The problem of the dictators is, that their victims don't give votes

World's largest civil building The parliament house
in Bucharest
(Picture I) 

http://metsantarinoita.blogspot.com/p/the-problem-of-dictators-is-that-their.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The problematic execution of Nicolae and Elena Ceausescu, and how it influences attitudes about the execution of Muammar Qaddafi and other dictators is very interesting. There are many people, who claim that the killing of those persons was illegal because they were the heads of the state, and that would give that kind of person right to flee them countries when the people get enough their methods to lead the country. There were only the leaders of the state, whose rights were concerning the people, and their human rights were so important thing, that the press was shocking about their fate.
The problem of the murderers is, that their victims don't give votes


There is the same kind of attitudes with the case of the Tsar family. Only the family members of the leader of the Russian empire are remembered and we must remember, that there were many more 17 years old girls in Russia than Anastasia Romanova, who was killed in the civil war. And many more 15 years old youngsters who were slaughtered in the concentration camps and shared the fate of Anne Frank. In the case of Ceausescu, there was nobody, who remember the victims of that man, but there were people, who said that Ceaucescu's human rights were violated because of this trial.


The fates of the dictators are sometimes very interesting, like Jean-Claude "Baby Doc" Duvalier, who lived in France as the political refugee after his family has been kicked off the power in Haiti, and this is very interesting part of international politics. Only thing, what concerns the people is the fate of the dictators, who wants the political safe places after they were ordered extortions and killings in their country, and when those persons were in the power, nobody care, what they did to their own victims.


There are people who have very big necessity to support everybody, who have superiority position. Persons who have this need would ever see anything wrong in the actions of the dictators because they are the head of the state. When I saw once on the writing of authorities, there was the form of the worlds, that the ADHD-children have problems with the people, who have the official authority and the people, who think that they are the authority.


The last one was a very interesting form because there were claiming, that those people should follow the orders from people, who just think that they are authorities. This means that everybody, like other child or boy from the neighbor, should give the orders to those persons if they are just thinking, that they have jurisdiction about that, or they just think that they have right to give orders to another people. The problem with the power is, that it would make people evil.


One of the reasons, why Joseph Stalin was able to make the crimes, what he made, was that the world left that man alone. The demonization of socialism caused, that the Soviet Union were isolated, and the leaders of that country dare to make, what they wanted because nobody even cares, what happened in the land of "red twilight". Here we must remember, that in the eyes of international law Joseph Stalin was not made any crimes, because in police actions the international law says, that they are internal affairs of some nation. And the international law is, that if some violations are made in the territory of some country, is that country's business to get those violators in the court of law. The attitude was that Stalin's place was in the Soviet Union, and nobody cares, what happened in there. The same thing kept Ceaucescu in the power of Romania.


That small country was the member of the Warsaw pack, and it was in the shadow of the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union were not the only state, what kept political prisoners, but that country had the prime role in the policy of the United States, what kept Soviets as their main enemy. The attitude in Washington was that the Soviet Union was the only nation in the Eastern Block. Other governments of that side claimed, that Moscow forced them to make political arrests, what was not actually true. The Soviet Union was the thing, what was used for making fear in the mind of the people.


But the police forces were under national command. And there was the thing, that in the law books were texts, that every action in the parliament should follow the socialistic order or code. Even today are some historians arguing, that was the DDR, Hungarian and Czechoslovakian governments forced to ask their allies and the Soviet troops to stop the democratization movement, and in Hungary the Government claimed, that the Soviet troops were used force against people, who came to barricades.


And the Soviet Commanders claimed that the force was used by AVO, what means Hungarian secret police-troops, and the Soviets were only supporting the legal government. In the real world, the reason for using force could be, that some members of AVO The Hungarian secret police shot Soviet Troops because of provocation. Or that action could make by somebody, who didn't think about consequences. Or maybe those firearms were used against people because somebody claimed, that the force was used against the Soviet embassy. That kind of disinformation would justify the military actions against the demonstrators.


One of the reasons, why those information-operations are made, is that its mission is to make the shooting easier for young soldiers, who must go home after that kind of actions. So they must have the story, what justifies the use of force in the eyes of their families and other people, who they meet before they would go to the cadet- or secret police's school. And after that were much talking, that was the demonstrators really carry the guns, but those things lost in history.


The people like Ceausescu were kept the power in Eastern Europe until the Soviet Union collapsed, and the Soviet government could not support their allies by military force. But the improving telecommunications allowed people see, what was going on in those countries at 1989-1991, and that gave the breaks for the actions of the Soviet troops. If those demonstrations were not followed by the western media, the results could be different, because if the military and police leaders would be allowed to act without publicity, they would dare to give orders to shoot the demonstrators.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Claude_Duvalier


Picture I

http://acountryamonth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/parliament-palace-people-house-bucharest-romania-visit.png

Writing about the deportation of the Russian diplomat and international politics.

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The deportation of Russian diplomats from EU is meant for the signal that the nerve-gas attacks and cyber warfare against other nations are not the acceptable way to work in international politics. The reason for deportation is that its mission is to give pressure against Russian leaders, that they must do something, that this kind of actions doesn’t continue. That is the same thing if the orders for those actions have given by official leaders of Russia, and that is the same thing, are the strikes made by official Russian intelligence.


Russia is a state with powerful nuclear weapons, and that’s why the international community is very tolerated with it. Same way the United States is dealt in United Nations, and this is the reason, why many other nations have got their own nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons would grow the respect for the state and its citizens, and this would please many leaders in the world. Nuclear weapons would increase the tolerance for any nations, and that’s the reason for nuclear programs around the world.


The purpose of the deportation is that the leaders of Russian government would resign from those actions, and also start to find guilty persons from Russia.  Also, the purpose of those deportations is that Russian government would start to cooperate with western authorities, by using little bit different methodology, then asking permission to search the western intelligence offices databases. The cooperation means that the actions, what are made in those operations are benefiting both parts of those parts of cooperation.


When we are talking about the trolls, what are made in the name of Russian authorities, we must notice that they are targeted to the leaders of the nation like members of the parliament. The purpose of those propaganda-actions is to claim, that in Russia the leaders would not need to tolerate any worlds, what are targeted against them. And of course, the real leaders should not tolerate any uncovering of their tax evasions. Real leaders would silent those things by making censorship laws, what allows them to do anything, what they want.


And of course strong leaders use police and military forces to scatter the opposition and all protests should be terminated. There is only one aspect in this kind of actions. It would please the persons, who believe the power of weapons. For some of those persons, the threat of Russia is the reason for giving the demonstration of their militaristic power. Those movements want to hide behind back of Russian government. Some of them are only criminal organizations, what claims that they would get support from Kreml.


When we are talking about those gangs, who would demonstrate their power by portraying with weapons in the cover of magazines, we must say that those movements want the censorship-laws, because they would not want to show their faces in public. So the best way to create those laws claims, that those organizations would get support from Russia. And here we must say that the Russian government has the most powerful nuclear weapons in the world. And that’s why the Russian government is the very good tool for domestic politics in many nations. Asking censorship laws for keeping the relationship good between Russia sounds better than asking them for hiding the tax evasions.


And this is one of the reasons for demonizing of Russia. Every time, when something is happening, the Russian intelligence would kill somebody. This is the very good argument when normal people wanted to keep their mouth shut for some business, what would not be tolerated in normal life. If some businessman would catch from tax evasions, might this person claim, to working with Russian businessmen, who are of course agents of FSB. All of those things were of course done under the protection of FSB when this kind of businessman would catch by police. This would frighten the reporters and prosecutors, who would not raise charges or uncover those actions.

Sources:

Picture 1:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a6/Moscow_Kremlin_from_Kamenny_bridge.jpg/1200px-Moscow_Kremlin_from_Kamenny_bridge.jpg