There is a rumor that Russia would plan to attack to Ukraine

The Moscow Kremlin
(Wikipedia)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Some cyber companies have claimed, that maybe Russia is going to attack to Ukraine, and this is the very alarming situation. Not only for Europe because that can make the world very unstable place. The problem for Russian military is that it has a very low number of men because it must same time defend rest of its borders if that State would begin the war in Europe.


There is a chance that somebody would attack to the back of Russians, and that might cause the very difficult situation for those troops, and if the situation turns to full-scale warfare, would it cause that Russians or some other nation would attack with nuclear weapons in the opponent's area. That is very problematic in the relationship with Russians, who are wanted to see themselves as the beneficiaries of the Soviet Union, and this is the reason, why that nation attracts some left-wing political activists, who see Putin as the representer of the "old school socialism".


This makes Russia so strong in information warfare. They would always claim, that in that land things are better than anywhere else. And of course, Russian gas company Gazprom has always something to give, if other states want to be friends with Russians. The solution to every problem is the strong and masculine army, what is the great tool in the hands of Kremlin, and of course, the power of the nuclear weapons is very confessing, and it guarantees that Kremlin's way to see things is in the prime role in media. And then there would be news, where the Russian military would win NATO in 15 seconds, what purpose is to support nationalists around Europe.


The main purpose of that kind of news and information is to scatter European Union, and at the same time would there be given many advise, how to handle foreign and refugees. That would be a good reason to hire more police and military men, and of course, at the same time would be delivering the information, that EU would cause next conflict between Russia and NATO. And the best opportunity to avoid conflict with that nuclear-armed superpower would be separating from EU. This would guarantee, that Russia would not start aggression against those states, what is heard the wise men of Kremlin.


Of course, the situation, where some state would left alone, would make opportunity for Kremlin start the aggression. The policy, what Russia uses in EU is scratch and rule those states. And at the same time, skinheads and Neo-nazis would play the role that they are taken support from Kremlin, and if those persons would start violent actions against Russian citizen, would it cause the reason, that Russian military would come to protect its citizens, and then the Russian military would start the occupation  in that area. This would be a good reason, be reasonable, but as we know that reasonable men would not go to war, and they would not become legends, and that's why we might not be reasonable.  Or would Finland be an even independent state, if this country were led by reasonable men in 1939, when the Soviet Union started the conflict, what is known as the "Winter War"?


The wall of Europe would seem very good in the eyes of nationalists, but there is only one problem. Behind that wall would the enemy start to grow, and that would cause the similar situation, what the Wall of Hardianus caused to the Roman empire. That thing caused the situation, where legions couldn't destroy the enemies of the Rome, and they were grown bigger and stronger than that empire. This is the reason, why European wall would not be the suitable solution for the long period use.


For the stable solution must those nations, where refugees are coming make restless. And the democracy is one road for stable peace, but of course, there always be some persons, who want to make terror attacks and other violent actions. That kind of persons are known as terrorists, and they would not want to go to jail. Or sometimes their actions have caused very much pain for local people, and that makes them very hated. That means they have no other change than fight or die because they would not have future in anywhere. And those persons are the most dangerous enemies.

Sources:

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-cyber-routers-ukraine/cyber-firms-warn-on-suspected-russian-plan-to-attack-ukraine-idUSKCN1IO1U9

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/

What is so special with Russian relationship with nuclear weapons?

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-so-special-with-russian.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

We always read stories about Russian new nuclear weapons, and of course, we must notice, that Russian military forces have the very strong relationship with those weapons. Nuclear weapons give attention to every nation, what have those weapons, and they are the good shield for every state. And at the same time, we might wonder, why Russian government doesn't even try to introduce a single defensive nuclear weapon?


Of course we can say, that offensive attack against enemy military forces is the best defense, but then we must consider, that attacking against other nations is always against international law, and making that with high power nuclear weapons causes very much suffering and pain in targeted states, where millions of people would die in those attacks. But why Russia always develops that kind of weapons, what uses megaton size nuclear warheads?



One of the reasons for that is sometimes mentioned, that Russian conventional strike capacity is not so good that NATO has. There are own problems with making GPS-guided bombs and missiles, what allows airplanes to close the target in free angle, and that satellite-guided ammunition is "fire and forgets"-type munitions. Same way some of the equipment of Russian military are very old, and there might be problems in their tolerance. I mean that any nuclear reactor is not outlasted forever.


But there could be more problems in the military technology, what is not mentioned. The Russian military has problems to get computer programs and electronic components, what is needed for high-tech military systems like drones. And the attitudes of the old fashion generals and admirals makes problematic to make new kind of intelligent military technology in the hands of the Russian military. Those generals believe the power of tanks and artillery, with massive firepower. The result of that is seen in Syria, where Russian bombardment destroyed over 80% of infrastructure. That bombardment was effective against the infrastructure of targeted cities, but the destruction was very massive. And the use of firepower was similar as in Grozny, where the use of massive firepower caused more damages than any terrorist organization could ever make.


This is the problem with the Russian military. When they would destroy entire cities, they would not able to take DNA and other samples from ruins, what would help to track terrorists, and maybe some members of terrorist organizations could slip off those areas claiming that they were dead. But this is only thinking about problems about using massive firepower in the urban area. And maybe some Nazis could slip off the Berlin because they were claimed that they were dead.


Maybe some of them would ever found because their bodies were exploded in pieces in the bombardment of Red Army artillery.  The main problem of the Russian military is the very huge size of that country, and this has maybe caused that many wars have been canceled for that reason. In Russia is about 146 million people, that means there is very small population if that is compiling with the size of that country. And that nation has many neighbors, what of course wants to take part of Russian natural wealthiness like oil and metals. This means that if the Russian military would go in the full-scale operations in Europe, some other country could seize this hypothetical situation and attack against Russia, would that state need nuclear weapons for protecting itself.


The Russian military has the problem, that if some man fights in the European area, that same man cannot protect Russian borders in the Far East. And that is, of course, the very good break for military operations in European territory. And we must know that Russia is the nation with nuclear weapons, and we must live with that thing. There is also very much natural resources like gas, what Russia wants to sell to the West, and that makes the relationship with that nation very complicated, and many political leaders wants to forget the situation in Ukraine, because that makes problematic to buy gas from Russia, and if the Russian gas would be used in European power plants, gives that  possibility for Russia to blackmail European countries, by cutting gas deliveries, if some nations policy doesn't please Russian leaders. This means that if some leaders of European Union talks against Russia, would the pressure in the gas tube decreased, and that would be the good method for controlling the economy in another country by using the non-violent method.


The reason for decreasing gas-pressure could be explained as the service of the gas tube. And that would be one method to give pressure for European countries to understand that Russia is the superpower and other nations should understand that. And nuclear weapons are very big status in International politics and good shield against military aggression against that nation. They would raise the tolerance limit for Russian actions extreme high, and for the same reason, many other nations have to get those weapons because they are giving better position in the international field of diplomatic talking.

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-so-special-with-russian.html

What is the problem with the question of Jerusalem?

 Bulgarian Air Force Sukhoi SU-25UBK_Lofting
 (Wikipedia)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The result of the confession Jerusalem as the capital of Israel was what people should expect.When we are facing the real political life, and it connects to religion, we might see something, what happened in United Nations, when the President of The United States confesses Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Almost every other states in the world were against that decision, and the result was crushing for that action. So what is the point of the situation of Jerusalem, what was conquered by Israel Troops in 1967, and after that occupied by same government?

One reason for this conflict is the weapons what are dumped to the Middle East, and of course, the salesmen of the weapons wants that their products are the most effective in this operational area. And that is the reason, why Apache and MI-24 helicopters and tactical support planes like F-16 and SU-25 are very much in the television. Even if SU-25 "Frogfoot" seems little old fashion, it is easy to modify with "smart weapons kit" as a modern close support aircraft, and Israel has modified also MI-21 "Fishbeds" to operate with smart bombs, laser-guided missiles like "Maverick" and "Hellfire" and the most modern missiles like AIM-120 AMRAAM" if the weapon hard-points were changed. And there is of course capacity to operate with the Russian missiles. The SU-25 offers a cheap choice for expensive NATO-planes.

http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/mig21/

The reason why Israel dares to do that occupation is, that its government gets very much military aid from Washington, and this makes those rulers so brave with their actions against Palestine people. But as we might see there are many truths of that area and the occupation of the Palestine areas makes Israeli government very unpopular in that area. And the main role of the Israeli community is the hardcore militarism and one of the most important export articles of the country is military equipment. The reason why Washington gives support for Israel is that this nation is weak, and its capability for making war with the other nations depends on the support what Washington gives to it.

And that is very important because this denies Israel to slip into the hands of Russia. And of course, the reason for friendship between Israel and the USA is very simple. The USA can use Israel as the bridge-station if it wants to make the invasion into Middle-East. Another part of this strategy is wealthy states in the Gulf area, what have weak military forces. Those states must give military bases for the United States Air Force, and even if the tactical aircraft can operate from carriers, the airborne tanker aircraft and heavy cargo planes need the fixed runways.


Those aircraft are the necessary part of giving airborne refueling capacity for strategic bombers and the tanks and other protection and technical support units of that airbase. In this strategy, the airborne refueling aircraft gives operational support also for the United States global nuclear task force, and also those military bases will act as the emergency landing sites for B-1 and B-52 bombers. Also, this strategic set is mentioned for denying Russia take control of all oil production in the Middle East. The problem of that area is that the USA and its allies have the technological advantage, but Russia and its allies control the oil fields. Of course, Russian technology is also good and in the last sentence, I meant technology, what is used by local actors. The Russian military also wants to advantage its global strike capacity, and it's airplanes need same kind of support than the USA:s airplanes. So this guarantees the Russian interest to the Middle East.


The problem is that Russia controls the route of the gas to Europe, and it wants to connect the European energy solution for Russian gas, and that's why the situation in Syria is very suitable for Russian interests. If the Middle East is the unstable area, the Russian oils and gas will become more interesting opportunity for Europe, and of course, if those contracts are cheap enough, the advantage of the Russian political and social environment might be without notice. And I think that European leaders won't want to connect European energy solutions the goodwill of Turkey or some other Islamic states. If Russia takes control of the coastline of Georgia, the gas line from the Middle East to Europe will be under Russian control. And it will give political advantages for Vladimir Putin and Kreml.

https://luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2017/12/22/what-is-the-problem-with-the-question-of-jerusalem/

Secrets of EC-130 "Commando Solo".

EC-130J "Commando Solo"
(Source Internet)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/secretsofec130commandosolo/etusivu

Somebody says that U.S or Russian military have the ultra voice-based systems what are meant for brainwashing or creating absolute hate in those people, who are in the effective range of that equipment. The rumors say that that equipment was uncovered when the Soviet Union collapsed. Those systems are equipped with special purpose airplanes like EC-130 “Commando Solo".


 When people are talking about EC-130 “Commando Solo" airplanes they don’t usually understand that “Commando Solo" is an equipment what can install any radio-.or TV-station all around the world. This system has the capacity to send subliminal messages to the enemy command or civil information network or use it equipment as a normal ECM-system, and the airplane has also ultra powerful LRAD-equipment. Other those parts of that weapon systems are specially modified TV- and other network equipment like extremely powerful WLAN-systems and special radio maser-system what can target the radio signal to one specific target like moving car, what will have own radio network by this plane, and also operators of that system might use remote computing to operate those systems.


The capacity of “Commando Solo” is to take enemy communication system under control and deliver false information of the situation to the enemy troops. But those subliminal sound system might have devastating and horrifying use as psychological operations against some countries. Also, this heavily modified airplane might able to give assistance for the law enforcement in the hostage situation. But if “Commando Solo" will use against some fighter pilots, they might think forced to jump over from the other side or order them to shoot missiles against the own targets.


If somebody misuse this kind of equipment this might cause even the mass murders if those system operators want. The reason why I’m writing this is, that large-scale psychological operations might cause the same scale of destruction than weapons of mass destruction. That’s why we must realize that this kind of weapon is more dangerous than any gun in the world. The forefather of that weapon was used in the Vietnam war. The there operator said to loudspeaker what used infrasound frequency “stand up". And when enemy military jumped up the sniper shot him immediately.


That was the reason, why the United States military was very interested in this kind of equipment. The use of this kind of weapons is the very scary thing. If somebody thinks that some infra voice systems are harmless, I must say that those systems might put us to see our worst nightmare. Those signal systems might install in the systems that are created for electronic warfare. That means that changing the programs of the ECM (Electronic Counter Measure) systems, what makes every airplane or radar in the world as the psychological warfare system.



That system can use to incite the people to do the things, what they ever can imagine. Those subliminal systems are very dangerous in the wrong hands. Some people are said that those systems are tested in some supermarkets. And they might be used to influence the people’s opinion for many things and make them buy anything that that system owner wants. So that is one reason, why subliminal loudspeakers must talk seriously.