Total dystopia and the controlling society

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/total-dystopia-and-controlling-society.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Sometimes I have thought about thoughts of dystopia and the control society. Somewhere I read the story about the Earth, and the future, what was not seem very bright. In the system based on the modification of the atmosphere, and there would be always a cloud layer above the cities, what kept them in shadows, and every square millimeter of the city were covered by cement plates, what were denied to make food in that area. Also, the purpose of the clouds was to deny the sunlight in the city areas, because the unauthorized plantages were impossible.


This idea of this book, which name I don't remember was taken from the city walls of medieval time. The purpose of those walls was explained to regular people for defending the citizens, but the real purpose was to control the food supply to the cities. Also, clothes and another kind of stuff must be brought from the countryside.  That kind of asset was also used in the propaganda, where the forests around the city were claimed to be full of bandits, and in the medieval period, there might be persons, who believed, that there were not world outside city gates. And that made people easier to control.


 Outside of the cities were the agricultural societies, what lived in the Medieval time, and the reading the books were not allowed in those societies. All technology would be prohibited and in the cities, the people had all kind of technology, for making their life easier. This separation between those societies, what of course was on the Earth had their mission in the supporting of the leaders of that society. The mission of the "outsiders" or the persons, who are not living in the cities, was to feed the population of the cities, and if there would be rebellion in the cities, would the leader just cut the food supply.


And if there will be the rebellion in the countryside, that rebellion can be crushed by using tanks. Or the leaders can use the so-called soft method and destroy the plantages by using some mushrooms, and of course, the seed corn was sent to the cities for storage. In that book, the hero stole one potato and made clones about it. That sent the leader away from power, this might be some kind of science fiction, but the food supply is the very good thing to control human beings.

Picture I

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/75/16/66/751666ab32ca52f07df66178614037b7.jpg

Why modern China's president have more power than Mao ever had?

Forbidden City Beijing

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Why the president of China has more power than Mao could ever imagine is because of the Internet. That thing what is made for freedom can also be the most dangerous thing in the hands of dictators. That network makes people surveillance possible, and I think that sometimes those undemocratic leaders will follow their orders by surveillance cameras. So by this thing the president of China can see what his men are doing anytime he wants. That man must just click an icon of some surveillance cameras, and he can follow anybody who he wants.

The surveillance equipment what is needed is any device that has an Internet connection like computer or GSM-telephone. That thing where the leader of the state has this kind of surveillance equipment, what can he use to break some person’s privacy is a very new situation for the world. China also might have FOBS (Fractional Orbital Bombardment System) nuclear weapons. Those weapons can launch to Low Earth Orbiter, and there they can be ready for a surprise attack. FOBS- weapons can be launched a couple of weeks before the attack, and then the satellites were in the orbital the final order to begin the attack.


But in the wildest rumors, there are satellites what spends even years at higher orbital, to wait for orders to open fire with nuclear weapons. Those satellites might play space junk or they might be weather satellites, what is equipped with a nuclear weapon, and if they play some weather satellites, that will cover the communication between the satellite and command center.

If authorities put some surveillance application in cell phones that are sold in some nation, could the leader of that nation personally eavesdrop anybody in the state, who has that application in his cell phone? And we must realize that those governments are very authoritarian users of power, and there might be some kind of orders, that cell phone must keep open all the time, because the leader of the state want’s to hear, what his staff members are talking.

That’s why those cell phones that are sold in that country might be equipped with the modified operating system, what allows officials to open any cell phone anytime when they want, and use that thing as a spy equipment. That means that officials want that phone is always in their man hand or pocket, and of course, that equipment will never able to leave even on the table without attention.

That kind of orders makes cell phones more effective surveillance system because it can transmit every world, what in the room is said to an observer. The Internet allows also very large scale information operation, where media, what is free and trust-able in the west, begins to make massive disinformation projects, what mission is to support that state’s leaders own policy.

When we think that some media are safe from false information. That’s not true because there are many things what makes media very effective tool when we are talking about false media, what is protected by highest leaders in the state. Nobody realized when the Internet was created with rules of media, what happened to some states.


The Internet became an ultimate tool also for propaganda. And nobody ever imagined that in the hoax-information background is the governmental actor. If the government supports propagandists that will make the defense against them very dangerous and difficult. Dictatorial governments can censor all attempts to correct false information. The truth of those states is what their leaders want that be.

If somebody fights against this kind of actor, that person could be in danger of political arrested. And if a government is co-operating with those propagandists, they will ever come to any court halls, because those men can avoid any attempt to close their homepages and personal data. That’s why governmental propaganda is more dangerous than we believe.

Have you ever see one interesting thing in this painting "The fall of the Alamo?" (Robert Jenkins Onderdonk,1903)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This is a painting what I saw in one music video on YouTube, and I saw one interesting thing in it. So I started to search what was that paintings name and who did it? This didn't take long, because of the internet, so I must make one confess. I didn't need to travel to the United States, and that's why investigator's work in real life is quite different than in some Indiana Jones movies. Today we can search many things from the Internet, so we must say goodbye for nice trips to warm the State of Texas, and stay in very cold Finland. But let's go back to business and making analyses about this painting, where is one very sarcastic detail. I think that artist who painted this was hidden little notice about communities inequality.


The men who stand on the wall are Texan or Americans, who kicks off Mexicans, who represents something that was below American way of life. But the artist Robert Jenkins Onderdonk, who painted this painting might mean something more than he wants to show how Americans kick off Mexicans. I must say that this man had a very unusual name. In this painting is a part what I could say as the Marxist or socialist way of thinking. There is a message how upper classes of society systematically denies downed social class delegators to rise up in social pyramid. They deny those people's attempts to rise in their world.


The man who stands with the sword is an example of the power of the government. But he is also an example of higher social class people way to invoke a weapon when they defend their rights. Those rights are supported by very expensive universities, what guarantees those men and women high pay jobs inside some firms. But sometimes I think that Onderdonk want's to ask is this really necessary, and I think that his idea of this painting was to show where will way of violence takes all nation. If people can't talk together the route is straight to civil war.


All growing and advancing of society and culture stop if people fight together. Only power what can raise the nation is that people will band together. They must pull one rope to one direction if they want to make something big. Only nations band together can advance and stay strong. And if people kick everything that they don't know back, they will separate from real life. What makes the leadership good, is that those men and women who make decisions can get real information about that, what society really needs. And that's why there is always need for new men and women and new ideas in the government.