About the Russian money in the Trump's election campaign and the little words of the history of politics of that nation

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There is a thing, what people don't seem to understand about the Russian financial support for Donald Trump's election campaign. The primary question about this kind of investigations is, did Trump knew about the support, what came from Russia? Of course, that money came from the private persons, and they didn't come straight from the Kremlin, what makes that money basically legal. But if the money were given by the Kremlin and the purpose was to support the election campaign of Trump, would the uncovering that support near the final of the presidential election made for supporting the opponent? And that's why that money and the gift was given to public knowledge just before voting process. When we are thinking about the investigations, what are made by special prosecutor Mueller, there is one big question about those investigations.



It is "should the president answer the questions, what investigators make when that person is in office? Here we are talking about the thing, what is very big, and it's should the president be over the law, or could that person kick off, if there are some financial problems with the election campaign? And what happens if some foreign government just put money into those bank accounts, what are opened to the presidential election campaigns. After that, we must say, the most attractive thing for some political thrillers would be that some South American drug cartels would give money to some politicians election campaign. In that case, there would be the very interesting problem, because that bank accounts for the election campaign gifts are open, and what if some drug boss just sends money to those accounts?


And then tells that to the whole world. Could that cause the arresting for the president? That kind of things is very interesting because those drug cartels have money and will to influence the policy of the United States of America. And could the president be responsible for the things, what he or she would not even know? And should that person step out from the office, if that kind of support from illegal actors are found in the election campaigns, even if the president would not know about that money? This example is more radical than the support, what came from the Kremlin but it is basically similar to the real-life case, what is investigated by Mueller.


And of course, the interesting thing is, have somebody make that kind of financial support for presidential elections before in history. Here I must remember, that after the First World War Woodrow Wilson was very passive in the foreign policy. In 1915 the German Submarine sank the ship named Lusitania, and in that case, Wilson was not given the declaration of war to Germany even 1000 united states citizens were killed, and the reason for that was, the ship was under the British flag. Of course, declarations of war are given by Senate, but somebody has claimed that Wilson was in the main role that the Senate was not given the declaration of war to Germany. Even in the ship was over four million rifle patrons, the target was the civilian ship. So that incident turned public opinion in the USA for supporting Great Britain and its alliances.


But then after the first World War, the League of Nations were established in 1919, and the mastermind behind this idea was the foreign minister Grey and it was supported by President Wilson. After that, the Senate has not ratified the Versailles peace treatment and the USA stayed outside the League of nations, and then that nation stated the isolation policy, what ended just until Pearl Harbor attack in 1941. The question in those actions was, that did somebody bribed those congressmen or Wilson to make that kind of decision?


The action of Wilson is sometimes translated to confess people, that he supported the League of Nations, but then that thing torpedoed in the Senate because the USA didn't want to join the battles in Europe. And the major question is, what kind of actions were the Wilson or Senate didn't want to take apart? Wilson's actions after Lusitania have caused claiming, that maybe some Germans gave support for that man? But this is only the speculation. If Wilson would send the troops to Europe in 1915, the war could be ended, because Germany would get honorable peace. But those things are only speculations, and we do not know every fact about those happens, what caused that the League of Nations left without teeth, as we might say. 

What is the problem with CIA? And why it was created?

CIA Headquarters Langley, Virginia
(Picture I)

https://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The CIA (Central Intelligence Agency) is problematic because it is a civil organization. The reason, why CIA was established in 1947 by Rear admiral Roscoe Hillerkoetter was that the role of the intelligence was problematic for military and civilian leaders. The leader of OSS (Organization of Strategic Services) was lead by General major William "Wild Bill" Donovan, and because the leader of the intelligence was the lower rank officer the vital reports could be left to the tables without notice. And the otherwise the leaders of the intelligence would not always read the reports what came from the field.


And that caused sometimes very bad situation if some fortresses or their location were not in the knowledge of the field corpses. Hillerkoetter and his superiorities wanted to create the intelligence service, where the henchmen could say something to their superiorities, and otherwise, he wanted to create the intelligence agency, what work was extremely professional, and positions in that system based only in the personnel own abilities and training. The model, what was used to form that system came from the FBI, but the CIA was able to work out of the United States territory.


This thing makes  CIA very problematic organization because the reports what would not satisfy the leaders is not causing the divorcement of that agent. When we are thinking about the position of field agents, their life can be very dangerous. Sometimes those men and women have got problems with their works in the places like customs. And maybe the president of Russia Vladimir Putin is one of them, who have been humiliated in some customs during his KGB career.


The leader of Russia should be some commander of tank-divisions, that he would have only one way to see things. And the President Of The United States would also be the easier person if that man gets 's only positive things in the life. Trump has faced the feelings about bankruptcy, and people's attitude for that. He has seen, what kind of attitudes people have for persons, who fail in the business life.


And after that would be better for somebody that this kind of persons would not raise in power again, because they have the deal like second-class people. But Trump has shown, that resistance could turn to power. And he has shown, that the rise after the catastrophe is possible. Sometimes I have thought that is the newspapers cold attitude for Trump reason for that bankruptcy? Did some journalist deal that man with the bad attitude?


Spies are problematic also because they are talking with opponents, and they are under the influence of the opponent. Spying and espionage is a work, where operators face the things, what their superiorities would not want, that they would notice. Sometimes DEA or other police intelligence agencies agents face the riot police's baton or SWAT-team assault during their operations. And this is, of course, very traumatic.

Picture I

https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/headhuntersholosuite/images/0/04/CIA_headquarters.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20160725155533

Conclusions and thoughts about meeting between presidents Trump and Putin

The Presidential Palace Helsinki Finland
(Wikipedia)

https://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The meeting between Putin and Trump is over, and the conclusion is, that only man who made mistakes is Trump. There are only stories, how Trump was under Putin's rule, and this is the very remarkable thing. In the newspapers is not a single word, what Putin made, except that he had a Beriev A-50 recon plane escorting his personal aircraft. The thing, that Trump claimed, that USA have been made mistakes is taken as the weakness in the front of Putin. And this is the very interesting point. When John F. Kennedy made partially nuclear test ban treaty between the Soviet Union, that man was prosecuted for being soft in the eyes of the Soviet Union.


This is the very interesting thing because if the international community wants that the peace is built for something else than nuclear weapons, must the talking do in the base, that there are humans in both sides, and humans make mistakes. Accepting the reality, that even the President Of The United States can make mistakes is the way to open talking about serious things. When we are thinking about the complicated relationship between superpowers, there is only one thing, what is good for the people. And that is peaceful co-operation between those nations, even if somebody doesn't want that advantage.


When we are looking at the results of the meeting, we can say, that in the world we have found optimism and positivism is the relations between superpowers. And the advantage is that the meeting between the leaders of those nations has been done. Talking is the road to concrete conferences and then contracts. This is the beginning of real actions for the peace. And when the results of the meeting are under the observation, we must say that there was so short a time to make preparations for that meeting that the concrete contract was not possible.


And when we are looking at the position of Donald Trump, we must remember, that this man is the president of the democratic country. He must stand the critics and there are always people, who have different opinions than he has. When we are talking about court etiquette of Great Britain, there should be somebody, who will tell about the rules for the people, who are not often visiting in the Buckingham Palace.  Maybe Trump learned his lesson about this very important etiquette.

Who takes a part in other countries internal politics?

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/2018/07/who-takes-part-in-other-countries.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The great point of meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump is closing, and here is one very interesting notification about this meeting, and about criticising those leaders. The thing is, that Trump is prosecuted by taking a part in the United Kingdoms internal politics because he said something about it. But meanwhile, the Russian military personnel are charged with hacking the computers in the election process of the United States president.


And this is a very bad thing because hacking of those computers can influent the result of the election. This is the very interesting thing because if some intelligence service would want to influent the election of other states leaders, that is taking part in internal politics of that country. When we are talking about how those leaders would be dealing with media, we are noticing that is a difference about attitudes, what is tolerated by those leaders. Everything, what Putin makes is right, but when Trump says something, he makes everything wrong.


There is something that makes Russian intelligence operations more acceptable than United States intelligence operations. And I must say that this is the very interesting attitude. By the way, the term "intelligence operation" means actually the getting information. The hacking of the computers and influence the internal politics of some other land is "covert action", or "Black Operation". And when we are thinking about the situation, that Russian intelligence officers have made the influential action in the election campaign, that would happen by order of Kreml or somebody else, and this kind of actions can be marked that every connection to the head of the state would deny.


That means that the persons, who might be behind that action are covered. Maybe Putin knew that or maybe he didn't know about those hackings. But there are also other people, who might claim that Putin was involved because that would slow the investigations. This hacking brought some thoughts to my mind. One of them is "how many times this has made before?". I think that those persons, who are behind that operation might not be first-timers for making that kind of things. And how many times that kind of influence has been given to the election campaigns in the small countries, what would not be so loudly to protect their benefits? So is there other nations, where is made this kind of hacking operations, where the election of the head of the state has been influenced by cyber operations, what are made by the foreign actor?


One part of information operations is that the enemy would tell that the resistance would be doomed even before the war have begun. The opponent is trying to metalize the targeted nations, that they would not have any change in the real military conflict. And after that, the "wise men" would lay down their weapons and start to take a spoon in their beautiful hand, and start to follow the opponent's orders. There is one thing that information warfare specialists always highlight. That is that "why own military personnel must risk their lives for some other country?". The purpose of this kind of argumentation is to break coalitions and for this kind of action, the single parts of the coalition would give the benefits like free trade contracts if they slip off the front. Fear is one of the best weapons in the word. And if another side would be doomed to lose, that would give change to grow the own position in the international area.

What is the purpose of the meeting between Putin and Trump? (And something about leadership)

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin are meeting in Helsinki, sometimes we are thinking, what is the purpose of those meeting? Why those men are meeting in Helsinki and if they would not be made any concrete things, why they would travel to this town, and talk together? The problem of those leaders is simple, they need foreign treats, and many of their supporters are in the military industry. That industry need treats for selling their products to other countries.


The purpose of making investigations and developments in those products is to create even more and more superior technology, what would increase the strike capacity of those products. And the advantages of the technology would be guaranteed the markets for new military equipment. And every leader in the world want of course peace, but if they will send their men to war, those persons must tell to mothers of their nations, that their sons were dying in the field.


Presidents and other highest rank politicians need public support for their campaigns, and in the world is one rule: who would pay your salary is the person, who makes decisions, what sings you are singing. And this is why every leader in the world must look strong. If some leader would give another side opportunity to speak before that side would be destroyed, that thing is mentioned as a weakness. Only thing what confesses people is the use of power. Everybody who would not satisfied must be kicked off from work.


Why must the leader tolerate persons, who have different opinions than the leader have?  This is the normal attitude in some talking about leadership. When other people come to meeting the leader would start to tell, what would be next things, what would be done. And after that, this leader would tell, that the decision of this conference is something.


This is, of course, the very nice way to lead, but why this leader calls the meeting if that person would not want to know anything that is different than own ideas? Why this man or woman would not send orders of the action to workplaces and start to work? If the person has made the decision before, the meeting is only a waste of time.


And time is money because those persons need salaries. So why not send the orders to the subleaders and stop playing democracy. The leader is responsible for the decision, and that gives this person the right to make those decisions alone, but in that case, should the report marked that the decisions are made by the leader alone. This is one very interesting point of view of leadership.

Why is somebody not satisfied with the meeting between Trump And Kim?

Nice photo about meeting
(Picture I)

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/why-is-somebody-not-satisfied-with.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There would be the greatest disappointment in the world. The nuclear war didn't start in the Korean peninsula. There have been many writings in the media, that the meeting between the leaders of the USA and North Korean leaders should not be done, and some persons seem very disappointed about this meeting, what was the first between the USA and North Korea. If we think this case very sarcastic way, the thing, what is always disappointed in the case, where some nations would normalize their relationship, or making something else than building nuclear weapons and shoots the opponents.


There is sometimes the persons, who believe, that the attacking another country would bring the peace, and of course, the media would be filled with the pictures of human sacrifices. Also, the attacker would be the nation, what always want the war against other nations. When we are thinking about Donald Trump, this man has not yet begun any war, and that makes him very different than Barack Obama, and the media supported strongly the choice of Hillary Clinton in the presidential election campaign in the USA. And now the media would not be seen, what it wanted.


Trump didn't attack North Korea and proved that he would be some kind of war maniac, who always want to attack other countries. This is the problem with the United States. This nation is always welcome when the force is needed but during the campaign, the media starts to blame the U.S military men as the war criminals, and of course, the opponent is always the heroic fighter, what causes terrible losses to U.S military forces. And when we are thinking about this kind of things, we might face the truth, that this time Trump didn't make the favor for his political enemies, and attacked North Korea, what would cause the billions of deaths.


When we are searching the reason, why the conflicts, what is so far away, are so popular in the newspapers in Europe, we must say that some of the local politicians and newspapermen need those conflicts to turn the heads of the people away from ordinary problems like growing differences of salary, the loss of homes and many more things, what we should talk  in everyday life. Those problems are easy to cover with the stories of the war, what was, of course, started the militaristic USA because it is the evilest country in the world.  And then we could face the situation, where the opponent, North Korea would become the puppy of the media.


This is the normal news in media. And the problem with that kind of writings is, that they would support the dictators and the only part, what is listened, would be the opponent of the USA. There have been many persons, who would like that kind of conflicts. And many people would support anybody, who makes harm to the USA.  There have been persons, who would believe, that everything, what the intelligence community makes is some kind of crimes. And they support everybody, who shares harmful information about those organizations. But there would be little conflict between media and Trump because media is always against this man, but at the same time, there would be waited for support about divorcing some persons, who were not satisfied the press, what will tell the people, how unctuous those leaders smile was in the meeting.


And when we are talking about Chinese pearls of wisdom, many of them are made in other countries. But when we are thinking about the thing, what Ivanka Trump wrote in the social media, I must say, that this phrase was very good.  Probably it was written somebody, who lived in Chicago, but who knows about those things. The phrase  “Those who say it can not be done, should not interrupt those doing it.” is good. And if that is written in Chicago would not make it worse, than if it would be written by some monk in Sun Tzu monastery in Tibet.  Many of those phrases, what are mentioned as "Chinese" are made the journalists, who claimed to read or hear them from some Chinese person because that would hear and be more selling by pearls of wisdom of Chinese monks than pearls of wisdom of some journalist, who worked in the newspaper at Chicago.

https://www.hs.fi/ulkomaat/art-2000005716541.html

https://demokraatti.fi/donald-trump-ja-kim-jong-un-kohtasivat-kamera-tallensi-maireat-miehet-meilla-tulee-olemaan-loistava-suhde-minulla-ei-ole-siita-epailystakaan/

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/ulkomaat/artikkeli/ivanka-trump-tviittasi-kiinalaisen-sananlaskun-internet-jaljitti-sanonnan-yli-sadan-vuoden-takaiseen-chicagoon/6948470#gs.54VK=6M

Picture I

https://cdni.rt.com/files/2018.02/article/5a7ef399dda4c813348b45a7.jpg

Suhteita valtioiden välillä ei rakenneta päivässä

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/2018/06/suhteita-valtioiden-valilla-ei.html
http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/2018/06/suhteita-valtioiden-valilla-ei.html
http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/2018/06/suhteita-valtioiden-valilla-ei.html
http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/2018/06/suhteita-valtioiden-valilla-ei.html
http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/2018/06/suhteita-valtioiden-valilla-ei.html
http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/2018/06/suhteita-valtioiden-valilla-ei.html

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/2018/06/suhteita-valtioiden-valilla-ei.html

Kim Jong-Un sekä Donald Tump ovat sitten ottaneet ensimmäisiä askeleita kohti liennytystä.

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/2018/06/kim-jong-un-seka-donald-tump-ovat.html
http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/2018/06/kim-jong-un-seka-donald-tump-ovat.html
http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/2018/06/kim-jong-un-seka-donald-tump-ovat.html
http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/2018/06/kim-jong-un-seka-donald-tump-ovat.html
http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/2018/06/kim-jong-un-seka-donald-tump-ovat.html
http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/2018/06/kim-jong-un-seka-donald-tump-ovat.html

Donald Trump meets Kim Jong Un, so the mind is changed and the meeting will be done

COBRA DANE Early warning radar in Alaska
(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Donald Trump meets Kim Jon-Un at Singapore and that means the mind has been changed on both side of the telephone line between Washington and Pyongyang. This also marks that people in the world are realizing, how expensive and the powerful weapon is the nuclear bomb. This meeting is the sign, that people of the world want peace, and one of the most important steps in the stable peace in Korean peninsula would be stopping the war between Koreas officially and write the peace contract between those nations.


This is the road, that could make something good for that area, and also that would help to begin the weapon disarming around the world. The international politics is the very complicated thing, and when we are talking about peace contracts, we would say that they are the good beginning in the real peace. But as we know, there would be some problems with this kind of meeting. The reality is, that the full-scale war between Koreas is the very bad thing and this could cost millions of lives on both sides. If North Korea would stand alone, we know, who would win that conflict, but the price in humanity and economical aspect would be horrible.


Nuclear conflicts are the very complicated thing, and if some other nuclear-powered state would involve that conflict, would the situation turn very dramatic, and conflict would send the world to global nuclear conflict, where would be billions of dead people.  Nobody doesn't want to use nukes in that area, but if the conflict would grow to open war, there would be the situation, that somebody wants to break the situation by using nuclear force, and then the counterstrike would be made by using nuclear weapons. And if some other nuclear state would come to support North Korea, are the ingredients ready for global nuclear war. This is why the peace contract in that area would be very important.


The situation in the Korean peninsula is similar than in 1980's Between India and Pakistan. In that time were spoken that this area would go to so-called limited nuclear warfare if those nations would go to war against together. In that scenario, those nations would have the only couple of bombs, but the problem with nuclear weapons is, that they are so powerful destructors. And if the defense against those weapons would not work, the results will be devastating. In the Persian Gulf, United States destroyer got hit by Exocet missile, and that made strategist think the situation that some nuclear missile or fighter, what carries nuclear bomb would pass the defense of some battlegroup, and this might cause the destruction of all group of ships.


And the problem in the defense against nuclear weapons is, that it should not fail a single time. Nobody wants to test those weapons in the real situation against real nuclear bombers or missiles, what is coming from the skies. In that time, the time for the reaction would be very short, and there would be many mistakes, that could be done. When nuclear missile would come against some target, are the members of the defense system in the most stressful situation, what people can imagine. In that situation, the counterstrike and anti-missile operation would fail.

Sources:

https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-today-06-01-18/h_93c4d23f42662913cf11e72ed2979df7

http://www.afmc.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/803875/cobra-dane-team-moves-forward-with-radars-sustainment-plan/

Picture I

https://media.defense.gov/2013/Apr/05/2000061219/-1/-1/0/130325-F-ZZ999-006.JPG

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

The prosecutions against President of the United States are not very common thing

Picture source  Internet 

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The problem with this Trump case does the president of United States  Donald Trump know about that money, what came from the Russian government, and can special prosecutor Mueller proof that support from another state as it will cause judgment to the president. The problem with Trump is that he was used his position in this case, and that will cause some troubles for his defense.


Predicated support for Trump's election campaign is channeled from Russian companies bank accounts. That means that there will not find the straight connection that money came from the Russian government. But the major procedure in this kind of actions is, that that kind of money will be first transfer to some company's accounts, and then they will be given to that politician's election campaign.


So if this kind of rumors that Trump took money from Russians is true, there will not be found any signs that money came from the Russian government. They might use series of corporations, what hides the role of the government, and there might find some signs what will show that  Gazprom is somehow handler of that money. But this is only speculation and I really hope that this investigation is unnecessary. But the prosecution is the very bad mark for Trump's career.


The President of the United States is the most powerful man on earth. And that kind of people will always follow some kind of conspiracy theories. That is very usual when we are talking about leaders in governmental and business life. And those rumors will sometimes be investigated by law enforcement officers.


If Trump didn't react like he did in the beginning of that investigation, this process will ever begin. And disturbing those investigations made this process possible. It's not the very common thing that the president of any nation will be investigated by law enforcement, and this shows how strength society that nation is, and Mueller's investigation shows to the people, that nobody is above the law.


And what makes the very bad thing for Trump is friendship with Putin. Many Americans think that Russia is their archenemy, and that's why posturing with the president of Russia Vladimir Putin is very troublesome for Trump's reputation. People think that Putin is some kind of new Juri Andropov, and that's why they probably don't like that Trump was his friend. Those things what happened before Trump's presidency might look small, but they have big frames in the court. And the question is what did Trump took money from another government.

First chargers have been risen in Trump Case

Kimmo Huosionmaa

If some democratic states president will get charges of misuse his power it is a very serious thing, and even if the president of the United States of America Donald Trump will not in the chair of prosecuted in the court hall, this case is very serious for this man and his closest people. Those prosecutions are involving the thing, what means real troubles to Donald Trump. That is taken cash from Russia, and that's why FBI started to investigate those rumors. And after that Donald Trump made the worst mistake what a man can make.


He suspended those investigators, and after that, he made a crime, what is called exploitation of position. And another crime is disturbing a criminal investigation. Those crimes are very serious, and if Trump will proof as a guilty, he will lose his position. And if he took a money from Russian government he might get charges for spying and treason of the state. Those crimes are much more serious, what Bill Clinton made when he was on charges of sexual harassment. Even Richard Nixon was not in charge of spying for another state. He just ordered secret service for eavesdrop his competitor.  People don't seem to understand, spying and making a treason of state are very serious charges even for normal people.


But if the president is in charge of that kind of crimes, he will be in very bad trouble. That kind of prosecutions are not anything, what can rise easily, even if they are targeted to normal people, but even if somebody claims that the president made those crimes, and some authorities started to investigate those things, they must have very strong evidence even for investigations. The worst mistake what Trump made, was starting to kick off investigators in that case. And that action made people think that those rumors of some secret contracts between presidents Putin and Trump might have the real background.


Question is that, did president Donald Trump really know himself about that support, what came from Moscow or did those campaign members work alone? And what kind of support Trump's campaign got from Russia? Was it a money or did those Russian fellows give his campaign also technical advisings like "how to build interesting homepages" and pieces of advice how media operations must be done, that they have the greatest effect possible on the people mind. So if Trump took that kind of help from another country and the prosecutors can prove that, will be in a very bad situation.