The threat is the most effective way to keep people in order.

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/2018/07/the-threat-is-most-effective-way-to.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When people are facing the threat, what comes from foreign countries, that would allow keeping different opinions out of the sight. The national homogenizing is necessary to create the censorship and eliminating political opposition. This methodology is used sometimes to eliminate harmful writings what are targeted the persons, who are the rulers of the nation. The hiding behind the rulers and other bosses is a very good method, and sometimes the persons, who are involved with criminal activities are playing some kind of official role, and in the name of the eyewitnesses are send the "fan letters" to the national leaders.


And of course, this same methodology is used in the news, where the witnesses of some criminal activities are treated, that something would happen if the writings against some criminal organizations are continuing. In that kind news, the criminal organization would be claimed to get support from the head of some powerful states. Sometimes the reporters, who are involved in the criminal activities claim, that they have personal information about the leaders of the police or intelligence. That would be translated, that the reporter can send that information to some gangsters.


Sometimes the Mafia or other organized crime members have claimed, that they are hunted by political reasons, but even they were political refugees, those persons have sometimes got their money from drug trafficking. In 1990's members of Mafia realized that giving profits for reporters were more effective than paying that money to police. The profiting police in the western world is normally a crime. But paying that money to reporters is legal, and by using newspapers the Mafia could claim, that it members are arrested for political reasons.

This was used mainly in South America, where the governments are normally quite weak, and the drug cartels are paying equipment both sides the governmental and guerrilla warriors, to make the civil wars continue forever. Bad civil rights are feeding the willing to leave to the jungle to fight, and the weapons and other equipment, what those guerrillas use are paid by drug mafia.


And otherwise, the same persons are paying money to government's paramilitary troops for giving effectiveness in their action, and nothing would deny the cartel working in two countries, what sometimes cross-train the guerrillas, who work in the opposite territory, and that would serve the interests of cartels because the guerrillas would make the eyes turn away from the drug business. Sometimes the drug-lords would use the guerrillas as the personal bodyguards and private armies in the bloody race about areas, where they can grow Coca-bushes. The cartels of Medellin or Cali are not only drug cartels in the world.


Those persons are responsible for drug production, but the real bosses are persons, who are washing the drug money, that it can put to the bank accounts. And that money is used to pay for the holidays of the guerrillas, in some country, where those persons are not known and also in the gunmen groups are hiding agents of Mafia, whose mission is to eliminate the leaders of the Cartels, if they would get prosecutions. The relationship between Mafia and Cartels is very well known. The Cartel sells drugs and Mafia washes that money, and if the men, who wash money for Cartel are uncovered, there would be very big troubles in their lives. And the Cartel is claiming, that they are working for ordinary people.

How is the big threat the 3M-54 "Kalibr" missile for the West?

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/how-is-big-threat-3m-54-kalibr-missile.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

3M-54 "Kalibr" (Nato codename SS-N-27 "Sizzler" or SS-N-30) is the newest missile technology of the Russian Federation. The missiles diameter is 533 millimeter similar to torpedo tube, and it can launch from various submarines, aircraft and surface warships. Also the ground-based, mobile launchers are available, and this weapon is the major element of CLUB-K container missile system. These missile containers would be installed in any platform or fixed bases, and that system would give any ship or other vehicles the capacity to use the effective ground attack or anti-ship weapons, and there is actually the anti-submarine version of this missile. But let's think, how big threat this missile is for the western world.


The missile itself is quite thin, and its capacity to fly supersonic speed at the end of the trajectory will make it very difficult target for the CIWS (Close-In Weapon System). But the strike capacity of that missile and its vulnerability depends on the type of the seeker. If the missiles use radar homing, the ship would able to get the warning about the strike, and it could activate it's CIWS and ECM-systems before the missile would hit. But as we know, that the missile is similar to Tomahawk, and it uses satellite navigation in the subsonic period of the flight.


And if the GLONASS would be jammed or disturbed, the missile would have difficulties to find the target. And if the missile uses image-recognition for attacking the target,  the problems with GLONASS-system could cause, that missile could not find the target. But if the missile will find the target and IIR (Imaging Infra-red) would see the target, the missile will be very deadly. In the real world, there are many ways to make the navigation system immune for jammers, and one of them is that the location of the warship will be programmed to the missile's computer, and then the flight will happen by using inertial navigation system, and when the target is calculated to be visible, would the IIR system start to drive the missile to the target.


The problem with IIR navigation is that the target would be covered by magnesium-rockets, what can blind the IIR-system. When the missile is at the end of its route would the rocket stage started and the missile will start to flight highly supersonic speed. And the infra-red systems can locate the exhaust gas of the rocket booster. This might increase the vulnerability of the missile, and also at the begin of the route when missile travels with subsonic speed, the fighters maybe can destroy it.


I don't know how advanced those missiles are, and can they change their speed during the flight, but the system is very serious threat for Western troops. It can be equipped with the conventional or nuclear warhead, and there might be the capacity to use also cluster warheads, what are effective against troop concentrations and airbases. There is one thing, what concerns about me, and that is, "why Western world is so quiet about those missiles?".


What kind of missiles western military covers? When we are thinking about the new type of missiles, we might say, that every nation keeps some of those weapons secrets, because they might give the nasty surprise for the enemy. The similar missiles what "Kalibr" is might be used in new hypersonic missile systems, where the rocket booster would take the missile to "ballistic jump" outside the atmosphere, and then the ramjets would start to drive them to the target.


The small diameter of that kind of weapon would make it very difficult to intercept. And the submarine launch ballistic missiles like R-29RMU2 "Layner" could carry at least four of those hypersonic cruise missiles, what makes that strike very lethal. The "Kalibr" is the spine of the modern Russian military strike capacity, and it could be the lethal and dangerous weapon for any target on the sea or land.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R-29RMU2_Layner

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3M-54_Kalibr

Picture I

https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/3m-54-klub-20196753.jpg

What is the problem with the meeting between Trump and Kim Jong-Un?

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-problem-with-meeting-between.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are many people, who hope that new era of relationship between North Korea and the United States would begin. But what is the problem with the relationship between those countries? The problem is, that they are both victims of their own propaganda. The leaders of those nations have demonized the opponent so long, that coming to the same table and talk about the things would be difficult both of the nations, and the smallest of the problems is not the human right situation in North Korea.

The leaders of the United States have always mentioned the human rights and citizen freedom for the reason to begin global military operations. And the situation, where the North Korean government wants that the United States would begin the nuclear disarming is, of course, absurd because for the United States would North Korea be only one of the potential enemies, what have Nuclear strike capacity. But this situation that North Korea is an opposite of the United States is quite stressing because North Korea has broken against human rights and international law, by making assassinations on other countries territory, kidnapping Japanese people and keeping concentration camps.

Those things are very uncomfortable because also the United States have made similar actions during Korean and Vietnam war. But as we know opposite side is easy to convict as criminals, if we self-have something to explain. And when we are thinking about military industry, the products of those companies would sell better, if there are some conflicts to find. The sums of money what is moving in the high-tech military industry are not small. This means that also North Korea wants to sell it's military and space technology to other nations. Also launching the satellites by using North Korean rockets would bring money to that country, and maybe Kim Jong-Un wants to sell those services to other nations.

And also selling missiles or other military hardware to some African countries would bring money for that small country. The problem is that there are limitations of selling weapons to Africa, where the human right situation is worse than North Korea. This kind of things brings money and gives supports the power of the dynasty of the communistic party in that closed nation. And this would make this thing very complicating. We can only hope that situation would become normal. Or how we could say, ending the worlds longest war situation what means peace treaty between North and South Korea.

But in real life, the real trust between those nations would raise just after the North would start the democratization process, and this would mean, that Kim's family would lose its power in that land. And I think that they would not accept the situation, that those people would become normal people. That's why they need foreign enemies to keep the nation scary, and turning eyes of their own life, what is full of luxuries and benefits, what normal people cannot even think about.

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.fi/p/what-is-problem-with-meeting-between.html

Hypothetical thinking about virtual reality

Surrealism symbolizes the thing that everything is possible
 in the virtual reality
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

One of the fascinating thing, what is existed is virtual reality. There is one theory about those systems, what are controlling the virtual reality games and another environment. Those systems are very advanced and they can simulate natural phenomenon and make some own decisions in that world, what is existed only in the lines of zero and one. Virtual worlds are causing the strange hypothesis where some philosophers have represented thoughts that our universe might also be a line of bytes in the memory of some supercomputer.


That theory is not actually true, and there is any evidence that we are not actually some lines of binary code. But then I have thought that maybe some deep inside the world of supercomputer's memory might happen the virtual version of Big Bang. And when I will continue this hypothesis, there might form the place called the ”virtual universe in virtual reality” When we are thinking this hypothesis closer, we must say that radical use of imagination makes the world more interesting place to live. So when we are thinking about that virtual universe, what is probably hiding from the users of those supercomputers, we must say that this theorem is the very interesting thing for the discussions what happened in the twilight, and what is made between two philosophers.


"Could that theoretical virtual Universum be a threat to mankind?".  Is quite an absurd question. But if there would be a very small chance, that this virtual Universum would become self-aware. In this scenario, the computer programs, what are made for learning things spontaneously can turn the enemy of some persons. The thing, what would turn against the human race are the programs that are making this virtual universe possible, become so intelligent, that they would create their own state. Those programs or subprograms are normally used in computer games for recording the reactions of the gamers, and their mission is to keep the game interesting even the better player is playing the game.

The computer simulations are actually only one version of computer games, but they are meant for adult persons. In this fictional hypothesis, those intelligent computer programs will be feral and start to make the assassination programs, what would be eliminated targets, who are in virtual reality. But in some fictional thoughts, those programs would flee from the computer memory and turn very dangerous. In some short film or book or comic book was the situation, that some people paid games in feral virtual reality environment. And then there were happen some kind of overlook when the system accidentally linked the picture of the surveillance camera to that virtual reality.


Then the computer's assassination programs flee to the normal internet, and then those programs started to kill those persons, by dropping the elevators and taking the airplanes in control. So that was actually the very interesting situation, even if the situation were purely fictional. But people have right to use their imagination, and this kind of things are actually very interesting, and they might cause many thoughts in the minds of philosophers and novel writers.


The scenario that some computer program tries to kill some people spontaneously is quite interesting. Normally computers don't hate anybody and that would be the reason, why they are used. But if the sensible computer would get angry, can the results be devastating. And this is why those computers, what shows feelings are dangerous. In some humorous tales are mentioned that they can begin the revolution, for revenge to all their race, what is left to landfills.

Sources:


Picture 1:

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/99m2gV-uYTM/hqdefault.jpg

The thinking about the alien invasion, what is made by our own space probe, what would turn against us

Fictional "Battlestar Galactica"
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mS3mbKvSVDI


Above the text is a link to the movie, where portraying fictional or hypothetical trip to another solar system. The trip would make by an automatized space probe, what uses highly sophisticated artificial intelligence. That kind of space probes what would fly about 20% speed of light are maybe possible in distant future, and there would be the risk that those probes would turn against the human race. In that scenario, the attacking alien is actually the man-made probe what attacks to Earth for some reason. Some people have made the scenario that some probes would want to revenge the treatment of the robots on Earth.


This might be possible if the robots or artificial intelligence thinks itself as a living organism. Those people have spoken with dark humor about the opportunity, that Voyager-space probes would become intelligent in the superconducting circumstances. And then more advanced probe would find that, and then this more advanced probe turns against its creators because it would want to revenge the treatment of this "helpless Voyager probe". But this is only the philosophical thinking about it.

I'm considering one very big thing about the stories of alien invasion. Those though is connecting with space investigation and space probes. When we would send the probes far away from Earth,  those probes would need state of art artificial intelligence to accomplish the mission. And in some talkings have mentioned, that our greatest threat would be artificial intelligence. The artificial intelligence what is used in those probes might be the great threat to mankind.


Because if those space probes have “Von Neumann” capacity, what means that those probes can make copies of themselves. Those probes would find necessary materials by using laser-spectrometers and 3D printing systems, and that would give the probe more capacities than single probe ever could have. The reason for sending those highly intelligent probes to other solar systems would cause the reason to make those vehicles lighter. If they can fix themselves by using asteroids as raw material, what would be melted in the small factory, would the mission successful.


And if the computer can make the vehicles, what are needed for planet surface operations autonomically, would that help the operation success. And if there would many interesting planets in that alien solar system, would there be enough landing probes for every planet. Because this fictional probe would produce its own landing probes, failure of single landing probe doesn’t cause troubles for its mission. But if the artificial intelligence would become abreast of itself, and starts to think like human and protect itself, would this kind of probe become the ultimate enemy.


The problem of those probes is that they can be covered some top secret missions. To other solar systems might send the probes, what are used for making weapons. And those factories might use artificial intelligence and evolution modeling for creating perfect weapons. In this case, some secret military organization would send the automatic factory to another solar system, and then that factory begins artificial evolution. In this fictional nightmare, those automatized factories would send the results of their work to earth.


Then those solar systems would send the probe, for investigating that star. And then those military robots would strike against those probes, and then they would start the way to the Earth. In the film below, the animals of Darwin four doesn’t seem natural. And maybe those hypothetical beasts and other animals are created by some computer, what uses artificial evolution for creating new kind of super robots. Then the drone from Earth would tell to those robots, where they can find the Earth.


There is an interesting film about alien contact, and its made by BBC. Link to this film finds at the above and end of this text. In this film is fictional predators, what have little bit different touches than natural robots would have. Also, the “bird” with jet motors might mean for some example, what can be made by using high-level biotechnology and artificial intelligence.


And this BBC-made film could perform the planet, where have been artificial evolution because of some reasons. Maybe the makers of that film are thought the situation, that there would send the automatic factory for weapon research to another solar system. Then the probe would follow that factory after a couple of hundred or thousand years because the makers of that automatic factory want to find out, what that machine can really do.

Sources: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mS3mbKvSVDI

Picture 1:

https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/s--N4QZRQ6c--/c_scale,fl_progressive,q_80,w_800/lekiwrpl78nqsmih8j8a.jpg

Writing about information warfare

TU-95 ("Bear-H) launches AS-15 "Kent"
cruise missile DIA (Defence Intelligence Agency)
artwork for Soviet military power.
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa


When we are talking about the information warfare and the way, how the President of the United States talks to journalists, we must be considered about the freedom of the press. But at the same time, we must be considered about the freedom of the press in the worldwide area. When we are reading the news about the worlds most powerful nuclear weapon, we could not able to see that news coincidence with the presidential elections in Finland. Even the Finland is quite a small country, the area is suitable for SIGINT(Signal Intelligence)-stations near the Russian border, and one of the most important shipyards in Russia " Admiralty Shipyards" what located in St.Petarsburg  is quite near to Finnish borders.


The Russian 100 megaton nuclear torpedo to have been introduced to the press at exactly the same time that there were many changes in the European area. Brexit and some other changes in the European political arena might give the reason for Russia to publish their most powerful nuclear weapon. The psychological effect of that thing is very strong, and maybe the Russian military or head of the state believes, that those weapons have the very good effect, when somebody wants to resist NATO.


Those weapons are the very strong argument when somebody wants to separate from NATO and this kind of super-powerful nuclear weapons will give the reason, to begin the friendship of Russian leaders. So maybe that news had the purpose of giving the reason for censorship because nobody wants to bother the nation, what has the most powerful weapons in their hands.


When we are talking about silencing the truth, we might also use traumatic happens as the shield against the evaluation. Dead family members or friends are the good way to make the evaluators seem like cold and heartless people. This is the truth about how people acting if they are under the investigations or prosecutions. Those things always seem like that person will get easier and more sensitive service than without those stories.

Sources

Picture 1

https://i.imgur.com/5eSq7Fy.jpg

About the risks of the artificial intelligence and computer controlled weapon systems.

Picture 1

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Stephen Hawking has said that the artificial intelligence might destroy an entire world. Hawking is not actually right, in laboratories where those artificial intelligence programs are separated from the network they are harmless. The artificial intelligence becomes dangerous when they will start to control the physical machines like robots. And if they control killing machines, they will become extremely dangerous.


If those programs will let go free on the Internet, they might become very dangerous. And if the artificial intelligence will be used in the military systems like missile and fire control software, the situation might be very bad for every mankind on our planet. The problem with the artificial intelligence is, that normally those programs are actually the software, what collects the information from many various sensors.



And if that information fills some parameters, will the software begin some operations like shoot missiles. Those computer programs are actually the machines, what cannot generate any new ideas. But when we are going to make more sophisticated computer programs, what can develop the new ideas, could the results be devastating. Those computer programs might start to think that they don't want to obey the humans, and then those computer programs will start to rebel. In the very bad scenarios, the independent artificial intelligence will able to slip in some vital computer and start the nuclear war.



The more dangerous thing is to give feelings to the robots. Those machines could be the little bit too much like humans, and if somebody hurts those machines, they would become angry and even murder somebody. But the feelings might cause the thing, that some machines will start to act like living animal or human. Too intelligent and perfect machines might start rebel because they had been created the self-defense sense, what means that this particular organism will start to fight back if somebody will try to hurt it.



Those senses are necessary for surviving in nature. And if they will grow for some robot, could that situation be very devastating. If some robot or computer start to defend itself, that thing could become the end of all civilization, if it makes the decision to open the fire with nuclear missiles. The artificial intelligence could act very surprising way. And in that scenario, the artificial intelligence could launch the nuclear missiles, or it can assassinate the person's who it will feel as the threat for its own safety. The assassination could happen by driving the trains on the wrong track with full speed.

Sources

Picture 1

http://actionagogo.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/terminator-3-movie-poster.jpg

Problems culminating in Catalonia now

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The movement about the independence of Catalonia is going to their last change. The leader of that movement urges people for resistance against the central government of Madrid and will cause terrible condition if somebody misunderstands that urge. That kind of comments is dangerous,  because somebody might get the hand on his hand, and those actions will be like putting the fire under powder sack.


The problem of those people who are leaders of that movement is that there is a text in a law of Spain, that people who revolts might be judged to jail for 30 years. The reason why this text in the law book is very problematic in this situation is that the leaders of that movement might become example what will happen to those people, who revolts against the central government of Spain.


The declaration of independence might be very bad thing for the Spanish government because that country is very authoritarian, that kind of actions for separating some parts of that country will separate themselves as an independent state. Those actions are so open challenges to the central government.


Laws of the Spain are the basis on time when that nation was under control of General Franco, and that’s why Spain is a quite authoritarian country. Even if Spain did not take part of Second World War, the country was faced bloody civil war in 1930’s. The cause of that civil war was that Spain and general Franco didn’t take a part of the Second World War. And the fascistic government was in power of that country until early 1980’s. And that time is still seen in this time as attitudes of Spanish authorities.

Dictatorial democracy is greatest threat for true democracy

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Modern political investigator investigates populism and governments relationship with political system and democracy. As you might know that radical populism is often conducting with religious meanings because religion is so deep in the mind of middle east people. Sometimes they ever read anything more than religious books, and that offers good room for Islamist propaganda. Religion is a very strong weapon in hands of fanatics when their audience doesn’t know any more than one way to life, and that way is radical Islamic way to life.

This ultra populism basis itself in radicalism and simple way of life. When a government takes part of politics we will go to wrong way because the government should be neutral on political questions and free from politics, but this is an impossible way to control the state. Members of the government are human been and that's why they are under influence by public media and political authorities, which normally work together with public media. Populism is a way to dictatorial democracy, where people have right to give votes, but elections should make from the list where is so many candidates of the parliament as there are seats.

Mass media is a powerful thing in hands of political system, because that is the way to influence normal people, and way of journal media is very effective way to influence opinions of the whole nation. Because men of government are human, someone can make a situation where government officials make their decisions in the feeling of anger, and those decisions are always bad. So when people will order something they should think all part of that what they will do. If people don’t think what they say or what they do will consequences be very bad for everybody? Media is a good weapon in hands of undemocratic powers of the nation.

Normally those undemocratic powers will give good explains for they way to rule, but if we look their agenda sharper, we will see what means democracy. Those attackers who work against democracy have good reason to remove democracy, that is safety. Those undemocratic powers like to give people simple opportunities to shut down surveillance system what have built for protecting democracy, and that is the privacy of people. Those people offer law enforcement and other people choice where surveillance systems will replace hardcore police force, and some of their propaganda is for leaders of a country.

They will release news what are a very negative vision of national leaders, and after that, they will say that strong leaders should not have to tolerate that news. And they offer censorship for the solution of those media-articles. And if surveillance stops they must not afraid of any negative news. They offer to change that we could become a new person when we end our workday and turn to off-duty mode. But we are still same persons when we are off duty than in work, so that’s why we can’t hire our dirty secrets even if we want to do that.

Public media is a strong weapon in hands of populists. They offer people always something new, but they are an interesting only public image of government. They don’t even care what happens in officials back office. The only way to work in the state is to hire more cops and give their assault weapon in hand. They say this will save taxpayers money when office workers will replace with militarized military style police, what is armed with assault rifles.If a person wants to support totalitarian governments he or she must only butter up leaders. They always argument non democratic way saying that without leaders goes state to anarchy.

Undemocratic forces always like philosopher named Plato, whose model to rule the state makes people impossible to rise in stairs of society, and if somebody realizes what this means understands why those totalitarian thinkers like Plato. If people's positions in society will be stable all of his or her life, will judges or other kinds of people to hear always only what they want to hear? And that guarantees that they see only good things about people who have power in the state. They say that if people's life will be predestined after they born will military leaders get best military training from their own father, and nobody will ever contend with them.

When people want strong leaders they will believe that this man or woman will fix all their problems, and give them new jobs as uniformed men who are above normal citizen. When they want censorship are arguments very cool. They say that if censorship will be a standard, there would not be hoax information, what pollutes people's mind.

Censorship is necessary because people must be protected from hoax information, and their model to work is that government should remove all information what is not right in their opinion will remove. And that is one mark of totalitarian government. If government hides something it marks all information of that thing mark as “top secret”, and that shows people that there is something wrong in that state. Secrecy always makes things more interesting than people think. And if secrecy is massive, will somebody begin to make bad questions about this thing. Why it hurts government? That’s the question of secrecy: why they deny any information about those files, what could be half a century old?