Sometimes important persons seem boring

https://gamesandtehories.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Willing to doubt sense is the key to making new things. The new ideas and new ways to do can only found from the old and traditional ways. When we are thinking new things and will to make new ideas, our mind needs food, and this makes our lifestyle important. The lifestyle must have three balanced parts, the fun, the rest and the work must take balanced roles in our life, and there is one thing, what we always forget. If one part in this triangle takes the too big role, that thing changes its form. Let's take an example. Have you ever took part to parties, where you must go? That might feel very funny, we always like the party.


But in this case, the parties are because the old grandma would have her 85th. birthday. In there the youngsters would not feel comfortable, because the old grandma doesn't normally listen to the same music what youngsters like. And the clothes and behavior in those parties are the little bit different than in normal school parties. In this case, the clothes, what youngsters wear might be different than in the normal parties they visit and do you think that they have fun to listen to the things, what they would not quite understand.


The business life is not the quite interesting thing in the mind of young people, and there are not many adults, who quite understand the mechanisms about the economy and society. But there are many people, who want to see the movie "Top Gun". They want to see, that the jet fighters are flying on the skies, and this makes that movie the great experience. But the reality is always forgotten. In the real life, those fighters or fighter-bombers are made for some purposes, and they are part of the most calculated strike force on the Earth.


And here I forgot one thing: the strike capacity of the military force must not be too high, because the force needs resistance. If there are no enemies, our military forces would sometimes take a control in the nation, what is not the very nice thing. But as we know the real life is not the movie, where we can get everything, what we want. If we want to be realistic, we need money for parties and another kind of things. And this means that we can't avoid the work. And many times the work is not so interesting looking, what we might want. There are many boring things, what are made by the boring looking persons, who might want to look boring. Those persons make houses, what is safe to live, and also they make fighters, what mission is to take the airspace to control and bomb the enemy targets away.


But when we are thinking about the second and more boding thing, what is making buildings, we might notice that there are many things, what could be dangerous. Have you seen the music video "Angels crying" of the techno band "E-Type"? In that video is the very interesting shower, what might not be allowed in real life. If there are two showers on the wall, what would be separated, there could be the way to kill the person. If some real evil person would connect the electricity to those showers, with installing the cables in the different tubes, the electric shock would kill that person instantly.


In some book, the killer connected the aggregate to that kind of system and executed the victim by using that very lethal method, what is very difficult to notice. In some death chambers of the concentration camps were used the salt water, what was be electric, and the metal floors were connected the electric circuit, that the electricity traveled thru those persons. When the showers would be used, the system will connect the circuits and the electric shock will kill the victim immediately. The similar system is used in the electric stun guns, where two ionized water showers will target the person and high voltage electric shock will terminate the target. Sometimes this impulse uses the lethal electricity, and that kind of weapons have been delivered to the special forces and law enforcement.

How to become popular in politics?

The Parliament of Finland
(Picture I)

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/p/how-to-become-popular-in-politics.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Many people might think, that this is the re-take of another text, what I wrote yesterday, but the reason, why somebody becomes popular in the political field is the very good question, and that's why I write it here. First, the person, who wants to be popular, must make speeches about the things, what people want to hear. And sometimes that is far away from realistic opportunities, what the state can give to the voters. There are always limits, what the state can pay because the national economy would and property of the state give limits, for what the government can buy, and what kind of taxes it must take from people. If there would be big payments, must the state increase level of taxes to fix the budgets.

Also, friends in the press and media would help the politician to get the opinions known to the large group of people. So politicians must make good influence about themselves for media, that the reporters would say good worlds for their program. And praise the opportunities, what the politician would give to the field of politics. This is the very good idea to become popular in every field, and of course, the good way to see, what makes people interested and like about the politician, is use decibel meter, and meter the time of the applause after speaking.

The feeling at the front of the speaker is the very good meter for the political leader or person who wants to become the political leader, that people want to hear the speeches of that person. And one of the worst mistakes is made in this field because if somebody offers something from some organization, should this person also mention, own position in that system.


Uniformed organizations are of course the very good field when something wants to promise, but there is one little problem with them. There is so little number of police officers and professional military men in the western democracies, that their votes would not raise any person in the position of prime minister. But those kinds of groups are the good field to give permissions because they seem like big and homogeneous groups. But the problem is those people afraid uniforms, and if the politician promises very much for those actors, would that cause that normal people would not give votes to that politician, what seems like some totalitarian.


And this is one reason, why the Second World War veterans got so much positive publicity, and many permissions were given straight to them. They were the big group of people, who have the same background. And if those big groups of people like some political movement or party, that brings votes for politicians. This is the mathematics of democracy. If somebody wants to get the workplace in the parliament, this person must get popularity from the people, that have only one vote to give. And only the vote, what is dropped in the box means in the election. The politicians want to please the major part of the electors, and if they want votes for new political movement, they must promise something different than old-school political leaders. And of course, they must get publicity.


That's why every political movement is very radical when it begins the work. Radicalism brings votes, and then they would get the place in the cabinets. And new political movements can always blame old actors, that all mistakes are made by them. One thing what would bring support from media is mention that some political movement has the biggest group of members in the political field. This might be sound good, but then we must ask one question: how many members are found in the party? And at the same time ask, clear answer to the question, by using numbers. In the field of politics is a good thing to find supporters from the media, because that brings free space for political advertising.


Same time, we might ask how many members are in the average party, what acts in the country, where lives five million people, and in the parliament is ten parties. There are 17 registered parties in Finland, and this makes me ask, how many members really is in those parties. But the being biggest party in the political field is the very notable thing, and it would bring more positive writings in media because big parties can get more sure places from parliaments than small parties. The membership of big party would bring more personal good for the active member, who is the good speaker than membership in the small party.


But same way we must say, that in the big party is found many opinions and the one permission is not enough, because the votes must be collected from the larger field. And that's why there must make investigations of average persons in the voting area, and make some permissions to them, and then some permissions, what are targeted in some precisely selected areas. If there would be many families with children, they might want some services for children, and if there would be the active military reserve, would they be interested in military funding for armed forces. Those examples are very far away from together, and that's why I put them here.


They are the perfect thing for compilation, what kind of permissions must politician give in the career. And that shows, how difficult is to be the politician. Without permission is no votes, and if the permissions go for wrong persons, who don't live in the voting area, would that cause the catastrophe. That means the end of the political career if the person is the first time in the election campaign. And if the result is the flop, would the supporters go to find another politician, whose campaign they want to sponsor.

Sources:

http://vaalit.fi/fi/rekisteroidyt-puolueet

https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/kansanedustajat/eduskuntaryhmat/eduskuntaryhmarekisteri/Sivut/default.aspx


Picture I

https://www.worldatlas.com/r/w728-h425-c728x425/upload/c4/bc/58/shutterstock-150288245.jpg

Writing about the boring thing (Why somebody hated Alexander the Great?)

Alexander the Great
336-323 B.C
Picture 1

About boring thing

Kimmo Huosionmaa
When we are making analyzes of the some Alexander the Great's national politics in the antique world, somebody thinks that is boring. But when we are concentrating on the military politics of ancient Macedonia, will that give us the key, how the conflicts were creating in that time. In this kind of situation, we must realize, that this great military leader was looking for his enemies far away, but he should look them inside his palace.


I don't know how many true battles has this iconic creature ever win, and how much of his glory has been made by other leaders and their poets and historians. The things what happened in the battles are only one thing about the life of this man, who died of poisoning at the age of 33 at Babylon.


In that time the truth about the battles was, what the writers or their payroll payers wanted, and if some writer had different opinions about those leaders, their head would cut off by the sword. So in the real life, the real Alexander the Great had very little connection between the person, who was as the main character of the books, what were written about him. When we are thinking about life and death of this war leader, we must say, that this man had very good preparations for his mission.


The priests were told him that he was the choice of the gods, and of course, there were many things, what gave Alexander the self-esteem to accomplish his mission. But when this man came back from his war, he has faced the situation, that his enemies were conquered his palace. One reason, why this man was probably murdered, was his way to use alcohol.


When he was drunk, this man was violent and could use his sword against his friends. That feeds the anger against Alexander. While he was young, this man saw very much violence, when his father killed one family member. And his way to drink caused the situation, where Alexander lost his memory. The guards might also kill his friends, and claimed that Alexander was guilty about those things, by giving orders to make those things or taking the sword by himself and striking his friends.


And that made him unstable against his friends, and agitators used those killings against his personality. There were many more people in those parties, and maybe Alexander and his friends were violent against them. And maybe somebody invented that the chef will be the next one who would be sacrificed and this man gave lethal poison to the king. So were the parties the reason, why that man was killed by poisonous vegetable like ricin. What is painless and very lethal poison, what will find in the plant, what has the same name than that poison.  This poison denies the work of mitochondria, and it might cause death in very small doses.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great

Picture 1

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cb/AlexanderTheGreat_Bust.jpg/300px-AlexanderTheGreat_Bust.jpg

Why radicalism is not the real answer to problems of the state?

Picture: Internet

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/whyradicalismisnotanswer/etusivu

The reason why traditional parties are back in popularity is that those "new age" parties can't reclaim the promises, what they have given to voters.  The power of populistic movements is that they promise something concrete to the people, but as it happened many times before those promises have been over limited when they are compared with resources of the state.


When some group begins to control the state, the limits will come from national funds. Those funds are the thing, what the government uses for paying its own payments to own citizens and of course to the other states. This fund is capital, what government uses if it must reclaim its money back from markets, and if there is too much money in the markets, it will collapse the value of money, if that money comes to markets.


That brings very strong disappointing for voters, who wanted to get those things, what those parties have been promised. And when those promises leave in the level of promises, will voters leave that party. When we are talking about radicalism in political control, we must say that radical movements are often driven their state to destruction. Example of that advantage is Bolshevik-revolution in Russia 1917 and rise of Nazi-government in Germany in 1930's.


Those movements were very radical, and that radical policy drove those states to war and then authoritarian government-controlling policy destroyed the economics of The Soviet Union, but the economics were a reason, why, Adolf Hitler attacked to Polland in 1939. The reason for the attack was that nazi-party took their popularity by promising work for the people, and they, of course, made many workplaces, but those workplaces were in the police force and military industry.


And of course, those workplaces were grown in public sectors, like building new houses for a new government. That made very bad losses for cash of the state, and then Hitler decided to attack against Poland because they wanted to rob that states money and national treasures. When economic situation is bad, will the people want new workplaces, but if those workplaces are only in the public sector, the economic situation will not able to fix. Only real marketing is an answer to the bad economic situation because public workplaces are only money holes for the government.