Why is somebody writing only the negative news?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When somebody is writing only the negative things about some things that come to some area, we must realize that there might be a purpose for those writings. I have written earlier about the journalist's way to write about the western subway in the capital area of Finland. Sometimes the pressmen have tried to pressure the other journalists and officials for stopping the investigations by treating them in public writings. This methodology is meant for given pressure for other journalists, that they won't write about those things. Here I'm writing about the things in the global perspective, not only what has been happening in the capital region of Finland.


They are found only the negative parts of this thing, and the reason why those things are written may be found in the local newspaper. In that newspaper was the story, what was capitalized like "the problems with the subway, will mirror in the prizes of the apartments", and the purpose of that kind of stories have been giving reason to sell the apartments of that kind of areas. If the estate agents would get the apartments at the right time, the price of the apartments would rise very soon, and there will be very good chance to make the profits in that area.


In the USA same kind of writings have been written in the areas, there were some improvements in the territorial infrastructure. And probably the reason for those negative writings and the prices of the apartments have the same reason here in Finland. When we are talking about the service of the western subway, we must notice, that this line is not ready yet. And that kind of things has always risen the prices of the apartments.


So for the is best that people will sell their apartments with great hurry because when the subway is ready, the prices would be different. And if they will get the apartments in their hand now, there would be the chance to get big profits about those apartments. When the subway will be ready, the prices will start to rise. And that would make possible to make big profits in that area.

What means the analytical form of the "big data"?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The price of the investment is ordering one thing, how long is this thing in use. And when we are talking about the price of the buildings, we must know actually how long the structure is in use. Then we must know how much service, electricity, and cleaning costs are per year. This will give the real price of the production. If some railroad is used only one hour during its lifetime, the costs would be very high.


And also the ratio of use, and the number of passengers and other transportation, what will come money for the accounts are making the economic balance and statistics about this thing. So if you want to calculate the profits and losses of the business, just minus the costs from the incoming money, and this is the way to make cost accounting. If the number is positive, the transportation would be economical and bring the profits.


 There is no rule about the shape of the big data or metadata, what means unprocessed data warehouse. When we are talking about the big data, it can compare of the massive sandpit. Sand is actually useless itself, but when we are starting to process that material, we will make it the useful material for many targets like houses and roads. The big data might be some TV-broadcast, the poster or the story in the newspaper. There might be things in that poster or story, what makes it very interested, and when we are going to make analyses about that article, we must ask one question.


Where that poster actually is, and if it will give negative picture or view of the service or company, what owns that room for advertisements? Nobody must be allowed to publish negative information about the service, what it offers in the area, what is under its own ownership. But when we are starting to check the information, what is in that poster, we must make the analyses about the text, and then we must understand, that there will be many things, what must be noticed in that poster.


I saw today the poster of one local newspaper, that the western subway line of the capital area of Finland has overcalculated the number of the users of this transportation. If those calculated numbers of the passengers were beaten, the line would be the disappointment. But then we should get more information about this news. What was the calculated number of the passengers? And what is the real quantity of passengers, who uses that railroad? And what is the range, where those calculations are made?


When we are seeing the other railways, we must notice, that every station of those railways has not the same number of the passengers. And when we are seeking the truth, we must see that almost every statistics can change to seem the disappointment. Only thing, what is needed is to show very big numbers of the passengers, and then the calculated ratio of use is of course under the limit of the calculations. This is the very good thing when the prices of those tunnels are shown to the ordinary people.


The price of the subway is very high, but we must remember that the limit of the calculations is not mentioned. Is this the price of the first year of use, or is there calculated the next years of use of this thing, and what costs have been set in those calculations? Those things are also the very important thing when we are talking about the price of some investment.

I Want to believe...

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When some people are against something, they will be tuned to find only the negative things about some things. Those people will look for the things what supports their own opinion for any questions about the things. Those people would write only the crimes, what are made by foreigners, and if we are talking about the western subway line in the Finnish capital. Helsinki, would some people write, that the users of this line will transfer to use their own cars.


The resistance of the western metro line was quite noisy in the public media and the journalists wrote that some people got 30 minutes longer work trip, because the straight bus lines between the cities were disbanded. And after that, the looking for the mistakes were continued, and the technical problems have raised in the front of the public eye. There was news, that even 10 years old youngsters have spent all day in the subway, what is not accomplished yet.


So what is the reason for the resistance of this new traffic line? The reason is that some people might have the contract with bus companies, that they will get some benefits from those companies, and when we are talking about the use of the private cars in the capital of Finland, we must realize, that there are no parking areas for the private cars, and the parking bills are very high. And I have seen, that the same kind of texts was been in many newspapers. So is the writer same person every time? The used phrases and linguistic arguments are the same kinds of every press stories. And one thing what connects those texts is the support of private cars are mentioned bt phrase "Transfer to use the private car".