The international community have very bad problems with authoritative governments

(Picture I)

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/the-international-community-have-very.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

North-Korea and it's relationship to other world are always been problematic. And now the leader of that country have shown, that problems are not over yet. This small country has shown again that they are capable of surprising maneuvers in international area in the very short period, and now the top meeting between the leaders of the North-Korea and the United States have been treated because South-Korea and United States have had military exercise together. This is very well known act from the North-Korea's leader, because of those persons.


They are trying to blackmail other countries by delaying the meetings, and of course, the trust between other nations and the North-Korea is not very good. Even if some contracts can be made, the North-Korean way has been, that they would speak other and do other. That states nuclear program is the very good example of that. North Korean government undersign the treaty, that they would not make nuclear weapons, and after that, they just dug the tunnels to that nuclear plant and continued the project.


The North-Korean way to think that single person doesn't mean anything is the very bad thing, and sometimes I have thought, how many deaths that nuclear program has caused in that country? Or did they actually care about safety instructions, what are given for work with radioactive material? When we are thinking about the complicated relationship with North Korean government and the international community, we must say that is quite complicated. The reason for that is otherwise that state has many very bad human rights problems and loss of food is the big problem in that country, but their leaders live in the middle of outstanding luxury.


Also, political arrests and sending people to prison camps for rest of their life for crimes like looking western television or visiting foreign homepages is quite common. Otherwise, that is independent, what have it's own rights. And this makes the relations with this country very problematic. The western world should show to others, that this kind of way to rule the nation is not tolerable. But otherwise many western leaders would accept silently the occupation of Gaza. And this is also very complicated situation because Palestinians are of course right to want better treatment, but sometimes there is nobody in the Middle-East who is really interested their position.


When we are talking about Palestinian refugee camps those people have kept in there because of political reasons, that some Arab leaders could use them to turn their own people eyes of their authoritative way to rule the countries. And because of that Israel has allowed occupying the Gaza area. That has caused riots suffering and deaths in that area and the major threat in the eyes of the Israeli government is that if they would give independence to Gaza, would that slip to rule under radical Islamist government.


When we are thinking about the situation in the Gaza area, we must know that there is a quite democratic actor in the opponent. Also, the Internet have opened the scenes of that area and the violence between Palestinians and Israel like shooting unarmed protesters in the middle of normal western people live, but then we can think how many people have died in that area before the Internet, and could the shooters, who targeted the fire to protesters continue their careers in some governmental organizations? But then we must know that in many Arab nations Palestinians doesn't have even id-papers, and in officially they are not even existed.


That means that those people could be murdered and nobody ever asked, what happened as example Palestinians, who were rioted against the Syrian army in 1980's. When we are returning to North-Korea, could we even know about the prison camps in that country? Same way we can ask, would the situation in Gaza or Syria kept off the public eye if there would be no Internet? Those are good questions for thinking when we next time look at the situation in Gaza, Syria or North-Korea. Or would they just keep out of TV with comments that there have been disorders in some area, and the army has taken the situation under the control?

Sources:

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/ulkomaat/artikkeli/pohjois-korea-huipputapaaminen-uhattuna/6910762

Picture I
https://statetalks.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/totalitarianism.jpg

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/the-international-community-have-very.html

Somebody still selling oil to North-Korea

Picture 1

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In the satellite pictures is seen that Chinese and Russian tankers are selling oil to North-Korea, and this is the very bad thing for the international community. When some members of international community slips of the line, there will be problems with the effect of those sanctions against that land. The problem of the situation in the Korean peninsula is that it will take the international observes out of some other states human right conditions and another kind of things.


When there will be the nuclear crisis in Korea,  the United Nations observations would turn away from another, less interesting places like Ukraine and Middle-East. The nuclear crises are very interesting and frightening situations because the nuclear weapons are so devastating, but the North-Korean military have more notorious weapons than nukes, and proof of those weapons have been found one North-Korean military personal flesh. In this case is the question of biological weapons.


Those organisms that are found are anthrax-bacteria, but I don't know have somebody modified the genomes of those bacteria? In some scenarios, there is possible to connect the mushroom genomes in the bacteria, what makes those organisms act like mushrooms. In this scenario manipulated bacteria creates the form of hypha and that organism will stay at the chains, what can make them more devastating than any natural anthrax bacteria can be. But if some state will want to make biological weapons it will also need nuclear explosives.


Because if there is the leak in the laboratory, where those organisms are kept, must that place sterilize immediately. Best way to make that sterilization is to use nuclear weapons for destroying the laboratory and organisms what are inside it. The problem of biological weapons is that only one piece bacteria is enough for making those weapons. And even if the weapons would be destroyed, there might found some test tube in some icebox, and the cultivating of the new population of the bacteria is very easy.


That's why the North-Korea have changed more complicated. This state has got more powerful weapons with nukes, and it will give the power for Kim Jong Un and his government to counteract the international sanctions. And even his nukes can't destroy the military command systems of the United States, could those weapons give that leader more power in his leadership, because he will use the nukes as the power of domestic politics, what can force the people of the North-Korea to stay in the form.

Sources:
Picture 1 and other text

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/12/27/chinese-ships-spotted-satellites-selling-oil-north-korea-30/