The little writing about Pigeons.

Picture I

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

We have all heard the story of the "Birdman of Alcatraz", civilized prisoner, who grew birds in the Ravenwood and Alcatraz prison. The story is very famous, and I would not return to it during this time. But sometimes I have thought that this man was a quite big risk for security in those prisons because he grew Pigeons. the bird, what is used for carrying the mail.


Pigeons have one quality, what makes it very dangerous for every person, who have reason to hide their identity. This bird always returns to the nest, if it would send to somewhere. This is why Pigeons would be used to carry letters, but they can also carry drugs or even the weapons. They can carry an even long weapon if the barrel of the gun has been cut into small pieces, and then those pieces can put together again. In this scenario, the barrel of the gun would be covered by the screw thread, and then it would be sent to the prison in pieces, and then this barrel can put together by using bolts, what would put outside.


There are rumors, that the Pigeons were used to carry the weapon parts to some prison. This happens, that the bird would grow in the prison, and then it would be taken to another place, and the weapons could be connected to the leg of the bird as the parts, and every bird would carry one piece of the gun, and also the ammo would give to another bird.


Sometimes the Pigeons would carry drugs, and if that bird can take alive, the authorities would connect the GPS-transmitter to that bird, and follow the way to the pigeonhole, where that bird is grown.  There is a story, that the "Birdman of Alcatraz" gave the coin to the Pigeons what he sold, and that was the mark for the gang partners, that there was a prison guard's house. This is one story of the man, who lived in the prison almost all his life. He was the legend because of his birds. And this kind of men are feeding stories, what is not true. So this story could be true or false, you decide what is your opinion about this man and stories, what is written and told about him.

Picture I

https://d1ia71hq4oe7pn.cloudfront.net/photo/66031271-720px.jpg

The message of the Hugo Simberg painting “At the Crossroads”

"At the crossroads"
Hugo Simberg
(1894)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The symbolism of the art is the very deep thing. When the portrait is looked the first time many people see only the picture of something. But when we are thinking about the portrait, there might be the very deep story to tell for the watcher. Above the text is Hugo Simberg painting, where angel and devil are walking together with the man.


First, we will see the very funny situation, but then there would be a serious message for the observer. Hugo Simberg wanted to tell us, that when the man learns some skills, this person makes always own choices between good and bad. The devil is on the right side, and it pulls the man to walk together with this character.


Angel in at the left side of the person. The symbol of this character is that the choices must be made by using the heart. This is sometimes difficult, and when we are looking at this portrait, we must say, that the choice to follow the devil seems sometimes be right. And following the devil always looks like very easy.


Evil always promises something nice looking thing, what symbolizes those ships at the strait. The canvas of those ships is red, what symbolizes hate and violence. This thing means that devil promises the revenge for that man. Angel promises nothing. But when we are thinking about those promises, the devil will set this man to the position, where this person must thank this devil. So devil hangs this person in his character, and addicts this man about the gifts what this bad character gives to this man in this painting.


When people are walking with the angel, they will walk straight ahead. But then there would be no choice than choose of two roads what are offered. This person has come to “T” crossing, where he must make the choice, what road would he choose. And they would understand the consequences of the decisions, what this person makes. Following the devil seems very easy, but it would not take the life anywhere. The initial setting of the portrait is quite a mark of Stoic philosophy, where people should be very cold and objective.


And the devil at the right side of the man symbolizes also the inducements of the life. There are many things, how the person can destroy the own and other people life. And those things like drugs, illegal activities and bad company should be avoided. This is the thing what Simberg wants to tell the people in this portrait.

Chimera and the Bellefonte

Picture 1

Kimmo Huosionmaa

I have read one essay about the retrovirus, and it will bring in my mind the terrifying ideas, what this kind of biomanipulation can cause to human beings. In this story, this retrovirus would be used to transfer the phenotype of the human. The story was the mercenary soldier or something like that, and it might bases the Stephen King’s novel ”The Stand”, and the bad guy of that book Randall Flagg. The writer of that story might think, that maybe that imaginational anti-hero had the retroviruses, what allowed this person to change the phenotype or the shape of this person by using the virus. In this scenario, the retrovirus can be used to turn the shape of the human as an animal like penguins or monkeys. In the real life, nothing makes that impossible.


The genetically engineered virus can change our shape to another organism like in some vampire movies happen, but I won’t recommend that thing for anybody. The difference between human and monkey is very small, and the only couple of genes will separate our species from monkeys. So if some mad scientist wants, this person could make the retrovirus, what can change the shape of species to another. This is, of course, fascinating thing, but it will give very bad things in my mind. Those viruses can be used for giving the person muscles like gorillas or python snakes. And this might be the next generation doping, where the sportsmen would be genetically manipulated for better results.


Would you believe, what happens if some mercenary soldier gets this technology in the hand, and then wants to change the shape to another. This kind of virus can also change the phenotype between the persons to another person. So the outer core of the person changes, but inside will be same. This might cause the situation, what is very serious for the national security, and it would be worse than some ”Face-off”-movie ever can show. In the dark operations that would mean, that in the operation goes another person, who comes out there. And this will give the change, to cover all illegal military actions in the world.


In some scenarios, this virus would be set in the targeted person by using nanotechnology. The artificial macrophage can be injected those viruses in the immune-cells, what will deliver it around the person’s body. The virus can modify the genomes inside this targeted person’s cells, and it would make possible the real-life transformation. This is why those viruses are so terrible. If the body of the person can be changed, that would make possible to create the perfect spy, who can slip in any target, what the creators of this virus wanted.

Sources

https://sites.google.com/view/chimeraandbellefonte/etusivu

Picture 1

http://www.mlm-thetruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Cancer-metastacise.jpg

Was Dante's Inferno actually a mining site, where the people were humiliated like in some concentration camp?

Botticelli's painting about "Inferno"
Picture 1

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In many libraries is a strange book, what has been written the man named Dante Alighieri (1262-1321) in 1321. The book was maybe published after Dante's death because in that book had been written the things, what might cause that the writer of this tale would that writer must step to the bonfire. This book what's name is actually wast the narrative poem "Divine Comedy" has given the people the world "Dante's Inferno", what means the hellish place, and when we are reading that book, we might hope, that Dante had very good imagination, and he wrote a fictional story when he met the demon, who allowed that man visited hell. Inferno was the first part of that book.


The hell was an underground place, where was allowed to go by the well, and that route Dante used, when he visited the place, what he called as "Inferno". The place had nine levels, where the souls were suffered by the things, what they did during their lives, and that is the thing what you might find yourself are the styles of punishments, what those people, who made sin, were found in that place. When we are looking at the pictures, that has been drawn for that book by Botticelli and Gustave Dora in 13th and 19th century.

In Botticelli's painting from the year 1482, is the shape, what we might see in the open mining sites in many books. The Botticelli's image might look like also the pope's helmet, but my opinion is that looks like mining site, and when we are starting to look at those levels of hell, we might see the things like bitumen or some other mineral lake, where those person's who worked in that mining site, were brutally pushed, and those minerals will preserve the bodies like they were in their last moments.


Also, other stories what Dante wrote about that place, told about brutal punishments. When we are looking at the figures of Dante and his guide, we must think that Dante got his contact person the uniform of the guards and allowed to see what was going on in that place, what destination Dante didn't want to tell the people. So was that Inferno the mining site, where people were tortured like in some concentration camp?


Did that place the end of the life those people, who were somehow avoided the bonfire, when they were prosecuted by the  Inquisition? And did that mine site remains in the pope's personal control? Or what was the reason, that Dante hired that place? Did the witch hunting made by the reason, that those mines needed workforce? And what was the reason, that this particular mining site was hidden by the public? What was it the product? Was it gold, jewelry or radium?


What was the reason, why that slavery camp was so secret?  If the production was the radium, the reason might give pope the "power of the God" by the radioactive radiation. In this text, the radium means actually the pitchblende mineral, what is the uranium mineral, and if that mineral would be powdered, the dust would cause cancer. And those times the people didn't know about this symptom.


Or maybe it produced the gold for pope's personal use overtaken the Vatican bookkeepers, and that allowed the pope to hire mercenaries for increasing his and his family personal power in medieval Europe. This might be one explanation, why Dante wrote that novel or poem at the time, where the relationship with the devil might send the man straight to the front of inquisition and then to the bonfire. And in that book Dante told stories, where he was in friendship with the demons. So those writings would send that man straight to grave. And that's why this sensation was published after the writer's death.

Sources

Picture 1

https://kottke.org/plus/misc/images/botticelli-dante.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inferno_(Dante)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dante_Alighieri

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_Comedy

About the working life and disappointments

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are hiring our employees, we might always forget one golden rule. We can't ever hire our bosses, we are always hiring our henchmen, and that is the reason, why we must ever make the mistake of hiring our friend to our company. When we are hiring somebody in the firm, we must understand, that this person is below us on the ranking list of that firm, and if we are the persons who made that recruitment, we are this person's superiorities.

And we must be sure, that person who is hired by the company does the jobs, and if this employee would not fit the team, we must kick this person off the firm. The problem of hiring the friend or member of the family is that if that employee would not follow the orders or our superiorities make the decision, that this is not the right person for the team, will that break our relationship with our friend.


If we promise too much, and we can't keep our promises, we will cause most terrifying disappointment, what the person can ever imagine. The thing about the working life is that we are human ourselves. We are not perfect, but if we are hiring somebody, we must be sure that the disappointment in the life is not too heavy. If the person is an adult, the person must stand for disappointments.


But too much is always too much. When we are talking about disappointment, we normally think that kick off the job is a big disappointment. We ever think that if our friend will become our boss, will that change our relationship forever. We can't visit our bosses home as we might want. And also other members of the working community might spurn us if we got our job from our family's friend. That is the reason, why we must always think if some of our friends send us the job application. In that case, we must remember, that become the boss of some our friends in the working life, will change our relationship forever.

Do you want to be famous?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are talking about famous people, we will normally think that people are born as famous. That is not true. Or of course, there are a very famous people, who are very popular and famous, because they are born in the famous families. But when we are talking about social media or something like that, we can say that many people are more famous as they believe, and if somebody wants to say that social media has no effect, I must say those people are wrong.


If some blogger or whatever they are doesn't mean anything, why those people who so hate those people must interview the persons like the commander in chief of the military forces. When are we talking about persons who mean nothing, why we see sometimes very aggressive writing against those people? When people are living in the modern world they must understand that we all have opinions, and when I'm writing something, I must not accept those writings by my daddy.


But when we are talking about some journalistic "pranks", we will see in some comments or in some kind of published news the little things, what makes us believe that those journalists use some "dirty tricks" when they are making their stories. In those stories was seen, that those people have got some passwords in their hands, what is used in some employment services. And do you know that is a crime? And the memberships of the sex clubs and another kind of that societies are normally confidential if those societies say that they are confidential.


And also salmonella and AIDS- tests are confidential if some club member has been given those papers to the media, and that test is actually free. When we are talking about taking care and sense of responsibility about the people, we must say, that many people make love in the real life.  That is what the normal people do together. Also, the information of the incompetent person is confidential. So in the real world, the delivering that kind of information will sometimes cause the prosecution process. If somebody misunderstands that their neighbor is the person, who is incompetent, that would cause the very big refund, when that makes trouble for that person's businesses.


But when we are writing something, it doesn't mean that somebody must always cry, when those people are writing their texts. There is a little thing, what the media makers usually didn't see before social media. That was the texts where reporters and other journalists were criticized. They were the persons, who wrote what they wanted, and if some things were not accessible for those people, the things just changed for satisfying. And many journalists used the term "many people" in their stories, what represented only single person's opinion of those things. That's why we must say, that social media has been changing the role of media forever.

Who benefits the crime is a key to find terrorist back forces

Picture: Internet

Kimmo Huosionmaa


Investigation of terrorism is similar than any other criminal investigation. The investigator's mission is to find out real criminals, and after that, the government can focus their mission on those persons, who will want to take in the court of law for crimes, what they have made. But as we see, the investigation of crimes begins the question, who benefits the crime.


Anybody in the world can yell "Allah Akbar" when he kills somebody, and in those cases, I think that some of those brutal actions are made for some other reasons than bringing the Islamic revolution to the west. This is a problem with an investigation of the terrorism.

Even if the striker is a fundamentalist, that doesn't mean that he or she is the member of that particular organization what he claims to represent. The world of terrorism is very complicated, and that's why the strikes mission is not always, what it looks like. The mission of the terrorism is sometimes to sic the strikes against the organization what is the striker's competitor.


Sometimes there have been rumors of the 1980's terrorism, that behind that violence was actually right-wing movement, who wanted to calumniate the socialist parties. Sometimes there have been wild rumors, that even the CIA has been supported those radical socialist movements, for decreasing the popularity of socialist parties.


But even if the background actor claimed that this person represents the CIA, that doesn't mean that this "unknown man" ever worked for the CIA. He might be the member of any other intelligence service or perhaps that person worked for some "security company" what hires mercenary soldiers for dirty jobs in Africa or Asia. And nothing will connect those persons to any western intelligence organizations because their payments were paid by some South African companies.


But these are only rumors, and nothing ever can be proven about those actions. Even a radical Islamist can say that he is from CIA, and that might be key to those crimes. I think about the scenario, where some Islamist extorting people, claiming that they are from CIA or the Mossad, to motivate the persons to hate western world and Israel.


But the legend remains as we have seen many times before. When we are talking about those strange persons who kill people for political reasons, we must remember the phrase, what is in many detective stories "who benefits the crime"?. That is a key question when officials investigate any crime. And the second question is, who can motivate persons to those horrible actions against innocent people? The motive is a key to answer, who was behind that kind of action, what is a shame to every person in the world.

Is the story about Luther and his theses literally true?

Martin  Luther
(1483-1546)

Have you ever noticed a strange thing in the picture of Martin Luther? His left eye seems not always painted in the same direction with the right eye, what might mean that his left eye might be blind. Or probably he had strabismus in that eye, but why the painter had put that thing so visible in his painting of the man, who became famous for his work as the church reformer and the man who created the Lutheran church. Is that eye injured something in his younghood, and does that presumable injury have something to do with his antisemitism?

When we are talking about Luther, we always forget, that nobody borns in age 40. So did he went to fight with some jews, and did something that happened in that fight cause that hates Jews? Or was Luther cover something with his hate? I read from some book that Luther had Jewish friends or at least mates, who visited at his home. So what Luther might cover, when he began to write anti-semitic writing named as “About Jews and their lies"?

Was he make business with Jews, and if theologian will uncover that he lends money from jews will everybody laugh to him. Or was the thing more serious? Was there something that drove that priest to break his connections with catholic church? Something that might cost his life. So was Luther a man who changed a place with somebody else? Was real Luther killed by that man hand, and did he took a place of his victim? Is that reason why he created a new church, where priests use people's language when they speak to normal people?

What was his motivation to begin that process, to start the reform for the church? Did he really want to establish the Lutheran church?  But there is one thing, what every investigator must know about this man, and other famous people in history, There are many text and fact about them, what is not literally true. Some texts for their life have written after their death because to protect that person’s real identity. So we might only guess where Martti Luther actually lived when he made his translation of Holy Bible. The biography might be true, but it might also be colored.

The facts what we read today might be written by some propaganda writers during 30 years war, where the King of Sweden and other protestants wanted to break catholic leagues lines by claiming that Luther was made translations of the Bible under the protection of some German prince. So when those writers wrote his biography, the outcome could be something, where Luther can’t even recognize himself. And that’s why those biographies are not always followed real life of that person.