The second civil war of the United States of America

https://avoimenkoodinmaailma.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

So here is the time for some conspiracy stuff, and I decided to make this writing about the "second civil war in the USA". The civil war of the USA in 1861 to 1865 cost over 300 000 casualties and that war was one of the bloodiest in the history of that nation. Today we are concerning the freedom and our privacy, and we have almost forgotten one quite interesting idea of the civil war. When the Union won the war in 1860's there were claiming, that the Southern side of Confederate would try to make relevance in sometimes after the civil war.


 And here is the very interesting thing about that claim or rumor. What if there were another civil war in that nation? What if those politicians and military men were not told about that war to the people, and then nobody even knew about this internal conflict. This theory or story have been told to explain the time of the wild west, and maybe some parts of this story are true. But in the modern time is claiming that some internal groups of USA would want to begin the civil war, and then somebody got an idea, that why people should know about that kind of things? The only information, what is needed is, that somewhere is an armed person, who might be dangerous. This is the only information, what the law enforcement must know when they come to make arrests.


If somebody would serve in the some "shotgun company" in the middle west, why that person would not treat as the normal criminal? Why should every people know about that kind of persons political interests? When we are talking about terrorism, we are facing the fact, that why people should know about that organization? If the terrorist group is well known, it has more easy to recruit people, and here we are facing the question, what if the British have not mentioned IRA? Or newspapers would not be mentioned about the rebel of General Lee? And why that person's military rank mentioned? Why didn't they make that person the normal leader of the outlaw gang?


What if newspapers would not tell, that Lee had some political purposes, and if that man would be mentioned as the normal outlaw, who robbed banks or something? Would somebody join that rebel team? And if the IRA would not ever be mentioned, would anybody even know about that organization? This is the key in the stories about "The second civil war". If nobody ever knows about the rebellions, they would not join that force too easily. And maybe press have been censored the political aspects of the outlaw's actions in the Wild West in the 1880's? Who knows the truth?

How behavior sciences helps to track of dangerous people from the community

Marlon Brando's iconic look in 1950's
movie The Wild One
(Picture from Internet)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When somebody warns the people of some gangs like Hell’s Angels, we must realize, that those people of some "uninformed gangs"  are very visible persons in the community. Those persons what might be members of any gangs want to look like normal people. Earrings with skull and another gang stuff like lethal jackets and uniform- style clothes are shown that those people are members of some gang, what membership is very wanted status in the underworld. And nobody says the thing about those very strange clothes, what the gang leaders use when they want to show their position in the community, and the good example of that are lethal clothes and strange hats, what also Marlon Brando used in one of his movies "The Wild One".


The membership of those gangs gives that person the girls and parties. And that’s why the law enforcement will follow the central persons of those gangs, to predict the actions of another criminal. The leadership of the underworld gangs is the very visible thing, because those people will always give orders to another person, and that will put the stamp on that person behavior.


If somebody always tells another person what they must do, it will be very notable part of some people speak. The things what the gang leader always does is like “would you open the window".  Those questions are always orders to another person of the gang. The thing what shows to another person that somebody is the leader of the gang is very simple, those “kings” have always people around them. And they always give orders to another person.


They never do anything self, and that will show the position of the hierarchy in society. And of course, some people would hear only positive things about them self. The leader of the gang always want to be a good looking person, and that is the reason why some of those men have “contrast person" in the next to that boss.


This person might be very fat, and the reason why the boss is keeping this fat person near self is that if some fat person stands near somebody else, then another person seems thinner. And of course those fat persons have always trouble to find friends, and that’s why their social life depends on membership of the gang. The bad thing is that their membership depends on the leader of the gang, and all the things are made with the boss.


And everything that the boss says to that contrast person is sinking. The leader of the gang might throw the candies to the floor, and then this contrast person must take them up. And the leader will always show that this contrast person allows the leader to do anything, what this boss wants. This also means that this fat person always dropped to the home, when other persons of the gang will send to the parties.

Heath mind in healthy body: Roman and Greek statues and why they are made

(Internet)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When we are looking for some statues from the ancient Greek and Rome, we must see that the models of those statues are quite well physical strength. Of course, the artists have made the same kind of statues even in the modern era, but they have copied the style of those statues. So those medieval- and renaissance statues can be said as the "roman" or "Greek statues". When we are talking about those sculptures what are shown the sportsman or something like that, we must think that those statues are made for some purpose.

The statues are very high-level handwork, and they are made of expensive materials. Molds what are used were high-class work and those sculptors hadn't got computerized working equipment and the work was high standard titivated. So the question is "why those well-known statues have been created"? Those statues purpose is probably to be some teaching artifact.


They were used as the model of "perfect man". The mission of the statue is probably to show anatomical dimensions of the perfect sportsman for the people, who selected the gamers to the Greek Olympics. And in those days the mission of the Olympics was to help the leaders of the Greek states to select the warriors to their phalanx. Even in those times of the war of the Peloponnese, the philosophers have thought, what kind of person is the perfect warrior?


What kind of persons is the best for the best? Those people were selected as professional warriors for the Greek phalanx, and their mission was also to protect the leaders of the nation or city-states. So the Olympics were the good place to take meters for the men, who won those games. Greek philosophers had limited methods for use in the selection process.


In that time the most hardcore military in the western world was, of course, the Spartan military, Nowadays the scientists can use DNA-tests to select perfect military men, and they can take DNA-samples from the best special forces operators, and then compile them together, and if it is same sequences between the operators, those sequences might use for help to select that personnel in the most hardcore military operators in the world.

What means the sun in old mythology?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/thesuninthemythology/etusivu

The sun has a special place in the Nordic mythology. The term “sun group” or “Sonnen Gruppe” means normally the central group or the group that leads the other groups of the organization. And Sonnen (Sun)  person means the person, who is the center of the group like the sun is the center of the solar system. The sunrise will normally mean the beginning of the new age or rising culture. That’s why that symbol is sometimes installed on the houses, what are designed in the early 20th. century.

That symbol was meaning for rising nationalism and rise of the new government, what will kick the colonialist government out of the country. The reason why those societies were kept in secrecy, was that those colonialist governments would hunt the members of those societies and sent them to prison if the society was uncovered. And between the world wars, the secrecy of creating the German war machines was extremely important.

In these photographs is the normal way how the architect will also mark those buildings and also make eyeball that normally people won’t look those houses. The architect has used a nice looking bright house in the front, to make the target for observer’s house. The other house looks like less attractive than creme looking house in the front, and that makes the darker house less attractive. The labyrinth means the road or way of studying. That is also a symbol for the secret knowledge of some things like airplanes. Also, the sun means the things what are public and the dark color means the moon or the dark side of the force.

The mean of the labyrinthine was same in the ancient Greeks and Indians. It was the road what endpoint the traveler was unable to see, and if the traveler was trying to make something wrong he wakes up the monster what eats him.  The Mayan Indians had the same kind of philosophy in their life. The sun means public and well-seen power, but the moon means the hidden.way to use power in the society. That’s the reason why the temple of the moon was extremely feared in the Mayan culture, because it meant the “power of the night", like phosgene gas, what was created in anaerobically stored crass.

All empires have their problems, and they all choose their road

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/allempireshavetheirproblems/etusivu

About the future of the Europe is a road, what every culture and empire have done. That is the road of the Roman empire and all other empires on the earth. All empires have risen because people needed protection against other people, but after that, the empires have fallen by internal disorders. That is the road for the European Union, if something will not be done soon. The reason why all empires have fallen is very clear. There have been the forces, who thought that all nations must be independent. But those people have another reason for drive independence in their areas, and that is not very altruistic. The reason for those independence movements is actually that those people can be great leaders in the small countries. And those populist movement leaders might only want good work in the parliament. And that kind of people caused the collapse of the empire. Every empire has met their fate in the situation, where people have bored about the government of their homelands. In the authoritarian state,  people lost their trust in authorities.


And that stated the rebel against the central government like in the Russian in 1917. The people were bored for the tsar, and after that, they started to fear the leader of the Russian empire, and that’s why they started the open rebellion against that man, who was the absolute dictator. The authoritarian and strong leadership of the state seem very good way to restore law and order to the state. But there is one little risk in that philosophy. Those leaders will sometimes become very brutal against their people. When we are talking about the restoring the law and the order, normally people think that means riots and violence.


Modern police forces have created the situation where violence is concrete but the violent person wants to save his life. And of course, the weapon what is used in that action is effective only in the short range. Nobody ever thought that somebody will open the fire in the middle of the street with the assault rifle and after that explodes himself. This kind of violence is the new element for police. But when we are talking about strong leadership we must understand that those strong leaders might be first very democratic. Those laws what allows the authoritarian way to use power are made to protecting the state. They were necessary for young states, what was not able to stabilize their governmental power and position for their governmental institutions.



 But if those laws will stay, they can give power to undemocratic advantage for that state. And we must realize that no leader lives forever. When the person in the head of the state changes the next owner of that position is not so democratic than his predictor. That is what we have seen in the history. The democracy based need for the strong leadership has changed for the nightmare like in many young states have done. The leaders who were very charismatic leaders for the people were changed as populistic and authoritative leaders, who crush the opposition without mercy.  That kind of advantage will cause fear against the government, and the result could be devastating for the empire. That happened in the Roman Empire and the last empire what faced that truth is the Soviet Union what collapsed because people feared to go home after protests.



That caused the snowball effect, where more and more people came to the streets, and then the Soviet government was unable to handle that situation. And the thing what grown that effect was fear, because the history of the Soviet and Russian government showed to the people, that they will go in very big trouble if they have taken part of the riots, what we're all demonstrations, what were focused against the central government of the Soviet Union. And they remember the promises what the Soviet authorities had made, and what they had broken.  And that is the problem with strong leaders. They afraid the people, and sometimes the fear is too strong, and people will start to rebel. This is the danger for an authoritative government.

Every case in the world is always two sides

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In the case of declaration of independence of the nation is always two parts, the independence movement, and another part, who doesn’t want the independence for some areas. Sometimes those people are not very often seen sight in media because their emotions are not so high than that independence movement. The problem with independence movements is that they appeal more feelings than a mind. That's why those political movements get so much room in the media. And what brings publicity brings votes. Some journalists like to make big stories about those movements because they are so colorful.


People are so sensitive and real, and they can speak spontaneously for their supporters. And what is the better picture in the media than a picture, where a supporter of independence cries when the flag of that new state rises up? The media is a very effective tool when people want to get publicity in their matter. And some journalists want to make big news for some movements, because they have no strong political opinions and antipathy against the government, that they will support everybody who is against the governments all around the world.


They want to believe, that everyone in the world hates governments and NATO. When we are talking about media's attitude about independence movements, we can see that those movements can get very much very positive publicity in the news where that movements power and popularity are very strongly highlighted. And that’s was the same style of the information what was given people in “Brexit case”. The media saw only positive things about Great Britain's separation from the EU.


And that’s why I think that kind of publicity might be supported by Russians because they might want to crash NATO. Publicity brings supporters to all parties, and when those leaders come to the front of people and sing some national hymns of some area, they might look like teddy bears. They want to stand in the front of people and show their patriotism to everybody. But they forget that in those street parliaments stands only the most eager part of the people, and that is a weakness of those politicians. Popular politics are very good to manipulate people, and they always can say right word in the right place.

And if police arrests somebody in the front of their flag, those politicians say "nobody has right to hit a people of that area", and that thing happens if those arrests are for crimes like breaking windows or something else. They always change those things to political persecution. All speeding ticket what they get is given by political reasons. And after that, they will get more people to listen to their song about the greater independent nation, what will live without evil central government.  Those street parliaments are sometimes threatened other people with violence if they will not support their idea of independence of some areas.

Miniaturization of technology gives new ways to mark documents

RFID-chip inside person's hand

Kimmo Huosionmaa 

Print media is problematic for data security. Those print files could be put just in the pocket and after that thief of that data could walk out the building. But modern technology gives very effective methods to deny that kind of work. This method basis itself in miniaturized RFID-chips, what can put in the ink tanks inside ink liquid.

Those nanosize chips are so small that they can inject to a paper same times, where text and pictures are, and those chips are so invincible that they can't be separated from other text and that equipment can put in the normal ink tank. So even printer operator doesn't know that those systems are in the ink. And in that RFID-chip can save information about who printed that paper, and if the thief walks throw security gate, what might be covered in the doorframes.


Of when security personnel is looking for those documents they must only use GSM-phones, what will take near persons and their pieces of luggage, and after that security personnel can take that thief in the hands of the law. That reading application might be similar, what is used by ticket checkers in public transportation. And that application might send the report of those papers to firms security. And if I really want to think nasty, those applications might send report same time to the security police. It also might work as a ghost software, what is secretly installed in all that workplaces workers telephone, and if they don't see or know that application that might cause them lots of trouble if they steal papers from the workplace.

That system could be also metal detector and that magnetic field will be inducted electricity to that tiny little microchip, what will send data about the person who printed that document, and even what kind of is in the document. The printer or copy machine can also take PDF-copy of that document, and mark it with register number what will put in the chip. And if some prints will attempt to take out the building, they will alert chief of security and he will see what documents are taken out of the building.

After that, if a thief can slip off those documents will deliver to hands of patent officials and police. And if somebody will sell those documents or try to capitalize them, will patent authorities notice that. This is very important if stolen material consists research and developing the technology for company's tomorrow products. Those kind of stuff are in marketing at least couple of years and they might be wonderful equipment in many things. 

Small size implanted microchips might be put surgically in some people bodies, and that thing might read by airport's security gates. That kind of RFID-chips are put in dogs, but they can also implant in bodies of some special forces operators like NAVY SEAL- or other persons who the government doesn't want to go somewhere. And also dangerous prisoners must be implanted that law enforcement could find them in the crowd of people.



That other persons are technical and scientific specialists whose skills are that kind of that government ever let them go to the country what is hostile. Somebody thinks that some key members of some nations government and scientific laboratories are implanted with GPS-chips, what looks like pills and contains very long life batteries, that government can follow them around o'clock in every day of the year.


Yläkuvan osoite:  http://www.michaeljournal.org/articles/world-government/item/global-control-through-the-rfid-chip