Nuclear weapons are the really good tool in international politics

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Nuclear weapons are the most calculated systems in the world. The strike capacity of those weapons is planned by men, who are got Nobel prizes for their scientific honors. And the person who operates those systems is selected the most intelligent process what military systems can ever create. The nuclear weapon is extremely expensive, and the most secure military equipment what mankind ever created. And they are the very good tool to make other nations to listen the owner of those weapons own ideas. If the nation has nuclear weapons, it's very easy to choose diplomatic solutions, if that nation makes something, what is normally prohibited in an international field. This is the reason, why superpowers have this kind of armament.

The new weapons of Russia are really fascinating. They would be very devastating, and some persons have asked, why the western world didn’t do this kind of weapons. The problem of Russian weapon systems is that they are so monstrous. And somebody asked once the good question, can Russian or the Soviet government do anything small. The world’s most devastating nuclear device 50 mt. the weapon can also installed to head of “Sarmat” missile, and there might be also airplanes, where that weapon is internally installed.


Those superweapons have one little problem. Their destruction range is so huge, that they can only use against Washington. If those weapons are used on the battlefield, all troops would be erased in seconds. Another way to use those weapons effectively is just detonated them under the Atlantic or Pacific surface. The underwater explosions would destroy any submarine on the ocean, but the own submarines must be warned about this kind of attack, that they could avoid the pressure wave.


When we are thinking the U.S NAVY’s situation in the South China Sea, we must say that the admirals of the fleet must know the weaknesses about those naval units. And somehow I must say that maybe those ships are decoys for some other actions. The nuclear arsenals of the United States and Russia are basically same. There are two types of weapons, what supports together. The strategic weapons are long-range missiles, what might have many types of warheads. The mobile systems survivability bases, that they are hard to locate before shooting. Fixed systems are easy to locate and they are installed in hardened silos, and their survivability bases the bunker-type solutions. Those systems can be destroyed by seismic warheads, what is penetrating in the ground before the explosion.


Fixed systems are needed for the train the missile troops because this way the political trust of personnel can be diagnosed. And “no wanted” persons like drug users and unstable personnel can cut off the system. The use of those systems as training is safer because the silo-based missiles are harder to steal than highly mobile systems. The ICBM needs two points to flight: the beginning point of flight and target point. And that’s why silo-based ICBM can launch the little bit faster than mobile systems but the time is only marginal. Satellite navigation makes the targeting the systems very fast, and the difference between those systems reaction times is the only couple of seconds.


There is one very big problem by choosing those warheads. Smaller warheads are lighter than big ones, and they can carry more in the head of the missile. Those warheads can be used against any target, what they would need to destroy. The smaller size means that they are harder to destroy than larger. But there is one problem with small warheads. They must hit precisely on target. The bigger warheads are not carried so many in same time, but they would destroy larger areas in same time. If somebody steals those warheads,  the result would be devastating. There is always the possibility of terrorist action against those missiles because those weapons are so wanted thing in the mind of fanatics.  And the problem with the selection of warheads is if the state has the only couple of large yield nuclear warheads, they can destroy easily if they would be located in space or by recon planes. But if those missiles were launched, the ability to destroy them is very low.


Mobile nuclear weapons are extremely hard to locate. But if the weapon is located it’s easy to destroy. All missile systems need fixed bases for security and service duties of those weapons. Also, ICBM’s are assembled in mobile platforms, and submarine-based ballistic missiles are “hard to find, easy to kill” weapons. Tactical nuclear weapons are supporting strategic weapons by destroying enemy troops or aircraft what attacks the missile site. And those weapons are used as “police armament” if the commanders of strategic nuclear weapons are rebellious. There is actually no direct line between tactical or strategic nuclear weapons, and long-range strategic systems can also use to support the situation on the battlefields around the world. One thing what we must notice is that the USA or other western nation would say any world against “Sarmat” missile. So we must say that no nation would uncover their best weapons.

Sources:

Picture 1

http://newstodaypk.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/nuclear-bomb-explosion.jpg

What is MIRV (Multiple independently targetable reentry vehicle)?

W87 Warheads on MIRV-bus
 (Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa People normally ask what actually means term MIRV? The term means that nuclear missile carries many warheads, what it can target to the same point or different locations on the enemy ground. This means that one “Sarmat” missile can destroy one big area or 24 cities around the world. Term MRV (Maneuverable Reentry Vehicle) means normally that nuclear missile carries warheads, what can change their course during flight. This weapon is very devastating, and it can avoid kinetic energy ABM (Anti Ballistic Missile) system. That warhead is equipped with sensors, what notices the incoming ABM-rocket, and then it starts to turn, what makes the direct hit to target very difficult. Intercontinental ballistic missiles would operate many ways, and there would be many advantages in that equipment since 1960’s. Modern missiles are equipped with artificial intelligence, what makes the defense against them difficult. First, the hit to enemy ground would happen that some warheads detonated in orbital trajectory. That would cause damages to radars and other equipment, what are guided those ABM-systems. Also, some of those warheads could probably return to Earth and re-installed to missiles. That makes the threatening with those weapons more effective because those weapons can send to the skies and park over the enemy capital city. And if the war would begin, those weapons can strike with warning time, what takes seconds.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_independently_targetable_reentry_vehicle

Picture 1.

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Usa/Weapons/W87clr.jpg

Huge North Korean tunnels and underground installations are the problems for the national security of South Korea

(Source CNN)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When the North Korea launches their missiles, there is always the risk of the war That’s why those nation leaders trust their tunnels what are more complex and harder than Vietnamese tunnels. Those tunnels are made for the long-term residency if the country will be occupied. They are equipped with vegetable farms and another kind of support, what gives those people the capacity for the long-term resistance and sudden attacks against the enemy troops.


The tunnels of the North Korea are the very complicated threat for the national security of South Korea because the North Korea might be made this kind of structures in the side of South Korea, and those tunnels can be used as the barracks or other military installations. The tunnels of the North Korea are actually very well known for the western intelligence. Even the deep tunnels are quite easy to locate with the VLF (Very Low Frequency) radars, what radio waves will penetrate deep inside the landscape.


Those systems are helpful also when the archeological structures are searching from the orbital trajectory. But the problem of the searching with that equipment in this particular case is that the tunnels are so complex, that anti-bunker nuclear warheads will not destroy entire complex. Those tunnels are probably in many levels, and that makes the strike very complicated thing. If the nuclear strike will be done against those tunnels, that will decrease the nuclear arsenal very much. And another problem is that the highest leaders of that nation will be on the special train, what will move all the time.


There are rumors about that train is special designed machine what is made to stand for the pressure waves what strikes against it, in the case of the detonation. And the train would be also designed as the submarine, what stands the water, what might lead into the tunnel if there will be detonated the nuclear weapon. Those communist leaders are well known for their 007 stuff, and their personal protection weapons are the legendary example, what the power makes to the human.


Those are the rumors about that train, but almost everybody is sure that, in this train is hidden nuclear weapon, for the case that the leader of the North Korea will be surrounded by the hostile troops. And the train is armed with chemical weapons, what can be released by the leader's remote control. The system works that the leader of that country will take the atropine injection from the special box, what is in his pocket, and then the nerve agent will be released in the train or outside it. And even if this would be only the rumor, there are not many men in the North Korea, who will test if they are true.

Drones and cruise missiles are changing strategic thinking all around the world

Lockheed Desert Hawk III Drone
(U.S Army picture)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This is a writing about new dangers, what cruise missiles will cause to the nations. The miniaturization of the weapon technology will make those missiles little bit different than before. Of course, those missiles have sophisticated artificial intelligence, what controls their flight. But the small size of the computers has made possible to build a very small size but still effective weapons. Those new style cruise missiles are like small drones, but they are equipped with warheads, what can be dangerous almost all main battle tanks.


The example of new very small cruise missiles are weapons what basis their technology to "Desert Hawk III" and "KZO" target drones, what have used also in miniaturized recon planes. Those drones missile versions might send to airborne and they can fly across the battlefield, and when the operators see something important targets they can fly that missile to hit it with High Explosive Anti Tank warhead.


That kind of drones might also have Anti Radiation capacity, so they can be used as an elimination for enemy radio-equipment and if we will see a very scary situation, those miniaturized drones can be used in assassination missions, and those missions can be accomplished like in some action movies. Those operators must only get the location of their target and after that drive the drone against this target.


Modern cruise missiles might be position in any container, and that makes possible to build undercover missile sites and those masked containers might make any ship in the world as a combat ship. Those very far generated weapon systems might be remote controlled, that those ships crew doesn't even know about those weapons until they will be launch.  But modern cruise missiles have more capacities than ever before.


They can send to airborne by normal motorways, with wheels, using helicopters as a launching platforms. In this scenario, the helicopter just raises enough high, that the missile's motor can start and the weapon can begin stable flight when this helicopter drops cruise missile from ropes below it. And of course, those weapons can deliver from any kind of aircraft, what can carry them. Those cruise missiles can be patrol away from bombers, and they can refuel as any other airplane, and they can be returned to their base as other drones.


And in the wildest imaginations, those missiles can fly inside some cargo planes, what is using as a flying aircraft carrier and service platforms to those weapons. So is it possible that some UFO-incidents are actually situations, where some cargo planes operate with drones or cruise missiles? They might release that equipment to airborne, and after the situation is over, they will fly that thing back inside the plane.