The problems with hypersonic flight can be solved. But it takes time.

Researchers face huge problems. With hypersonic weapon development. And. Hypersonic aircraft development is more difficult than hypersonic cruise missile development. Reusable hypersonic systems can turn many things faster and more dangerous than they are now. 

In normal cases, a hypersonic system can reach hypersonic speed only in high-flying conditions. The air must be thin enough that the temperature will not rise too high. The hypersonic aircraft travels in very thin air. The aircraft must have a system that prevents the body from overheating. One of the things. What can solve that problem is the wires or antennas, which can transport heat out from the hypersonic body. 

The antenna. That is behind the aircraft. It can help to stabilize the temperature. This thing. It is. To use the high-temperature ceramic shell, which chemically bonds to the titanium-wolfram-chromium metal composite. These kinds of materials. They are very resistant to high temperatures and pressure. Another thing is the stealth technology that the aircraft should use. That it survives the missions. A big problem. With hypersonic warheads like the Russian Avangard, is that. In high-speed flight, plasma. Covers those warheads. That plasma always acts in the same way. It causes the radio blackout. When a spacecraft travels through the ionosphere. And hypersonic aircraft travel in the ionosphere. 

The plasma makes it hard to detect those warheads or hypersonic aircraft. Making them invisible to radars. But. The same system denies those aircraft . And missiles to use radars. And other radio wave-based communication. Radio waves cannot travel through that plasma. But. The system can. Use a magnetic field to push that plasma away from the aircraft. The system can push air away from the aircraft body. Making the air thinner decreases friction. There is also a possibility that the aircraft uses lasers to create the plasma shield. The stealth system must use nano-lasers to create. The plasma. By ionizing air using those lasers. 

The plasma stealth or plasma shield requires. The system uses lidars. And optical-AI-based systems to search and intercept targets. The hypersonic system can use lasers. To create the bubble, the air is thinner. And that allows researchers to reach hypersonic speeds in lower altitudes. The fact is that hypersonic missiles can be used. The kinetic energy impacts the target. This system requires highly accurate target recognition and an attack system. 

This system cannot use radars to search for targets. And that means those hypersonic systems are hard to use nuclear detonators. Those systems use inertial navigation for starting navigation. Then the missile starts. To corner the target. At this point. It requires. Some kind of radar image. It can be used for high-accuracy operation. The problem is that the radar signal doesn’t pass the plasma layer. And that denies the use of radio transmitters that drones can attach to the roofs. The hypersonic system must slow its speed so that it can use the radar to search for targets. 

https://www.imeche.org/news/news-article/engineers-face-extreme-hurdles-as-hypersonic-weapon-development-accelerates

 https://interestingengineering.com/space/varda-space-flies-hypersonic-system

https://news.usni.org/2021/06/14/mda-u-s-aircraft-carriers-now-at-risk-from-hypersonic-missiles

What is the difference between drones and missiles?

Russian Iskander missile (Wikipedia)

Missiles are easier to use in war crimes. The missiles need only two coordinates the launching point. And the point where the target is. The missile crew will give the target coordinates to the missile. And then the GPS/GLONASS system tells the missile its location and the distance to the target. When the target is in range, the system simply tells, that it's time to shoot. 

The problem with that kinds of missiles is. They need to update their target's position all the time if the missile wants to hit the moving targets. The CEP (Circular Error Probability) depends on the accuracy of the positioning system. Things like radar and image (or imaging infrared) homing missiles require the position of the target and then the GPS or inertial navigation system will drive the missile to the point, where its trajectory starts to turn to the ground. 

Then the seeker must see the target. If the seeker doesn't see the target the AI must decide does it detonates the missile in airborne. Or would it allow it to impact the ground? The thing is that AI-based imaging infrared systems are the new things and the computer code that is needed is complicated. And the most usual way to make a missile fly to its target is to use GPS/inertial navigation. 

If there is no optical seeker the operators would not even know where they shoot their missiles. So the fault, if the missile hits civilian targets, is the person who gives coordinates to the guidance system. 

Things like UCAV (Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicles) are made against highly mobile missile systems. The combat drone can patrol for hours or even days and search the targets. And missile systems are the primary objects for small and lethal anti-tank missiles. 

Those drones can observe the ground operations but they are capable to destroy both anti-aircraft and short-range ballistic missiles. They can use along with the manned aircraft or alone against all ground targets. The thing is that the controller of the system sees the target. And if there are some civilians those drone operators should see also that thing. 

The thing is that the high-flying low-enduring drone is always quite a hard target for ground-based systems. The piston engine leaves a very low infrared signature. The question is why Russian military have not those systems?

Bayraktar TB-2 (Redditt)

The answer could be that the drone can use for so-called "surgical strikes". And that means drones are useful also things like assassination missions. The thing is that drones are effective and dangerous tools is that they can be almost everywhere. Small UCAV drones can carry to operational areas even in the trunk of the car. 

And they can leave to the attack position. The drone can be a quadcopter or it can be aircraft-shaped like Boeing Dominator. So when the target is coming to the operational area it will go airborne. The aircraft-looking drone can use a balloon for lift-off. 

And the operator can make that strike from a long distance. That thing makes them very frightening. And the weapon systems must be frightening because they deny the attacks from foreign countries. The purpose of the military system is to put fear in the mind of enemies. And that thing makes all successful weapon systems rough, brutal and shocking. 

The new miniature drones are extremely dangerous in wrong hands

Picture I

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

On the Internet have been stories, that the Russian new drones can jam any cell-phone by the distance of about 10 to 15 kilometers. Those drones can be equipped with ECM system, and they can interrupt any data communication, what have used the frequencies, what the operators would know. Those extremely small drones can throw to the air by hand or they can shoot by using crossbows or dropped from aircraft or helicopters. This makes those drones extremely sophisticated, and they can use in recon or attack missions by military personnel or undercover operators.

Sometimes those drones are equipped with the thermobaric warhead, and plainclothes agents can carry that equipment near the target, what might be the enemy radio station, ammunition storage or airfield. Those drones can operate remotely from the other side of the world. This means that those agents must only get those devices to air, and in that mission can use balloons, what would be filled by using the remote command. When those drones are high enough the wires would cut and the operator would fly them against targets. Use of balloons guarantees, that those agents must just leave those weapons to the ground, and flee away.

Those drones can be controlled by cell phones, what communicates with the guidance unit, and that thing is actually normal radio-amplifier, and the idea of the controlling system is similar to WLAN, but it uses more powerful radio transmissions than the normal WLAN. This kind of system could be installed to radio telescopes, and the idea is that the other side receiver-transmitters must be powerful, and the drone can be operated from another side of the Earth by using this kind of remote systems. When we are thinking about those miniature drones, they can also be equipped with explosives, and use small sizer cruise missiles.

If those small size cruise missiles are equipped with HEAT warheads, they can destroy even the tank or those systems like RQ-11 can have the thing like "frag grenades", what means thermobaric hand grenades, what has killing radius almost 30 meters. Thermobaric ammunition can installed easily to those miniature drones. And also the force of the HEAT-warhead can boost by filling the empty space ahead of the explosive hydrocarbon like gasoline or propane, what makes those ammunition extreme powerful. Sometimes the small size FAE warheads are only the HEAT ammunition, what are equipped with ventile, what can be used to fill that ammunition by aerosol, and the Russian RPG-7 has sometimes this capacity.

Picture I

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AeroVironment_RQ-11_Raven

Kinetic energy bombardment is the new threat in the military world

Picture I

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

X-37B is a small size space-shuttle, what is a very mysterious creature in the skies. The shuttle itself offers a platform for modular systems, and one of the most feared military solutions is the so-called kinetic energy missiles. Those missiles can installed in X-37B very easily, and the shuttles manipulator hand can be used to operate that thing. The system could be actually the rocket drum, what is normally installed to helicopter or aircraft, and those rockets can equip with concrete profiles, what would keep them shapes in extreme heat, what causes the rocket hits the atmosphere, and the resistance of the atmosphere would heat that projectile in very high temperature. 

This kind of solutions bases everyday technology, what would put in the new environment. The kinetic-energy bomber should not actually be a big size or complicated system. And sometimes "Mercury" capsule is actually the early version of the kinetic energy bomber. That system could be simple like the flying rocket mortar, what would shoot the rockets very sharply in some targets. In the Soviet "Almaz" program was planned to install 20-30 mm. aircraft cannons in the spacecraft. That ammunition would equip with the ceramic nucleus. And that would allow making even the river on the ground. 

There have been stories of the United States giant kinetic energy bombardment system, what was called "Project Thor". Many times there were claiming, that "Thor" was railgun or electromagnetic gun, what is installed in some satellite.  But in the real life that electromagnetic system would not be necessary, and many times I have thought that this system would be the giant airgun. Those pressure base space-cannons are actually similar that the cannons, what is used in the normal combat situations, and they can be very effective. 

The ammunition, what would be metal tungsten, will shoot to target by pressure, what is made by burning hydrogen and oxygen in the combustion chamber, and if the same force would be targeted to opposite direction, would that keep the satellite in the direct position. Sometimes the weapon like "Thor" is suitable for making channels in the dry areas, and that's why it should be classified as the mining equipment. The United Nations have prohibited those weapons, but the nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction are also prohibited. The contracts prohibit the MIRV or multi-warhead missiles. And any nuclear state is going to limit their arsenals, and the development of the new nuclear missiles is going on. 

Picture I

https://assets.rbl.ms/17314781/980x.jpg

Why is CIA so active in Central America?

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/why-is-cia-so-active-in-central-america.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we looked the news ar 80's we saw every time, that CIA or some other United States intelligence organization was working intensively in Central America. Sometimes somebody asked, what is the problem if some Nicaragua or Costa-Rica moved to the socialist country? There is one thing, what makes this choice very bad for the United States. If some of those nations would turn to socialistic, they might call the Soviet- or Russian airbase to their territory.


By using this airfield the Soviet air force could operate near the United States borders and if the country has got harbors, the highly mobile missile systems might be transferred to that area. In the Cuban missile crises in 1962, the Soviet Union wanted to move their IRBM-missiles to Cuba. Those missiles were very primitive, and they must be tanked before the attack. And if the USAF would notice that the missile's tanks were filled, they could destroy those missiles by using napalm and cluster bombs. Those weapons could destroy fuel dumps and rockets of the missiles, and the radioactive pollution would be delivered all the area if the warheads of the missile will be damaged.


After the missile crises, the CIA have suspected that the Soviet Union or Russia had plans to bring SS-20 "Saber" or SS-25 "Sickle" (Topol-M) highly mobile missile systems to Cuba. Those highly mobile missiles could be driven to the places, where they are out of the sight, and because the fuel is stored in the missiles, they are very independent and highly mobile. Those missiles could be driven out straight from Il-76 cargo planes, and then they would be transported out of the sight. There were no signs of that kind of operation, but as we know that those highly mobile systems could transport to Cuba in very short warning period.


They must just drive in the cargo planes and then fly to the target. Those ballistic missiles would be most suitable for the mission because their fuel is inside the rocket, and structure of solid rocket fuel makes those missiles easier to handle than cruise missiles, what uses petroleum in their jet motors. In the high temperature, the petroleum can evaporate, and that's why in the tropic the tubes of those missiles must equip with the cooling system. That keeps the temperature of the missiles low and eliminates the vaporizing the fuel.



If liquid rocket fuel like highly poisonous Hydrazine starts to vaporize, would those missile crews wear the NBC-gas protecting suits, and start to pump that fuel to other tanks for decreasing the temperature of the chemicals. If there would be the leak, the highly toxic chemical can kill people and also pollute the ground. With Hydrazine would be used nitric acid, what can cause terrible burnings, and destroy the protective gear. If that chemical, what is used as the oxygenizing agent in the reaction would deliver to the ground, that would cause pollution.


The problem with that kind of operation is that those weapon systems are then far away from the mainland, what means that their crews are out of the political control. And that thing causes problems with this plans. There were rumors that those missiles would transport to Cuba without launching codes and necessary circuits if the crises would get deeper. And then some MiG or Sukhoi fighter would bring those stuff if that is necessary, but then those plans were abandoned because the KGB would not be sure could those fighters survive to Cuba in the real crises.

Picture I

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/df/Russian_RT-2UTTKh_Topol_M.jpg

How is the big threat the 3M-54 "Kalibr" missile for the West?

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/how-is-big-threat-3m-54-kalibr-missile.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

3M-54 "Kalibr" (Nato codename SS-N-27 "Sizzler" or SS-N-30) is the newest missile technology of the Russian Federation. The missiles diameter is 533 millimeter similar to torpedo tube, and it can launch from various submarines, aircraft and surface warships. Also the ground-based, mobile launchers are available, and this weapon is the major element of CLUB-K container missile system. These missile containers would be installed in any platform or fixed bases, and that system would give any ship or other vehicles the capacity to use the effective ground attack or anti-ship weapons, and there is actually the anti-submarine version of this missile. But let's think, how big threat this missile is for the western world.


The missile itself is quite thin, and its capacity to fly supersonic speed at the end of the trajectory will make it very difficult target for the CIWS (Close-In Weapon System). But the strike capacity of that missile and its vulnerability depends on the type of the seeker. If the missiles use radar homing, the ship would able to get the warning about the strike, and it could activate it's CIWS and ECM-systems before the missile would hit. But as we know, that the missile is similar to Tomahawk, and it uses satellite navigation in the subsonic period of the flight.


And if the GLONASS would be jammed or disturbed, the missile would have difficulties to find the target. And if the missile uses image-recognition for attacking the target,  the problems with GLONASS-system could cause, that missile could not find the target. But if the missile will find the target and IIR (Imaging Infra-red) would see the target, the missile will be very deadly. In the real world, there are many ways to make the navigation system immune for jammers, and one of them is that the location of the warship will be programmed to the missile's computer, and then the flight will happen by using inertial navigation system, and when the target is calculated to be visible, would the IIR system start to drive the missile to the target.


The problem with IIR navigation is that the target would be covered by magnesium-rockets, what can blind the IIR-system. When the missile is at the end of its route would the rocket stage started and the missile will start to flight highly supersonic speed. And the infra-red systems can locate the exhaust gas of the rocket booster. This might increase the vulnerability of the missile, and also at the begin of the route when missile travels with subsonic speed, the fighters maybe can destroy it.


I don't know how advanced those missiles are, and can they change their speed during the flight, but the system is very serious threat for Western troops. It can be equipped with the conventional or nuclear warhead, and there might be the capacity to use also cluster warheads, what are effective against troop concentrations and airbases. There is one thing, what concerns about me, and that is, "why Western world is so quiet about those missiles?".


What kind of missiles western military covers? When we are thinking about the new type of missiles, we might say, that every nation keeps some of those weapons secrets, because they might give the nasty surprise for the enemy. The similar missiles what "Kalibr" is might be used in new hypersonic missile systems, where the rocket booster would take the missile to "ballistic jump" outside the atmosphere, and then the ramjets would start to drive them to the target.


The small diameter of that kind of weapon would make it very difficult to intercept. And the submarine launch ballistic missiles like R-29RMU2 "Layner" could carry at least four of those hypersonic cruise missiles, what makes that strike very lethal. The "Kalibr" is the spine of the modern Russian military strike capacity, and it could be the lethal and dangerous weapon for any target on the sea or land.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-29RMU2_Layner

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3M-54_Kalibr

Picture I

https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/3m-54-klub-20196753.jpg

This is why governments are developing killer-drones

Type-22 missile boat
(Picture I)

https://www.facebook.com/IWCsync/posts/10156666083309406

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The situation in the developing drones is like in some children's sandbox, where children throw together with sand. They always claim in those situations, that somebody else made that first. The developing of killer robots have been argued that also other nations interests make this kind of robots. The United States uses drones, what is, of course, the bad thing, and the development of those weapons have been in the public teeth, but in the same time, in Europe, Russia and China are developed many new kinds of military drones, what might be more advanced than U.S X-47B.


The Dassault-Breguet "Neuron" is one version of killer drones, and of course, BAE "Taranis" is the latest technology in the military android making. Those systems are the most intelligent in the world, and they have the ability to communicate with computer centers and as an example, the warships central computers, what give those drones more independence than ever before.


Also, there might be planned the data satellites, what are actually the computers, that are launched to the orbital trajectory. And their mission would give more calculating capacity to those drones. Of course, they can improve the capacity to communicate between the drones and supercomputer centers at the opposite side of the oceans. Those systems are quite terrifying, but the Chinese operations and their navy's and air force's new automatized boats and aircraft would have an excuse to continue drone programs around the world.


Those machines are perfect weapons, and when opposite force would use them, why the western operators would not continue the development of those weapons. And of course, China is the potential enemy of the United States and Western nations, and Chinese weapons are good excuse to develop new very lethal weapons, what can fly from another side of Earth to attack to the targets in the far east. What is far enough from European media.

Sources:

https://www.facebook.com/IWCsync/posts/10156666083309406

https://www.c4isrnet.com/unmanned/2018/06/01/see-chinas-massive-robot-boat-swarm-in-action/

https://warisboring.com/dozens-of-chinese-robot-boats-swarm-the-sea/

https://www.dassault-aviation.com/en/defense/neuron/introduction/

Picture I

http://dtlon6z3v1kfl.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/20090159/type-022missileboat2.jpg

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

The tactics of nuclear weapons

B-2 "Spirit"
(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are two possible tactics or routes when the nuclear weapons are developed. Another tactic is to create high-yield missiles, what would attack against targets, what are in the enemy area. If the state chooses this route, it would have very good strike capacity, but the problem with those missiles is, that they could not return to the ground. And when the strike has begun, the missiles would not call back. But this is the past. Today missiles can shoot to the low trajectory, and if the strike would be unnecessary, those rockets can be returned to earth.  Here I must say, that also slid fuel rockets can be used many times, and only thing, what need to do, is to change the fuel cassette inside the rocket stage.


The rocket can shoot to orbiter from silo or mobile station like submarines, and when it should return to Earth, the warhead could return like Apollo capsule in the military base, and then it can be loaded to another rocket. Or they can be the load to miniature space shuttle like X-37B, and then this system can return those warheads in any runway in the world. Those miniature shuttles can also use as the hypersonic cruise missiles, but they have also scientific purposes. Modern cruise missiles can also be released from aircraft and they can refuel in the air.

They might seem like X-47B, what is equipped with nuclear or bunker-busting conventional warhead. Those missiles could also return to their base, and land like airplanes to carriers or fixed bases. They can also shoot with rockets, and when the mission is over, other parts of the rockets, like used stages of can be landed in the sea by using parachutes and the NAVY can pick them up. If the fuel would be in the separate tube, those stages could reload immediately.  There is one thing, what makes nuclear missiles more addictive for the eastern block than the nuclear bomber or submarine. That is the missiles can be kept in surveillance of security forces all the time, and that grows the political trusting in those weapons.


The tactics with those Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles is that they would be used to terminate enemy troops in long distance at the enemy territory. And this is why those missiles have high-yield nuclear warheads. The targets of those missiles are airfields and missile silos and command bunkers, and that's why those warheads are planned to destroy large area targets, and deep dug targets. That is the problem with fixed base systems, the location of those structures is well known, and that's why there is created mobile systems, what are easy to drive out of the nuclear base.


Some of those systems are meant to destroy rebellious nuclear bases in the situation, where nuclear troops are going to take control in the country. The mobile missile-systems what are mounted in trucks and warships are the reason to create nuclear bombers, what mission is to search and destroy those mobile systems. Those bombers mission is to penetrate deep inside enemy airspace and search those missiles. They are actually offensive weapons, what uses multipurpose nuclear and conventional weapons, what mission is to destroy nuclear missiles in the silos, and mobile systems like trucks and submarines. The problem with this kind of weapon systems is that they are heading to targets, what have defended with heavy anti-aircraft systems and fighter shield.


That's why those bombers need STEALTH-technology. The destroying missile-silos can be made with conventional laser- or GPS-guided bunker-busting weapon, but the target can also be destroyed by the similar nuclear bomb, what penetrates the ground and then seismic waves would terminate the base. The mobile missile systems are very vulnerable if they are located, and even normal anti-tank weapons and cluster bombs can destroy those missiles. But before that, the missiles must be located and the strike against them must begin.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-37

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman_X-47B



Picture I

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ec/B-2_Spirit_%28cropped%29.jpg/1200px-B-2_Spirit_%28cropped%29.jpg

About Russian hypersonic missile and strengths and weaknesses about hypersonic cruise missiles

(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Russia has said, that it would have the new hypersonic missile, what can knock out any U.S Carrier from the sea. This concept is not actually very new, and the beginning of this weapon is in the early 90's when the Soviet Union collapsed. In that time engineers worked with the new type of weapon, what based on the ramjet-propellant hybrid missile, that could avoid U.S air defense. Hypersonic missiles have many strangenesses but also weaknesses, and one of those weaknesses is that those missiles cannot make many curves, what makes probably possible to calculate their flight route and the target, and the heating of the nose can also allow targeting the missile with infrared systems. This can help the target to predict the attack, and send the anti-aircraft missiles against those hypersonic weapons.


The weapon was meant for a shoot to ballistic trajectory by using conventional ICBM missile like SS-19 or it's the first stage, and then the missile would dive in the atmosphere. After or during the dive, the fuel would be injected to the ramjet engine, and then the cruise missile could start to fly to its target in the speed of Mach 6 or more, and that very high speed would make the defense against that missile very difficult, and those missiles would be very big threat for any target in enemy territory.


Those cruise missiles would seem the little bit like SS-N-21, but they must be more aerodynamic than SS-N-21. Those missiles would be devastating even without the warhead, and if they would attack against carrier fleet, would the level of kinetic energy be very high, if that kind of missile hits the ship. But of course, that kind of cruise missiles can carry the conventional or nuclear warhead. The problem of the warhead is that very high speed of the weapon would make the timing of detonator quite difficult, because if the warhead detonates in the different time, would the armored nuclear command bunkers survive the attack.  The modern computer technology makes those missiles more deadly than ever before.


Modern computers allow the missile to change it's course and speed all the time, and also image identification system allows them to attack sharply than ever before. Those systems bases that the photograph of the target is installed in the memory of the computer, and then the camera takes the picture, what is compiling with the picture that is saved in the memory of the computer. When those pictures are perfectly in one on the other, the weapon attack straight to the target. Hypersonic cruise missiles are very difficult for defenders because they are extremely high-speed targets, what can fly in low level.


There is, of course, one weakness about those weapons. That is that their nose would be heated in very high temperature and that infrared signature can be used to aim anti-aircraft weapons to those targets. The most effective weapons, what can be used against those hypersonic cruise missiles could be DEW:s (Directed Energy Weapons) like lasers, what can aim to target by using infrared cameras. And if there would be creating the hole in the nose of that missile, would that cause the situation, that the hypersonic weapon would be destroyed before it hits the target. But that needs the direct hit to the missile. The speed of hypersonic cruise missile causes, that if any projectile hits it, by flying straight to the nose of that weapon, that would destroy the hypersonic missile by very high-level impact power. And those high-speed missiles cannot turn very tight curves, what could be possible to calculate the point, where that missile would fly, what might make defense possible.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3M22_Zircon

https://www.unilad.co.uk/technology/russia-confirms-its-6000mph-hypersonic-missile-is-ready-for-war/

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/russia-tests-hypersonic-missile-kinzhal-vladimir-putin-nuclear-weapons-donald-trump-a8250796.html


Picture I

https://www.neweurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/01_Zicron.jpg

Why were German wonder weapons so big flop?

V-2 Rocket was the most well known German
wonder weapons
(Picture I)

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/why-were-german-wonder-weapons-so-big.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This is the text, what I sometimes wanted to write for explaining, why Nazi wonder weapons ("Wunderwaffe")  were the biggest flops in history? There is one very good reason, why those weapons ever got effect against allied forces, and that was that they were produced so little number, that they would not have any kind of effect against allied forces. Another reason for those flops was that they were produced and drawn by very big hurry, what caused the situation, that there were many mistakes in planning and production of those in paper very good airplanes and submarines. One of the best examples of the good ideas, but in real life, bad and dangerous product was Heinkel 117 "Greif" what motors had got too little coolers, and they made that airplane very easy to burn in airborne.


And because of the Nazi-bureaucracy, nobody changed the drawings, and production of the aircraft, what had two V-motors with a double number of cylinders, but the coolers were metered for half size motors continued even if many of those aircraft were actually started to burn in airborne because of engine overheating. Also, the famous V-2 rockets had one problem, those rockets were actually planned for scientific purposes, and that made them very difficult to a product. The missiles must be the large number, and that's why almost every missile in the world uses solid fuel because that allows manufacturing a large number of missiles. V-2 could be effective if there would be used biological or chemical warhead, but luckily those plans were disbanded.



When we are talking about "real weapons" the problem with those real weapons was that they were ineffective against allied forces. And because of Focke-Wulff and Messerschmitt fighters problems with allied aircraft the Nazi government wanted to make new kind of weapons. One of those weapons what were effective was FX-1400 ("Fritz X"), what was first used in 1943 against Italian battleships and one of the DO-17Z-3 bombers was able to get direct hit to one Italian battleships gun tower. One thing makes me think, that maybe some of those problems with bombers were caused in purpose are involving in this weapon. Why the survivability of those bombers didn't make better by using laughing gas or some other oxygenase in the motors of those bombers, what would allow them to fly higher altitude. And avoiding the air defense and some fighters of allied forces.


That was shown how effectively guided missiles could be worked, but the problem was that the Luftwaffe had to transfer the production of bombers to the fighters, and that caused the loss of a number of bombers, what had the capacity to carry those glide bombs. Also, the training of airmen to use that weapon was difficult, because allied fighters disturbed those pieces of training, and loss of fuel caused problems for flight operations. When we are talking about German submarines and their weapons, there were made new kind of torpedoes, what could guide to the target by using electric wires, what was in the spinning rod, and the captain of the submarine could drive those torpedoes to the target by using two circuit breakers. Those weapons were ineffective because if the captain of the submarine made the wrong move while losing the sight of the torpedo, would those torpedoes destroy own submarine.


The "Walter turbine", what allowed to drive submarines underwater with high speed flopped because the fuel was too exotic. And the principle, where steam for turbines was created by mixing hydrogen peroxide and water was very good, but those submarines were ready for their first patrol in May 1945, and they couldn't make an influence for the World War II. But those submarines were the very good vision and technically advanced. And some bad rumors tell or claims that they were produced for allied forces as the commercial card, what kind of things the German military engineers could do.  One of the reasons for the failure of those wonder weapons was that their users could not wait for the sign of their effectiveness against the enemy.


If some of those wonder weapons were not hit the target, that meant the delaying of the production of that system. And of course, German factories were gone under the heavy bombings, and that made impossible to the product of those new weapons, and that made them ineffective against any target. They were very technical and difficult to the product. But the air superiority of allied forced Germans to make those weapons, what was not very effective, sometimes because of the small production numbers. Of course in German political culture was very many cases, were the engineer, who made mistakes just executed, and that's why those people hide mistakes, what they made in very high pressure and for those projects were given very short time. That made those machines dangerous for their users.

Sources:


https://www.warhistoryonline.com/world-war-ii/sinking-tirpitz-eu-battleship.html

Picture:

https://www.historyanswers.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/V-2_lift-off-2-e1396520167626.jpg

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/why-were-german-wonder-weapons-so-big.html

Why Russian navy has only one aircraft carrier?

Russian aircraft carrier "Admiral Kuznetsov"
(Picture I)

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/why-russian-navy-has-only-one-aircraft.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Some people always, ask why Russian navy has only one aircraft carrier? The reason for that is simple: the war in Europe means that the prime mission of Russian navy is to cut NATO's convoy and support lines to Europe. And this means that Russians have more need for submarines, what can shoot high-speed cruise- and ballistic missiles to the targets. The mission of those submarines is also destroyed NATO surface battle units like carrier groups.


The reason why Russians have the aircraft carrier, what have effective missiles what can be used with or without aircraft, is the question, what many people always ask. The Admiral Kuznetsov, what is the name for Russian only aircraft carrier have P-700 "Granit" (SS-N-19 "Shipwreck") missiles on board, and it has about 41 for use aircraft in operations.  The reason for that is, the aircraft carrier would be meant for use in anti-terrorist operations. In those operations would need to replace the aircraft of that carrier with helicopters, and in that case, must the ship have own weapons to protect itself and give it the capacity to attack against other ships and coastal targets. And if that aircraft carrier uses only helicopters, could the enemy disturb it, if that ship doesn't have own missiles for giving trustworthiness for that ship.


Russians might want to use the aircraft carrier as the supporting large-scale helicopter missions and temporary airbase for Sukhoi Su-33, what is a carrier-based version of Sukhoi Su-27. And of course, that aircraft carrier can operate  Sukhoi Su-25  "Frogfoot" STOL (Short Take-Off and Land) assault planes, what allows those flight crews possibility to take a rest in safe place. In large scale helicopter operations, Russian fleet would be evacuated Russian citizens from the conflict area or try to destroy NATO's submarines.


The aircraft of aircraft carrier needed for secure that mission. Also, special forces like Naval Infantry and VDV can get tactical air support from that carrier, and in Syria, some classified weapons like satellite-guided weapons might be stored in that carrier, because they are not allowed to get to hands of enemies. That could be the reason, why Russians don't produce their own NATO-style carriers, what have only airplanes to operate. Russian aircraft carrier uses also Anti-ship missiles, and that carrier is actually capable of ground targets by using its own missiles.


Russian navy can operate very effective by using strategic bombers like TU-22M or TU-26 "Backfires" and submarines against those surface battle units, and the helicopters are needed for rescue the crews of those bombers in the case that some of them would shoot down by enemy fighters. And those helicopters would need also support from the fighters. That's why Russian navy have not the similar aircraft carriers what are used in U.S Navy.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_aircraft_carrier_Admiral_Kuznetsov
http://foreignpolicy.com/2016/09/13/can-putins-aircraft-carrier-stay-afloat-on-its-syria-mission/

Picture I

https://cdnit2.img.sputniknews.com/images/585/90/5859025.jpg

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/why-russian-navy-has-only-one-aircraft.html

Anti-radiation missiles are useful also as an assassination weapons

EA-18 "Growler", electronic warfare version
of F/A-18 "Hornet"
(Picture I)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-dangers-of-anti-radiation-missiles.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa


The Anti-radiation missiles are the very complicated thing because normally those weapons destroy only the radar stations. And those missiles are normally shown as the weapons, what destroys only material, but there is one aspect in those anti-radiation missiles. They can take off any radio-equipment on the battlefield. This means that some fighter-bomber flies above the battlefield and then it shoots the missile, what would home to the radio-transmitters.


That might cause that all patrol of enemy soldiers would die if some AGM-88 HARM (High-Speed Anti-Radiation Missile) would hit the radio, what those soldiers use. And HARM is not only anti-radiation missile in the world. Also, Stingers have made the version, what can home to the radio-targets. Those missiles can also shoot from ground vehicles and warships for destroying enemy radar and communication equipment.


And those missiles would be devastating if they are used against land troops. The problem with modern military personnel is that they would use radios all the time, and then those men would become "perfect targets" for anti-radiation missiles. But the HARM-type weapons can also use to destroy other communication equipment than field radios. They are useful against WLAN-networks because they can destroy the WLAN-support stations. That's why there is investigating the laser-cased networks, what would deny the use of radio-based networks.


These newest versions of the WLAN-systems would also store the information inside them, and send them the data with short bursts, what makes very difficult to locate those stations. Laser-based communication has one problem, and It's visibility in infrared systems. And in some cases, the infrared homing missiles can take that system off. But the terrifying threat is those anti-radiation missiles can be used as an assassination weapon. That kind of weapons can be programmed to lock on in the cell phones, what uses some certain SIM-cards. And then those missiles would shoot straight to those targeted persons.


This technology has been created by use in anti-terrorist operations, and the idea of this is that intelligence services would send some SIM-cards to terrorists, and then would some EA-18 "Growler" electronic warfare platform target HARM-missiles to those cell-phones. The reason, why we must be concern about this technology is, that it can be misused.That means somebody might give information about the business competitors SIM-card and then some airplane would shoot that person away. That is one of the terrifying scenarios of that technology.


Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-88_HARM

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_EA-18G_Growler

Picture I

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_EA-18G_Growler


http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-dangers-of-anti-radiation-missiles.html

Why North Korea wants to talk with the west?

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/why-north-korea-wants-to-talk-with-west.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Why Kim Jong Un wants to talk with western world is a question, what is interesting about many people in the East and West. One thing what might make that leader interested to talk with the western world might be that the government of North Korea would notice, that the war might cause military take over or rebellion in that land. Another thing might be those leaders have been understood, that the nuclear strike to other nation would cause nuclear war. And that would be the end of North Korean infrastructure even if those nukes would destroy some cities in the United States.


Those attacks would cause revenge strikes to North Korea and those revenge would cause many deaths in that country, including many members of that government. But there could be one reason, what made the leader of that closed country start talking with the West. That reason could be that North Korean nuclear weapons would not act as they should in the war. Of course, those weapons could destroy civilian targets, but are they sharp enough to destroy military infrastructure like command bunkers and missile silos, what has the key role in the nuclear strike.


And the question is, how many warheads, and how ready to use the North Korean nuclear arsenal is? If those weapons were not tested properly, they might have malfunctions, and if the explosive segments would not work precisely right time, would the effect of nuclear explosion leave much weaker, than predicted or in some cases, those nukes would not even explode. And of course, the war might cause very bad damages for both sides infrastructure and the human sacrifices could be very large scale. And if 50% of people on both side of the war in Korea would die in that conflict, could that be too much even for that leader of North Korea.


https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/ulkomaat/artikkeli/miksi-pohjois-korea-on-yhtakkia-kiinnostunut-neuvottelemaan-kolme-teoriaa-kim-jong-unin-aikeista/6876616#gs.gC49Trg

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/why-north-korea-wants-to-talk-with-west.html

Soon robots would make own decision when they will open the fire

B-52H "Stratofortress"
(Wikipedia)

Kimmo Huosionmaa


Soon airborne combat robots like Predator-drones can make their own decision to open the fire against targets. That system would be most effective in air-combat robots, what are similar than X-47B. Also, it would help to produce flying missile stations like robot versions of B-52 bombers. Those bombers can patrol in years in the atmosphere if there would be fuel supply. And if they would get orders, those planes can attack immediately.  This technology bases the same image recognition system, what is used in many cities.


Image recognition system recognizes the weapons, and then in normal situation calls the security personnel to the positions. But in airborne combat robots, this system would open the fire with missiles and machine guns. Also, the image recognition system allows to track enemy tanks and armored personnel carriers, and then that system would open the fire with laser-guided missiles. In this scenario own troops use the recognition systems, what would send the digital code to those airborne drones, and that helps them to avoid the shoot own military personnel.


But the similar system would be very effective when it is used in early warning satellites. In this case, space-borne ABM (Anti Ballistic Missile) system would be equipped with automatized firing mode. In this case would the early-warning satellite and combat satellite combination orbit around the earth. When the missile launch would be detected, that satellite would use salvo of rocket ammunition against those missiles. The best angle to begin shoot those kinetic-energy rockets is forward to incoming warheads, when the projectile gets best impact energy as possible. Also, the microwave or laser-based systems are probably used in future.


When those warheads or missiles are targeted the microwave band radars, their electronic components would be damaged, and if the core of warhead will be damaged, would it melt in the atmosphere. This would cause that the warhead would not detonate, and radioactive material will be delivered to the area. Of course, that will cause cancer, but for the tactical situation, those radioactive bites do not have influence. The "autonomic" kill mode for those combat robots would, of course, cause reactions against those robots.

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/soon-robots-would-make-own-decision.html

The writing of strike to Syria again

travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/
travellingintimeandspace.wordpress.com/2018/04/17/the-writing-of-strike-to-syria-again/

How hypersonic missiles work?

Boeing X-51 Waverider  is typical HCM
(Hypersonic Cruise Missile) candidate
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Hypersonic missiles are the fastest man-made cruise missiles in the world. The function of those weapons is normally, that ballistic missile would take those weapons to the ballistic trajectory, what allows enough speed, that the hypersonic ramjets would be launched, and those motors would give this missile the speed of Mach 12. But there are many problems with those missiles and USAF X-51 "Waverider" failed, and it couldn't start it hydrogen scramjet-motors in 2012.


The hypersonic cruise missiles are new kind of weapon, what is extremely dangerous even without the nuclear warhead. The kinetic energy of those missiles is extremely high, and if that thing hits any target, would the result be devastating. Also, the defense against those weapons is extremely difficult because the angle of incoming missiles is so variable. The nuclear warhead is of course very devastating things, but the hypersonic missiles are devastating without explosives.


Many states have the similar projects, and the most devastating version of those missiles is the nuclear-powered missile, where the burning process of fuel has been replaced with the nuclear reactor. This missile has extremely high speed and because of its big size, this weapon can cause more destruction than any existed weapon ever before. The hypersonic speed allows using the pressure blast of those weapons as a weapon.


The hypersonic flight allows to use the pressure spire as the weapon, what might make the track anywhere this weapon flies. That would give this devastating cruise missile extreme devastating capacity. The big size nuclear-powered missile can use hydrogen or water as the fuel. In this solution, the fuel would be injected into the reactor, what would give very powerful specific impulse. This kind of nuclear ramjet is not very sharp about the propellant, and the idea of this motor is, that the propellant and high speed would also cool the reactor, while this missile will travel across the airspace.


But the problem of those weapons is radioactive fallout. The radiation of the reactor would change the material, what travels thru the reactor also radioactive. That's the very bad problem with nuclear-powered aircraft. In the Cold War were many projects, where were investigated the use of nuclear power in many roles like in automobiles and aircraft. The best way to use nuclear reactors in aircraft is to use closed-cycle reactors, where the reactor would use to rotate the turbines. And the propellant would be heated by using electric arc. This would not deliver radioactive fallout into the atmosphere. But this is the only rumor and those test planes are highly classified.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear-powered_aircraft

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-95LAL

https://geopoliticalfutures.com/hypersonic-weapons-fit-future-war/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Timberwind

http://knkx.org/post/hypersonic-waverider-failed

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-51_Waverider

Picture 1:

https://img.newatlas.com/waverider-fourth-test.jpg?auto=format%2Ccompress&ch=Width%2CDPR&crop=entropy&fit=crop&h=347&q=60&w=616&s=2352e7434d7b1926023639a604c8a78c

The prize of B-2 "Spirit" bomber is huge by the same reason than SR-71 "Blackbird" prizes are high

B-2 "Spirit"
Picture 1

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The prize of flight-hour of the B-2 "Spirit" bomber is extremely high because those airplanes are unique pieces of military technology. STEALTH-bombers are the most effective and frightened military machines. Those extreme killing-machines are planned by using same philosophy, what is used in the SR-71 "Blackbird" ultra-fast recon plane. STEALTH aircraft are unique designs, what have special fuel and tanker connectors, and they probably have unique airborne refueling aircraft and unique chemical structure of fuel. That means that if somebody steals that aircraft, they would not make anything with it.  B-2 "Spirit" has the capacity to strike its targets with long-range STEALTH-cruise missiles or tactical smart guided nuclear or conventional weapons like GBU-32 bombs and stand-off missiles.

X-47B
(Picture 2)

The truth is that STEALTH-bombers would in some missions wanted to replace with other military systems, what is cheaper, smaller and more effective than those strategic bombers. The problem of strategic bombers is that they are very large, and they need large runways. That's why the enemy could strike against those runways, and they also see if the planes are on the base by using satellites. One of those new style weapon systems is a cruise missile, what can refuel during the flight, and this means that those missiles can cruise independently in an atmosphere, and they can equip with landing gears or those weapons can fly in the cargo-planes if they wanted to return to the base for service.


This gives SAC more capacity to strike against any target on Earth by long distance. The conventional B-52 bomber can shoot those missiles from friendly airspace, and they can be refueled by fighters, what has refueling pack or normal tanker aircraft. And if the strike would be canceled, those missiles can be called back, and they can be returned to the base.


The BGM-109 "Tomahawk" might be launched by the same platforms that are used with BQM-109 drones, and those drones are actually unarmed versions of that cruise missile. Those missiles can also equip with AMRAAM or other air combat sub-missile systems, and that might give them more lethality than ever before. Those ultra modern missiles can be travel to the target by thousands of kilometers, and they can be operated together with another drone like X-47B, what can send real-time recon information about that strike to the commanders of military forces.


That X-47B can also equip with warheads, and if there would be the target, what is important enough, those drones can be used as missiles, what makes the "kamikaze"-attacks against those targets. The new kind of drones can equip with nuclear warheads, or they can drop also nuclear bombs to the target. In this scenario, those nuclear bombs would be exploded inside the drone, or they can drop to the target. So those drones can be used as bombers or missiles, as the commander wants to use them against enemy targets.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman_B-2_Spirit 

https://www.therichest.com/rich-list/most-influential/10-incredible-facts-about-the-b-2-spirit-stealth-bomber/

https://taskandpurpose.com/b-2-spirit-stealth-bomber-specs/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman_X-47B

Picture 1

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ec/B-2_Spirit_%28cropped%29.jpg/1200px-B-2_Spirit_%28cropped%29.jpg

Picture 2

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3d/X-47B_over_coastline.jpg

"Dr. Strangelove" still lives with his doomsday weapons.

TU-22M "Backfire" can easily
transformed as the missile
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There were plans to make so-called "doomsday weapon" in Russia, and this weapon might be 50-100 megaton nuclear powered "torpedo" or underwater drone, what could detonate below sea, and that weapon would cause terrible tsunami, what can risk lives and be very devastating on both sides of the Atlantic or Pacific ocean. There were many rumors about those super powerful nuclear weapons during the  Cold War, and both sides were tested and investigated very powerful weapons like the bomber-sized cruise missiles. Those equipment were actually the strategic bombers, where were installed the fixed nuclear weapon, what might be very devastating.


Those very advanced missiles were patrol like other bombers, but if the order for the nuclear strike comes, those drones would fly to the enemy airspace, and then explode in there. In those massive nuclear missiles would use the same technology, what is used in the normal hydrogen bombs. The size of that kind of nuclear missiles would cause terrible destruction because all body of that giant cruise missile would fill with the lithium, and the nuclear fusion would begin by the normal fission bomb.


Also, there were the rumors that there were the nuclear mines on the Ocean floor. Those extreme powerful underwater nuclear weapons were reserved to kill the enemy ballistic missile submarines in the large area of seas. They would have one big problem. If those nuclear weapons are used, the own nuclear submarines would also destroy by the nuclear blast. Some people think that the super powerful nuclear drone would actually look like some "Akula" or other nuclear submarines.


There are many things, what are not mentioned about those killing machines. in the nuclear submarines have room and power to use even the supercomputers as the "brains" of the next generation robot submarines. Those underwater autonomous robots might not even need the crew, and then those submarines can patrol even the years under Ocean surface, and then attack any target, what is ordered for the destruction. The underwater drones must be connected to the transmitter, and if the transmission will shut down, drone starts to attack against the predicted enemy.


Somebody says that there are mechanisms in all submarines that if the crew is missing from the board, those submarines will detonate all nuclear warheads in the missiles, what is on board. The drone-technology can use in the nuclear submarines much easier than in airplanes because the computing capacity of those vehicles might be much powerful because they have more space than some "Predators", and the nuclear reactor can give the power supply for the supercomputers. and the nuclear reactor can give the power supply for the supercomputers and of course the sophisticated but complicated artificial intelligence needs powerful computers.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tupolev_Tu-22

Picture 1

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/47/Tupolev_Tu-22M-3_taking_off_from_Soltsy-2.jpg/1200px-Tupolev_Tu-22M-3_taking_off_from_Soltsy-2.jpg

The advanced cruise missile systems are the most complicated things in the global operational area

X-37B during tests in  2012
(USAF photo)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The missile is very devastating and feared weapon, even if it doesn’t have the explosive warhead. The kinetic energy is also very devastating if the missile hits against their targets at the speed of  20 000 kilometers per hour. Normally modern military forces use bombers or tactical multirole fighters to carry the nuclear weapons to the targets because the strike can pull back. The missile launch is the end of the negotiations because when the intercontinental ballistic missile is launched the mission could not pull back, and the targets will be destroyed.

That would cost millions of lives because the enemy will make the counterstrike. The dark side of the space shuttle program is that kind of technology, what is used in the space shuttle can be used in the space bombers, what are actually the ICBM-missiles what can return to the base. The space shuttle can be converted to space bomber very easily. The cargo bay of the shuttle can load with the thermonuclear weapon.


Also, the cruise missiles can be formed as the space shuttles, and the new cheap and highly automatized miniature shuttles like X-37B could be the form of the new kind of cruise missiles, what can rise above the atmosphere and if the strike is not needed, can that missile return to the base. Those shuttles can use as the platforms in the many space projects, and one of them is very effective cruise missiles, what can be used in the operations for the national security. The return of those spacecraft can be made with the parachute, and they can also launch by the submarine launch missiles to the low earth orbital, where they can use as the threat for the enemies.


Also, miniature shuttles can collect the ICBM warheads from the orbital trajectory, and that will cause the revolution in the global way to think about the thermonuclear warfare. Those vehicles can also use the tracking devices for the warheads, and they can now strike against the fast-moving targets. Also if the warheads can connect to that space shuttle, those shuttles can help them maneuvers and also rise their altitude, and this way every single warhead has a capability to transfer as a FOBS-weapon.


The problem of the Fractional Orbital Bombardment systems is that those weapons can be hijacked by the space shuttles and also the service for those systems is very difficult. If the FOBS warhead is mounted to the X37B the weapon can be returned to the earth for service. If that operation will be done in the orbital trajectory, would every single telescope on the earth see those actions near the satellite, what is very easy to destroy with ASAT weapons, what can be installed to the Atlas rocket, what can raise that weapon even the highest trajectories, that be can imagine.

Drones and cruise missiles are changing strategic thinking all around the world

Lockheed Desert Hawk III Drone
(U.S Army picture)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This is a writing about new dangers, what cruise missiles will cause to the nations. The miniaturization of the weapon technology will make those missiles little bit different than before. Of course, those missiles have sophisticated artificial intelligence, what controls their flight. But the small size of the computers has made possible to build a very small size but still effective weapons. Those new style cruise missiles are like small drones, but they are equipped with warheads, what can be dangerous almost all main battle tanks.


The example of new very small cruise missiles are weapons what basis their technology to "Desert Hawk III" and "KZO" target drones, what have used also in miniaturized recon planes. Those drones missile versions might send to airborne and they can fly across the battlefield, and when the operators see something important targets they can fly that missile to hit it with High Explosive Anti Tank warhead.


That kind of drones might also have Anti Radiation capacity, so they can be used as an elimination for enemy radio-equipment and if we will see a very scary situation, those miniaturized drones can be used in assassination missions, and those missions can be accomplished like in some action movies. Those operators must only get the location of their target and after that drive the drone against this target.


Modern cruise missiles might be position in any container, and that makes possible to build undercover missile sites and those masked containers might make any ship in the world as a combat ship. Those very far generated weapon systems might be remote controlled, that those ships crew doesn't even know about those weapons until they will be launch.  But modern cruise missiles have more capacities than ever before.


They can send to airborne by normal motorways, with wheels, using helicopters as a launching platforms. In this scenario, the helicopter just raises enough high, that the missile's motor can start and the weapon can begin stable flight when this helicopter drops cruise missile from ropes below it. And of course, those weapons can deliver from any kind of aircraft, what can carry them. Those cruise missiles can be patrol away from bombers, and they can refuel as any other airplane, and they can be returned to their base as other drones.


And in the wildest imaginations, those missiles can fly inside some cargo planes, what is using as a flying aircraft carrier and service platforms to those weapons. So is it possible that some UFO-incidents are actually situations, where some cargo planes operate with drones or cruise missiles? They might release that equipment to airborne, and after the situation is over, they will fly that thing back inside the plane.