About the meeting between Trump and Putin and U.S support to Russia and the Soviet Union.

https://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There have been comments, that Trump was accepted the limitations of human rights in Russia, and makes brotherhood with dictators. But when we are going back to the Second World War there was the law, what was known as "Lending and Renting law". That law guaranteed that Joseph Stalin got military equipment from the United States during the Second World War, and USA delivered many military aircraft like Bell P-39 "Airacobra", A-20 "Havoc" and DC-3 to Soviet Air Force.


Also, some tanks and one Royal Sovereign class battleship were given by the USA and Great Britain, what delivered battleship for Stalin for the fire support role in 1944. That battleship returned to Royal Navy in 1949. That law actually supported Joseph Stalin to stay in power, and the question is, what the Soviet Union gave back for that equipment? Nobody ever asked, was this support necessary or did the United States government knew about the human right situation in the Soviet Union. But that was the Second World War and Western allies needed help, and Stalin was able to give that help in the form of the Second Front. And that was real after Hitler attacked the Soviet Union and the USA took the part to War after the Pearl Harbour Attack in 6. December 1941.


But when we are thinking about the supporting undemocratic government, the meeting between Trump and Putin is actually the very important thing, because Vladimir Putin is the very well known man, whose way to work we all know. And what we afraid in the west? There are persons, what have been out of the publicity, and who wait that Putin will someday divorce from the position of the power in Russia.


Those persons are same style men and women, who believe the Great Russian empire, and those persons might be very surprising actors if they would get the power. Putin himself is not the problem, the problem is the forces, what support him. When he got the power in Russia after the strange heart attack of Yeltsin, Russia got the president who had skills and relationships to crush the organized crime, but the work was left to halfway.


Putin crushed the street gangs, but he couldn't get the leaders of the organized crime to court. Those persons legalized their business and now they will sell the mobile telephones, and nobody ever can show them ex-mafia bosses. Putin Used KGB in that operation, and the peaceful streets were enough for people, who were tired of violence and corruption.


And the forces, what keep Putin in power are the very complicated thing. If some decisions of the people who they support are not pleased them, the punishment would be death. So if those forces want, that Putin will continue his career as the President of Russia, that man would not have a change, or he would become the disappointment, and that would cause the heart attack by potassium-chlorinate injection. And when we are thinking about Putin, he could continue his career quite long, and maybe he wants to become some kind of Brezhnev, who was many years in the power of Soviet Union.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Royal_Sovereign_(05)

What is the problem with CIA? And why it was created?

CIA Headquarters Langley, Virginia
(Picture I)

https://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) is problematic because it is a civil organization. The reason, why CIA was established in 1947 by Rear admiral Roscoe Hillerkoetter was that the role of the intelligence was problematic for military and civilian leaders. The leader of OSS (Organization of Strategic Services) was lead by General major William "Wild Bill" Donovan, and because the leader of the intelligence was the lower rank officer the vital reports could be left to the tables without notice. And the otherwise the leaders of the intelligence would not always read the reports what came from the field.


And that caused sometimes very bad situation if some fortresses or their location were not in the knowledge of the field corpses. Hillerkoetter and his superiorities wanted to create the intelligence service, where the henchmen could say something to their superiorities, and otherwise, he wanted to create the intelligence agency, what work was extremely professional, and positions in that system based only in the personnel own abilities and training. The model, what was used to form that system came from the FBI, but the CIA was able to work out of the United States territory.


This thing makes  CIA very problematic organization because the reports what would not satisfy the leaders is not causing the divorcement of that agent. When we are thinking about the position of field agents, their life can be very dangerous. Sometimes those men and women have got problems with their works in the places like customs. And maybe the president of Russia Vladimir Putin is one of them, who have been humiliated in some customs during his KGB career.


The leader of Russia should be some commander of tank-divisions, that he would have only one way to see things. And the President Of The United States would also be the easier person if that man gets 's only positive things in the life. Trump has faced the feelings about bankruptcy, and people's attitude for that. He has seen, what kind of attitudes people have for persons, who fail in the business life.


And after that would be better for somebody that this kind of persons would not raise in power again, because they have the deal like second-class people. But Trump has shown, that resistance could turn to power. And he has shown, that the rise after the catastrophe is possible. Sometimes I have thought that is the newspapers cold attitude for Trump reason for that bankruptcy? Did some journalist deal that man with the bad attitude?


Spies are problematic also because they are talking with opponents, and they are under the influence of the opponent. Spying and espionage is a work, where operators face the things, what their superiorities would not want, that they would notice. Sometimes DEA or other police intelligence agencies agents face the riot police's baton or SWAT-team assault during their operations. And this is, of course, very traumatic.

Picture I

https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/headhuntersholosuite/images/0/04/CIA_headquarters.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20160725155533

Conclusions and thoughts about meeting between presidents Trump and Putin

The Presidential Palace Helsinki Finland
(Wikipedia)

https://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The meeting between Putin and Trump is over, and the conclusion is, that only man who made mistakes is Trump. There are only stories, how Trump was under Putin's rule, and this is the very remarkable thing. In the newspapers is not a single word, what Putin made, except that he had a Beriev A-50 recon plane escorting his personal aircraft. The thing, that Trump claimed, that USA have been made mistakes is taken as the weakness in the front of Putin. And this is the very interesting point. When John F. Kennedy made partially nuclear test ban treaty between the Soviet Union, that man was prosecuted for being soft in the eyes of the Soviet Union.


This is the very interesting thing because if the international community wants that the peace is built for something else than nuclear weapons, must the talking do in the base, that there are humans in both sides, and humans make mistakes. Accepting the reality, that even the President Of The United States can make mistakes is the way to open talking about serious things. When we are thinking about the complicated relationship between superpowers, there is only one thing, what is good for the people. And that is peaceful co-operation between those nations, even if somebody doesn't want that advantage.


When we are looking at the results of the meeting, we can say, that in the world we have found optimism and positivism is the relations between superpowers. And the advantage is that the meeting between the leaders of those nations has been done. Talking is the road to concrete conferences and then contracts. This is the beginning of real actions for the peace. And when the results of the meeting are under the observation, we must say that there was so short a time to make preparations for that meeting that the concrete contract was not possible.


And when we are looking at the position of Donald Trump, we must remember, that this man is the president of the democratic country. He must stand the critics and there are always people, who have different opinions than he has. When we are talking about court etiquette of Great Britain, there should be somebody, who will tell about the rules for the people, who are not often visiting in the Buckingham Palace.  Maybe Trump learned his lesson about this very important etiquette.

Who takes a part in other countries internal politics?

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/2018/07/who-takes-part-in-other-countries.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The great point of meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump is closing, and here is one very interesting notification about this meeting, and about criticising those leaders. The thing is, that Trump is prosecuted by taking a part in the United Kingdoms internal politics because he said something about it. But meanwhile, the Russian military personnel are charged with hacking the computers in the election process of the United States president.


And this is a very bad thing because hacking of those computers can influent the result of the election. This is the very interesting thing because if some intelligence service would want to influent the election of other states leaders, that is taking part in internal politics of that country. When we are talking about how those leaders would be dealing with media, we are noticing that is a difference about attitudes, what is tolerated by those leaders. Everything, what Putin makes is right, but when Trump says something, he makes everything wrong.


There is something that makes Russian intelligence operations more acceptable than United States intelligence operations. And I must say that this is the very interesting attitude. By the way, the term "intelligence operation" means actually the getting information. The hacking of the computers and influence the internal politics of some other land is "covert action", or "Black Operation". And when we are thinking about the situation, that Russian intelligence officers have made the influential action in the election campaign, that would happen by order of Kreml or somebody else, and this kind of actions can be marked that every connection to the head of the state would deny.


That means that the persons, who might be behind that action are covered. Maybe Putin knew that or maybe he didn't know about those hackings. But there are also other people, who might claim that Putin was involved because that would slow the investigations. This hacking brought some thoughts to my mind. One of them is "how many times this has made before?". I think that those persons, who are behind that operation might not be first-timers for making that kind of things. And how many times that kind of influence has been given to the election campaigns in the small countries, what would not be so loudly to protect their benefits? So is there other nations, where is made this kind of hacking operations, where the election of the head of the state has been influenced by cyber operations, what are made by the foreign actor?


One part of information operations is that the enemy would tell that the resistance would be doomed even before the war have begun. The opponent is trying to metalize the targeted nations, that they would not have any change in the real military conflict. And after that, the "wise men" would lay down their weapons and start to take a spoon in their beautiful hand, and start to follow the opponent's orders. There is one thing that information warfare specialists always highlight. That is that "why own military personnel must risk their lives for some other country?". The purpose of this kind of argumentation is to break coalitions and for this kind of action, the single parts of the coalition would give the benefits like free trade contracts if they slip off the front. Fear is one of the best weapons in the word. And if another side would be doomed to lose, that would give change to grow the own position in the international area.

What is the purpose of the meeting between Putin and Trump? (And something about leadership)

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are meeting in Helsinki, sometimes we are thinking, what is the purpose of those meeting? Why those men are meeting in Helsinki and if they would not be made any concrete things, why they would travel to this town, and talk together? The problem of those leaders is simple, they need foreign treats, and many of their supporters are in the military industry. That industry need treats for selling their products to other countries.


The purpose of making investigations and developments in those products is to create even more and more superior technology, what would increase the strike capacity of those products. And the advantages of the technology would be guaranteed the markets for new military equipment. And every leader in the world want of course peace, but if they will send their men to war, those persons must tell to mothers of their nations, that their sons were dying in the field.


Presidents and other highest rank politicians need public support for their campaigns, and in the world is one rule: who would pay your salary is the person, who makes decisions, what sings you are singing. And this is why every leader in the world must look strong. If some leader would give another side opportunity to speak before that side would be destroyed, that thing is mentioned as a weakness. Only thing what confesses people is the use of power. Everybody who would not satisfied must be kicked off from work.


Why must the leader tolerate persons, who have different opinions than the leader have?  This is the normal attitude in some talking about leadership. When other people come to meeting the leader would start to tell, what would be next things, what would be done. And after that, this leader would tell, that the decision of this conference is something.


This is, of course, the very nice way to lead, but why this leader calls the meeting if that person would not want to know anything that is different than own ideas? Why this man or woman would not send orders of the action to workplaces and start to work? If the person has made the decision before, the meeting is only a waste of time.


And time is money because those persons need salaries. So why not send the orders to the subleaders and stop playing democracy. The leader is responsible for the decision, and that gives this person the right to make those decisions alone, but in that case, should the report marked that the decisions are made by the leader alone. This is one very interesting point of view of leadership.

There is a rumor that Russia would plan to attack to Ukraine

The Moscow Kremlin
(Wikipedia)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Some cyber companies have claimed, that maybe Russia is going to attack to Ukraine, and this is the very alarming situation. Not only for Europe because that can make the world very unstable place. The problem for Russian military is that it has a very low number of men because it must same time defend rest of its borders if that State would begin the war in Europe.


There is a chance that somebody would attack to the back of Russians, and that might cause the very difficult situation for those troops, and if the situation turns to full-scale warfare, would it cause that Russians or some other nation would attack with nuclear weapons in the opponent's area. That is very problematic in the relationship with Russians, who are wanted to see themselves as the beneficiaries of the Soviet Union, and this is the reason, why that nation attracts some left-wing political activists, who see Putin as the representer of the "old school socialism".


This makes Russia so strong in information warfare. They would always claim, that in that land things are better than anywhere else. And of course, Russian gas company Gazprom has always something to give, if other states want to be friends with Russians. The solution to every problem is the strong and masculine army, what is the great tool in the hands of Kremlin, and of course, the power of the nuclear weapons is very confessing, and it guarantees that Kremlin's way to see things is in the prime role in media. And then there would be news, where the Russian military would win NATO in 15 seconds, what purpose is to support nationalists around Europe.


The main purpose of that kind of news and information is to scatter European Union, and at the same time would there be given many advise, how to handle foreign and refugees. That would be a good reason to hire more police and military men, and of course, at the same time would be delivering the information, that EU would cause next conflict between Russia and NATO. And the best opportunity to avoid conflict with that nuclear-armed superpower would be separating from EU. This would guarantee, that Russia would not start aggression against those states, what is heard the wise men of Kremlin.


Of course, the situation, where some state would left alone, would make opportunity for Kremlin start the aggression. The policy, what Russia uses in EU is scratch and rule those states. And at the same time, skinheads and Neo-nazis would play the role that they are taken support from Kremlin, and if those persons would start violent actions against Russian citizen, would it cause the reason, that Russian military would come to protect its citizens, and then the Russian military would start the occupation  in that area. This would be a good reason, be reasonable, but as we know that reasonable men would not go to war, and they would not become legends, and that's why we might not be reasonable.  Or would Finland be an even independent state, if this country were led by reasonable men in 1939, when the Soviet Union started the conflict, what is known as the "Winter War"?


The wall of Europe would seem very good in the eyes of nationalists, but there is only one problem. Behind that wall would the enemy start to grow, and that would cause the similar situation, what the Wall of Hardianus caused to the Roman empire. That thing caused the situation, where legions couldn't destroy the enemies of the Rome, and they were grown bigger and stronger than that empire. This is the reason, why European wall would not be the suitable solution for the long period use.


For the stable solution must those nations, where refugees are coming make restless. And the democracy is one road for stable peace, but of course, there always be some persons, who want to make terror attacks and other violent actions. That kind of persons are known as terrorists, and they would not want to go to jail. Or sometimes their actions have caused very much pain for local people, and that makes them very hated. That means they have no other change than fight or die because they would not have future in anywhere. And those persons are the most dangerous enemies.

Sources:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyber-routers-ukraine/cyber-firms-warn-on-suspected-russian-plan-to-attack-ukraine-idUSKCN1IO1U9

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/

About Russian presidential election

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are thinking about Russian presidential election, and what that means to the world, we must say, that if the man in control would change, the policy would not necessarily change. Even if Putin were not elected, the next person can continue same policy than Vladimir Putin. We must remember that Putin himself was representing opposition when he was elected to his position.


What made Putin so popular, is the question, what many people ask. The answer to that question is that he promised change to the people. And also he promised to clean the streets from criminal activities. So he was the right person for his job. But when Putin was elected president, as he continued the way, what was shown before in Russia.


First Putin used his power to work to destroy criminal gangs, but then the work of internal security troops continued to destroy the political resistance of Putin’s policy. And this man has formed the feared security service again, claims western media. But when we are thinking this formation of security service, we must say that in the anti-mafia fight Putin used ex-KGB methods and officials very effectively.


And we must say that KGB even ever disbanded in Russia. The name of that organization was changed, but the methods remain. And when the Soviet Union collapsed, the persons, who worked in that organization existed. When Putin began his fight against mafia, the KGB was the ultimate tool to destroy those gangs. But this caused the situation, that Putin was thankful those persons. The name of that organization has been changed many times, but the methods are always same.


This means that nobody controls Russian without security service. And if somebody dares to threat that organization, would this person feel it in his body. There are more men than Putin in this feared organization. And those persons would not want to go to court. That security service is an ultimate tool for control people, and it is like the state inside the state. Nothing would happen without it, and even Putin is responsible for that organization.


And the western world knows Putin. His methods are known all around the World. So there is the well known man in the control of Russia. He has shown his way to act, and that's why western leaders would know, what is the value of the speeches of that man. So the western leaders can predict, what kind of language and argumentation comes from Kreml. And those things would not go any worse than they are now.

Sources:

Picture 1:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Kremlin_from_Bolshoy_kamenny_bridge.jpg/300px-Kremlin_from_Bolshoy_kamenny_bridge.jpg

About situation in Ukraine

7K720 Iskander missile
(NATO SS-26 "Stone")
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Vladimir Putin and the situation in Ukraine are not been very often in a stand at public media. Reason for that is there is nothing going on in that place, what is called as the Crimean peninsula. This place is in very important strategic location when we are thinking about a transportation of Caucasian oil and gas by tubes to European markets. If the Caucasian oil and gas will replace Russian products, that would mean the decrease of Russians economic and political influence. And in the real world, that means that Russia cannot cut those deliveries for having political acceptance for other actions. If the nation doesn't use Russian oil and gas, the threat would give only by the military forces. And it looks like bad in the international politics. Open threading by weapons will cause the public opinion turn against Russia.

And there have been ideas of massive United Nations peacekeeping operations in Ukraine, but the reason of Russian military power the passion for this kind of operations is much lower than in Afghanistan and Iraq. Russian nuclear force is the very frightening thing, what will make think twice, if somebody wants to operate in Ukraine with United Nations mandate. Russian interest is that situation in Ukraine will forget as fas as possible. Also, many European countries will want to normalize their relationship with Russian leaders.


If we think that the USA would come in this situation with military forces, we must say, that this scenario is very improbable, because this nation has been in the war since 2001, and that would be not very good for the reputation of that country. The prize of that war is very high, and the operation in Afghanistan and Iraq have cost more than the Second World War. Also, the losses of human lives in those wars have been very high, and the people of USA have tired about the war.


The war between the USA and Russia would be the World War III, what might mean nuclear holocaust, where the big part of the human population will be killed. This is the reason, why the solution to this problem is not able to find the military way. The problem with this crisis is that Russian military has got power to stand in that area, and those troops are highly protected by nuclear weapons, what has installed on highly mobile battlefield systems warships.


Those weapons are extremely difficult to detect, and they have the capacity to destroy the entire city. If those truck-mounted weapons would detect, they are quite easy to destroy by tactical fighters, helicopters or commando-strike. But the detection is the problem. The weapon itself can be destroyed by anti-tank weapons or bombs. If the core of the bomb will be broken, radioactive plutonium will be delivered to the ground.  But of course, nuclear weapons have the very hard defense and strikes can be shielded by the security-fire by the security team. So this makes those weapons extreme difficult targets for military forces. The system goes, that tactical nuclear weapons will be used in the first strike, and those weapons are supported by strategic nuclear weapons And if Russian conventional forces would get in trouble those weapons will be used in this kind of situation.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9K720_Iskander

Picture 1
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQLGxFjm2f_Q1B794FLy3bk9rbb5tBXSPfDpZFFLlDs_S8lpHxlww

First chargers have been risen in Trump Case

Kimmo Huosionmaa

If some democratic states president will get charges of misuse his power it is a very serious thing, and even if the president of the United States of America Donald Trump will not in the chair of prosecuted in the court hall, this case is very serious for this man and his closest people. Those prosecutions are involving the thing, what means real troubles to Donald Trump. That is taken cash from Russia, and that's why FBI started to investigate those rumors. And after that Donald Trump made the worst mistake what a man can make.


He suspended those investigators, and after that, he made a crime, what is called exploitation of position. And another crime is disturbing a criminal investigation. Those crimes are very serious, and if Trump will proof as a guilty, he will lose his position. And if he took a money from Russian government he might get charges for spying and treason of the state. Those crimes are much more serious, what Bill Clinton made when he was on charges of sexual harassment. Even Richard Nixon was not in charge of spying for another state. He just ordered secret service for eavesdrop his competitor.  People don't seem to understand, spying and making a treason of state are very serious charges even for normal people.


But if the president is in charge of that kind of crimes, he will be in very bad trouble. That kind of prosecutions are not anything, what can rise easily, even if they are targeted to normal people, but even if somebody claims that the president made those crimes, and some authorities started to investigate those things, they must have very strong evidence even for investigations. The worst mistake what Trump made, was starting to kick off investigators in that case. And that action made people think that those rumors of some secret contracts between presidents Putin and Trump might have the real background.


Question is that, did president Donald Trump really know himself about that support, what came from Moscow or did those campaign members work alone? And what kind of support Trump's campaign got from Russia? Was it a money or did those Russian fellows give his campaign also technical advisings like "how to build interesting homepages" and pieces of advice how media operations must be done, that they have the greatest effect possible on the people mind. So if Trump took that kind of help from another country and the prosecutors can prove that, will be in a very bad situation.

Why political atmosphere in Russia is changing?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Vladimir Putin will continue as the president of Russia if he wants. But that state will change, because that will be the end of something that have stamped all Putin's presidential work. Putin has lost contact with young people, and if he plays a role as an elder and wiser man than another person, he will go far away from young people. People are getting older and they don't want to get back past. The Soviet Union collapsed in 1992 and after that was time of political and economic disaster when societies were unstable.

That caused the rise of Putin, and after drunk Boris Jeltsin, he was better than people could even thin for a ruler of that country. Bad social situation and chaotic nation society will help that kind of man to rise a leader for the country. Those are things what makes people want to get strong leaders, and that is, of course, bad for democracy. But when the situation of state will become calm people begin to want more ways to make the influence of highest level of political control. Putin's idea of his work was that he will put down open corruption and open criminal activities.


But there was silent corruption inside government. Russian laws are very authoritative and that's why the democratic surveillance of government is almost impossible. If newspaper men will write against Kremlin will they will get troubles. But as we see the glove of secret police will slip from society. Russia goes to democracy sooner or later, but we must understand that state ever been real democracy, and that's why bringing democracy to that country will take longer than other East European states.


The reason of changing a political atmosphere in Russia is that people's attitudes are changing. People who saw the Soviet Union are now about 40's and that means at younger people have found new interests than military service. In Putin's time, Russia has been at two wars which didn't go so good as Putin probably hopes. And before those actions against Georgia and Ukraine was Groznyi, what destroyed totally when Russian army attacked against that rebellious city.


Russian own artillery made more damages than any terrorist organization ever could make. And the same style begins in Syria. That's why some people think that Russian military is leaning only for nuclear weapons.  Truth is that wars what Putin began went very bad because his military couldn't neutralize any targets without causing massive damages to infrastructure. Putin rose very masculine militarism as a stamp of Russia, but I think that those special forces kickboxing and other aggressive training methods make those troops very unwanted service places for many young people.


They just want to go to the army and came back as normal servicemen around the world. And younger people don't even know what was the Soviet Union. Putin was born in 1952, and he is now 65. So he will be an old man. His career as the president of Russia will over sooner or later, and if some 18 years old young people look, Putin, he will look like the grandpa. And for them will sooner or later time to elect the younger man as the leader of Russia.