Antiprotonic helium

Image 1: Model of antiprotonic helium. 

The antiprotons are orbiting helium atoms in super cold helium. And that material is called antiprotonic helium.

The antimatter physicists of CERN have created a new form of hybrid material. The antiprotons are put to orbit helium atoms in super cold helium liquid. These kinds of experiments are interesting. The energy level of antimatter is extremely high. 

And the annihilation reaction could use for ignition in fusion reactors. There are other hybrid materials where the material particle is connected to an antimatter particle. The hybrid materials where the antimatter particles are connected with regular material make it possible to store antimatter very effectively. 

The reason why antimatter experiments and storage must make at a temperature that is as near zero kelvin as possible is simple. The low temperature removes the oscillation of the material and antimatter. And that minimizes the possibility that mirror particles touch each other accidentally. 

The most common of those particle pairs are positronium (electron-positron pair) and protonium or antiprotonic hydrogen (proton-antiproton pair). The protonium is quite similar to positronium. Except for one thing. In protonium proton and antiproton replace electrons and positrons. Protons and antiprotons are much heavier than electrons and positrons. And that makes protonium more high-energetic than positronium. 

In that particle pair positron and electron are orbiting each other. There is the possibility to conduct electricity to one point by using those particle pairs. And they can uncover things like the existence of superstrings. The idea is that the electron and positron are enough lightweights and small particles that can resend energy to possible superstring. 

And then that energy load can make superstring visible. The idea is that. The energy load that is sent through positronium increases energy in hypothetical superstring. That means the interaction between superstring and that particle pair will turn stronger. 

The positronium is sometimes introduced to use as data storage. In that data storage information is loaded in the positron and electron. And that thing transforms them into qubits. Then the magnet will pull electrons in the quantum computer and the positron can collect or let annihilate. If the data storage will open unauthorized. The positronium will collapse. Then annihilation destroys entire information. 

https://www.quantamagazine.org/icy-antimatter-experiment-surprises-physicists-20220316/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiprotonic_helium

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positronium

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protonium

Image: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiprotonic_helium

https://thoughtsaboutsuperpositions.blogspot.com/

Hawking's radiation and wormholes

" The Sombrero Galaxy" (M-104)
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-actually-means-hawkings-radiation.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are looking at texts about Black Holes, we sometimes face the term "Hawking's radiation". But what that term means? When we are trying to Google that term, we would meet the texts, where black holes mentioned to lost from existence, by sending the "Hawking's radiation". And maybe we can now understand that term. The term "Hawking's radiation" means that sometimes one photon would flee from that supermassive piece. In this case, the black hole needs other stars or material around it, and that mass what this black hole sucks in it, that black hole can easily compensate the lost photons.


 But the situation changes when the black hole would transfer to absolute empty space, where is not even light or electrons around it. There would happen the case, that the black hole will be steamed away because of the electrons or photons are flying from that piece. When we are talking about material, also the photons and electrons have mass, and when the structure where even the light cannot flee, would pull the electrons and photons inside it, would it get more mass for it. Photons and electrons are actually same particles and the speed or energy level of those particles separate them from each other.


When we are thinking about my favorite thing, the wormhole or "Einstein-Rose bridge" we can say that forming that channel across the universe, should the black hole find another black hole, and then those black holes must start to oscillate with the same frequency. That would make possible to create that channel across the universe. But when we are thinking about traveling across that channel, would there be one thing sure. That would not dangerous, because of the "Einstein-Rose bridge" can forming between two black holes. And when something would come out from another side of the channel, would the black hole start to pull that thing again in it. And that means that the traveler would travel easily out from that channel. But this works only if those black holes would have the same mass.


If another black hole would be bigger than another, the results would be devastating.  If the black hole what sends the particle to the wormhole is bigger, it works like the super cannon, what can accelerate the particle at very high speed. And if something comes out from wormhole with the speed of light, would the result be that impact energy would destroy the planet immediately. When the case would turn that receiving black hole would be bigger, the piece what would send thru that tunnel, would it snap back to the sender with destructive results, and the  If human race would sometimes use wormholes for traveling across the universe, we must be sure, that those black holes would be the same size.


This means that traveling thru the electromagnetic wormholes are just in the level of theory. When we are thinking about traveling thru that tube, we must send the spacecraft to the targeted solar system, and then it would make the electromagnetic wormhole, and the similar singularity would be produced on the Earth, and that would allow traveling between stars. But first, we must send the spacecraft to another star, and it would take very long time. There is one thing what we ever thought, and that is, the ship what travels thru those "bridges" should across the central point of the wormhole, that it could travel to another side of that tube. And that can be done by using rockets to give more speed to our fictional spacecraft. When we are talking about intergalactic traveling, we can make wormhole near the center of our galaxy, and then drive the spacecraft thru that supermassive black hole. and if there is a wormhole between two supermassive black holes would the travel be very calm.


But if the partner is the normal black hole, would the result be, that spacecraft would travel very roughly in somewhere where we ever thought to send that fictional spaceship. This text is, of course, hypothetical thinking about the world of wormholes, and I used that space trip as an example how difficult is to make those trips thru the wormhole safely. And in the real life would happen very badly, because there might be no wormhole between two black holes.


And actually, we don't even know where those roads between two black holes would end, and that means that the trip across that channel would be like random, and we cannot be sure, where we would send that hypothetical spaceship if we would find small enough black hole, what we could cope with our own technology. In that case, we would find the very small black hole, and then we would create the electromagnetic black hole, what would oscillate with the same frequency, and of course, that artificial black hole should be the same size than the targeted black hole.


If we are thinking carefully that ship what travels thru the black holes, must send across the central point of the wormhole, and that would be key to travel across those channels. If the ship would stay in the center point of the wormhole,  it would stay in there forever. And then the use of motors would transfer it to another black hole. But this is only fiction, and good day to spend time with thinking about those phenomena, what are actually the most high energy thing in the universe.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

Picture I

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5e/M104_ngc4594_sombrero_galaxy_hi-res.jpg/1200px-M104_ngc4594_sombrero_galaxy_hi-res.jpg

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/what-actually-means-hawkings-radiation.html

"Project Montauk" (Time travel version)

Montauk Radar station
(Internet) 

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are talking about time travel, the principle of that action is very simple. The time machine or the times will be work with the method, where the mass of the machine will grow until it will change as a black hole and drops away from our universe. There have been some tests, where the core of metal pierce will be load with radio waves, and the purpose of that operation was to pump the electrons to the piece, and that way grow the mass of that piece of metal.  I don't know would that machine ever work, because the need of the electricity is so huge, that if somebody wants to travel in time, the making of the artificial black hole will take hundreds of years.  But electrons have mass, and if they will pump enough to the target, the target will change sooner or later the black hole.


The only problem with this kind of time machines is that the electricity will erupt to the ground, and that’s why those tests have been unsuccessful. When I'm writing about "Project Montauk", I mean that there might be many projects what had this code name, and some of those projects might be touching the genome research or mixing the species with biotechnology.


That so-called thru erupting denies that system working if the particle is not isolated well enough. That is the reason why that time machine will work better in the outer space. If the radio waves are targeted to the spacecraft the electrons won’t escape, and the mass of that thing will grow. If we make that test in the atmosphere, there will be theoretical risk that this particle will make the stable black hole, what might suck the atmosphere thru it.  There are claims that the united states air force and the Navy have been tested the time machine in the “Montauk" and “Rainbow” projects, but the success of those tests was bad.

B-52 at the EMP-test ATLAS-1
(Wikipedia)

The problem of those tests have been that the magnetic field will induct the electricity to the particle, will same time make heat if the magnetic field is rotating. That heat will melt the metal, and some cases there was been the burn for the person who took the part of the test. The systems that are tested are actually very simple. The story tells that there was the specially made suit, where was metal net, and the person goes in that suit. Then he was targeted high power radio waves, and the attempt made him drop in the fourth dimension. So in the test, the man was standing in the head of the wooden statue, and the radio waves were transmitted to that person, who was wear this special suit.


The story doesn’t tell us what happened after that, but some person believes, that the operation had some kind of success. And after that, there was raised a giant wooden structure in the New Mexico desert, where was officially tested EMP and anti-EMP system with the B-52 and B-1 bombers, and there are many published photos about this test. I don’t know can humanly make enough energy for time travel on the scale of the human body. But this artificial black hole will be very interesting when we are talking about nano bugs.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATLAS-I

 Those tiny robots might be sent to the past or the future by the tiny wormhole. If we can make about millimeter size black hole, there is possible to use nano technically produced bugs to see thru the hole. And if the test will be successful that tiny robot will able to transmit the signal thru the wormhole. The danger of that process is that the wormhole can pressure the atmospheric atoms symmetrically, and that might cause the nuclear fusion in the atmosphere. This might be the interesting thing to think in some philosophical lecture in the university.