How can the law enforcement work with science?

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/how-can-law-enforcement-work-with.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Have you ever thought to go to the police station, and tell the officer, that somebody makes clones of humans? One reason for making those clones might be the attempt to get stem cells for some cancer patients. Or the mean for those clones might be growing organs for wealthy patients. Also, the reason for those actions might keep some military operations secret. In this case, military personnel might clone some special forces operators for the case that some of them would die. If there would be the clone as available that would hide the loss of some operator.

When we are thinking about laws and their relationship with laws and science, we must understand, that the laws are only texts in some book. Even if the laws prohibited some actions, that text is useless in the situation, that somebody wants to break the law. And the criminals are persons, who brake the law. Even if some country would deny something, would the law be only the text, if it would not enforce by authorities? Do you believe, that somebody would go to police station, and tells to some officer, that there would be suspected clone experiments in the area of those policemen and -women? In the laws of cloning is only one thing, what we always forget, and that is the enforcement.


In some clinics in the Far East can any person buy silicone implanted and maybe the making of clones is the same kind of thing as some silicone implanted. And those clinics do change the genres or fixing surgery without any juridical sanctions and talking with psychiatrists. So I sometimes think that those clinics might also the giving infertility treatments without a necessary talking with parents, and those treatments are more invincible and easier to give than some plastic surgery.


When we are thinking about the ethics of those clinics, they would not always care nothing else than money. The cloning humans are not more difficult than cloning some "Dolly" sheep, the same technology would work with humans. In that technique, the genomes inside the nucleus of the cell would replace by another genome. And if somebody wants, can those clinics make the clones. And then we must ask, who would control those clinics?


If the police don't control even the medicines, how it could control the cloning of humans? Have you ever thought, what kind reaction would you see in the local police station, if you would go there, and say, that somebody would make clones of humans? The problems of the laws, what purpose is to limit cloning, must we say that there are not many authorities, who would listen, persons, who make reports about this kind of things. This kind of things are only the conspiracy theory, and the persons, who would tell about this kind of actions to authorities will send to mental institute for taking little cure for their symptoms. And how normal police would control those things.

http://crisisofdemocracticstates.blogspot.fi/p/how-can-law-enforcement-work-with.html

The science of statistics can help to find criminals

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/statisticsandcrimes/etusivu

The use of statistics makes possible to control risks in the normal life. The collected data can be used to locate the risk drivers, dangerous crossroads, and many more things. Statistics will not necessary mean numerical information. If somebody is too hard on driving test, that would be seen by statistics. And if somebody is too allowed in that driving test, that would be seen in statistics, because this person’s driver candidates makes many accidents in compiling with other drivers. This separation is seen clearly after a couple of years driving. If somebody, who really drives the car, would not make any errors in the driving, it will cause the suspicion about the driving test. That data is collected from insurance companies databases, and also the governmental databases like speeding ticket databases are used.


Was it failed for fun or some other personal reasons? Also if the person would not drive the car after driving test, will deleting the car tell, the thing that this person affairs of driving. Same way acts the data if some person has always broken the car. That means this person might be targeted by systematical harassment.


Same way uncovers the harassment in the working site. The thing what uncovers that is the person, who will very often change the workplace. That tells that everything is not like it should be. They also can mean the location information. That information would be effective when officials are tracking drug sellers. In this case the places, where the narcotics user’s equipment are founded, that place must be marked on the map carefully, because that information can be important when dealers are tracked.


The statistics are the very effective thing when criminals are tracked. Those systems will compile the information if somebody has got the tickets to the happenings, where something bad would happen.And if some person is simultaneous in the concerts where the places have been broken, or somebody was injured, that will see in those systems  When we are talking about the vandalism and public transportation, we must know that specific collection of the data is not effective way to look for the persons, who might break the bus stops. The database would be very large, and that would make it ineffective.


But the data about the ticket types can be collected, and of course, the number of passengers can also be stored in that system. And maybe there was only one person, who used the single prepaid ticket, and if this person has used credit or bank card, and other users were mature people, this might help to track the person, who has crashed the bus stop. This was not the best example of the use of statistics in the tracking criminals.


Also, military intelligence uses statistics for tracking suspicious persons. The time and number of using fire against single operational unit can be tell something about those men. Or what do you think about the situation, that the operational area of the unit is restless, and when the change-group comes, all area turned as hell? And suddenly when they were leaving, the situation turns back to restless? Seems very interesting thing. Also, the type of used weapons is telling something about both sides of the conflict.


If some part of conflict uses normally assault rifles, but suddenly in one specific case, they will use the sniper rifle, that would that tell that something was wrong with that shooting. If only one person would shoot by the sniper rifle in all operational area like Afghanistan, that killing would be not made by the enemy. This might be a real murder, what will attempt to cover as a military action, and in this case, the investigations might focus on that killed person’s private life. In real life, the statistics tell us if there is something wrong with some family or person. If somebody is in the hospitals emergency every Friday, that means that this person lives very dangerous life. Also if in some family will happen many strange accidents or homicides, that will cause the investigations about those persons.


When some persons face the things, what are like straight from the book “The hound of the Baskerville” that will tell, that somebody is persecuting those people. If the dog simultaneously bites people, that might cause the suspicious that this dog is a fighting dog, what is used in illegal dog fightings. Those animals are extremely dangerous because they are trained to attack other animals and even humans.


The mission is to fight rough and tough, and some of those animals are feed with other dogs flesh. There are also difficulties to separate fighting dogs or killer-dogs from together. They are used to also for guarding the drug houses, and their owners might keep them in hunger because that would make them more aggressive. But if the dogs are attacking against other animals or people in some area, that would tell that there is illegal dog-farm for growing those animals for brutal and inhuman “hobby”, what is prohibited in the law.

How are the ancient gods made?

Picture 1

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are talking about the gods, this world doesn’t always mean that the god is nothing else than the person, who have some skills, what makes this person necessary for the community. In some cases, those skills, what the god had might seem like some supernatural things, but in the real world, the background of those things is almost every time some usually very simple technology. If some person controlled the irrigation system, he must be the person, who got very much respect from other people.


This thing is notable, when the god of ice is mentioned in some texts. This person might have skills to make the ice. In the realistic way that person had skills to build the temperature pump, and that thing might make the very good impression for some people, who saw the nasty stick and the wind, what caused the cold and white stuff formation in the surface of the artificial hill or house. In this text, the words “artificial hill”, means the muddy hump, what is used to store the ice.


Even if they didn’t know the temperature pump, the person who bought the ice from the mountains was very important part of society. The ice must be packed under the mud, and then bought from upriver of Eufrat to the front of the people. And if those ice bites, what is covered with the mud were used as the material of the dams, those dams will break, and then all irrigations would be left below the water. But when we are thinking about the ancient landlords, whose positions changed as the pharaohs and kings, we must realize that if some person controlled the dam in some Mesopotamian river, and this person orders to destroy that structure, could people die in the flooding.


And if those people wouldn't allow the freeing the water release to the agriculture, the people would die of hunger. I don’t know did those people know about the polluted water, but if they knew the methodology, what happens if the flesh was left too long in the closed pot with the mud, would that create botulinum in that food. And it would be caused the death. The electrical vortexes are very impressive, and of course, the Mesopotamian were noticed, that the lightning strikes almost every time to the tallest place on the place.


And maybe some of them accidentally left two copper or golden plates in the temple on the wooden statue, where were good isolator between them, and if the lightning strikes to that structure, it will store the electricity. If those people knew how to produce electricity with the batteries, where is copper and iron in some acid, they might test how to make hydrogen and oxygen with the electrolysis. In this theory have known the galvanic battery, that ancient scientist might notice the strange feeling when they touched those things with tongue, with the way that tongue touched both electrodes at the same time. And if they knew the electrolysis process, they might make nice explosions in the air.


The ancient people didn’t have the knowledge of the electrons, but they knew electricity as the phenomenon. The Greek philosophers thought that when we will cut the material enough, we will face the situation, where the material was cut in so small particles, that it will get the point known as the Greek word “atomos”. When the material gets this condition, it cannot break anymore. When we are talking about the flying with the balloons, the ancient Chinese knew how to fly with the paper balloons, where was the small burning piece of cloth below it.

Sources: Picture 1

https://www.realmofhistory.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/10-ancient-mesopotamian-gods-goddesses-facts.jpg

What means the sun in old mythology?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/thesuninthemythology/etusivu

The sun has a special place in the Nordic mythology. The term “sun group” or “Sonnen Gruppe” means normally the central group or the group that leads the other groups of the organization. And Sonnen (Sun)  person means the person, who is the center of the group like the sun is the center of the solar system. The sunrise will normally mean the beginning of the new age or rising culture. That’s why that symbol is sometimes installed on the houses, what are designed in the early 20th. century.

That symbol was meaning for rising nationalism and rise of the new government, what will kick the colonialist government out of the country. The reason why those societies were kept in secrecy, was that those colonialist governments would hunt the members of those societies and sent them to prison if the society was uncovered. And between the world wars, the secrecy of creating the German war machines was extremely important.

In these photographs is the normal way how the architect will also mark those buildings and also make eyeball that normally people won’t look those houses. The architect has used a nice looking bright house in the front, to make the target for observer’s house. The other house looks like less attractive than creme looking house in the front, and that makes the darker house less attractive. The labyrinth means the road or way of studying. That is also a symbol for the secret knowledge of some things like airplanes. Also, the sun means the things what are public and the dark color means the moon or the dark side of the force.

The mean of the labyrinthine was same in the ancient Greeks and Indians. It was the road what endpoint the traveler was unable to see, and if the traveler was trying to make something wrong he wakes up the monster what eats him.  The Mayan Indians had the same kind of philosophy in their life. The sun means public and well-seen power, but the moon means the hidden.way to use power in the society. That’s the reason why the temple of the moon was extremely feared in the Mayan culture, because it meant the “power of the night", like phosgene gas, what was created in anaerobically stored crass.

Why media will handle only a negative part of the life?

Kimmo Huosionmaa


The problem with media is that there will ever be introduced an average person's life. A person who is the main character in documents and movies is always some kind of ultimate version of people what represented of some lifestyle, what is introduced in those programs. Do you think that Pablo Escobar is some kind of an average version of the drug dealer? That man had billions of cash, but does some so-called “street level"'drug dealer that kind of money, or does he even dream about that, when that person hangs around some shopping center and sells some crack-capsules. What made Escobar so frightening person, was his money.


He could hire mercenaries to support his reputation. But I always thought that Escobar was only a shield man for some other actors in that dirty business. If people have money, he could do almost everything, but if he want’s to hire a mercenary, must he have the right relationships. Nobody wants to get smoked that the person has been worked as a mercenary. That’s why they take jobs only from agents who they trust. And being mercenary in somewhere Africa is the little bit different than making murders in normal western State. If a person will smoke that he is an assassin, will he or she punish by the court of law? The line of that kind of people is extremely tough. Those prisoners ever get out from prison.


But in those cases like Escobar, we might see what is the direction, where media sometimes goes. I don't know why they are not writing about guys who were in gangs and after that, they began to live a normal life without any problems. Why the objective of those documents is always so negative? They always begin that kind of problems with interest, but soon after intros, the journalist really begins to show really bad attitude for that case. They just are beginning to find some errors in that case, and sometimes the information what has been given to people is very grotesque.


They bring in front of the public eye some that targets friends, who might be in jail. But they never tell to people, why those people were arrested and what was a crime, where convictions came. And of course, they never tell to people, how long those "criminals" were been in jail. Only thing what is mentioned, has been that those persons are convicted for some crimes. If we see that kind of journalism realistic, we must be naive.


There is always news where drug user brutally killed the people who helped them. But when we are taking a focus in those stories, we must realize that narcotics users might be very dangerous and unpredictable because they have hallucinations. But when we are talking about those cases, there have been only a couple of that kind of cases in the Europe. And didn't anyone told those people, that if somebody uses drugs, he might be blackmail by his fellows to let them in?


And why reporters only take this kind of crimes on the front pages of newspapers? In here I must ask, is the help what came to those persons so altruistic at all? Why they bought a cell phone to that guy? I know that these are the most brutal worlds, what anybody can write, but didn't anybody tell to those people, that money should ever give drug user or alcoholics. They just buy more drugs with that money. When narcotics control the person, he or she might not able to control his or her actions, and that's why those people might be dangerous. But why media tells stories about only those cases, what ended sadly way?