Writing must not be serious and it could be fiction.

https://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

I might be written about this thing before. But let's begin in this phrase, that writer has right to use their own imagination. They have the right to tell their opinions for other people or their audience, as you might call the people, who read writers texts. "Don't be serious Sam" could be the good motto for writers.


Writing is a good hobby, and when we are thinking about the reason, why somebody writes a fiction, we must say that they do it for fun. Many people do something only for fun, and one of those hobbies is writing. But if we are always looking at facts and be like slaves when we are looking for truth, we are not giving room for our own thoughts and ideas, what might be good, but they are not historical fact. And here we must think deeper than the normal person about some claiming, what feels very funny.


 One of those claiming or jokes is that some person like Nikola Tesla is coming from Venus. In this case, we might start to laugh very loudly. Please, neighbors, try to understand us, we are the little bit different than you. But as you might know, we can try to be serious in this kind of cases, and try to think deeper, why somebody claims that Nikola Tesla could be from the planet Venus, and here we are finding some terrestrial and natural explanation for those claiming.


This is that maybe Nikola Tesla is coming from the city like Dubrovnik and the name of the city is coded for some reason. Or if we are making a spy or agent book, we might think that some very important scientist is trying to flee from the hands of Nazis, and that person whose name has been coded as "Nikola Tesla"  waits in the place, what is called as "Venus" for giving the important files for our main character.


But this is only the fiction of course. When we are talking about fact and fiction, we can always make everything in an easy way and satisfy ourselves with explanations, what are given at some press conference. But the life is boring in that way. That kind of way of thinking, that everything has been told in public media is, of course, very good way to think, if the person is very hurried and the time is not enough for sitting down. In that case, the normal way of thinking is enough and easy way is always giving room for parties and pub evenings.


And there we can laugh for people, who are writing some own ideas. But as we might hear from somewhere, luck is limit in this world. If we would not go to schools, we would get very nice jobs in the hamburger restaurant, but that kind of jobs are ending sometimes for kicking off. The disappointments in the school are sometimes the reason, why somebody would stop the studies. But in the working life that would cause the situation, that the boss would not be so nice, as in television. There are many jobs that have meaning, and also many job applications for those jobs. The job what has no meaning does not exist.


The job for cleaner has the purpose to make the working are clean. Here we must say, that if the job has no purpose, would the employee kicked off straight away. If the application would not have the purpose they are fun to write and send. But if the application has the purpose, the reality changes to different. And in those places, the leaders will tell that there are over tens of thousands of places open in that sector. That would tell something about the attitude for those jobs.

What means free mind and freedom to think? Thoughts about Druids, Julius Caesar, and Aulus Hirtius

White Cliffs of Dover
(Picture I)

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/what-means-free-mind-and-freedom-to.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Somebody always asks, what actually mean term "freedom to think"? Freedom to think is the key element in the writing, what has only one purpose: to make text, what maybe has some kind of influence. The freedom of think means that person can product own thoughts about some things, and in this case, that does mean, that the text what the writer does must not have connections with science or other evidence.


The freedom to think means, that if we use the Julius Caesars book about the war of Gaul (Gallic wars) as the source, and look where the text about the "Bridge of Druids", what Julius Caesar mentioned in his book, we might give that thing three explanations. One is the normal or conventional way to explain that kind of things. By using this mode the mean for the term "Bridge of Druids" can be actually the regular boat line, what fishermen used when they traveled between British islands and European mainland in the Strait of Dover, where the people can see the British islands by standing on the coast of France. The book "Gallic wars" were written with Aulus Hirtius, who wrote military books in the Roman empire.


The second explanation might be natural, but it would also be forward its time. It means that maybe Druids made pontoon bridge from Britannia to Gaul. And maybe they turned that bridge away when they didn't need it. In this fictional case, the bridge was built over the boats, what were in line between Gaul mainland and Britannia. And the third explanation could be purely fictional. In this fictional explanation, Druids were space aliens, who used the wormholes to travel across the Universe. In this very interesting Science Fiction based explanation also explains the Stonehenge and other stone rings as the systems, what we're used to opening the wormholes thru the universe.


In this model, Stonehenge was equipped with radio system, what would allow that the energy rises so high, that there would be forming the small electromagnetic black hole in the middle of that stone ring. In this case, those Druids might have advanced maser- or laser technology in their hands. This explanation might be very far from the truth, but it is the very nice explanation of the question, who druids actually been. And that kind of thoughts is needed because that would make life more interesting than simple answers, that the Stonehenge was some kind of clock or ancient almanac.


This is freedom of thinking. People can enjoy writing, even they are in University. Every world, what the man or woman is writing must not be scientifically proven. We are not in the courtroom now, and we are not giving the speeding ticket to Martians, what might have skin, what have chlorophyll in its cells, and maybe those Martians can use their sin as photosynthesis. And in that case, the fictional Martians can be green, or maybe they use green makeup like special forces soldiers. But when we are thinking about that kind of things, we notice that there are many secrets on Earth, what is raising the body hair. Those secrets are very deep in history.


Maybe we ever get the answers, why somebody builds Stonehenge. And then we must ask, where Caesar built his navy for his operation to conquer the Britannia? Also, we must ask another thing about this ancient military operation: what Caesar was looking for in Britannia? How did he get permission to attack that island? What kind of treasure could Romans get from that island? Did some Roman see there some jewelry? The Gaul war is the very interesting book, what is probably rewritten many times after Caesar. Some parts of it are not written any master of rhetoric, and the part, what was written about the landing to Britain is quite interesting. The Strait of Dover  is not ideal for cavalry operation, bur Caesar claimed that defenders of Britannia used cavalry against the Roman legions.


Then the rest of this part would look like some visit to the whorehouse, what was written in better form. But the writer uses terms, what is not suitable for strong writers. And here I must say, that if Caesar lied, why he lied? And if the original script of landing was replaced by other, why that action was made?  If that part includes something information, what Caesar or writer if that was the different person didn't want to send to Rome, could it interesting to see, what was in those pages, what was replaced by other text in the situation, there was no time to get the qualified writer to make those texts?


Was this text made somebody in the command of Aulus Hirtius? And was the reason the chancing that text that Hirtius wanted to denigrate Julius Caesar in the eyes of Senate? If Caesar were the liar, Senate would execute him immediately, and then somebody else could raise the power of the Roman empire. Why was that replacement made so fast? Was it made just before senators ask the reports of the actions of Julius Caesar? This is very interesting part of history.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_Caesar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aulus_Hirtius

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallic_Wars

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Druid

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonehenge

Picture I

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/content/dam/Travel/leadAssets/33/35/white-cliffs-of-do_3335160a.jpg?imwidth=450

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/what-means-free-mind-and-freedom-to.html

The little writing about existence.

Kimmo Huosionmaa

What means “exist"? For Réne Descartes that word means thinking, but what that means for bugs or computer programs? Those things also exist, but the last one has no physical form, so should we think that existing or being needs the physical form of the material. And if we want to put the challenge too great Réne Descartes we must ask what is the sleeping person? Is this person lost the existence because this person sleeps? The form of the existence is the very old question. Some philosophers have written that they have thought if the humans and Universum exist only in some computers databases, and the argument for that thesis is that the universe is too ordered to be spontaneously created.


In the lone houses were sit long period to think, what means the world "exist", and then we must think that does the existence means that every particle in the universe must have some rights? Do the stones need rights because they exist? Or they are excited if some überphilosopher will strike their toe to that stone. Or does the thing exist if they are the thoughts in my head?


Those are quite exciting questions, what gives the bread and butter for some philosophers. Every philosopher in the world is some kind of strange because those people are professional thinkers, who do not need to prove their words by the empirical way like "real scientists", who operate with kinetic things. Philosopher can let their mind fly, and that makes them very hard to fall. The atomic model where the material could be brake until it cannot anymore divide is functional even today, even if Aristoteles made that model over 2300 years ago. The names of those particles have changed as the bosons and electrons.


But there is still the point, where the particles of material cannot divide until there will build the new particle accelerator, what will bring to our eyes even smaller more high energical and short aged particles than Higgs bosons ever can be. But that means that there must build the new accelerator, what uses more electric power and more powerful magnetic fields than "The Hadron" accelerator in CERN uses.


And those modern philosophers think that Universum is the central computer, what have this reality in it mass memories. If we will start to let our mind fly, we must say that if we are some bytes in the computer memory, that will explain the Holy Bible extremely well. If we would be part of some computer program, that will give many explanations about the thing, what we are calling as “the reality". Of course, this is only thinking, but if we are living in the memory of the supercomputer, we must make the question, what would be the purpose of this computer.


And why there is the program like this. Then we must go to the toilet and begin the second part of thinking about the reality, and the purpose of existing. Why are we exist is the main question of philosophy? What is the reason, why we are living? If we are asking this from the person, who lived in the Medieval time, this person would say that the purpose of life is to serve the king.


But then we must ask what is the purpose of the life of the king? If this person answers that serving the God is the purpose of the life of the king, we must ask does the king probably know the god, or how this person knows how to serve the master? Does this man got some rules about the way of serving this creature, what normal people would not meet until at the gates of Heaven.


But when we are thinking about the technology, we must say, that the reality is what we want it is, and this would give some Scifi-writers the ideas, that the human been is actually sleeping in some spaceships hypothermal coffin and all the things, what will happen in that virtual space, will make to please the journey of those travellers. In those very nice fictionary books those space travelers are connected with the spaceships central computer and those travelers would give their brain capacity for that imaginational mission.

The brains what were connected to the central computer would give the productivity and imagination for the use of those computers. That would be the very good choice when somebody wants to create computer what really can think. This system would give the computer the capacity to imagine the things, and if the computer can create something new, would that make the mission easier. In some books, that kind of trip was already made, and the solution how the organization could hide that action was that they cloned those persons, who will go to space. That would be cover the trip to the distant target.

https://sites.google.com/view/writingaboutexistence/etusivu

Thoughts about freedom of thinking

Picture 1

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In the freedom of thinking is one way, what we might think as very free. This way of thinking is the atheism, and of course, many people say proudly that they are atheists. And one of the greatest atheists is the world is, of course, Joseph Stalin. This man had only one thing in his mind when somebody in the country what was lead by Stalin was talking about the freedom of thinking.


The freedom of thinking was allowed when the way of thinking was same as the Joseph Stalin, and the thinker was like the parrot, who repeated same things as the Joseph Stalin said, and this is why some atheists are very ponderous. They think that the only right way to think about the things is same way then this person has. But there is one thing what makes those persons like Stalin very weird.


They can't stand that somebody has different opinions than this particular person has, and this kind of person uses violence for silent other opinions. They are unable to understand that there are another people in the universe and those another person has right to say that they have the different way to think about the things than this  "the boss" have. This way of thinking was very common in the Roman emperor's palace and emperor Augustus raised himself as the god. When he executed the person's who were not pleased him, this man became very powerful but same way he was very hated.


And after that, the Romans became very hated because the emperor was the Rome, and that way of thinking was caused the destruction of the Roman empire. Because the Emperor was so powerful authority in the Rome, nobody says that if there will be some enemies behind the wall. And if the emperor didn't listen, nothing was done. The emperor might though that the Attila was somewhere in the Middle East, and he woke up until Attila was behind the walls of the city of Rome.  The emperor thought that his legions could destroy the troops of Attila because that was always done before.


And nothing is so sure than unsure. If emperor didn't get information, what he needs,  that would cause the terrible situation. But nobody dares to tell to the emperor, that his legions were lost the battle. If this information was not satisfied the emperor, he might cut the informer's head. In the real life, the system of information or intelligence is not mentioned for please the leaders of the state. Its mission is to get the real information, what is needed when those men make their decisions.


And in this case, the system of the information might give the data, what feels very uncomfortable for the leaders of the state. I think that the emperor of the Rome would need that information, that his legions strength was too weak or their tactics were wrong, that he could defend the Rome. And when the city of Rome was conquered, the magic of Rome was gone. The city was gone, and the power of Rome was ended. The Rome was in the same position as the Soviet Union.


The military power of that nation was so frightened, that nobody ever dares to say anything against it. And the fear what was feed by populist and left-wing movements was build on the statue the rumors of the brainwashed military and the most powerful nuclear weapons, and that guaranteed the position of those movements because they claimed that they were the real friends of the Soviet Union. And of course, the persons who had different opinions than they had were dangerous. If somebody says anything against the great Soviet land, that would cause immediately the military attack against that country.  And that's why everybody must be quiet when the leader of the Soviet Union came to visit in some land. He was able to hear only the worlds what were served the leaders of the nation. And if somebody says anything else, would that person arrested by the police.

Source:

Picture 1 http://davidcrank.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/free-mind.jpg