Katýn forest massacre what was almost forgotten.

Tokarev-pistol, what was very popular
in the use of NKVD
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The massacre, what was made by NKVD (MGB) in the Katýn Forest, Poland, where this organization liquidated or murdered Polish officers in 1939-1940. The massacre was ordered by the head of NKVD and the reason, why the Soviet authorities were so silent about this particular action, was that those executions were made to cover the Soviet co-operatives identities and some officers who were co-operatives got new identities in that operation.


Some of those traitors might mark as executed in Katýn. The shootings of those officers were done in various places in the Baltic area, and there were stories that they began in the October 1939, and the victims of the executions were stored in the flesh storages, where they NKVD was kept them in cold. When we are seeing the film about this case, we will notice, that younger officer like gives orders to general in charge, and I don´t know how many interviews the filmmaker was made for his documentary films scenes, what was played by actors, but if younger  officer gives orders to general, we might think, that this general have not got very much popularity.


We remember Katýn because those murdered people were officers. NKVD made many more murders, where it was shot ordinary people and none of those victims would not get the memory statues. So is Katýn remembered only because those victims were officers? When we are thinking about the shootings, we must understand that chief of NKVD, general Yezhov was executed after this action. And the order was given by Joseph Stalin, who gave personal orders to eliminate those officers Or this is what Yezhov was claimed. But as we know, this man was a drug addict, who used opiates.


 And this made him the good person for the tool for Stalin, and he was easy to blame, because of his unpopularity. So was Yezhov only the shield, who covered some other man´s crimes, and when he was sent to the grave, there were many people, who would be more guilty than this unpopular man, who is known as the drug addiction and one of the most notorious killers in history. Yezhov was the man, who planned the execution room, and this was the thing, what he was proud. But many people think that Yezhov was too impulsive for plan anything more than next heroin dose.


So who made those rooms, where victims were shot is actually the mystery. When the shootings were done in Katýn there were not used the standard execution patrons, and that´s why the walls of the shooting cabinets were covered by blood and the executioners were walked in the blood, what was the very bad mistake because the prisoners were alerted and that was taken executioners in danger. And maybe some of the executioners were made mistakes, and shot their comrades by an accident when they came backward of the victim, who started to fight at the wrong moment.  If the shooter didn´t use the silencer, could prisoners warned too early, and maybe some of them were too tough for those executioners.


If the shooter were taken some drugs, there might be the situation, where the gun would get by the wrong person, and of course, if the shooter was drunk, that might scare the persons, who kept hold the prisoners, and that might cause the situation, where the prisoner could free himself. Maybe some prisoners managed to escape if they would get the gun of the shooter, and I believe that they would not tell that thing anywhere. But this was only the speculation. But when we are talking about this very bad crime, we must ask one question. How NKVD chose the persons, who were shot in that place? Did they know something, what NKVD didn't want them to know? How those killing lists were made, and who made them?  There were much Polish soldiers in the Soviet army in 1940´s at the war against Germany.

Sources

Picture 1

https://c1.staticflickr.com/9/8527/8675480377_a7600eeb7b_b.jpg

The story of the crucifixion and the Roman methodology of the punishment.

Uspenski orthodox cathedral Helsinki

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The crucifixion is probably the most hated and brutal way to execute the human been, and because this method was chosen for execution of Jesus Christ we hate that method very much. And we are of course hating Pilatus, the man who gave that judgment after 2000 years. But when we are looking for the method, what was chosen to kill Jesus, we must think that the death penalties are mentioned for the warning, what would happened if somebody speaks or acts against the Roman Emperor. The crucifixion was one method, what was able to use against the people, who threatened the superiority of the Roman Empire, and the problem of that method was that the crucified person should not yell anything against the Rome, and something had to be used to close the victim's mouth.


Because if that person hangs in the execution pile, will that person say something bad for the Rome for last words, and that was the reason, why the death on the cross was so feared. Everybody feared that method and that was not comfortable even for the Roman authorities. So when Roman authorities wanted that the person would be silent forever, they normally send the undercover legionnaires to neutralize the target.


When we are talking about whipping, the methodology what the Roman empire used in that kind of punishment was poisoning with Cobras poison. The whips were moistened in the poison, what was tapped from Cobra or Mamba, and after that, the whips just touched the victim. That poison is the mixture with neurotoxic and the component what destroys tissue, and causes the situation, where on victim's body will open the cut, where the nervous poison will be suck in the victim’s blood, causing the death almost immediately. Same way the crown of thorns could be deadly if that is pet with the poison of those snakes, and of course the nails that are used in this action, would be covered with poison.


So why those methods were not used in this particular punishment? Why Roman Empire and Pontius Pilatus made that man the hero? Was in the Roman interests actually use that very frighten punishment for the man, who did not even take the sword in his hand? The normal methodology what the Romans used was that they were the “nice guys”, who just cut the heads off, and the tough and painful methods were reserved for the vassals of Rome, whose mission was to prepare the area for the Roman control. And those men were extremely hated.



The reason why Roman vassal Herodes ordered the massacre of Jerusalem about 30 years before this particular eastern. The Christmas night massacre, where all children of that city were killed, was meant for killing the King David family and cut the bloodline of the king of Israel. There is one very interesting part of the Holy Bible, and there was mentioned, that Josef was a room and family of King David, what might mean that Maria was actually the member of the royal court of King David. Josef was also the high-rank nobleman, who was from the remarkable family, but not member of the royal family of  David. But the Holy Bible was not ever mentioned one very important thing.


How close member of that royal family was for David. Did they be some kind of cousins? And another question will raise from that book. Why didn’t they have room in that city? When the Romans were ordered that tax collection and the massacre, they were calculated the people, and reserved them the rooms. That would make the arresting easier, but did somebody took the place of that family? Or did Josef or Maria actually lied that they were members of the royal family? And the question is, why they didn’t have that room in the city? Why did they have to go in the cowshed? This is the questions that are made in this case from 2000 years ago.