When somebody would violate or hurt other persons, we must ask who taught that is the right way to act?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

We always see the essays and other stories about social relationships and how to act without hurting somebody. Media is full of stories how to say "I'm sorry", and how to act in situations, that somebody feels have been hurt, and also there are stories, that somebody didn't understand how sad some work fellow is? When we are thinking about the situation, that somebody has lost the member of the family, and some person in the working place would not even notice that thing, we must ask one question: "how this ice-cold person has been treated in the working life"?


Did somebody leave that person without support in the situation, that the person needed somebody, who would listen to the problems? When we see the person, who is like ice, and doesn't even notice, that somebody is crying, we must look in the mirror in that kind of cases. We might ask one thing "how this person dares to talk about dishes or account numbers when somebody has lost the child or spouse"? Then we can visit the library and take some book of psychology from the rack, and notice that there is the very interesting story about model learning. That is sometimes called as the "Lucifer effect".The worst example of this effect is the situation, that person who has been violated at home, would start to violate the own children.


Or sometimes ex-concentration camp prisoner would become the prison guard, and then start to act like some guards were acted in Auschwitz. The reason for that is, that the person would learn that prison guards can act that way. And it is learned this person by hitting with batons and extort that victim in many ways.  This means that if we see that somebody else does something to us, and nobody thinks that is wrong, that way to treat other persons would transmit straight to us. And in that kind of cases, where somebody doesn't even care about other person sadness, we must ask was this person always alone in the workplace?


The model learning gives us answer, that in some other workplaces this particular person had got bosses, who didn't care about this kind of situations, and maybe this work mate  had similar situation in the life, that the member of own family or some very close friend of that person had died, and the boss just didn't care about this situation. Or maybe this heartless workmate has been some kind of temporary worker, who was not even noticed in the workplace. Why should that person care about the workmates, who meant nothing to other workmates?


If other workers ever speak to that person, why should this temporary worker ever care about the loss of somebody else? In this case, I must say something, what you, my dear readers ever don't want to know. Thar worker might hurt somebody on purpose. If another person would just yell to henchman or temporary worker,  this victim might want to hurt other persons on purpose, because this  person was first the victim. And that would cause the spiral of revenge, what would cause that all works in the workplace have not been done. Social relationships are very important thing, but in workplace work comes first

http://marxjatalous.blogspot.fi/p/when-somebody-would-violate-or-hurt.html

Steiner and theosophical methodology

The first Goetheanum
Picture 1

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Rudolf Steiner was the great thinker, in many ways, and when we are talking about the relationship with the Steiner's pedagogy and another world, we might see that there are some harmful parts of his theories. One is his relationship with medication, and I think that this man was wrong if he meant that some real sickness is medicates with some therapy. In this case, this thinker is wrong, if he meant that ordinary medicals can be replaced with some natural thing. His idea that cancer is some kind of parasite, was probably given the ideas of the surgeries, that the tumor can be killed by closing it blood vessels by some wire is awesome, but Steiner was not the doctor of medicine. And don't take this text or some text from Wikipedia as the scientific truth. His methodology will be emphasized as the studies, not in some medical care. Those persons like Rudolf Steiner are very complicated, and we probably ever understand their ideas, but as we might see the methodology, what this man used was not very scientific.


He looked at the things from horoscopes and something like that. When we are talking about the religion and theosophical way of thinking, we always think that this thin is some kind of religion, and this is how somebody handles it in the writings. Steiner himself was mentioned, that Theosophy is not religion. And in sometimes I thought that this Theosophy is meant for the equipment, what this man used when he handled the things like religion. This man was the doctor of philosophy, and those persons are quite difficult.


Their way to speak and think is very abstract, and when we are talking about the religion, we are facing the thing, that religion is also one of the forms of the philosophy. And when we are talking what kind of attitude some people have with the religion, we are facing the phenomenon, that religion is one way to force the people in the same mode, and the religion is also the good way to say "Shut up" for another people.


The idea of the Steiner-pedagogy is that when the person will get the esoteric information enough, will this information get the implosion like happened in the fusion test, wherein the same point will pump very much energy, and then the energy will work like that piece will start to generate the independent energy. And the same thing is in the key role of Steiner-pedagogy. In this pedagogy, the person will predispose the knowledge, until this person starts to produce own ideas and information. When lots of information will put in the person's head, will it work like in some fusion test: start to make and publish own ideas.


The road to the individualism goes thru the groups, and until the person has been in some collective, can this person realize what means the freedom to be alone. And only the person, who has been in the authoritarian and totalitarian country can respect the freedom to be different than the other people around this person are. The question of to be different is the question of the right to be individual. And only the individualists dared to make new ideas and other things.


They want to be different, and also they always want to be over the top. There are limits for the individualist, and real individualist dares to use their own imaginations for making products and bringing their thinking public. They are the professionals in one thing, what is called as the thinking. Thinking is not the very easy way to earn the brad to the table, and some people don't dare to bring up their own ideas. In this chapter, I must say, that everybody can copy another people writings, but only real thinker dares to write own thoughts and ideas as other people can read them.


The idea of day books is sometimes that they are used as the blackmailing material. But now my dear readers I must ask, why those people keep their day books secret? Why don't they publish their writings to another person, and keep that day book public, because then everybody can see how maniac that person is. When some person will keep their day books open, there will be no change to censor it, and then other people will get all texts what this writer have done.


They can't select only one sentence from some day book, and this is the way to show to other people what is full image of that writer. And in here we must say that the persons who will attack against other people are normally used the one or two sentences of the texts that are in the 100 pages day book. Then they will show that the person, who owns the day book, would be some kind of different than they are, by using two sentences as the argument.


When we are talking about Rudolf Steiner and his way to look the world, we must say, that the person is never an expert in everything in the world. There is no so-called common genius and in 19th. century, there was very little hope if the person gets cancer. In the studies method, Steiner might be the genius, but in the medical things, this PhD. was only the ordinary person, even if he hunted ghosts in them and talked the astral creatures. When Steiner talked about those creatures, I think that this person meant the memories or something like that.

Sources

Picture 1

https://www.goetheanum.org/fileadmin/_processed_/c/5/csm_1goefarbig_01_32fb9271bd.jpg