Graffiti, and its relationship with social media

https://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.com/

Kimmo  Huosionmaa


Graffiti and other wall writings are one way to make social media, and they have still a strong position in many subcultures. The graffiti is a mark for the border of some gangs area, and sometimes it tells the people, where are the parties, and who would be taken to the gangs. Graffiti is one way to make paintings. Many times there are people, who are concerning about that somebody would think of graffiti as an art, and here I must say, that making graffiti to the wall without permission is the thing, what would be punished.


Graffiti is actually an art like everything else, and it is protected by the copyright like other productive work. So that means, that introducing graffiti as the own product if it is made by some other person is violating copyright laws. And here I must say, that I haven't made the graffiti what is in this picture. But the maker would get inspiration from the Easter Islands stone heads, when this person made the graffiti, what is at the picture above the text.


There are claims, that sometimes the cleaning companies have paid to graffiti-makers, that they would make those pictures and the company would get jobs from those actions. But the graffiti is not the new thing. Even cavemen and ancient Greeks made those writings and paintings to the walls. They also made scupltures, what sometimes had the political purpose, and in that time making political graffiti could cause death penalty.


And here I must say that the youngsters were similar in ancient Greece and Roman empire as they are today. Some letters what have found from that age are telling, that some emperors were very unpopular. The letters have remained in good condition because they have been in anaerobic space, and that's why the texts could be read sometimes without any special equipment.


But when the scientists use the UV-light and photographing technology, where cameras take even thousands of pictures, what is connected to one photo, and laser scanners what separates the small risings in the paper, could even the weakest text read by scientists. And those texts would give us the good look in the regular people life in the Greek and Roman empire. Those people had similar problems as modern people, but one big difference is: they didn't have the Internet and Facebook. This is the biggest difference with modern people, and that's why the ancient people had better wealth than modern people.

Why Sergeant Meyer stole C-130E Hercules in 1969, and why he disappeared?

HC-130
(Picture I)

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/why-sergeant-meyer-stole-c-130e.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-articles/a-stolen-military-plane-in-1969.html

In 1969 at Great Britain one man stole an aircraft and then flew it somewhere, and this man Sergeant Meyer didn't ever found. The aircraft, what this Sergeant stole was C-130E and this thing is quite mysterious. The story itself is behind the links on above and below the text, and you might read that story from those articles. But here I must say, that there are many strange things, what makes this case so interesting.


C-130's  were used in some top secret missions in Vietnam, and one of those missions were used that airplane as the  gunship, another was electronic intelligence and the last one was using that aircraft as the launch platform for "Firebee" drones, and they also dropped  BLU-82 "Daisy Cutter" bombs to the Vietnamese targets. Also, those airplanes gave airborne refueling for combat helicopters like MH-53 Super Jolly Green Giants, what were used in special air rescue missions.  If that Meyer took part in those operations, that would cause the violence in that man, because PTSD (Post Traumatic Stress Disorder) causes that kind of symptoms, like violation and headache.

MH-53 takes refueling from HC-130
(Picture II) 

The first question, what we would perhaps ask from sergeant Meyer, would be where that man believed to go with that airplane? He stole that C-130 playing captain, but there is one thing, what we must handle. This is, that there might be very strange that captain rank officer would order gasoline for the overseas flight by using C-130. Of course, Meyer introduced himself as the captain of service crew, and in this case, the role, what that man took was the material officer.


In that article is claiming that Meyer was going to home to his stepchildren, but that meeting ever happened. Meyer was lost during this flight, and that was of course very stressful for his family. Meyer had two commands to Vietnam before that flight, and then some people believed, that man was under the emotional stress. He was drinking too much in his last evening, and that caused problems in the military base and outside it, and the problems began, when Meyer drunk too much in some parties, and then became violent. This would have something to do with that man's Vietnam duties, but if that sergeant was only the chief of the ground crew or technical crew, why would he got symptoms, what are common in combat veterans.

DC-130 with "Firebee drones"
(Picture III)

So was Meyer took part of actions of flight group "Commando Vault", and AC-130 gunship missions in Vietnam. When we are thinking about those operations that flight group destroyed million of North Vietnamese trucks in Ho Chi-Minh road. If Meyer was the member of SOCOM (Special Operations Command) that man could be played lower rank, what he actually had. And here comes very good question about that Sergeant. Where did he learn to fly that C-130E? Normally all pilots of the aircraft are actually officers, and if Meyer was some SOCOM or intelligence specialist, that man could actually fly his plane straight to home.


And another mission, where that man could serve were electronic intelligence missions, where the platform, what was used was C-130 "Hercules", what was equipped with electronic intelligence equipment, and the mission of those systems was to record the signals what North-Vietnamese radars send.  Also, C-130E was used in that time top secret drone-missions, where radio-controlled "Firebee" drones send to photograph North-Vietnamese military bases. Those early drones were highly classified, and the operations of those planes were also out of public eye. So if Meyer took part in those operations, that would explain strange disappearing of that man.


For the reason of lost that man and the plane was claimed to be that USAF shot down the C-130 and the man, who stole it. But if they did that, was the reason, because of some of those missions were illegal, and Meyer wanted to keep silent? Or did he just an ordinary sergeant, who just lost control of the C-130? But also the reason for shooting that plane down could be that somebody was afraid that Meyer would try to dive his plane in some house like The Parliament of Great Britain or White House. And that action could be made because saving the innocent lives. And this is only speculation. There is no evidence about that kind of orders, and also that Meyer involved some "Air Commando" operations in Vietnam is also speculation.

Sources:

http://peteralanlloyd.com/the-use-of-drones-during-the-vietnam-war/

https://theaviationist.com/2014/07/28/ac-130-vietnam-war/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLU-82

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Firebee

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/war-articles/a-stolen-military-plane-in-1969.html

Picture I

https://www.warhistoryonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/1200px-us_airforce_hc-130-741x521.jpg

Picture II
https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/aircraft/images/hc-130-dvic192.jpg

Picture III

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/1a/DC-130H_Hercules_drone_control_with_a_pair_of_AQM-34_Firebee.JPEG

https://pimeakronikka.blogspot.fi/p/why-sergeant-meyer-stole-c-130e.html

Why this captain of the Akula-class submarine tells that he was sailed unseen near the coast of the United States?

Akula-class submarine
(Picture 1)

https://www.facebook.com/IWCsync/posts/10156448642159406

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Submarines are secrets of the state, and then that’s why I’m asking a question, why this Russian submarine captain tells about this kind of thing? When we are thinking about this “Akula”-class nuclear attack submarine, it can destroy multiple targets inside the opponent's area by using SS-N-21 nuclear cruise missiles. Also, all other Russian submarines have those missiles and they are shown their capacities in the war of Syria. Those missiles are also used in new land-based highly mobile cruise missile systems.


But why this captain of the submarine leaks the information, that he was near the coast of United States? The operations of nuclear submarines are normally highly classified, and the capacities of nuclear submarines are very great secret. Here I must say, that those talking might be made because they are meant for afraid the NATO-countries. But in this case, the question might be about information warfare.


That leak might be very highly calculated, and the objective of that information might be put the pressure to the United Kingdom, what should be shaken because the Novichok chemical agent was used against the Russian immigrate family, who lives in the United Kingdom. First, the panic might be very dramatic, because the strike believed to made by delivering the Novichok agent thru the mail slot.


But later the reason for poisoning was less dramatic. Nobody carried Novichok to the United Kingdom. I read somewhere that the Novichok agent would be put in the daughter’s luggage when this was visited in Russia. When I’m thinking about this behavior, I don’t think that the threats what was targeted to those persons, were not very powerful. And I must ask also if those people thought that Russian intelligence threatened their lives, why they went to Russia? I don’t know was this man, who was ex-Russian spy visited in Russia, but his daughter was.


The question is why those poisonings happened so uncommon chemical agent? Why didn’t those attackers use some more common chemical agent like cyanide? Or why those mysterious poisoner’s didn’t simple shot those persons? Here are many questions, what makes this case very uncommon. And why the finger of evidence shows so clear to Russians?


What kind of intelligence service pulls itself to the target of the prosecutions of murders? The suspicious of murders, what are made by Russian intelligence makes the operations of those services more difficult because they would be problems with carrying the equipment over the borderline, and that kind of high-profile assassinations would cause that the suspected intelligence officers would be followed by counter-intelligence officials more often than before those attacks.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akula-class_submarine

https://www.facebook.com/IWCsync/posts/10156448642159406

Picture 1:

http://nationalinterest.org/files/styles/main_image_on_posts/public/main_images/akula.jpg?itok=QK_sMtep