How to make own words more influential?

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

All of us want to be heard in the meetings and conferences, but how we can make our words influential? How to be sure, that other people would listen to those words, and they would support our opinions? If we are younger employees, we might have difficulties with that problem. How to make elder workers listen to our words? The most effective way to make power to our words is claimed, that the idea comes from the customers or some other actor.


That would give a picture or thought, that the idea is coming from somebody else. In this case, we must remember, that the persons, who we want to influent, might check that thing. They might ask, have somebody really said that thing, and that would be little embarrassing if that customer etc. will not remember that thing. Another way to make an influence is to claim, that some great scientist has said the things, what we are bringing in the discussion.


This is the way, what some persons are using in university. They would copy the ideas of great scientists and then put source under their texts. This shows that those persons can read the ideas, what somebody have brought in the own discussions maybe a hundred years ago.  When we are meeting that kind of person, they might be really vexatious. They always start their speech with the words "the great scientist said once", and this makes those persons look like a little bit silly because we all can lend that book from the library, and see those pearls of wisdom from there.


In this case, we have a problem. We should say something, what those persons, who have written everything about those things cannot find in books. We must bring something new to that table. And that is really difficult. The most difficult thing in the world is to show something really new, what comes from our own brains. Also, people should have to make listen to those ideas and the comments should take very seriously. When we are at meetings, we should put our mobile telephones away, and listen to the things, what other people say.


And in those meetings, we should be active, and write the ideas or some other interesting things on paper. And after the meeting, we can write those texts with the text editor. This shows that the person is active, and interesting about the things, what are under the handling. And in the meetings, we should follow, what other people say, but everybody is sometimes "sleeping", and when the boss asks something, is two ways to act.


Other is to say something, and hope that the answer would be even near the thing, what question handles. Or the other way is to say, "sorry, but can you repeat your question". Think about which one is better? And the third is to say, "I have nothing to say". But in this case, we should be careful, because if those words are involved in the thing, what we should do, there would be very embarrassing situations. So the best way is to confess, that we are not perfect, and ask, what the boss said. This would spend time and money.

Glass and the bottle of Suze (Pablo Picasso,1912)

Glass and the bottle of Suze Pablo (Picasso,1912)
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Cubism is a very strange style of art. It's different than so-called "photographic art". And somebody hates it and somebody loves it, that is the question of the taste. Everybody has right to have their own opinions about the art. Somebody believes that cubism is the only couple of lines on the paper, but some other person sees those lines as the sign of genius mind, what makes the hand as the instrument of God. Those paintings are like whispers from the 1970's, even if they are painted earlier. They make the picture of yellow furniture and bright colored clothes with graphical pictures in my mind.


The masterpiece of cubist art is the portrait, what Pablo Picasso painted in 1912. The name of this masterpiece is "Glass and the bottle of Suze", where the painter has involved the newspapers and the mosaiced picture of those things, what are listed in the name of the painting. In the painting seems to be the head of the eagle, what looks to the looker of the painting. As we probably know, there are many levels in this painting, and that's why the translation of this picture needs the deeper way of thinking than just looking at it. In the name of the painting are the worlds, what might symbolize family.


If the person is an alcoholic, the alcohol and glass are everything in the life. In this painting is also small sarcasm about the thing, what the people are talking in the restaurants during the war, what was, of course, the First Balkan war. Those newspapers were told about the war at Balkan peninsula, and of course, that was the main role of talks in the restaurants. And if persons drink too much, the speech will translate to the patriotic, and this might be very humorous to hear.


And in the restaurants were sitting the famous painter, who would become the avatar of the cubist painting style, and one of the greatest and most respected painters of 20th. century. The cubism is one version of abstract art, and it is something so different than other art. The paintings are actually looking like very simple, but they are different than so-called "photographic art". They would bring many thoughts in the observer's mind, and the role of the picture is only a road to master's mind. The abstract art brings the images in the observer's mind and it lefts room for imagination, what like feeds the lost pieces of the picture.


The artist has many ways to make the work and the idea of the artists like Picasso is, that they left the final decisions of art for an observer. Those painters paintings are only frames and the picture is creating in the mind of the observers. So the painting is like simulation, what will begin the mind-storming of some observers, and they simulate the productive way of thinking. Imagination is the beginning of the process, what brings the picture in the artist's mind, and then the stimulation must be transferred to the paper. The painter actually makes synthetic pictures, and even if they are portraits of something, the colors could be different in nature, what they are in the picture. This is one way to make an art, and it's very different than some other styles of art.

Sources

Picture 1

https://www.wikiart.org/en/pablo-picasso/glass-and-bottle-of-suze-1912

People have right to be weird if they want

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are thinking about geniuses like Albert Einstein, we must say that they might be the little bit weird. And it is true that if the person thinks loudly and speaks to self that might clear this person’s thinking or how we must talk about that thing. People have right to be little abnormal if they want. And when we are talking about, talking or languages writing is also one way to communicate. The difference between talking and writing is that writing is making the kinetic worlds to the paper or in the screen of the computer. So the writing is one way to talk.


Why the thing that the person will talk alone is so negative, that this person must send to the psychiatrists? If somebody writes diaries, they don’t speak alone. They are writing the diary, what is full of the things, what might interest also somebody else and if that person who speaks alone writes the public diary on the Internet, would somebody think that this person is some kind of interesting or even intelligent person.


If somebody wants to read the diary, that person does that, if the reason to read is that writing is some kind of dangerous. Then the judge will give the permission to take the diary to the hands of the law. And the reason for that is the diary can involve the texts what shows that the writer is dangerous for other people. Of course, those things might be that person’s own. And if I will kick off the job, what I liked I would say that I could be very angry about it. In some courses of the psychology is the key element, that person writes the ideas to the memory. And that thing is very dangerous because the diaries are very wanted material for blackmailing.


If you write when you are angry, you might write something that makes other people scary, and in that case is the best way to keep the open diary. If somebody reads the open diary, will that person seem that this text is mentioned for public use? If I write something I will not usually try to prove anything. But when you, my dear friends are reading these texts, you might understand that I will not always write absolute truth. There is no absolute truth exist. The question about writing is that would be the very good way to let other people know what kind of person you are. In the closed diaries is the only question that how many pages have had been removed, when this diary will get to the hands of the judge.


Nobody ever tried to blackmail me by these texts, and I would not care how many times you, will share this material. I don’t hide anything, and I will not care what other people think about me. I don’t clear my blogs because I write something strange or the things what might look like weird. This is the thing what I like, and if you really want to know something about how I spend my working time, I must say that I sometimes write this kind of texts in the evening and publish them by the timer during my working day. Or did I lie to you, and do I even have a work? Or does my boss know about this and lets this action continue? Or am I sitting in some mental institute


Or am I just an ordinary unemployed who have lots of time to write texts on the internet? I ever wrote the diary, but why those texts what somebody writes to the paper are so interesting? If somebody will steal my diary, I would ask this person one question.  If I’m not the interesting person or my opinions and thoughts are not interested other people, why they even read this text? How many times more interesting could be some diary, what you might find under my bed? That would be very nice to read, that you could steal my diary from my home and show that to your friends, and then you made a decision to get me to the custody and mental institute.


But why did you read only two worlds of that diary? Did somebody else even saw that fictional diary, and the inscription inside it? How could they be sure in that fictional situation, that this particular diary was even mine? In this case, I will write about the situation, what could happen to anybody. In this text, the person whose diary was stolen is me myself and I. This ever happened to me, because I ever kept diaries, because I didn’t want to remember yesterday.

Http://ewao.com/2017/08/11/according-to-psychology-talking-to-yourself-is-a-sign-of-higher-intellect/