Radio transmission is the weak point of modern military drones.

 Radio transmission is the weak point of modern military drones. 

The new British military jet-propelled "Hydra 400"quadcopter is an interesting design. 

The new jet-propelled drone is an interesting design. The jet-propelled quadcopter can fly fast. And it can raise more cargo from the ground than electric engine drones. There is a possibility that these kinds of quadcopters can used as "quad autogyros". 

In those designs, the quadcopters use their quad rotors for lift-off and landing. During a long-distance flight. The drone can use free-rotation propellers and a jet engine. And that thing makes those drones fast. 

Those drones can used as kamikaze drones. Or they can launch missiles like Javelins if they are connected to them. The kamikaze quadcopters are interesting tools because they can observe the area. And if there are no targets those drones can return to base. 

But if there are some kind of targets the drone can make it's surveillance mission and then attack targets when their flight time ends. The drones can use an image-recognition homing system that allows them to take out targets with very high accuracy. 

Above Hydra-drone. 

The military is interested in independently operating drones is that those drones don't require full-time communication between the drone and HQ. The Ukraine war shows how dangerous full-time radio communication is. If the electronic intelligence finds the transmitter, the enemy can turn every cannon against those command centers. So the kamikaze-recon drone can transmit data to the command center and then dive against the target. And that helps to hide the place of the command system. 

The full-time operating radio transmissions are dangerous for drone swarms. The drone swarm where hundreds of members is a suitable target for large anti-aircraft missiles or AA grenades. Similar ELINT systems that are used for track radio transmitters also aim AA cannons at those drone swarms. High-power radio waves can jam the data communication in that drone swarm. 

Those missiles could equipped with a similar homing system as HARM (High-speed Anti Radiation missiles). The HARM-type missiles are also deadly against any radio transmitters. 

Normally HARM is shot from the aircraft. Portable shoulder-launched Stinger missiles also have a so-called "Anti-radiation variant" called Stinger ARM (Anti-Radiation Missiles) that can detect and destroy enemy radiation sources. That makes radio telephones missile magnets if the enemy can track their positions by using radio detectors. 

But there is the possibility that those missiles can be mounted on rocket launchers or warships. Warships can also use those missiles against enemy surface combat unit's radars. And that means the artillery rockets and grenades can have a warhead that can detect radio transmitters. 

https://interestingengineering.com/military/british-army-jet-propelled-drones

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autogyro

The thoughts about the song "In the year 2525" part II (Microchip, what allows to click straight in the net)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are thinking about the song "The Year 2525", we can imagine that maybe tomorrow in our society might put GSM-data implants to a human head, and that kind of systems allows the people of tomorrow to click themselves inside the Internet, without using visible computers.  Those WLAN-microchips might have the decoder, what would change the data that form, that it can be used to control computers and in another way, the human brains would understand that data. In this case, the implanted microchips can allow us to use remote cameras or any database, where that person has access. This kind of equipment can allow making the "modern shaman", who can click the mind to the Internet, and it allows this person communicate with electronic devices by using EEG-transmission. Those micro chips could be the most dangerous invention in human history.


Implanted Microchips would allow following any thoughts and actions, what we do, and that would be the top invention of "Orwellian control society". This kind of systems is introduced in some SciFi-books, where the person is allowed to click inside Internet, without any visible computers. That could be possible by using implanted WLAN-microchips, what is set in the brains after the birth. Why is this technology so fascinating? It allows us to increase our body and mind to the machine, what would become our second body.  But we don't always realize the risks of that technology.


Memories what would transfer from robots would be our own, and if somebody would hack that system, would it cause the situation, where somebody can make murder and put that to some other person's fault. In this case, the criminal would simply collect the own EEG during the crime and transfer the brain waves to other person's brain core. Only thing, what that criminal must avoid, is to think his own name. And then this person can record the EEG, and transfer that to some other man or woman brain core.  That kind of systems is investigating in real life because the brain core controlled robots would be very useful in many missions.


Those robots would look like humans, and they would be controlled by thoughts, what means that the electric operands in the human brain would send by decoder thru the Internet. And the opposite way the robot would send the feedback from its cameras and other sensors straight to controller's brain core. The sense of touch would make by using piezoelectric crystals, what would send the sense to robots computer, and that robot would send that information to controller's brains. That kind of equipment allows controlling robots in very dangerous missions.

Below:

The link to that song

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yesyhQkYrQM

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-thoughts-about-song-in-year-2525.html

A relationship between social and printed media

Kimmo Huosionmaa


When we are talking about trusted media, we must say that of course printed newspapers are very high ranking and professional way to make media, but in some cases that thing have been caused even genocides. The problem is that some dictators are used printed newspaper against their political oppositions. In those cases, the "faked news" are caused the persecutions and violence against persons, who have talked against the dictators. This is one way to say, that many times dangerous is use trusted media for getting power in the state. I mean here, that also printed media can be used as developing the faked news and lies for people.


And this kind of misuse of media is always very dangerous because people are always trusted the media. But when we are thinking about social media, what is very unreliable, we must see one thing. When we are walking on the street, we don't have to look Facebook all the time. And we can remove that application from the telephones. That means we can just watch that thing couple of times per day. And the problem with social media is of course that if the people would use that thing, they might uncover very big secrets, or what do you think that somebody would publish the images from the house, where is guns on the wall. That kind of things is very bad for public safety.


But when we are thinking the role of social media, we must not stare that all the time, and when we are talking about the use of social media, those applications are meant to use together. So the all writings should be published in WordPress or Blogger, and then the links can be shared on Facebook etc. If we are thinking about working day and social media, we must say that the time for social media can leave outside the working day, if that feels disturbing. But the use of social media sometimes uncovers the little secrets, like that some worker, who is claimed to be an engineer has no training or education at all.


This might cause the little bit embarrassing situation if some team leader has been played an engineer, and then the dirty secret would be uncovered. In that case, somebody might want to ask, "why that person has not done anything".  And of course, if somebody writes bullshit or prosecutes somebody without evidence, can this person take to court. This is one very complicated question of social media. Superiority has right to deny the use of social media in working time, but if there find the things that are illegal, that would make possible to prosecute this person in the courtroom.


Nobody wants to be the asshole in the eyes of the family, and that would be a reason why some directors are wanted to deny the use of social media. But sometimes the reason for denying the social media is more complicated. There are cases that some other reasons were behind the blocking the social media, and one of them is, that worker keeps sick leave, but then there would be the picture, where this person sits on the terrace and drinks beer. That would be little embarrassing thing.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/about-relationship-about-social-and.html

If you feel that somebody is dangerous for the public security call the police

Kimmo Huosionmaa

I have made writing job as a freelancer or regular writer so long time, that I have got almost every kind of feedback in my life. I know what I write on the Internet, and I know what kind of pictures I have put in there. And if there is some kind of, problems call the police. The police is a right authority to inform when somebody is dangerous. If you feel that somebody will be the danger for public security call the officials immediately, please don’t wait a couple of days for the phone call, because those people can be dangerous.


Police make analyzes about that page, and then they will send the patrol to the place, what has the right equipment for that kind of situation. For closing the homepage is not enough that one person will make the report about them. Those pages must involve some racist or violent material. And if the writer gets bad feedback, he will learn to see what kind of situations are connected with that feedback.


But when we are talking about the situation, where those pages have been scared to somebody. When we are talking about homepages, there are many homepages in the world, what involves very scary things. But when you want to remove those pages from the Internet, you should report those things to the right authorities. And like one porn star sometimes said, if you don't like this material, just don't look. We are all adult persons, and if there is something problematic stuff in those homepages, we must call the real authorities. If there is something illegal, those authorities will close those homepages.  I don’t care anything about that. Sometimes some people are scared about homepages and texts, because they are given bad feedback to those homepages.


When somebody dislikes those text, what I write or the pictures what I put in there, I must say that those people can say, the word “dislike". When somebody writes feedback in that system, they should know, that when they begin to write those stuff and many writers always read them. And if there is some information or references to the things that are not mentioned to the public. And do you know that there are many homepages in the world, what is full of weapons?



The methods what authorities use in the violent situations are different. The school system the teachers use their authority as an older person. Those methods what the teacher uses are mentioned to use the underage person, who has no experience about life. Those methods are not suitable for handle adult people. The basics of communication between adult people are able to give another person a chance to say his or her opinion about the things. Police have weapons because that equipment gives normal people the honorable reason to surrender, but of course, the police guns are made for the bad situation.