Islamic revolution to the west. This is a problem with an investigation of the terrorism.

Even if the striker is a fundamentalist, that doesn't mean that he or she is the member of that particular organization what he claims to represent. The world of terrorism is very complicated, and that's why the strikes mission is not always, what it looks like. The mission of the terrorism is sometimes to sic the strikes against the organization what is the striker's competitor.


Sometimes there have been rumors of the 1980's terrorism, that behind that violence was actually right-wing movement, who wanted to calumniate the socialist parties. Sometimes there have been wild rumors, that even the CIA has been supported those radical socialist movements, for decreasing the popularity of socialist parties.


But even if the background actor claimed that this person represents the CIA, that doesn't mean that this "unknown man" ever worked for the CIA. He might be the member of any other intelligence service or perhaps that person worked for some "security company" what hires mercenary soldiers for dirty jobs in Africa or Asia. And nothing will connect those persons to any western intelligence organizations because their payments were paid by some South African companies.


But these are only rumors, and nothing ever can be proven about those actions. Even a radical Islamist can say that he is from CIA, and that might be key to those crimes. I think about the scenario, where some Islamist extorting people, claiming that they are from CIA or the Mossad, to motivate the persons to hate western world and Israel.


But the legend remains as we have seen many times before. When we are talking about those strange persons who kill people for political reasons, we must remember the phrase, what is in many detective stories "who benefits the crime"?. That is a key question when officials investigate any crime. And the second question is, who can motivate persons to those horrible actions against innocent people? The motive is a key to answer, who was behind that kind of action, what is a shame to every person in the world.