Writing about the warming of the atmosphere.

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/warmingoftheatmosphere/etusivu

The climate changing is not the positive advantage to Africa. But does anybody know what that might do to the Netherlands, Great Britain, Denmark and of course to the areas in the USA and Asia which are in the same kind of position, like similar areas in Europe? We saw that kind of destruction in the St.Louis when hurricane Katrina hits against it in the year 2005. That hurricane caused very big damages, and the changing of the climate might cause the situation, where those tropical hurricanes will come to the northern areas, where they will cause problems for ships and other infrastructure.


When we are talking about weather modification, we must realize that will not happen by the purpose. But when we are looking for the financial and political aspect of that phenomenon, we must realize that will favor Northern states and that will grow the northern states like the USA and Europe influence to the African states. There is one very simple way to modify the weather all around our planet. That is to spray chemicals like CFC to the outer atmosphere. Another way is to cover all of the Earth with clouds.


Only need to do is increase particles in the atmosphere to increase cloud forming. That thing might change the all atmospheric formation. When we are talking about the climate changing, we must notice that most of the influence about that thing will be targeted to the areas, what are hostile to the western world. And if we think how easy is to modify the atmosphere, we must say that changing the climate is very bad for Arabic countries and growing Sahara makes very bad for all planet. Only thing what we must do is increase pollution in the North. The south part of the planet can do unable for agriculture by destroying the ozone zone with CFC-chemicals and those chemicals will not move to the north, because of equatorial winds of the Earth. Those winds will circle the Earth, and deny those CFC-chemicals travel across the equator.


But there is one very important thing about climate changing. If the Sahara will begin to increase its size, there is one very interesting vision in my sight. That vision is that if the people of the African states will not agriculture their own countries, they must buy the food from the Europe or from other northern states. That will start the new era of colonialism. If other states will give food to them for free, that will make those countries more and more dependent on northern states friendship. They will get food if some other nations can give that to them.


 And if they get them the corn for the gift, that will grow those nations dependent on other nations. And if that food comes as the gift that aid is very easy to cut. Only the political decision is enough for cutting the support, and one good reason for that is corruption. If some leaders of the country will put the aid in their own pocket that would be the good reason for cutting that kind of support. That will make those countries more and more dependent on western nations.


When we are talking about this kind of phenomenon, even if they are not made for the purpose, they can be also devastating but they can favor some part of an actor. If the water level on the oceans is rising, they might danger the national security of countries like Netherlands. Those countries are very low-lying, and that’s why those countries and areas need massive dam systems to protect themselves against the ocean.


And those nations and areas are in extreme danger if some terrorist group will attack against those dams. That might cause terrifying flood-wave to those areas when that dam system will break down. Same thing happens if the storm of the North Sea grows and breaks the polder system. That might cause the situation, what nobody wants to see. And those storms are also the very great danger for cities like London and Hamburg., what might cause massive damages when the flood comes up the Thames or Elbe. Those floods can cause damages and injuries in a long way from the coast. And of course, those flood waves can rise also by the Hudson River, and cause threats to the cities like New York.

Why political atmosphere in Russia is changing?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Vladimir Putin will continue as the president of Russia if he wants. But that state will change, because that will be the end of something that have stamped all Putin's presidential work. Putin has lost contact with young people, and if he plays a role as an elder and wiser man than another person, he will go far away from young people. People are getting older and they don't want to get back past. The Soviet Union collapsed in 1992 and after that was time of political and economic disaster when societies were unstable.

That caused the rise of Putin, and after drunk Boris Jeltsin, he was better than people could even thin for a ruler of that country. Bad social situation and chaotic nation society will help that kind of man to rise a leader for the country. Those are things what makes people want to get strong leaders, and that is, of course, bad for democracy. But when the situation of state will become calm people begin to want more ways to make the influence of highest level of political control. Putin's idea of his work was that he will put down open corruption and open criminal activities.


But there was silent corruption inside government. Russian laws are very authoritative and that's why the democratic surveillance of government is almost impossible. If newspaper men will write against Kremlin will they will get troubles. But as we see the glove of secret police will slip from society. Russia goes to democracy sooner or later, but we must understand that state ever been real democracy, and that's why bringing democracy to that country will take longer than other East European states.


The reason of changing a political atmosphere in Russia is that people's attitudes are changing. People who saw the Soviet Union are now about 40's and that means at younger people have found new interests than military service. In Putin's time, Russia has been at two wars which didn't go so good as Putin probably hopes. And before those actions against Georgia and Ukraine was Groznyi, what destroyed totally when Russian army attacked against that rebellious city.


Russian own artillery made more damages than any terrorist organization ever could make. And the same style begins in Syria. That's why some people think that Russian military is leaning only for nuclear weapons.  Truth is that wars what Putin began went very bad because his military couldn't neutralize any targets without causing massive damages to infrastructure. Putin rose very masculine militarism as a stamp of Russia, but I think that those special forces kickboxing and other aggressive training methods make those troops very unwanted service places for many young people.


They just want to go to the army and came back as normal servicemen around the world. And younger people don't even know what was the Soviet Union. Putin was born in 1952, and he is now 65. So he will be an old man. His career as the president of Russia will over sooner or later, and if some 18 years old young people look, Putin, he will look like the grandpa. And for them will sooner or later time to elect the younger man as the leader of Russia.