About conflicts in Middle-East and use of under-age combatants

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

One very traumatic thing in the Middle-East conflict is using children as soldiers in those conflicts. When ISIS or some other terrorist organization would deliver their propaganda, they introduce under-age persons, who are armed with assault rifles. And that version is probably in use at another side. The sultan's personal soldiers, Janissary have chosen in very young age, in Ottoman's Empire, and those warriors tradition have been transferred to modern Emir's special forces in Oman and other Middle-East countries.


There is one very interesting transformation about the Janissary training. The Sultan of Turkey claimed to those persons, that their parents were Christians, who have delivered their children as slaves to Sultan. That guaranteed the loyalty and hate against Christianity of those troops, what was known as their fanaticism and brave in the battle. The modern version of that political training could be that there would be that the children whose parents have been dead claimed that the terrorists or Islamic terrorists have caused the death of those persons, and that can cause hate for rest of that child's life.


Hate makes them the good target for the special forces recruiters, and if the death caused by the terrorist attack, would that increase the hate. In this version, the real reason for the death of those parents could be driven in drunk or overdose of heroin. The story, what will be told about that incident could motivate that person to take recruiting in some special units or mercenary companies could be surer than without that kind of motivator.  Have you ever thought that maybe somebody would guide the laser-guided bombs against civilians on purpose?


One of the most important purposes of showing child combatants is provoking the opponent to open the fire against targets, where are children. And then introducing those victims, would that terrorist organization want to get people sympathized their side. Smart weapons are very effective against tanks and hardened shelters. The use of those weapons is that the laser-guided bombs would be pointed to target, what is marked by the laser designator. The designator can be installed to the aircraft or it can use the operator, who might sit on the ground and point the laser designator to the target.


That person can be the regular combatant, special forces operator or agent. The use of those weapons has become more common because they give aircraft very effective tank busting capacity, and they help avoid the civilian casualties. But if the laser-guided weapon is targeted to the civilians, would the result be more deadly than making this strike by normal free-fall bombs. Sometimes smart weapons are criticized because they allow the assassination missions, where is used aircraft.



But the answer to critics has been that behind it is Russia or the Soviet Union, what wants to deny those bombs because they danger the tank-base tactics. But that might be only the propaganda of the CIA. And today is created very small size (1-10 kg) guided bombs, what can destroy any tank or cannon on the ground. And they can be used by F-15 or other fast attack aircraft, and they are created to replace cluster bombs in those anti-tank missions.

Working life is not self-evident and kicks off from work doesn't mean the end of the life.

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/working-life-is-not-self-evident-and.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Racism is always mentioned as the European phenomenon, but this is not true. There is racism also among other ethnic groups like Arabs and Black Africans. Also between African tribes like Hutu and Tutsi. When we are talking about slavery, we always forget that hunting of the slaves was handle by Arabs and members of black tribes, who sold people to European slave markets for getting guns and other weapons. When slavery was officially prohibited in 19th. century, transferred European businessmen their cotton plantages to Africa, and that was, of course, needed men, who have guarded those places. The hate between Hutu and Tutsi is from that age because owners of the cotton plantages used another of those tribes for guarding the slaves.



That was because Europeans didn't want anybody knows, what was going on in those places, what could be called as near slavery. Slavery was officially prohibited because priests were justified the trade of humans very clear, but the slavery continued everywhere, where public eye didn't look. Europeans choose the tribe, what was used as guards, by using one method: they must be the minority in their area. That made them addicted to European firearms, and this was caused hate between people of Africa. Those plantages were like some concentration camps, and everywhere were only black persons, who worked in there. The guns were explained to be against predators, and if somebody would become suspicious, could that person shot and left to savanna, where scavengers would terminate the body in a couple of hours. We are living in the world, where every man should be free, and we wish to believe that the time of slavery would be over. But there is still marketplaces, where people are sold for work without payments. And now we are not talking about sex-slaves. There are a million of people in the world, who are working as the cleaners and other works, but they ever see their payments.


In some cases, the payment would go to those workers parents, and those workers would not even see their homes. Those parents have sold their children to the factories to get more money, and the under-aged worker's payroll goes to the pockets of the parents, who might live hundreds of kilometers away from that factory. There are also cases, where the company pays payments, but the money would get back to the pockets of the company owners.  In those cases, the employer says, that they would pay payments, but the worker should live in some "hotel", and then all money goes to living. The idea of this kind of slavery is that the company takes their workers only from some "hotels", what are actually some warehouses, and then the rent of those places would get all the money, what that company paid. It's sometimes kept by the bosses of the company, but sometimes the keeper of those hotels is some labor union guy, who might be the cousin of the owner of that company. Also sometimes the payroll would get back to the pockets of company owners by the very nasty way. The owner or work leader of the company tells that employee have made damages in the work, and then the company can ask payment for those destroyed stuff.


This has been the fate of some young workers even in the Western world.  But there is one model of slavery, what we might see everywhere. That is the psychiatric patients and handicapped people rehabilitation work. Those works are usually very dirty, and nobody wants to do them. And the payments of those works are poor, and they are under-ranked. Sometimes the attitude of those workers is, that their work is so bad, that they would need any payments. Also, their work has been delayed more often than normal workers, even if the quality of the work has been the same. The slavery, where payments would go to the pockets of the parents is the thing, what happens also in the western countries. In some cases, alcoholism or narcomaniacs would send their children for cleaning the roofs or delivering newspapers for getting drugs or alcohol. And those children even get food at home.


There is connecting the question of social media. When some employer claims that person would be kicked off because of the writings in social media, and if those writings were not made,  that person would be kept in the workplace. But this thing is a little bit suspicious. Is it really so, that the employer would be kept the worker in the work if this person would leave the social media? if the employer has isolated the worker, they would ever be allowed those workers to stay in their places. And if the employee writes to social media, would the kicks off be more easy that if that person would be quiet. There are people who claims that it would be easier to keep the mouth shut, but then I must ask one question: would it really easier to keep the mouth shut? And when we are thinking about the situation, that employee has been kicked off, why must that person hide those things?


I have had many work relationships what have been cut for many reasons, and I would say that I'm not an easy person, who just wants to comply everything, what the boss wants. And that have caused problems for me, but when I'm thinking about those situations, that some proud man has said that I'm not suitable in their workplace, I must say that kicks off have been easier than if I was not written about this stories. Sometimes those bosses have not dared to say everything, what they wanted. And the kicks have been coming anyway, so, why should I feel that this situation is some kind of "stigma" for me? If that is the stigma for some work instructor, that is that person's problem, not mine. This has been the nice morning to think about those things and let's go to face the new day and new challenges.

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/working-life-is-not-self-evident-and.html

Why somebody hates artists and especially painters?

"Scream" Edvard Munch
1893
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

All of us have different opinions, about the art. And we will not normally shoot those artists because of their work. If somebody will send artists to prisons because they paintings will not satisfy those persons, that will wake the investigators interested in those works. The reason for arresting of somebody because of some paintings seems quite small and strange for our democratic society. And if the painting is some kind of the political manifest, we must ask what makes it the political manifest?


Why the picture cause reaction, that some police-officers will come to artists home with sub-machine guns. Are those pictures some kind of danger for national security, and another question is, what means term "national security?". Is that the security of military industry? Or is it the national leader's personal security? And are the arrests made for hiding some leaders personal secrets, that they were in some places, where they were not? When we are observing person like Lev Trotsky, we must understand that this person was in New York during the Russian revolution in 1917.



And when we are thinking about the connection between Trotsky's place, where he stayed during the revolution and hate him, we must consider that maybe the reason for killing that man was, that somebody else was claimed, that he was with Trotsky in some very important place, and when Trotsky was in New York, that story was uncovered the lie. So did that revolution began too early, that the persons would not be in right places when the operation began. The revolution began too early in St. Petersburg, and the front was opposite direction, to what was planned. Maybe the leaders of the revolution thought that they will start to attack the Pacific coast of Russia to St. Petersburg and Moscow.

But the plans were not working because the people would start to hit the winter palace, and that caused the situation, that some key leaders were in wrong place.  And Lenin arrived in St. Petersburg after the revolution happened in that town. There was no evidence that Stalin ever was at the front, and he just claimed that he was the political prisoner. And the evidence was the prison card, what could be made by Okhrana, the Tsar's political police. And if Stalin was the agent of that organization, would that man be in trouble. He just claimed that he was the metal worker, who was the member of "secret communist cell".


But when we are looking about the "purges" what was me by him, this thing would get the different meaning, because GPU:s terror was targeted to metal industry and engineers who worked in there. So was Stalin hiding his past of the Okhrana's agent? This would explain, why this man hated those engineers. Because if Stalin ever was talked to real metal engineer about the things, what happened in the factory, this man would catch by lie, because if he was Okhrana's agent would this man know anything about the work in metal industry, and he would not know about the missions of the men, who work in there. And that would uncover the dirty secret about the man, what would cause death to him.


 When we are thinking of some portraits we must understand that if there were the landscape where some great battle was to happen, and some leader doesn't remember that or this person remembers a wrong place, that would be very destructive for the reputation of that person. Those leaders of the revolutions might make about the personal glories around them, and that's why they are so sharp about their reputation. And in the case of the Russian revolution, might be some fakes in those votes, about the leadership of the state.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Trotsky

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purges_of_the_Communist_Party_of_the_Soviet_Union

Picture 1

https://www.rotadisi.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Munch-scream-Oslo.jpg

Why somebody hates Christmas?

Picture Internet

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Do you know that most of the hate is a learned part of the human life? When human will face simultaneous disappointing cause the hate against some things, other people normally love those things, but this particular person starts to hate those things. Normally people love holidays and parties, but in some situations, some people will begin to hate those things.


The question what connects to that thing is that some persons are work-addicts. They are persons, who have got positive feedback only from their working life, and that thing makes those "super bosses" who never be at holidays. Those persons are living only for their workplaces because they ever get positive feedback from their private life.


This is a psychological-philosophical writing, and all connections with real characters are fictional. So I try to be not hurt anybody with this writing.  Somebody hates Christmas songs, and that might cause dangerous situations in the real life? The hate against those sings grows, when some people feel Christmas as some kind of uncomfortable thing, they begin to hate that celebration.


Do you know, that there are a people in the world, who hate parties? Those people are some kind of abuse when they are been in parties, and after that those people will begin to hate the things that are funny for other persons. If some particular person meets the only abusive behavior in those parties, he or she lost able to like them.


The abusive and trashing behavior against some member of the society is a very good way to start the process, what might cost some lives in the future. But let's go back to the beginning of the text. Why can that Christmas music cause terrible unfold in some shopping center? The reason for that very aggressive reaction is PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder). If very young people face aggression in the Christmas, the event will store in his mind.


After that, there will be things, what keeps that person out of troubles. But when that thing removes from the person's life, might happen the thing, what we don't want to face. That reason for life and what was filled that person's life might be husband or wife who dies and the sadness and repressed feelings might come to the surface of that person.

Risks of modern computing

Kimmo Huosionmaa

What is a threat to quantum computers? Those machines are so fast to handle calculations that, they can break almost every code in the world, and that makes ultra-fast computers very dangerous in wrong hands. The problem with secrecy and confidentially in the net is that every secrecy system is made with computers, what is possible in that time. And that’s why all security solutions need to be updated simultaneously.

If those algorithm is getting old, the information what it hires will become available for hackers. And modern computers might be very fast. If their processors will be used in liquid nitrogen, they will become superconducting. That means there will be no resistance in the system, and that’s why those computers are really fast. Same way ultra-small components make possible to make very powerful small size computers.

A nanotechnology is a powerful tool for computer technology. It allows the engineers to build an atomic size component. The nano technical transistor might consist of three atoms, what formulates stand, collector, and emitter in atom size. And of course, the artificial intelligence is a strong component in computing. If we can create an artificial intelligence, what can generate own ideas, and what can use imagination and have feelings, that makes computers dangerous because feelings make them feel hate.


But the most dangerous things of artificial intelligence is that they will be conscious of themselves. That might happen a situation, where machines will rebel. The power of the robots is that they have no feelings and that's why they are ideal to work in military use. But if robots have feelings they might become very dangerous. Have you ever imagine, what if some engineer uploads program, what simulates feelings in some Predator UCAV's (Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle) main computer? Can you imagine, if that computer-controlled killing machine will feel anger against some target? This situation might be so terrible, that I don't think it with pleasure.


Normal computers don't have imagination, but if we connect neuron cells to the microprocessor, the computer might become surprisingly working tool. In those test will the neurons connect to microprocessors, and the reason for that kind of test is to test computers, what can really think. Those neurocomputers can do same things than living organisms. The problem of those machines in to feed those cells, what communicates with the inorganic microchip with electric signals. That will make computers a skill to produce new things. And those things are of course interested in the people, who make UCAVs.


Those intelligent UCAV's might equip with the computer, what microchip is boosted with dragonfly's or other bugs neuron cells, what might give their extreme air combat capacity, what normal UCAVs doesn't have. The normal computer makes only moves, what are programmed in that system, and when enemy learns those  UCAV's movements, they would become easy to drop. But those biologically boosted microchips can able to give those robots a capacity to make surprising actions. And if that technology goes to wrong hands, could that cause terrible things.

"Loving Vincent" will have same old theme what makes investigators believe that something was not right

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There will be a new masterpiece of animation called "Loving Vincent" from 2016, and that have been dawn by style what used by famous artist Vincent van Gogh during his life. This artist died tragically by his own hand, and that's one of the saddest stories of the world. I saw the trailer for this movie in the net, and the website what I used was YouTube as you might guess.In this trailer was on retort, what made me write this essay to the Internet. It went like this "all village hated that man", and this kind of things make investigators think that something was wrong in that community. And the question of Vincent van Gogh's life did community drove that man into suicide or did he brutally murdered by some people who could not accept his work or personality. Or did Vincent make some false paintings and dealers who sold them brutally murder him?



Even if some person is strange or he wants to be lonely rider all of his life, doesn't cause anger in all community. I mean that everybody doesn't care if people are someway different than other members of the community. When people face pure hate all around him he will collapse. And the sad thing about this is those persons like Vincent van Gogh are sensitive. Artist is never so-called "easy person", but they are very sensitive and deeply feel persons who want to create something unique. And anger what some artists face will be hurt them, and it can drive them to suicide.


In this case, I mean that hate is not spontaneous if the target for hate didn't do nothing bad for people. Those very large scale anger cases where everybody hates somebody reason is normally most disgusting thing what people can imagine. Somebody might claim that some lonely man made murder or something like that, to rise anger of every person against some poor man. Some of those cases reason of hate were that somebody puts his or her own crimes on this kind of man shoulder. And after that, they will agitate people against one member of the community.


I know that Van Gogh was in mental institute or hospital, and if somebody was claiming that this artist was some kind of monster could he cause anger against that man. This is a reason why the staff of those institutes must keep them mouths locked. If somebody just says that people like Vincent were in a closed hospital, they could cause something terrible. The mental hospital patient is a good target for blaming that person crimes what they couldn't even make. And in this kind of cases where all village hates somebody should the investigator think that people are agitated or even forced to hate some member of the community.


This is how some leaders of criminals work. They agitate people against some people who are different than others. After that, they say if somebody doesn't want to take a part of actions against this person they won't get free tennis-tickets. This is how works people who buy friends, and collective hate is thing what brings criminal polices investigators in the community. When somebody will burn of trolling will he get very long discussion in the police stations interrogation room with a couple of detectives? In this kind of discussion is an idea that all information of crime will go to hands of law enforcement officials. So what makes the investigation begin? Collective and spontaneous hate what is filled all community. And the question is why nobody defends this man? Movie is good animation which technique is following drawing method  what is used by Vincent van Gogh

Link to that trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47h6pQ6StCk