Who is the leader of the nation?

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Everybody wants to be the rulers of the nations. But that thing causes the problems with private life, and that's why the power is easier to use out of the public eye, and sometimes in the history have been happening that the real users of power have been hiding in somewhere at the palace. Cardinal Richelieu might be the most well-known user of the power, and that very notorious person hide in the back of the king Louis XIII of France and breathed things to the ears of the king. But sometimes people have thoughts that the orders for the actions, what Richelieu made, came from the King,

And sometimes those things came from the head of cardinal, who mentioned that his own political enemies were planned something against the king, and that caused that they executed by the royal order.  Louis XIII  like other kings in that time was not a Democrat, and he was one of the most notorious and powerful people in the history, and maybe his propagandists made the role of Richelieu bigger than it really was because of those persecutions against political enemies of the Louis XIV, the Solar king.

Richelieu mission in the government was to support the King and leader of France, and the benefit of the successor of the Luis XIII was that the internal political crimes like the persecution of Huguenots. the Protestants, who lived in France, was made by Richelieu, what kept the King's reputation pure in the eyes of the citizens. Sometimes the privileges, what Huguenots had got from the Louis X were claimed to give for make hate against those religious minorities.

Sometimes this kind of things are happening also in democratic states, and somebody claims, that some officer or some other official would act against democratically elected persons.  "There is no democracy" is the words, what some people use when they are talking about the political situation, and sometimes I think that those persons may be partially right. In the constitution laws the state guarantee, that every person, who wants can become the candidate in the elections, and this is the best thing in the world.

But there is one thing, what is not handled many times in the public discussions. That thing is, the person, who would be voted must be in the list, and there are good and bad things with that. The good thing is that every candidate is voluntary for that duty, where they would be elected. But the bad thing is that just being on the list is not enough for getting votes. And that's why those candidates need publicity. That is the thing, what costs in the campaigns.

Also, the programs, where the commercial would be broadcast must be, that the targeted audience would watch it, and the commercial must be interesting, or the candidate would leave without votes. Those campaigns are very expensive, and that's why candidate needs financial support from the businessmen. This is the thing, what those "real democracy" persons are judged. We know that nobody gives money for campaigns without terms, and that means that the candidate must promise something to those persons. And here it goes a little bit more interesting.

There are two kinds of permissions, the things, what candidate would give for the great audience, and the permissions, what is given in some back office, and what are not told to normal people. There are men behind those public users of power, and when some person goes to meet them for getting the support for the election campaign would that be a similar situation with the job interview. Those financial supporters must know "the man" because they would give that person the great power.

 Of course in the constitution guarantees that the voters would give the mandate to use power, but if the candidate would not get publicity will that person ever elected to the place, where power is used in the state. When those supporters come, they must have the power for the man, who would become the man with power. They don't give support if they are not sure about their man. And in the real world, the politicians are the frontmen for their lobbyists.

This is the problem with democracy. Those men who give support for politicians are very powerful, but there are many lobbies in the top of the politics. And the thing, what makes things more complicated is, that the candidate must promise something to the ordinary people. There are more cleaners and hamburger workers that the top economists and bank leaders. And this makes difficult to plan those campaigns.

If ordinary people would not get anything, would that person leave out from parliament or congress, but if there would things, like broken promises, would that cause the damage to the trust of all political movement, what single politician would represent. And this makes the politics very complicated thing. And the complicated structure of the political field makes it a very interesting field to investigate things, like conspiracies and another kind of stuff, what makes the World very interesting place to live.

About discussions with political leaders

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are always persons, who are telling about discussions with political leaders, and those discussions are sometimes very interesting. That person who tells interesting things is probably the director of some big company, but in this text, I use the politician as an example, what could happen if there is no evidence about some things, what are mentioned in the articles. And when we are talking about political leadership and the support from the politician, we must first realize, that the conclusion of the support would be made the politician self.


The first thing, what journalist must remember, is that the politician is responsible to his own electors. This is the reason, why they are not trying to please journalists. But when some journalist claims something, must this person realize, that if there is no evidence about the discussion, would that politician claim something else after the meeting. Political memory is very good, but it's selective, and if there is no so-called hard evidence about the meetings, will everything that is told about the discussions be claiming.


And this is why the words, what the politician says must not put to the newspapers. The question about this is that there are two sides in those meetings.  And the opponent is responsible to voters. That means that if the journalist is writing something in the newspaper, the question is "who actually says that"? If there are no films about this kind of things, would the opponent claim, that other persons will be invented all story.


In the history of newspapers is always mentioned, that some business boss or politician is said something stupid. In those cases, the key elements are, is that person told truth to that politician? And the second one is, of course, are those words, what are printed in the newspaper actually said by those politicians, or are they invented by the journalist, who is writing about the article. If there is no evidence about it, would those words be only claiming, and in the worst case, that can bring prosecutions against that writer. The witnesses are not so-called "hard evidence". They can forget what is discussed about the thing, what is written in the newspaper, and also they would not probably hear the words, what are used.

What is the purpose of the meeting between Putin and Trump? (And something about leadership)

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are meeting in Helsinki, sometimes we are thinking, what is the purpose of those meeting? Why those men are meeting in Helsinki and if they would not be made any concrete things, why they would travel to this town, and talk together? The problem of those leaders is simple, they need foreign treats, and many of their supporters are in the military industry. That industry need treats for selling their products to other countries.


The purpose of making investigations and developments in those products is to create even more and more superior technology, what would increase the strike capacity of those products. And the advantages of the technology would be guaranteed the markets for new military equipment. And every leader in the world want of course peace, but if they will send their men to war, those persons must tell to mothers of their nations, that their sons were dying in the field.


Presidents and other highest rank politicians need public support for their campaigns, and in the world is one rule: who would pay your salary is the person, who makes decisions, what sings you are singing. And this is why every leader in the world must look strong. If some leader would give another side opportunity to speak before that side would be destroyed, that thing is mentioned as a weakness. Only thing what confesses people is the use of power. Everybody who would not satisfied must be kicked off from work.


Why must the leader tolerate persons, who have different opinions than the leader have?  This is the normal attitude in some talking about leadership. When other people come to meeting the leader would start to tell, what would be next things, what would be done. And after that, this leader would tell, that the decision of this conference is something.


This is, of course, the very nice way to lead, but why this leader calls the meeting if that person would not want to know anything that is different than own ideas? Why this man or woman would not send orders of the action to workplaces and start to work? If the person has made the decision before, the meeting is only a waste of time.


And time is money because those persons need salaries. So why not send the orders to the subleaders and stop playing democracy. The leader is responsible for the decision, and that gives this person the right to make those decisions alone, but in that case, should the report marked that the decisions are made by the leader alone. This is one very interesting point of view of leadership.

The problem of the dictators is, that their victims don't give votes

World's largest civil building The parliament house
in Bucharest
(Picture I) 

http://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/p/the-problem-of-dictators-is-that-their.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The problematic execution of Nicolae and Elena Ceausescu, and how it influences attitudes about the execution of Muammar Qaddafi and other dictators is very interesting. There are many people, who claim that the killing of those persons was illegal because they were the heads of the state, and that would give that kind of person right to flee them countries when the people get enough their methods to lead the country. There were only the leaders of the state, whose rights were concerning the people, and their human rights were so important thing, that the press was shocking about their fate.
The problem of the murderers is, that their victims don't give votes


There is the same kind of attitudes with the case of the Tsar family. Only the family members of the leader of the Russian empire are remembered and we must remember, that there were many more 17 years old girls in Russia than Anastasia Romanova, who was killed in the civil war. And many more 15 years old youngsters who were slaughtered in the concentration camps and shared the fate of Anne Frank. In the case of Ceausescu, there was nobody, who remember the victims of that man, but there were people, who said that Ceaucescu's human rights were violated because of this trial.


The fates of the dictators are sometimes very interesting, like Jean-Claude "Baby Doc" Duvalier, who lived in France as the political refugee after his family has been kicked off the power in Haiti, and this is very interesting part of international politics. Only thing, what concerns the people is the fate of the dictators, who wants the political safe places after they were ordered extortions and killings in their country, and when those persons were in the power, nobody care, what they did to their own victims.


There are people who have very big necessity to support everybody, who have superiority position. Persons who have this need would ever see anything wrong in the actions of the dictators because they are the head of the state. When I saw once on the writing of authorities, there was the form of the worlds, that the ADHD-children have problems with the people, who have the official authority and the people, who think that they are the authority.


The last one was a very interesting form because there were claiming, that those people should follow the orders from people, who just think that they are authorities. This means that everybody, like other child or boy from the neighbor, should give the orders to those persons if they are just thinking, that they have jurisdiction about that, or they just think that they have right to give orders to another people. The problem with the power is, that it would make people evil.


One of the reasons, why Joseph Stalin was able to make the crimes, what he made, was that the world left that man alone. The demonization of socialism caused, that the Soviet Union were isolated, and the leaders of that country dare to make, what they wanted because nobody even cares, what happened in the land of "red twilight". Here we must remember, that in the eyes of international law Joseph Stalin was not made any crimes, because in police actions the international law says, that they are internal affairs of some nation. And the international law is, that if some violations are made in the territory of some country, is that country's business to get those violators in the court of law. The attitude was that Stalin's place was in the Soviet Union, and nobody cares, what happened in there. The same thing kept Ceaucescu in the power of Romania.


That small country was the member of the Warsaw pack, and it was in the shadow of the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union were not the only state, what kept political prisoners, but that country had the prime role in the policy of the United States, what kept Soviets as their main enemy. The attitude in Washington was that the Soviet Union was the only nation in the Eastern Block. Other governments of that side claimed, that Moscow forced them to make political arrests, what was not actually true. The Soviet Union was the thing, what was used for making fear in the mind of the people.


But the police forces were under national command. And there was the thing, that in the law books were texts, that every action in the parliament should follow the socialistic order or code. Even today are some historians arguing, that was the DDR, Hungarian and Czechoslovakian governments forced to ask their allies and the Soviet troops to stop the democratization movement, and in Hungary the Government claimed, that the Soviet troops were used force against people, who came to barricades.


And the Soviet Commanders claimed that the force was used by AVO, what means Hungarian secret police-troops, and the Soviets were only supporting the legal government. In the real world, the reason for using force could be, that some members of AVO The Hungarian secret police shot Soviet Troops because of provocation. Or that action could make by somebody, who didn't think about consequences. Or maybe those firearms were used against people because somebody claimed, that the force was used against the Soviet embassy. That kind of disinformation would justify the military actions against the demonstrators.


One of the reasons, why those information-operations are made, is that its mission is to make the shooting easier for young soldiers, who must go home after that kind of actions. So they must have the story, what justifies the use of force in the eyes of their families and other people, who they meet before they would go to the cadet- or secret police's school. And after that were much talking, that was the demonstrators really carry the guns, but those things lost in history.


The people like Ceausescu were kept the power in Eastern Europe until the Soviet Union collapsed, and the Soviet government could not support their allies by military force. But the improving telecommunications allowed people see, what was going on in those countries at 1989-1991, and that gave the breaks for the actions of the Soviet troops. If those demonstrations were not followed by the western media, the results could be different, because if the military and police leaders would be allowed to act without publicity, they would dare to give orders to shoot the demonstrators.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Claude_Duvalier


Picture I

http://acountryamonth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/parliament-palace-people-house-bucharest-romania-visit.png

What if the customer would take a part in the developing process?

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/what-if-customer-would-take-part-in.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The co-development means that the deliverer or offender of the product would work together in the development process. The way of thinking that way would mean, that there would be no borders for the feedback, and sharing the information of the problems would be easier. The problems with the multi-level planning of the production are that the information of the problems would not enter to the ears of traditional companies. The co-developing is not the leaders or directors, this model happens in the workshops were the persons, who would take the part of the process can talk freely, and that would support the innovation.


Of course, there are limits in that kind of developing process, and one of them is financing. and of course in the company is the leaders. But in the developing process, the major role in the process is the network type working, where everybody has the chance to influent the process. The network-type information system allows free innovation, but of course, there is one thing, what must be noticed in this process.


The introvert persons must also take a part in the talking about the production, and those persons must be heard. Co-developing process is very interesting, and the answer to the question: why the company should choose this kind of method in the production and developing new products is, that in those models the developing team would get every information for their work, and the customer can also bring their own experts in this kind of team.


Co-developing means the real P2P model development for the products. This would revolutionize the borders between the manufacturer, deliver and the customer. And the feedback would be given during the process, that the development team can fix the errors during the process, and that would eliminate errors in the final product.


But the success of that project would need the good knowledge of the product. And of course, the chemistry between the members of the team must work very good. The persons who are working this way must have good social skills, and they must know, that every member of the team is important. No firms would hire persons, who would bring nothing in their projects, because those persons must get their salaries. And that's why they must have listened in the process. The people must realize that there would be no engineer, who would have nothing to do in the company.


Those people are expensive, and that's why there must be something to do, where the engineers are needed. In those projects must first collect every needed information, and then make the analysis of the need for the new product. And in this analysis must be seen, what is the trouble in the product, and could it replace by giving their new cores, if the product is the mobile telephone or some tool, what would need to use with gloves. That new cores or size would make them easier to hand with gloves. But there is no need to invent the wheel again. The old products might have many parts, what would operate in the new size product. And that would make the developing process cheaper and easier than starting to make brand new concepts.

Picture I

http://climbingblog.jp/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/lightbulb-1875247__340.jpg

The problem of the asteroid ark. "When there is nothing to do, and days are boring"

Asteroid ark by David Hardy
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

I have written about “Universe 25” two times earlier, and I must say that name of this box or dystopia of the rats is very uncommon, and I believe that one of the missions of that test was test how many generations were needed, until those rats became too degenerated for accomplishing their mission. In some theories that data was collecting for some kind of spaceflight, that could be targeted to some other planet or solar system. And it shows that there would be things, what will happen when people will have nothing to do. And in the long term spaceflight would nothing to do in the spacecraft. This will cause the social problems if the population is in the wake when they are traveling in the Universe.


In the mission could be used two very slow spacecraft, what would fly to the target over 400 years or more, and in those spacecraft would generations follow together, and of course this theoretical spaceflight was out of the question. But the philosophy is the way of thinking, and in this kind of writing, I must not prove anything. So in this theoretical spaceflight, would the journey begin with two different spacecraft, where would be two different populations. When the spaceflight turns to the end, those crews would be combined.


This might be made “superrace” for the colonization of the targeted planet. I sometimes thought that this experiment would make by the MAJESTIC-12 group, and here we must say, that the results of those tests and experiments are done for many reasons. So the results of this kind of tests would use in the multiple places and targets. And I think that the world of science is so fascinating, that I must say that we have right to believe in what we want. The test of “Universe 25” was very brutal. It shows how the enemies keep the population strong, and when the enemies were gone, like in this box, the behavior what allows rats to survive in the natural environment lost. But one solution for the boring time could be "the war", where the "Cylons" would attack against the colony. This would keep them in action and sharp condition. Those "Cylons" might be like some "computer game" what creates outer enemies for the colony.


This is one reason, why so-called asteroid-arks are very problematic. If the population in some environment doesn’t face enemies, the result could be devastating, when this ark will land on some planet. Those aliens would never face any kind of attack, and they probably don’t know how to act, if something attacks, those individuals would probably know how to defend themselves. But the asteroid arks would have many more problems. The hierarchy in that colony would become very stressful for the individuals, who are down in the hierarchy. The children of the captain of the ship would be on the top of the hierarchy, and that would make possible to create absolute monarchy in this spaceship.


When somebody grows on the side of the top person of the society, this causes the behavior that will hurt other. This causes hate. And this is the problem of the societies. The individuals who are top of the hierarchy always resist the changes. They would ever be tired by the work, and they want the stable societies and everything is always fine in their opinion. The thing that wants the changes are always workers and the personnel, who are down in the social pyramid. And if the people don’t know another system, they don’t postulate the change. This is the reason for censorship. But when somebody says, that there would be another way to make things, then let one person rule all things in society.

Sources

Picture 1

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bd/9c/7e/bd9c7eb86684479cf77cc3dd7574db8c.jpg

What the "Todesrune" means for authoritarian systems?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

"Todesrune" is the symbol of opposite morale than Nazis and Waffen-SS had, and it meant the death of an authoritarian and totalitarian system. When we are talking about the “Lebensrune" and “Todesrune" we must notice that Waffen-SS official way to think was different than normal persons have, and this is why the death of Third Reich means to live for that personnel, who were persecuted by the Nazis. The official way of thinking in that organization was that weak persons must die, and also the henchmen had the responsibility to give their lives if their superiority ordered to make the suicide. In this notorious organization had only one law.


The henchmen must do exactly, what the superiority ordered. Without making any questions about the orders what they got. And that was the rule even for the highest rank officials, whose orders were to carry the cyanide tablets in their pocket or hollow teeth in their mouth because the suicide made them choose to avoid the imprisonment. And this “helped to keep military secrets” like holocaust and the concentration camps hidden from the public. The way of life in that organization was death and violence. That’s the way the normal persons must think opposite way than some SS-man thinks. This is the reason why SS symbol “Todesrune" is actually the offer of life to normal people. The way of thinking in the one of the most brutal political army in the history was very egocentric.


 In that military organization everything what the leaders or the commanders said was right. And that gave those men right for the mass murders. In this way of thinking the death of the SS mean life for another person's. We must say that this notorious organization was the top of the totalitarianism and militarism. The form of those organizations is that all totalitarian states will force all the people in the same model. Individualism is the worst what could be done in the totalitarian system.



In those systems, the only purpose of the human is to serve the superiority and the person can’t serve authorities, this means that the person is useless. In those systems the superiority afraid the “Fractal effect" what is actually known as the “butterfly effect". In all very well organized and organized systems the disturb will be seen very far, and in one theory is mentioned the situation, where the butterfly strikes it wings, will that cause the whirl what will be strong and then it will transfer to the hurricane. In the systems like military forces, all disturbing might be very well seen, and that will grow to all the regiment size rebellion. And that's the reason, why all military forces will give extreme hard punishments to the persons what it seems to disturb the service. And that is the reason why “Todesrune” is live for others.

The rise of strong leaders

The statue of roman Caesar Constantine

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/riseofstronleaders/etusivu

Somebody might find convergent with the rise of Vladimir Putin and Isaac Asimov’s book The foundation and the Empire, where the strange person The Mule rises in the power of the Empire. That character was followed by the Caesar of the empire, and his power was very strong, but that character was unique, and he couldn’t stable the new empire. Of course, those actions, what that character made, were disastrous, but this aliens influence to the empire was the short period.


The rising of Putin might be forecaster by the Western Intelligence because those “Mules” are sometimes followed imperial disasters because some people want to return the Imperil. The term mule means in this script a person, who exact the place of collapsed imperil leader. In those times, will people want the strong leader, and that’s why leaders of that empire will be replaced by some very populist character. The reason why leaders like Putin are very successful in their leadership is that they promise order and safety for the people.


 But as we can see, the rise of strong leaders after the collapse of empires, what also The Soviet Union was is predicted. People believe that strong leaders will restore the law and order to the state, and of course, the corruption is the very strong element, when those authoritarian leaders raise. A key element of the rise of authoritarian government is that people lose their trust in police and government. That will make the suitable situation for raise the new power for the leader. And why that style, what Putin uses in his leadership in the government of Russia is so popular? The Russia has ever been the democracy, the Tsarist dictatorship was followed by the communist dictatorship. That’s why the people of Russia like that man’s style, what is, of course, more liberal than the style of the Soviet Union. Putin had his chance to begin the war between east and the west, but as we are seen, that change is now gone. The policy between superpowers is very difficult.


The Russia, United States and China have all overgrown military forces, what needs threat outside those nations border. If there is no resistant force for undemocratic countries military forces, those forces will able to take control in the state. I have sometimes thought, that the USA might give the nuclear weapon into the hands of the Soviet Union because the USA would be too strong in the global policy, and in 1949 there were many problems in that nation.


The main problem was the anti-communist league, what wanted to begin the third world war against the Soviet Union. The war would be done with nuclear weapons, and to stop that advantage the government of the United States would give that devastating, but same times expensive weapon to the Soviet Union. In that time the Truman and Eisenhower government had very big problems with their relationship with Nazi-Germany and especially the Nazi-scientists and the intelligence staff.


 Some of those people took part in the Holocaust, and the USA wanted, of course, something more than only rockets and the airplanes. The military forces of the USA wanted also protective suits and biological weapons and nerve gasses, and the men who were working with those chemicals took a part of the Holocaust. And they also need the methodology, what made German people follow their leaders and follow the orders what made the most brutal, what human race have ever seen. Many prisoners were dead in the experiments, where German authorities tested atropine and other protective chemicals. Those crimes were very inhuman, but they happened in far away place called Europe. And there is a story of the nuclear test “Castle Bravo” that those scientists who took a part of mass murders in Europe were vaporized by the heat of thermonuclear weapon.


But in the USA they must hide those things. In the Soviet Union the human tests are made for political prisons to test medicines and another kind of stuff, and when the people, who made the test were Nazi criminals, they might be executed immediately after the test. Those tests like horrifying “sleep experiment”, where sleep center of victims brains injured made to create new kind of soldier. A human robot who does everything, what his leaders wanted. And in some tests were lobotomies made to the children, for destroy the ability for feelings. The needs of The Soviet Army was the same kind like the USA's military. They needed men who fight for their leaders without making any question about the justification of those orders.


Those men were sent to Special Forces of the Soviet Union, and I think that those persons were excellent military operators, because they were free of moral and emotional feelings. In some stories, the United States Army Delta Force has been tested that kind of operators, what might be selected from some hardcore prisons. In those rumors, the candidates of the project, what is called as “MONARCH” or “ARTICHOKE”, where people, who made serious crimes in young age. After they were imprisoned the surgeon made lobotomy to those persons, and then those men were sent to war. That methodology is, of course, the most notorious way to make “perfect soldiers”. But when we are looking, what kind of things those military forces have done, we must think that some persons like Josef Mengele and Sidney Gottlieb might think, that they have right to do those things to other people for making perfect “Delta operators”.

Where are all tough bosses coming from?

The Sphinx symbolizes some kind of leadership

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we see some boss, who is totally insane, we might think that person is something, what we don't want to be our superiority. But there is one little thing, what many people don't understand, or they don't want to think. That person acts like other person's have taught in workplaces. In those person's past workplaces have been policy, that probably the youngest person in the work team have been somebody, who will not want to take into the firms social life.


And of course, sometimes have been quarantined that those persons who have been in temporal employment relationship will not get the leader's position in that company. But nothing impedes that some other company will not able to hire that person. That means that those people will become the bosses for the enterprise scale production units.


If that person's past workplaces policy have been that the boss is the god of the workplace, we might face that policy in our own workplaces, when that person comes to the front of us. If this person has faced abuse or hazing in the past jobs, that person learns that is the right way to act in the workplace. When that person will become a leader of the team, that person will show straight to other,  what kind tartar he or she faced in the past jobs. And this is called "The Lucifer effect" in psychology.


The term means that when some person will get the position, what had the person, who repressed that worker. That effect is a reason, why bodily punishments are prohibited in the western world. When the person is punished in childhood by using the physical methodology, that person will learn that thing is right. But there is one little problem, that person will act like those people who took a part of the violence.


And if those actions are not justified that target of violence starts to think, that those actions against helpless people are right. And then when those people grow to adulthood, those things that have been happened in the children age become very real. If that person will get the position, where other people are helpless, the result might be shocking. On the Internet have been movies, where nurses are violent against elder people.


In some situations, the reason for that violent behavior has been in the grandparents. Some grandparents are violent against the children, and those cases are very difficult because nobody wants to believe bad things about nice elder people, who give gifts to their grandchildren. But sometimes those trips to the countrysides are trips to hell, where children are like in the concentration camp, and those things are not the worst, what the psychiatric personnel can't even face.


The most brutal situations are, that only one of the siblings is abused. In those cases, other members of the family might not even know that one of their children is brutally violent by parents or another sibling. Those cases are a good example how evil human been can be.

Why modern China's president have more power than Mao ever had?

Forbidden City Beijing

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Why the president of China has more power than Mao could ever imagine is because of the Internet. That thing what is made for freedom can also be the most dangerous thing in the hands of dictators. That network makes people surveillance possible, and I think that sometimes those undemocratic leaders will follow their orders by surveillance cameras. So by this thing the president of China can see what his men are doing anytime he wants. That man must just click an icon of some surveillance cameras, and he can follow anybody who he wants.

The surveillance equipment what is needed is any device that has an Internet connection like computer or GSM-telephone. That thing where the leader of the state has this kind of surveillance equipment, what can he use to break some person’s privacy is a very new situation for the world. China also might have FOBS (Fractional Orbital Bombardment System) nuclear weapons. Those weapons can launch to Low Earth Orbiter, and there they can be ready for a surprise attack. FOBS- weapons can be launched a couple of weeks before the attack, and then the satellites were in the orbital the final order to begin the attack.


But in the wildest rumors, there are satellites what spends even years at higher orbital, to wait for orders to open fire with nuclear weapons. Those satellites might play space junk or they might be weather satellites, what is equipped with a nuclear weapon, and if they play some weather satellites, that will cover the communication between the satellite and command center.

If authorities put some surveillance application in cell phones that are sold in some nation, could the leader of that nation personally eavesdrop anybody in the state, who has that application in his cell phone? And we must realize that those governments are very authoritarian users of power, and there might be some kind of orders, that cell phone must keep open all the time, because the leader of the state want’s to hear, what his staff members are talking.

That’s why those cell phones that are sold in that country might be equipped with the modified operating system, what allows officials to open any cell phone anytime when they want, and use that thing as a spy equipment. That means that officials want that phone is always in their man hand or pocket, and of course, that equipment will never able to leave even on the table without attention.

That kind of orders makes cell phones more effective surveillance system because it can transmit every world, what in the room is said to an observer. The Internet allows also very large scale information operation, where media, what is free and trust-able in the west, begins to make massive disinformation projects, what mission is to support that state’s leaders own policy.

When we think that some media are safe from false information. That’s not true because there are many things what makes media very effective tool when we are talking about false media, what is protected by highest leaders in the state. Nobody realized when the Internet was created with rules of media, what happened to some states.


The Internet became an ultimate tool also for propaganda. And nobody ever imagined that in the hoax-information background is the governmental actor. If the government supports propagandists that will make the defense against them very dangerous and difficult. Dictatorial governments can censor all attempts to correct false information. The truth of those states is what their leaders want that be.

If somebody fights against this kind of actor, that person could be in danger of political arrested. And if a government is co-operating with those propagandists, they will ever come to any court halls, because those men can avoid any attempt to close their homepages and personal data. That’s why governmental propaganda is more dangerous than we believe.