The tactics of nuclear weapons

B-2 "Spirit"
(Picture I)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There are two possible tactics or routes when the nuclear weapons are developed. Another tactic is to create high-yield missiles, what would attack against targets, what are in the enemy area. If the state chooses this route, it would have very good strike capacity, but the problem with those missiles is, that they could not return to the ground. And when the strike has begun, the missiles would not call back. But this is the past. Today missiles can shoot to the low trajectory, and if the strike would be unnecessary, those rockets can be returned to earth.  Here I must say, that also slid fuel rockets can be used many times, and only thing, what need to do, is to change the fuel cassette inside the rocket stage.


The rocket can shoot to orbiter from silo or mobile station like submarines, and when it should return to Earth, the warhead could return like Apollo capsule in the military base, and then it can be loaded to another rocket. Or they can be the load to miniature space shuttle like X-37B, and then this system can return those warheads in any runway in the world. Those miniature shuttles can also use as the hypersonic cruise missiles, but they have also scientific purposes. Modern cruise missiles can also be released from aircraft and they can refuel in the air.

They might seem like X-47B, what is equipped with nuclear or bunker-busting conventional warhead. Those missiles could also return to their base, and land like airplanes to carriers or fixed bases. They can also shoot with rockets, and when the mission is over, other parts of the rockets, like used stages of can be landed in the sea by using parachutes and the NAVY can pick them up. If the fuel would be in the separate tube, those stages could reload immediately.  There is one thing, what makes nuclear missiles more addictive for the eastern block than the nuclear bomber or submarine. That is the missiles can be kept in surveillance of security forces all the time, and that grows the political trusting in those weapons.


The tactics with those Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles is that they would be used to terminate enemy troops in long distance at the enemy territory. And this is why those missiles have high-yield nuclear warheads. The targets of those missiles are airfields and missile silos and command bunkers, and that's why those warheads are planned to destroy large area targets, and deep dug targets. That is the problem with fixed base systems, the location of those structures is well known, and that's why there is created mobile systems, what are easy to drive out of the nuclear base.


Some of those systems are meant to destroy rebellious nuclear bases in the situation, where nuclear troops are going to take control in the country. The mobile missile-systems what are mounted in trucks and warships are the reason to create nuclear bombers, what mission is to search and destroy those mobile systems. Those bombers mission is to penetrate deep inside enemy airspace and search those missiles. They are actually offensive weapons, what uses multipurpose nuclear and conventional weapons, what mission is to destroy nuclear missiles in the silos, and mobile systems like trucks and submarines. The problem with this kind of weapon systems is that they are heading to targets, what have defended with heavy anti-aircraft systems and fighter shield.


That's why those bombers need STEALTH-technology. The destroying missile-silos can be made with conventional laser- or GPS-guided bunker-busting weapon, but the target can also be destroyed by the similar nuclear bomb, what penetrates the ground and then seismic waves would terminate the base. The mobile missile systems are very vulnerable if they are located, and even normal anti-tank weapons and cluster bombs can destroy those missiles. But before that, the missiles must be located and the strike against them must begin.

Sources:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_X-37

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northrop_Grumman_X-47B



Picture I

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ec/B-2_Spirit_%28cropped%29.jpg/1200px-B-2_Spirit_%28cropped%29.jpg

Why are civil wars so bloody?

(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Finnish civil war in 1917-1918 didn’t differ anything about other civil wars in the world. The war and the consequences were extremely brutal like in the civil wars usual happens. Why all civil wars are so brutal and bloody causes the way that this kind of war is normally handled by the rebellions and by the government. In the international law is not mentioned how the state must do the war in the case of the civil wars. And in the internal conflicts is allowed to use any kind of weapons, what the government wants. In the eye of the international law, the rebellious people would act like criminals.


If we are talking true, the executions of the rebels are also legal action. The problem with the international law is that the expected winner of those conflicts is always the government, what justifies rebels as they want. And in this scenario, the winner is always the most powerful actor in the internal policy of those states, what will go to that traumatic situation. The way to handle the situation of the rebel is also very traumatic. The methods, what police and military units use to locate the guerrillas in the middle of the people bases the use of informers and also the prisoners would handle with drugs, exhortation and humiliating way.


That will grow anger in the mind of the people, and also the way to handle traitors in the guerilla groups will not be very sensitive. This kind of things will cause the revenge-mentality, what will erupt as the executions and lifetime imprisonment. When the anti-guerilla groups come to the villages, they would sometimes burn all houses and shoot the non-combatants. In those actions might use the weapon systems like mine-dispenser units, what would be delivered to near the located guerilla base, where could be combatants. The reason why those actions stay undercover, causes the reason, that those guerilla-organizations sold drugs for earning money for their equipment. In those operations, the aircraft came above the drug planting, and then the mine dispenser like CBU-12 clusters, what were filed with “Butterfly”-mines.


When those targeted persons went to the plant ages, those mines would be very devastating and terrifying equipment, what can break the morale of the enemy. But as we know the use of that kind of tactic is actually a crime against the humanity. Those mines will not select the non-combatants and combatants. And many of the victims of those weapons are many times children. Another tactic is delivering to the sensors to the combat areas, and those sensors can smell the person's DNA. Of course, the dogs are also the very popular way to track the guerrillas. But also agents and informers are still the main roles in those tracking operations. Those persons have GPS- devices to locate the enemy and lead the helicopters and airplanes or rapid reaction teams to the target. And sometimes those agents have the assassination equipment like silenced pistols and poison injection nails. ‘



’When we are talking about the modern way to handle this kind of operation, the GPS-equipment could be installed by the surgical way in the targeted person bodies. In the operation “Jihad or Die” is rumored, that those persons, who are forced to cooperate with the Saudi-Arabian government have lost kidneys because the operators will guarantee that those persons would die, if they will not cooperate. I don’t know do they even know that they have GPS-systems, what is surgically set in the bodies of those new “agents”. And then the assault planes track those persons, when tracking is clear, would this target bombed by the guided weapons. That military action is one of the most bizarre ways to handle the terrorists.

Sources

Picture 1

https://media-exp2.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/AAEAAQAAAAAAAALAAAAAJGM2YjhmMmQ5LTM1NTctNGJjYy1iZTE4LTYyMWI3MDhmN2E5Yw.jpg