Writing about religion and opinions

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Sometimes we are facing the newspaper article, where is mentioned, that somebody is atheist. And this kind of news is probably meant for giving the people some kind of picture of that person's opinions. What does the opinion of religion and god influences of other work of that person, is the thing that I don't sometimes understand. When we are talking about religion, we are talking about the thing, when people believe, or they do not believe in something. Religion is a myth, what is visible in every city in the Western world, or in the countries, what has not the officially atheistic government, what would deny any religious signs. 

When we are thinking about the God, I'm sure that this creature would not live in my neighbor. And I ever met this thing, so I must say that if there is no proof the existence of the god, we must proudly say that we believe or we would not believe that thing. And believing in something, what can change many times during the day. We have all confessed our Christian religion in the church, but do we really believe in that thing? 

This is the thing, what everybody knows in the mind or heart, what term we would want to use about that thing, where we deeply handle things, what is important to us. When people are young, the things like religion are not very important for them, but at the end of the life, those things like the existence of the God would become more important. And at the final end at the time of death, the human want to believe that something is waiting for that person because that makes things easier to stand. 

But religion and atheism are good weapons in the attack against some other persons because there are no right opinions about those things. When that targeted person tries to defend self, would that cause only more critiques and even hate against that person, because there is no way to defend the right way. Every time when this person tries to say something, would that hurt somebody very deep opinion and feelings about religion. 

Or if the defense bases the religion is the real thing, that would be justified as a pseudoscience. But how this is possible, that our person never please other persons in the society. The answer is simpler as you might think, my dear readers, there are three groups of attackers. One is the team, what leads the attack, and other teams, what have the opinion that religion is true, and another has the opinion, that religion is false. 

This action would sometimes boost with programs, where some private detective claims, that somebody, who has the same background than this targeted person is some pedophile. That sounds good in the media. The harassment is also very often used the method in this kind of things, where somebody would be wanted to smoke out of the workplace. Personal opinions about religion are everybody's own business. That is the thing, what would not be seen in the normal life. 

Do you want to be famous?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are talking about famous people, we will normally think that people are born as famous. That is not true. Or of course, there are a very famous people, who are very popular and famous, because they are born in the famous families. But when we are talking about social media or something like that, we can say that many people are more famous as they believe, and if somebody wants to say that social media has no effect, I must say those people are wrong.


If some blogger or whatever they are doesn't mean anything, why those people who so hate those people must interview the persons like the commander in chief of the military forces. When are we talking about persons who mean nothing, why we see sometimes very aggressive writing against those people? When people are living in the modern world they must understand that we all have opinions, and when I'm writing something, I must not accept those writings by my daddy.


But when we are talking about some journalistic "pranks", we will see in some comments or in some kind of published news the little things, what makes us believe that those journalists use some "dirty tricks" when they are making their stories. In those stories was seen, that those people have got some passwords in their hands, what is used in some employment services. And do you know that is a crime? And the memberships of the sex clubs and another kind of that societies are normally confidential if those societies say that they are confidential.


And also salmonella and AIDS- tests are confidential if some club member has been given those papers to the media, and that test is actually free. When we are talking about taking care and sense of responsibility about the people, we must say, that many people make love in the real life.  That is what the normal people do together. Also, the information of the incompetent person is confidential. So in the real world, the delivering that kind of information will sometimes cause the prosecution process. If somebody misunderstands that their neighbor is the person, who is incompetent, that would cause the very big refund, when that makes trouble for that person's businesses.


But when we are writing something, it doesn't mean that somebody must always cry, when those people are writing their texts. There is a little thing, what the media makers usually didn't see before social media. That was the texts where reporters and other journalists were criticized. They were the persons, who wrote what they wanted, and if some things were not accessible for those people, the things just changed for satisfying. And many journalists used the term "many people" in their stories, what represented only single person's opinion of those things. That's why we must say, that social media has been changing the role of media forever.