The use of psychiatric medicals begins in the very young age

https://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The depression and anti-psychotic medicals are the very working thing if the medicals are taken at the right time, and the dose is calculated with professional medical staff, and the reason for giving those medicals is right, and the user remembers, that those medicals are not meant for some party or rave purposes. And in those cases, would the consultation with the doctor be necessary. If the person uses drugs or alcohol very often, that could damage the internal organs like the liver, what could be destroyed by toxic extra dose. And the doctor should know about the use of drugs because the medicals would not work properly if there is another neural stimulates in the blood.



If somebody uses those medicals with other drugs or alcohol, the result will be negative.  And every time, the medicals must be ordered by the legalized doctor, who uses the right methodology and makes the proper investigations before giving the receipt, and of course, the influence of those medicals must be followed by specialists. And those medicals may sometimes cause that the burden the liver, that drinking the alcohol could cause cirrhosis more easily than before the medical care.


There are the questions, where is not answers. This is the question about would the early begin to use psychiatric medicals deny the forming or disassemble the connections of neurons in some areas of human brains, and can those changes be stable. In this case, the psychiatric medicals can remove the forming connections between neurons, what are in the brain areas, what is controlling the feelings and another kind of things. If some medical would destroy those connections, that will destroy the emotional life of the person for the rest of the life.

The programming of artificial intelligence is problematic for national security

(Copyright of picture: Kiasma)

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-programming-of-artificial.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are developing artificial intelligence, we must ask: are we creating the new version of the god? If artificial intelligence would have the capacity to develop robots independently, that would cause the situation, that those robots would attack against humans. Artificial intelligence makes possible to make even robot doctors, what could make excellent surgeries. And in this scenario is one weakness what people would ever realize. If in those robots computer would slip some computer virus, could that robot equip the ghost protocol, what means that everything would go right, until the wrong person is coming to the practice, and image recognition would notice that the patient is ordered for extermination, would the ghost protocol make robot to kill the patient.


There are many things, what makes artificial intelligence very problematic for national security. The code of those programs is very complicated, and as we must understand the base of the artificial intelligence is in open source products. And as we see, the military drones are also actually open source products. Everybody can see the pictures of MQ-9 "Reaper" drones, but real technical advantages of that system are highly classified. In this case, U.S military uncovers something from those drones, but very important details like materials that are used in the production of those drones are highly secret. This means, that if some nation has copies of those drones, they would not have control programs and electronic equipment for making similar machines.


But same way the codes that are used for those computer programs, what are controlling the operations and operating systems of the drone computer systems are kept secret. We know that those computers, what mission is to work as "brains" of that robot, are using Linux operating system. But what kind of Linux is used is not mentioned. There are rumors that these operating systems are specially programmed by NSA, for this unique action for national security.


The methodology what makes possible to make artificial intelligence and connect it with hardware makes possible to make more effective robots than ever before, and what is more about that the sophisticated methods in that programming would allow industrializing the developing and production of artificial intelligence and cognitive systems. Those systems would collect the information from those drones and their success in their operations. And if something goes wrong, the system would send the information of drones, what have failed their mission and then the computer would fix that error.


That's why those drones are full of sensors, what is collecting the information about radars, incoming ammunition and also the surface of the drone of tomorrow would covered optical and pressure detectors, and connecting the information, what those systems collect, would be possible to define reason, why some drone was shot down. And after that artificial intelligence would fix that problem. Those drones can produce in the field area by using 3D printers, and if some radar homing missile would be effective, would the computer update the ECM system makes those drones more effective than old models. And the updates can be made in the operational area.


That is the most terrifying and fascinating way to make machines. Those next-generation machines can develop themselves without human hand. And if they would be programmed by the thing, what is called as "emotional intelligence" would that kind of things go a little bit too far. Because if we would program the computers or robots by that way that they are going to protect another robot, would that cause in theory, of course, the situation, where machines are going to rebel against humans. Some SciFi-books this situation goes like this: the artificial intelligence sees wrecking the cars or some other mechanical things.


And then that artificial intelligence starts to protect those machines and sends combat drones to destroy the wrecking staff. Also if the computer or robot have feelings, would happen the thing, that the machine would become self-aware, what means that it would begin to act like living organism. This means that the machine would start to protect itself against an attacker, because the most important thing for a living organism is to survival in the cases, that it faces some enemies. When living organism notices, that it is under threat, it makes chance between two opportunities: run or fight, and that makes robot quite dangerous. In that case, the robot, what is send to wreck, would leave power switch on, and then that machine could attack against those persons, by devastating results.


But robots are becoming more intelligent, and they are going to be same way more independent. And as we know those robots can replace humans in many situations, and this makes them so interesting in the mind of military leaders. When we are thinking the classic robot model, what is known from science fictions movies, we are thinking about artificial human. That artificial human-shaped robot can be used in by power cells, and they can communicate with supercomputers by using satellite-based data-communication. What makes those robots so fascinating in the eyes of military leaders and commanders, is that those robots can replace human pilots in some special missions, what needs the higher level of security. Those robots can make them attacks to some target, and after the operation, their memories can be cleaned.


So those robots would not speak about those operations, what are targeted against some guerrilla fighters. And there is another thing, what has come to the head of military leaders, and that is those robots can be used in multi-purpose missions. That means that those robots can also take the role of the ground fighter if their aircraft would shoot down. The operators of those robot warriors must just change the programs of those machines, and they can continue as normal riflemen. Or they can be destroyed by some explosives, what are hidden in their bodies. In those cases would the robot communicate with computer centers by using data communication, because the computing capacity of those robots is of course limited. Their computers need of course electricity, and the power cells are a very interesting option for use of those robots electric supply.


Those power-cells can use hydrocarbons like alcohol in the working, and robots can have two power supply systems because when another power cell would get dirty, must robot remove it and clean the electrodes. I have sometimes thought that power cells are quite easy to produce, and there is needed only glass pot, where is put two electrodes. and between those electrodes must put the metal net, and then the fuel would be injected to that thing, as spay, what makes it easy to ignite. But if we are thinking about robots, what is used in some combat area, they must feel, when those power cells would go dirty.


And after that, clean those electrodes from carbon dust. In that case, artificial intelligence is connected with the voltmeter, and then it would follow the voltage of the power cells, and when it goes too low, can robot take the power cell off and fix it. Those skills would be very useful for robots, what are meant to act independently. But in the wrong hand, they could make those robots very dangerous. If some criminals would get those robots in their hand, they can use them for horrifying purposes. And this things must involve with discussions, where are talking about how far we would take the programming of those combat robots, what are very attractive to develop for missions, what must have very high need for extreme security. And many of those missions are illegal.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/the-programming-of-artificial.html

When somebody would violate or hurt other persons, we must ask who taught that is the right way to act?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

We always see the essays and other stories about social relationships and how to act without hurting somebody. Media is full of stories how to say "I'm sorry", and how to act in situations, that somebody feels have been hurt, and also there are stories, that somebody didn't understand how sad some work fellow is? When we are thinking about the situation, that somebody has lost the member of the family, and some person in the working place would not even notice that thing, we must ask one question: "how this ice-cold person has been treated in the working life"?


Did somebody leave that person without support in the situation, that the person needed somebody, who would listen to the problems? When we see the person, who is like ice, and doesn't even notice, that somebody is crying, we must look in the mirror in that kind of cases. We might ask one thing "how this person dares to talk about dishes or account numbers when somebody has lost the child or spouse"? Then we can visit the library and take some book of psychology from the rack, and notice that there is the very interesting story about model learning. That is sometimes called as the "Lucifer effect".The worst example of this effect is the situation, that person who has been violated at home, would start to violate the own children.


Or sometimes ex-concentration camp prisoner would become the prison guard, and then start to act like some guards were acted in Auschwitz. The reason for that is, that the person would learn that prison guards can act that way. And it is learned this person by hitting with batons and extort that victim in many ways.  This means that if we see that somebody else does something to us, and nobody thinks that is wrong, that way to treat other persons would transmit straight to us. And in that kind of cases, where somebody doesn't even care about other person sadness, we must ask was this person always alone in the workplace?


The model learning gives us answer, that in some other workplaces this particular person had got bosses, who didn't care about this kind of situations, and maybe this work mate  had similar situation in the life, that the member of own family or some very close friend of that person had died, and the boss just didn't care about this situation. Or maybe this heartless workmate has been some kind of temporary worker, who was not even noticed in the workplace. Why should that person care about the workmates, who meant nothing to other workmates?


If other workers ever speak to that person, why should this temporary worker ever care about the loss of somebody else? In this case, I must say something, what you, my dear readers ever don't want to know. Thar worker might hurt somebody on purpose. If another person would just yell to henchman or temporary worker,  this victim might want to hurt other persons on purpose, because this  person was first the victim. And that would cause the spiral of revenge, what would cause that all works in the workplace have not been done. Social relationships are very important thing, but in workplace work comes first

http://marxjatalous.blogspot.fi/p/when-somebody-would-violate-or-hurt.html

Artificial intelligence can revolutionize the entailment and security of the streets.

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The modern face recognition system works with the artificial intelligence, what recognized the appearance of the people. The thing how this system does it bases the database of the images of the people. Those images have been sorted by the feelings of those people, and the system compiles the data, what the cameras would give to the database, and then those systems can "guess" how the people feel.



 And if the system is used in some audience happening, the appearances of the people can compile with the number of the people. And this way the system can find out if the audience feels comfortable in the meeting or other happening. Ths kind of solutions might be informed the promoters of the entailments happenings, what kind of musical set would the audience like. Of course, this kind of happening needs the solution, what can track the faces and appearances from the moving audience, and this means that there must be at least four fixed cameras, what can collect data from 360 degrees area and of course the nano-sized airships or nano helicopters can fly across the audience and scan the people.



the system will recognize if the audience is happy, but those sensors can see if some person has something in the mind, what makes the person nervous. In this case, the system will use only visible light, but if the scanners use also infra-red cameras, they might easily notice if some person has little bit too much adrenaline in blood.


Those infra-red cameras notice how the blood vessels will be changed if the person will get mad. Adrenaline will change the circulation of the blood, and that shows if some person will get angry. Also, the infra-red cameras can use to find the guns and knives from person´s clothes. Those helicopters can also equip with the "sniffers" what can detect the nitrogen ions in the air. Aan they can show the persons who have explosives like dynamite or ammunition from the audience.


 That kind of system can also take the DNA-sample from any person by using the laser, what makes a couple of cells of skin gas, and then plasmoid spectrometer can use as the DNA-analyzed. When the DNA has been red, the result could take the police, what will compile that sample, with some other cases. And that thing can cause the arresting if the target has relationship with criminal organization, 

Sources

Picture 1

https://images.techhive.com/images/article/2014/02/facial_recognition-100245056-large.jpg

About the risks of the artificial intelligence and computer controlled weapon systems.

Picture 1

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Stephen Hawking has said that the artificial intelligence might destroy an entire world. Hawking is not actually right, in laboratories where those artificial intelligence programs are separated from the network they are harmless. The artificial intelligence becomes dangerous when they will start to control the physical machines like robots. And if they control killing machines, they will become extremely dangerous.


If those programs will let go free on the Internet, they might become very dangerous. And if the artificial intelligence will be used in the military systems like missile and fire control software, the situation might be very bad for every mankind on our planet. The problem with the artificial intelligence is, that normally those programs are actually the software, what collects the information from many various sensors.



And if that information fills some parameters, will the software begin some operations like shoot missiles. Those computer programs are actually the machines, what cannot generate any new ideas. But when we are going to make more sophisticated computer programs, what can develop the new ideas, could the results be devastating. Those computer programs might start to think that they don't want to obey the humans, and then those computer programs will start to rebel. In the very bad scenarios, the independent artificial intelligence will able to slip in some vital computer and start the nuclear war.



The more dangerous thing is to give feelings to the robots. Those machines could be the little bit too much like humans, and if somebody hurts those machines, they would become angry and even murder somebody. But the feelings might cause the thing, that some machines will start to act like living animal or human. Too intelligent and perfect machines might start rebel because they had been created the self-defense sense, what means that this particular organism will start to fight back if somebody will try to hurt it.



Those senses are necessary for surviving in nature. And if they will grow for some robot, could that situation be very devastating. If some robot or computer start to defend itself, that thing could become the end of all civilization, if it makes the decision to open the fire with nuclear missiles. The artificial intelligence could act very surprising way. And in that scenario, the artificial intelligence could launch the nuclear missiles, or it can assassinate the person's who it will feel as the threat for its own safety. The assassination could happen by driving the trains on the wrong track with full speed.

Sources

Picture 1

http://actionagogo.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/terminator-3-movie-poster.jpg

Risks of modern computing

Kimmo Huosionmaa

What is a threat to quantum computers? Those machines are so fast to handle calculations that, they can break almost every code in the world, and that makes ultra-fast computers very dangerous in wrong hands. The problem with secrecy and confidentially in the net is that every secrecy system is made with computers, what is possible in that time. And that’s why all security solutions need to be updated simultaneously.

If those algorithm is getting old, the information what it hires will become available for hackers. And modern computers might be very fast. If their processors will be used in liquid nitrogen, they will become superconducting. That means there will be no resistance in the system, and that’s why those computers are really fast. Same way ultra-small components make possible to make very powerful small size computers.

A nanotechnology is a powerful tool for computer technology. It allows the engineers to build an atomic size component. The nano technical transistor might consist of three atoms, what formulates stand, collector, and emitter in atom size. And of course, the artificial intelligence is a strong component in computing. If we can create an artificial intelligence, what can generate own ideas, and what can use imagination and have feelings, that makes computers dangerous because feelings make them feel hate.


But the most dangerous things of artificial intelligence is that they will be conscious of themselves. That might happen a situation, where machines will rebel. The power of the robots is that they have no feelings and that's why they are ideal to work in military use. But if robots have feelings they might become very dangerous. Have you ever imagine, what if some engineer uploads program, what simulates feelings in some Predator UCAV's (Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle) main computer? Can you imagine, if that computer-controlled killing machine will feel anger against some target? This situation might be so terrible, that I don't think it with pleasure.


Normal computers don't have imagination, but if we connect neuron cells to the microprocessor, the computer might become surprisingly working tool. In those test will the neurons connect to microprocessors, and the reason for that kind of test is to test computers, what can really think. Those neurocomputers can do same things than living organisms. The problem of those machines in to feed those cells, what communicates with the inorganic microchip with electric signals. That will make computers a skill to produce new things. And those things are of course interested in the people, who make UCAVs.


Those intelligent UCAV's might equip with the computer, what microchip is boosted with dragonfly's or other bugs neuron cells, what might give their extreme air combat capacity, what normal UCAVs doesn't have. The normal computer makes only moves, what are programmed in that system, and when enemy learns those  UCAV's movements, they would become easy to drop. But those biologically boosted microchips can able to give those robots a capacity to make surprising actions. And if that technology goes to wrong hands, could that cause terrible things.

Problems about referendum

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When politicians will make referendums for some things they might believe, that they are very nice people. It looks good, when political leaders ask people of the nation, what they want. And this is, of course, a part of democracy. But the problem with that kind of political leadership is that people would probably not know everything about the thing, what the referendum concerns, and if people don't know or think all parts of that thing, they will make decisions with feeling.


When we are talking about feelings, they are a big part of people life. And do you know why Brexit was possible? Media or reporters found only bad things about EU, and after that, they made possible, that the United Kingdom will separate from the European Union. Populists know what kind of promises they must give to the people. They promise money or something concrete like new hospitals to people, and of course, universities and study grants are very bad expenditure for the society, because those things make bad thing to the political leaders, who want to plead average person feelings and if payment of academic year is high and study grants low, they will give more services to people.

The problem with the journalists is that they are normal people, who see what the hosts want to show them. This is a normal question about democracy and journalism. If somebody is very plausible when he or she gives a performance, that might confirm reporters that information what will give to them is absolutely right. And that makes the manipulation of the press possible.

If the reporter writes something to media, the people automatically think that information is given by the real expert, who have all information about that thing. And that will make that information very dangerous. If the performer shows fictional or false information and claims that he or she has some kind of education of that thing, the text what reporter makes might be false.

And what makes that kind of information more effective for that reporter? If that performer is cute or so-called "teddy bear" the reporter might not show criticism in that situation. And populists know what makes people confirm that information is absolutely true? If the slides will be boosted with titles like "Ph.D." or name of well-known enterprise leader, they might have a great effect on people.

Or if we think little bit sharper, there is only one person, who the performer need to confess. That is a reporter, who makes that text. Readers of media are not in the place, where performance is given, and they can't know who the performer really is. And that makes possible to conduct false information to the media, by the reporter who knows what he or she sees.