Why must we have superiority for other persons every time, when something goes wrong?

https://sites.google.com/view/socialbehaviorsandselesteem/etusivu

http://marxjatalous.blogspot.fi/p/why-must-we-have-superiority-for-other.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are thinking about threats, the weak persons would normally treat to another people. Their purpose is to raise their weak self-esteem and inability to talk with other people about threats and violent behavior. Weak persons are unable to hear critics about themselves, and they are also unable to handle social situations. They are normal persons, who would always want to show their superiority to other people, and that means, they are unable to handle the social situation without looking the object downwards. They are always right in every case, and if they are in superior position for other person, they would show that to everybody. Weak persons are always want to talk with superiority and officials, if they are sometimes feel that they are right. 

People with bad self-esteem always call the boss, because they want only to show how important they are. And who cares about the person, who were responsible for the thing, what caused the violent situations. They want to show, how wealthy they are by using expensive jewelry and clothes. And of course those persons want to hear only things, what pleases them. And if the person, who is the target for hate is not even responsible for the thing, what caused the hate is same to those persons. The first thing, what those users of very expensive clothes make is to call the boss in the situation. 

This is the major problem in the everyday life. We all want to hear something, what we like. And if somebody doesn’t please us, we feel angry and hate. Sometimes I have thought that sometimes we are all those persons in expensive clothes. If some young person would make something wrong, we are lower tolerance level than with adult people. When some youngster yells to us, we would feel angry, and then we think that some 15 years old youngster is bad person. We cannot accept the situation, that some bicyclist would make scratches to our car, because this person just drives the cycle beside of our car. 

We want to call this persons parents and then call the police, who would give punishment to that youngster. But when some other adult makes the same thing to our car, we would accept the offer to repaint that piece of damaged painting. But why we must always be so adult, that we want to get some person in the court, because we want to show superiority for that person? Why we ever tell anything to some person self? Why we always must get authority from some official or superiority person, when we have some problems? The law says that we have not to tell anything to the underage person, but is it easier to give punishments behind the back? About need to be superior for other persons is clearly seen the situation, where some handicapped person makes some jobs. 

We want to see that the work, what this person does is somehow worse than our own work. This is the very interesting situation because the persons who are handicapped makes usually the same missions than so-called ”normal workers”, but their salary is normally extremely low. When some underage person would get punishment, would it be better than this person knows the reason for sending behind the bars? This might be the good thing that the person can change the behavior, but the most interesting way to get punishments is that the person would lock in some room, without telling the reason for that. 

And the learning of behavior needs that the person would know, why the punishment would given. This is the only thing, what makes person to understand where the target of the punishment made wrong movement? The philosophy of punishments is that they would be given for some reason. And when the punished person would know the reason, can this person fix the actions or behavior, and this is impossible if that person would not know the reason for punishment. But if the punishment would be automatically given, would that cause the situation, that this person doesn't even care about the behavior. 

If the punishment would come behaves that person good or bad way, would this person lost the care of the behavior. When I sometimes think about the situation, that the person would get punishment without the reason, would this also be the similar situation, that person would not be told about the reason for punishment. In some protective works the policy is, that if some person would not make the jobs well immediately, when this person came to work, the result would be kicking off. And in those cases the reason for kicks is almost ever mentioned to that person.

https://sites.google.com/view/socialbehaviorsandselesteem/etusivu

http://marxjatalous.blogspot.fi/p/why-must-we-have-superiority-for-other.html

Only things, what we always remember are bad things

(Picture is taken in Finland)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are trying to remember something, we face the thing, what sometimes distorts and dominates the memories, what has been told and written about some things that happen or what claimed to happen. One of those things is the NKVD, and the second one is the GULAG when we are talking as an example about the Soviet Union. And of course that state made also one war crime, it executed thousands of Polish officers in the place, what is known as Katýn.


The brutal crime and mass murder of Polish officers by orders of the Stalin himself with NKVD:s supreme commanders like Yezhov and Beria. I always thought that the real supervisor of those crimes was Beriya because Yezhov was the drug addict and very good choice for the scapegoat and after this crime NKVD:s most unpopular chief was executed by orders of Stalin, who was blamed Yezhov about the crimes, what he was ordered himself.


That way is common when some gangsters are in the courtroom. The main criminals blame their henchmen about the crimes, what they are ordered, and play some kind of angel, and we can think Stalin as the normal criminal, who just had changed to make the very large scale crimes. The demonization of the criminals makes them look like more dangerous than they are. And if we think that Stalin was the head of the gang, what took the all-state as they area, we might be right. Those men who worked in his secret police were nothing more than murderers who worked under the official authority.


Yezhov was suitable for this kind of operations, because of his addiction he was dependent on the injections and another person. And addiction made him very good perfect mask-man for Stalin and his notorious executioners. Yezhov was sadist and brutal man, who was responsible for many things, but he was easily controlled by the men, who gave him opium. And when he was executed, we must say that he was the perfect enemy of the people.


The remarkable thing about this war crime is that Katýn is remembered only because the people, who were shot were officers. After the Second World War the Soviet Union execution many trials against "the enemies of the people" in the Eastern block of Europe, and none of the victims of those trials have ever remembered. This is the question, what sometimes is under the discussions in some circles, what thinks about morality and the people relationship about morale, and we must establish that in sometimes the victims of the Katýn are remembered because they were officers.


When we are talking about the people who made crimes, we must see that every time in the court of law, there will remember only the bad things about the person, who is prosecuted some crime. And in those situations is visible how some persons forget they own role in the fights. Also, we must notice, that there will be also remembered only the last action, about the fights. That is the problem with police and other investigators. They see just the last thing, what is done in that situation. The things what have done before that fight or some other action, what brought the person in the courtroom as the accused of some criminal activity.


There is a principle in the western court system, that person is innocent until the authorities prove that person is guilty. And if somebody is suspected of a crime, that is the thing, what should not tell other persons. The thing, what will tell to some person that the charges might be raised, are that the person's faces very strong bureaucracy in their life. There will be many double checks in every time when this person makes something, and also there will be found many other things like slow reaction if this person is asking for help

Narcissists and living in the community

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The world "narcissism" will come from the Narcissus, the man who fell love in his mirror image. The narcissists lives in the dream world, where they might believe, that they are some kind of medical doctors or something like that. Many narcissists makes the counterfeits of the graduation papers, or they might tell the people, that their wife or husband is dead or mentally ill, even they are not been in married because those people want to manipulate other persons.


And the stories about the mentally ill spouse will make those people look like very sympathetic. This will help them to slip into the target person social network. Those people don't realize that they do nothing wrong if they slap their wife or children if the catering has made wrong way, and the spoon is the wrong side of the saucer.

The making the counterfeit of graduation papers is not very wise. Those papers involve certificates and their authenticity might be checked from the government. So the papers itself means nothing, and the making the unauthorized copies of other person's graduation papers is illegal. Some of the people think, that they can give evictions to other people by sending the counterfeits of the superintendent's companies, and the reason why some people will become suspicious of some letters, is that they will come only when the person's lawyer or owner of the department is somewhere abroad.

In the newspapers is sometimes the stories about narcissism, the very bad mental disorder. The most visible symptom of that mental disorder is the person is unable to see self as the normal person. This kind of person believes that other persons are below this person. And the narcissist believes that everything, what is done by this person is right. If you have narcissist as the neighbor, this person might keep very noisy parties, but when somebody else keeps parties or even cross water in the wrong time, this neighbor will call the superintendent, that the neighbor was keeping noise.


The other thing what makes the investigators suspect the fake is that there will be some letter from the estate agent in the post box. This kind of methodology is the very nice thing to make people sell their departments at the low price. This kind of things are very serious things, and they will cause the criminal investigation. When we are talking about the usual reason for eviction or problems with paying the rents, the most effective reason for denying person's use of bank accounts is mental disorders.

In the mental institute will the personnel take the symptoms of the patient, and the first thing what should make the investigators suspicious about the information, what the witnesses said during the investigation. That process will end in the courtroom, where the judge makes the decision if the person needs to be patronized because of the psychical conditions is there will be only the symptoms what are in some medical book.


Or there will be only those symptoms, what the person puts the reports. There are many symptoms of the mental disorders, what is not very visible. And if the person will have all the symptoms, what are found in some home doctor's book, they might not look like very reliable. When we are saying, that some people "are cold feelings", we must also see how it will accidents to another people. This is the problem when the person will come to tell the lies in the courtroom. In the real world, the symptoms might be very different than normal people believes.


And even if some person has narcissistic personality, there must be found some criminal activity, if this person will be closed to the mental institute. The criminal activity like domestic violence is the evidence of the person's need for psychiatric care. Another way is that the criminal doesn't understand when this person makes a crime. In some cases where graduation papers have been counterfeited, the person who uses those papers doesn't feel that any crimes have been made. This is the real symptom of the narcissistic personality disorder. The narcissist doesn't understand that the action what that person made is wrong.