The information what is given about gangs might be different from the truth.

https://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

On YouTube have been some very interesting videos, where persons are using violence or try to escape from the police. There have been discussions about those films because those persons have been quite easy to identify.  When police or some other organization delivers information, the purpose of that is sometimes so innocent as people believe. In the cases, when information delivered as an example about robberies, the information about pillages might be wrong, because that is meant to cause argumentation in the gang.


So the pillage is sometimes told to be bigger, what it really is because in the mind of criminals want to put the idea, that somebody of them has stolen from that pillage.  When some state would underline the violence and influence of gangs, we must remember, that this kind of information could be delivered because violent groups wanted to show them existence more openly, and that helps police and other organizations take the control of those gangs more effectively. In the real world, the motorcycle gang headquarters is the very good place for getting information about the people, who want to hide some muscles for illegal business.


Also, the well-known members of that kind of organizations are a very good target for undercover surveillance teams, what are searching persons, who want to make business with that kind of groups. The information is the very powerful weapon, and if we are thinking about the situation, that somebody photographs motorcycle gangs, and delivers that information to YouTube, would that cause sleepless nights for somebody. If some underage person hangs with those persons, that information would come as a surprise for the parents, who might not be very proud of their children at that time, when they see, that they are hanging with those MC-members. The motorcycle clubs are not always criminal organizations, but that hobby is good cover for criminal activities.


Sometimes there have been claiming that the members of the motorcycle clubs have been yelled, that they don't want to be photographed. Here I must ask, why those persons hide their membership because they use those vests and other marks of that gang? So why they don't want to show their membership in some newspapers or other media? Is there something, what they want to hide.  And those metal parts can use as a cover for changing the deactivated weapons for functional versions. That kind of business is always prohibited in the law. When we are going to think about 3D printers and they use in illegal weapon production, we must understand that drug dealer and another kind of criminals normally use weapons, what they can throw away after shooting.


Those persons would not even want high-class military weapons, and they have used even flare guns in their actions. The flare pistol have loaded with shotgun ammunition, and it can use as the single shot weapon, and of course, that gun would be destroyed in that shot. But if somebody attacks against that defender, would the shotgun ammunition stop that attacker immediately. Of course, those rockets can also use against the attacker. And if the user was some drug dealer, must that gun throw away anyway, this is the problem with gangs. They use normally improvised weapons in their normal business and the assault rifles and another kind of weapons are reserved for the bosses and punishers. And that is the very interesting thing in the world of gangs.

The second civil war of the United States of America

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

So here is the time for some conspiracy stuff, and I decided to make this writing about the "second civil war in the USA". The civil war of the USA in 1861 to 1865 cost over 300 000 casualties and that war was one of the bloodiest in the history of that nation. Today we are concerning the freedom and our privacy, and we have almost forgotten one quite interesting idea of the civil war. When the Union won the war in 1860's there were claiming, that the Southern side of Confederate would try to make relevance in sometimes after the civil war.


 And here is the very interesting thing about that claim or rumor. What if there were another civil war in that nation? What if those politicians and military men were not told about that war to the people, and then nobody even knew about this internal conflict. This theory or story have been told to explain the time of the wild west, and maybe some parts of this story are true. But in the modern time is claiming that some internal groups of USA would want to begin the civil war, and then somebody got an idea, that why people should know about that kind of things? The only information, what is needed is, that somewhere is an armed person, who might be dangerous. This is the only information, what the law enforcement must know when they come to make arrests.


If somebody would serve in the some "shotgun company" in the middle west, why that person would not treat as the normal criminal? Why should every people know about that kind of persons political interests? When we are talking about terrorism, we are facing the fact, that why people should know about that organization? If the terrorist group is well known, it has more easy to recruit people, and here we are facing the question, what if the British have not mentioned IRA? Or newspapers would not be mentioned about the rebel of General Lee? And why that person's military rank mentioned? Why didn't they make that person the normal leader of the outlaw gang?


What if newspapers would not tell, that Lee had some political purposes, and if that man would be mentioned as the normal outlaw, who robbed banks or something? Would somebody join that rebel team? And if the IRA would not ever be mentioned, would anybody even know about that organization? This is the key in the stories about "The second civil war". If nobody ever knows about the rebellions, they would not join that force too easily. And maybe press have been censored the political aspects of the outlaw's actions in the Wild West in the 1880's? Who knows the truth?

About nicknames of the people

https://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Nicknames are the thing, how the friends and social environment call people. They are sometimes only the translations about real names or they are marking some personal detail of the man. When some gang member is called "the Rat" backward, that could mean that this person likes so-called "rat bikes", what are one style to make Choppers. But that can also mean, that this person is suspected the informer for the police or that person can also tell things for other members of the gang, or be some other way traitorous.


But there is also nicknames, what mission is to show respect for the person. That kind of nicknames are very fine, and their mission is also cover the identity of the carrier of that name. But when we are thinking about the gangs, there are persons, who use only nicknames, we are facing the person, who have something to hide. Or sometimes the nickname of the person is given because this person is violent and other members of the gang would afraid that man. In that case, the other persons might use themselves very disgusting nicknames, because they want to please that person.


Sometimes the nickname is given because the person looks like something. When we are talking about nicknames, like "Spooky", the person is normally very big and strong, and maybe that person walks the little bit bent position. So that person is exactly like some "Spooky" in the children's channel. But when we are thinking about the shape of actor David Duchovny in the TV-series "X-files", does this person look like some spooky in the TV? This is one flop in this fictive series, what told about humanoids and FBI.


But when we are looking at those "Spookies", there would be children, who afraid those characters, and maybe if the fear is connected with the summer home, there could be some person stand in the yard when the child has been waking up in the night. And if that kind of afraid is very dominating, the reason for that should be uncovered. If there would stand some man in poplin jacket, the reason for that would be nice to know.

Kleptomaniac is the ritual thief, but the thing what drives people to those actions is often hidden in the past

Picture 1

Kimmo Huosionmaa



Kleptomania means the need to steal the stuff from shops. The purpose of that psychiatric behavior is to get something, what that person missed in the youth. Or actually, it means forcing need to steal.  Some kleptomaniacs steal only from the shops and somebody are specialized stealing people property from the pockets. This behavior was born because somebody has taught that person, that if somebody leaves something in the pockets, it's right to take them from there. In some cases, in the schools, the elder pupils are ordered younger pupils to empty the pockets from the jackets, what are left in the hat rack.


Many people steal from the shops, and they are not cleptomaniacs because the reason for stealing might be the loss of money because of alcoholism and misuse of narcotics. That kind of people must steal because they don't have money for their life, and especially the drugs are very expensive for the people, who are living on the streets because of drug addiction.



Sometimes the persons steal from the shops because they don't have age to buy some stuff like alcohol or tobacco, and they wanted to test those things. And those unthinkable actions might cause very many problems for those people especially if they attended to serve in law enforcement jobs. The stealing is a crime, and there are also people, who will start to blackmail the persons who have stolen property and steal the stuff from markets might cause that the person will go to the violent gangs and that is the very bad thing.


Those gangs, what are made even the brutal murders are hunting for the thieves and other small criminals, and then they will start to ask the "tax" from other people, who are hanging on their area. And those gangs might even force the other people to use and sell drugs in their neighborhood. But when we are talking about the kleptomaniac, we mean the person who steals the things what even this person doesn't need. In the departments of the kleptomaniacs is founded even thousands of stolen drill machines, what are still in unopened packages.


And also the magazines were in unopened cellophane cores. The kleptomania is the symptom, what conducts from the younghood. The nucleus of this syndrome is that person will not open the products, what has been stolen from the shops. In some cases, the person who has this symptom have ever got anything in the childhood, and then there have created the need to get the products or their packages as the "gift". Another reason why kleptomaniacs steal from the shop is that they will get attention from another person when they are been busted by stealing.


Human been is a social species, who needs another person around individuals, and if the person's only social contact is some security guard, will that person start to like them, even if they are busted the person. In this kind of cases, the security guards or the law enforcement are only persons, who will not yell at that person. The humans are made of the social individuals, and we have to need to get another people around us, who accepts us. And this need drives persons to the gangs and violence. In some cases, the kleptomania is the reason for the bad conscience. This behavior is sometimes the reason for betraying some younghood friend, and the betraying was very nasty in some of those cases.


When the person wanted to get out of the gangs and start the career as some trusted profession, the way might be, that the person sets up the gangmate for stolen property, and then the friend will get very much worse things in the life. And in those cases, the person, who was sat up, was sometimes very close friend, and then kleptomania will be like the signal of bad feeling about this action, what might give the informer even the way to some elitist clubs.


Those trials might be very traumatic experience because in those cases very close friend testifies against the person, who might be the friend of that individual from the childhood. And then the parents of that informer might be behind this thing. Sometimes people think, that if they are working as the informer for the police, will they get mercy from the judge. This is the reason why some drug addicts are so willing to share their information with police. They believe that if they will tell that somebody stole the box of cigarettes in about ten years ago in the age of 14  from the shop, will that information so hardcore, that those narcomaniacs will be released from gang violence and drug smuggling. This is the thing, what some of those people will think when they will come to the police station to sell their friends to the officers of the law.

Sources

Picture 1

https://wordsmith.org/words/images/kleptomania_large.jpg

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kleptomania

How behavior sciences helps to track of dangerous people from the community

Marlon Brando's iconic look in 1950's
movie The Wild One
(Picture from Internet)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When somebody warns the people of some gangs like Hell’s Angels, we must realize, that those people of some "uninformed gangs"  are very visible persons in the community. Those persons what might be members of any gangs want to look like normal people. Earrings with skull and another gang stuff like lethal jackets and uniform- style clothes are shown that those people are members of some gang, what membership is very wanted status in the underworld. And nobody says the thing about those very strange clothes, what the gang leaders use when they want to show their position in the community, and the good example of that are lethal clothes and strange hats, what also Marlon Brando used in one of his movies "The Wild One".


The membership of those gangs gives that person the girls and parties. And that’s why the law enforcement will follow the central persons of those gangs, to predict the actions of another criminal. The leadership of the underworld gangs is the very visible thing, because those people will always give orders to another person, and that will put the stamp on that person behavior.


If somebody always tells another person what they must do, it will be very notable part of some people speak. The things what the gang leader always does is like “would you open the window".  Those questions are always orders to another person of the gang. The thing what shows to another person that somebody is the leader of the gang is very simple, those “kings” have always people around them. And they always give orders to another person.


They never do anything self, and that will show the position of the hierarchy in society. And of course, some people would hear only positive things about them self. The leader of the gang always want to be a good looking person, and that is the reason why some of those men have “contrast person" in the next to that boss.


This person might be very fat, and the reason why the boss is keeping this fat person near self is that if some fat person stands near somebody else, then another person seems thinner. And of course those fat persons have always trouble to find friends, and that’s why their social life depends on membership of the gang. The bad thing is that their membership depends on the leader of the gang, and all the things are made with the boss.


And everything that the boss says to that contrast person is sinking. The leader of the gang might throw the candies to the floor, and then this contrast person must take them up. And the leader will always show that this contrast person allows the leader to do anything, what this boss wants. This also means that this fat person always dropped to the home, when other persons of the gang will send to the parties.

Why media will handle only a negative part of the life?

Kimmo Huosionmaa


The problem with media is that there will ever be introduced an average person's life. A person who is the main character in documents and movies is always some kind of ultimate version of people what represented of some lifestyle, what is introduced in those programs. Do you think that Pablo Escobar is some kind of an average version of the drug dealer? That man had billions of cash, but does some so-called “street level"'drug dealer that kind of money, or does he even dream about that, when that person hangs around some shopping center and sells some crack-capsules. What made Escobar so frightening person, was his money.


He could hire mercenaries to support his reputation. But I always thought that Escobar was only a shield man for some other actors in that dirty business. If people have money, he could do almost everything, but if he want’s to hire a mercenary, must he have the right relationships. Nobody wants to get smoked that the person has been worked as a mercenary. That’s why they take jobs only from agents who they trust. And being mercenary in somewhere Africa is the little bit different than making murders in normal western State. If a person will smoke that he is an assassin, will he or she punish by the court of law? The line of that kind of people is extremely tough. Those prisoners ever get out from prison.


But in those cases like Escobar, we might see what is the direction, where media sometimes goes. I don't know why they are not writing about guys who were in gangs and after that, they began to live a normal life without any problems. Why the objective of those documents is always so negative? They always begin that kind of problems with interest, but soon after intros, the journalist really begins to show really bad attitude for that case. They just are beginning to find some errors in that case, and sometimes the information what has been given to people is very grotesque.


They bring in front of the public eye some that targets friends, who might be in jail. But they never tell to people, why those people were arrested and what was a crime, where convictions came. And of course, they never tell to people, how long those "criminals" were been in jail. Only thing what is mentioned, has been that those persons are convicted for some crimes. If we see that kind of journalism realistic, we must be naive.


There is always news where drug user brutally killed the people who helped them. But when we are taking a focus in those stories, we must realize that narcotics users might be very dangerous and unpredictable because they have hallucinations. But when we are talking about those cases, there have been only a couple of that kind of cases in the Europe. And didn't anyone told those people, that if somebody uses drugs, he might be blackmail by his fellows to let them in?


And why reporters only take this kind of crimes on the front pages of newspapers? In here I must ask, is the help what came to those persons so altruistic at all? Why they bought a cell phone to that guy? I know that these are the most brutal worlds, what anybody can write, but didn't anybody tell to those people, that money should ever give drug user or alcoholics. They just buy more drugs with that money. When narcotics control the person, he or she might not able to control his or her actions, and that's why those people might be dangerous. But why media tells stories about only those cases, what ended sadly way?