Conclusions and thoughts about meeting between presidents Trump and Putin

The Presidential Palace Helsinki Finland
(Wikipedia)

https://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The meeting between Putin and Trump is over, and the conclusion is, that only man who made mistakes is Trump. There are only stories, how Trump was under Putin's rule, and this is the very remarkable thing. In the newspapers is not a single word, what Putin made, except that he had a Beriev A-50 recon plane escorting his personal aircraft. The thing, that Trump claimed, that USA have been made mistakes is taken as the weakness in the front of Putin. And this is the very interesting point. When John F. Kennedy made partially nuclear test ban treaty between the Soviet Union, that man was prosecuted for being soft in the eyes of the Soviet Union.


This is the very interesting thing because if the international community wants that the peace is built for something else than nuclear weapons, must the talking do in the base, that there are humans in both sides, and humans make mistakes. Accepting the reality, that even the President Of The United States can make mistakes is the way to open talking about serious things. When we are thinking about the complicated relationship between superpowers, there is only one thing, what is good for the people. And that is peaceful co-operation between those nations, even if somebody doesn't want that advantage.


When we are looking at the results of the meeting, we can say, that in the world we have found optimism and positivism is the relations between superpowers. And the advantage is that the meeting between the leaders of those nations has been done. Talking is the road to concrete conferences and then contracts. This is the beginning of real actions for the peace. And when the results of the meeting are under the observation, we must say that there was so short a time to make preparations for that meeting that the concrete contract was not possible.


And when we are looking at the position of Donald Trump, we must remember, that this man is the president of the democratic country. He must stand the critics and there are always people, who have different opinions than he has. When we are talking about court etiquette of Great Britain, there should be somebody, who will tell about the rules for the people, who are not often visiting in the Buckingham Palace.  Maybe Trump learned his lesson about this very important etiquette.

Positive thinking of studies and the international court.

"Country choristers"
Edward Bird
(1810)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The process of learning is like stairs. It continues by the life. The first steps are dangerous, and walking thru the stairs would the man stronger and this person gets more self-esteem during that process. When we are thinking about science, we must say that there would need much motivation to learn many things in the real life. And here we always think that learning process is always some kind of race to get the top university and the top place in that society.


The most important way to make the studies motivated is to give positive feedback. Many times the feedback is limited to mistakes of the person, and this way to give feedback normally kills the motivation. Why is it so difficult to say something positive to other people? Does it give that person the motivation to be social for other people? When the person gets only bad feedback will the results be devastating for this person social skills, that seems to be the most important thing in working life.


Then we are thinking about the situation, where the person gets only negative feedback about the things what our main character does, would the result be, that the person doesn't even want to develop the social skills. The social skills are things, what needs practice. And if only feedback would be negative, the person would be transformed negative. The negative things will make all the person like some anti-personality, and this would be the very dangerous thing.


If somebody would give the wrong feedback in the wrong situation, that thing would make that person the radical and realistic character, and this is the reason, why some persons would turn to members of the fundamentalist groups. That wrong positive feedback is common, that when the person is lonely, would some radical man or woman give the simple explanation for this people situation.


Feedback what prosecutes some foreigners about the bad situation would cause the thing that somebody would turn to radicalism. And this happens in the situation, where somebody would be left alone. There would be the mechanism inside the human mind, that the individual has the need to be the member of the group. And this would be the very sad thing, if the only group, what accepts the person is some radical nazis or group of fundamentalist, that would be the very dangerous situation in the people life.The influence of groups would make the person do things, what that individual ever thought to make.


Every person in the world makes mistakes, and that is the thing, what we must realize. If the person doesn't make mistakes, that person would ever do anything. And this is the danger of negative feedback. Then the person hears only negative things about the work, would that cause the situation, where this person would not even want to try to do anything. The afraid of failures can cause the situation, where the person doesn't even want to get the job because the workplace would not give that worker anything than negative things.


And that would give the reason to hanging in the shopping centers and asking for troubles, what would get the person to the criminal activities and prison. This kind of things are the most dangerous things because those persons might make violent crimes, and the victims of the violence don't care who was guilty. From the grave would nobody come to say how grateful they are about the penalties and officials. The racism is the very good tool to collect the nation behind the military actions. And that would also the good thing to control people mind to convict that everybody who is stamped as the enemy is the same kind of person, what made some terrorist attack.


Every Muslim is always terrorist, and every foreigner is always the potential terrorist. When somebody kills the citizens of some state, that state has the obligation to defend the citizens. And this is the conflict with international law. If the maker of the terrorist attack has other nationality and that state would not admit this suspect to justice, that would cause the war. When we are talking about the tolerance of nuclear powers, we must say that the other nations are very tolerated, when the suspect is the citizen of the state, what has the big nuclear arsenal. But if suspect comes from Muslim state, would the tolerance be very small for military actions.


And that would cost lives on both sides. The problem of terrorist attacks is that those suspects are not prosecuted in international court. And they would not even get stable handling for their cases. Of course, the terror bombings must also convicted. But the makers of those actions don't let their military men justify in international court. This is very fair because here are the nations, what would get judgments in those courts, but they don't care them at all. They say that national law is always over those international courts, and they don't ever follow the judgments of those courts, and this is the problem with those tribunals. They don't have the force to order states to follow their orders, and without the support of superpowers, those attempts to force other nations to follow the judgments are doomed to fail.

The writing about positivism and positive attitude

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Thinking of the positive things might help other people think the same way. If the person will put positive thoughts on the writing, it will give other people the picture of the positive person, who does the best in all situations. Some people think that they can slip off some things when they choose so-called “soft way" to make some things. Other people think that mathematics, other natural-  or information sciences are very tough, but as we know, the world is the tough place. They want to go take studies in the juridical or human sciences, and they want to say, that they will not want to study in the tough place.


So they want to study as the teacher. The teacher is the key role in the process, what makes new participants of the community and society. And those people are often very smooth, but they sometimes forget, that they are superiority of their classes, and the result is that those students or pupils will do very much homework. In this case, the teacher forgets that some pupils will have other classes and they must do every homework, what is given to them. Some teachers forget, that they will give punishments for children, who might hear that in all the year.


And sometimes the teacher will give the punishment for example to other pupils. Those other persons might do exactly the same things than this person, who is punished, but they will let go because one person is easier to punish than 30 persons. In this case, the Punisher uses one person as the scapegoat for appeasing other adults. Another way to get very smooth way to the working life is to go there without any education. The journey might be very easy, but that kind of person will get the feedback from the leaders of the company.


The ending of the school will seem very easy way to get easy works in the working life, but the price of that solution is, that this kind of person is very easy to kick off the company. And if we think about the working life of the person if the person has something unique like language skills, what can’t be replaced by another person, this kind of worker will meet more nice people in the working place than some person, whose working force will base on some kind of system or computer program.


That kind of person is easier to replace another person, who knows the same system. But the personal language skills are more difficult to replace by another person. If we are talking about the positivism and easy way to working life, many people think, that if the person says, that the applicant is not good for the job, feels good for the readers of the work application that person is wrong. The underrating of own skills is the sign of bad self-esteem, and that conducts the thought of the alcohol problems.


The positivism is the sign of the good self-esteem, good social skills, and good willing to make work. The negativism is the mark of bad feeling, what might change alcohol problems or another problem with medicals, because if the person has the bad attitude of self, that means that this person is more vulnerable of the alcohol or drug problem. And also the bad self-esteem might cost very much for the company, because this kind of person will not able to concentrate the work, because of the worries are controlling this kind of people life, and that means that they will work slower. But in real life, the worst case, what the man can face, is that the person will stay at home because this makes the everything feel bigger.