A relationship between social and printed media

Kimmo Huosionmaa


When we are talking about trusted media, we must say that of course printed newspapers are very high ranking and professional way to make media, but in some cases that thing have been caused even genocides. The problem is that some dictators are used printed newspaper against their political oppositions. In those cases, the "faked news" are caused the persecutions and violence against persons, who have talked against the dictators. This is one way to say, that many times dangerous is use trusted media for getting power in the state. I mean here, that also printed media can be used as developing the faked news and lies for people.


And this kind of misuse of media is always very dangerous because people are always trusted the media. But when we are thinking about social media, what is very unreliable, we must see one thing. When we are walking on the street, we don't have to look Facebook all the time. And we can remove that application from the telephones. That means we can just watch that thing couple of times per day. And the problem with social media is of course that if the people would use that thing, they might uncover very big secrets, or what do you think that somebody would publish the images from the house, where is guns on the wall. That kind of things is very bad for public safety.


But when we are thinking the role of social media, we must not stare that all the time, and when we are talking about the use of social media, those applications are meant to use together. So the all writings should be published in WordPress or Blogger, and then the links can be shared on Facebook etc. If we are thinking about working day and social media, we must say that the time for social media can leave outside the working day, if that feels disturbing. But the use of social media sometimes uncovers the little secrets, like that some worker, who is claimed to be an engineer has no training or education at all.


This might cause the little bit embarrassing situation if some team leader has been played an engineer, and then the dirty secret would be uncovered. In that case, somebody might want to ask, "why that person has not done anything".  And of course, if somebody writes bullshit or prosecutes somebody without evidence, can this person take to court. This is one very complicated question of social media. Superiority has right to deny the use of social media in working time, but if there find the things that are illegal, that would make possible to prosecute this person in the courtroom.


Nobody wants to be the asshole in the eyes of the family, and that would be a reason why some directors are wanted to deny the use of social media. But sometimes the reason for denying the social media is more complicated. There are cases that some other reasons were behind the blocking the social media, and one of them is, that worker keeps sick leave, but then there would be the picture, where this person sits on the terrace and drinks beer. That would be little embarrassing thing.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.fi/p/about-relationship-about-social-and.html

Happy Halloween and the writing about conspiracies

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/conspiraciesandcomissions/etusivu

When we are talking about conspiracies, we want to think that those theories are the hoax. But in real life, there are many things, what will rise those theories, and one of those things is of course media. Media is a very strong tool in the hand of people, who controls it. And when we are talking about some of the most well-known actions, what will find in history, we must say that those cases might be clear, if they were ordinary crimes. But what causes the real mess in those cases, is that there were many commissions, what mission was to find the truth. And as we might see, those commissions have a different kind of opinions about those cases.


And then we will see, what the public media does. It takes the report what feels the most comfortable in that situation, and after that, all parts of the truth are hiding. People who have different opinions will be yell to silent, and they will stamp as mentally ill. If somebody has the different kind of opinions than reporter has this time, the media is full of stories how silly somebody is, and how he or she slipped of the army. I sometimes ask what have those things to do with some conspiracy theories?


In this case, I use Kennedy's murder as an example a case where two commissions took two different kinds of question, who murders John F. Kennedy? The most notable thing with those commissions is that the first commission "The Warren Commission" what was set by Lyndon B. Johnson was sitting just after that case, and some people think that they were afraid the bullets. That commission spokesman was the member of the Supreme Court of the United States of America Earl Warren, and that's why that commission is called as "Warren's commission".


The second commission, The United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HCSA) what set in 1970's had editorialized that there MIGHT BE conspiracy behind Kennedy's assassination. Some people think that that commission's work had the strong attitude to show people there were a conspiracy behind Kennedy's case  And those words are what was under the microscope in media. In this time all commission work was under very sharp monitoring, and somebody in the media took an attitude, that the second commission was not agreed with the report.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_on_Assassinations


Somebody was thinking that in Warren's report words "The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large" were mentioned as a command what people must believe that report, but we must remember, that the commission was set one week after the murder of Kennedy, so they might be very afraid, and one thing rises above all. Members of that commission had very strong authority in America's society, so that was a very strong booster for that commission report trustworthiness.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Commission

And people want to believe, that judges of the supreme court are above every political question and they don't have opinions on this kind of questions like national rights etc or they have nothing to hide in their past. There is one sarcastic assertion about judge Warren. That assertion was that particular judge took a part of some black person abuse, but there is that kind of asserts around all judges. But those are only philosophical thinking's and I can say that I ever could proof that Warren was kicked some black person to die in his youngish.


So those assertions can leave at their own price. Many prisoners are talking about those stories, and if somebody will sit in the death row, he might do anything to get out of that place. So it's easy to start to tell stories about the judges who had to make crimes, to buy freedom from that place. And that decreases those testimonies rank in the court system. But this is a case where is written many books and many stories have been told.