North-Korea did it again

Picture I

https://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.com/p/north-korea-did-it-again.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The North-Korean government did the same thing, what it made before, and continues improvements of the nuclear reactor. This is the thing, what many people expected because the nuclear program is a very good shield for that government. The nuclear weapon development of that state is the very interesting thing because these weapons are made for eliminating both, internal and external threats for that government. People of the world hoped, that the leaders of this country would keep their promises, but the truth is, that those people talk about other things and do other things. The reason, why Kim Jon Un met Donald Trump was clear, he wanted to win the time because the missiles of that country have changed problematic for other things, like food supply from China.


And now the North-Korean leader has continued the nuclear program of that country. Or somebody else has continued that program. In that country, nothing is like in normal state. Actually, the western nations would not even know, who is the real leader of that country, and there are rumors that somebody in the coulisses keeps the dictator in the hand. Actually, the official leader of that country Kim Jong Un is a member of the "Room 39", what is very secretive and powerful organization in the leading party of that country.


There are many other people in the party, who would not give their position easily. Many of those people are age over 50 and they have done more than Kim Jong Un, and their crimes are very big. The reality of the "Room 39" is that they would not always follow the orders of the leader, because if that state would be democratized those elder members of the party will get punishments for their crimes. The problem with the Worker's party of the North-Korea is that is the militaristic organization, what has the name "party". This party has been the tool for the power of Kim's family, but there are also other persons in the power.


And those other people would not always tell to Kim, what they are doing. They want to use their power behind the back of the leaders of the North-Korea. Of course, Kim's family is very powerful, but as I told they are not North-Korea alone. The foreign enemy would keep the nation homogeneous and gives mission for the military. And fast-changing policy guarantees that the North-Korea would have threats, what it can use for argue the power of the Worker's party, and the position of Kim's family in that organization, what have kept power in the North-Korea from 1950's.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/jun/27/north-korea-nuclear-reactor-upgrades-summit-pledges

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Room_39

Picture I
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/8b/e4/4f/8be44fd1ee96840299d47d90f70c2f48.jpg

About the skepticism and the meeting between Kim Jong Un and Donald Trump

Picture I

http://kimmontaidearvioita.blogspot.com/p/about-skepticism-and-meeting-between.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Skepticism is always the good thing, but also optimism is important when we are talking about the meetings like North Korean and the United States leaders. The major part of the philosophy of defense is that nations should believe in the peace, but prepare for war. This is the thing with the relationships between those two states, what have nuclear power behind their leaders. When we are thinking about positivism and the normalizing the relationships between nations, we must say that positivism would tempt the North Korean government start to make changes in their country, and in this situation, the best way to act is to encourage this advantage.


But also there is also very many contracts in history, what the North Korean leaders have put their names in the papers, and then they have broken those promises. The most well-known case about that kind of politics has been re-beginning of the nuclear program of that nation. This program was given results, what we all know. And in the real world, there is many frighten weapons of mass destruction than some nuclear weapons can ever be.

Ranges of North Korea's missiles
Picture II

The biological weapons are more deadly than nuclear weapons, and North Korea has probably those organisms in their laboratories. The delivering of the organisms like Ebola is easier than launching nuclear weapons. The structure of delivering system would be lighter, and then delivering that kind of organisms can be made by dropping the test tubes from satellites. This is one of the worst nightmares in the world.


If North Korea would break the contract, and deny the meetings, we must face the similar problems than before. And the North Korean leaders would be stronger than ever before because they can use nuclear weapons in the shield of internal politics. There are rumors, that there is hiding nuclear weapons in the Pyongyang, what is ready to explode if the leaders of that country are in danger. But when we are talking about the nuclear weapons of the United States arsenal, we must also face the truth, that this nation has more threats than North Korea, and if it would start to disarming its systems, must the Russia and China also cutting their strike capacity.


And they would not go in that process, because those nations feel that India, Pakistan, Great Britain and France are also the threat to those nations, and there would be more nations in the nuclear club,because the membership in this group of the nation guarantees the respective handling of those nations in the international areas. And that's why many nations want those weapons for protecting their interests in the global environment.

Picture I

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/ct-0YyoSOsU/maxresdefault.jpg

Picture II

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DCDEHZjXoAAERzk.jpg

In this situation, there is no right actions

Picture I

http://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/p/in-this-situation-there-is-no-right.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Positivism is the thing, what would make advantages for everything in the world. And the meeting between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un is one of the most positive things, what has been happened in the world. When we are thinking of the meeting between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un, there are many things, that leaves questions in the air. And when we are thinking this situation from the side of Donald Trump, there would be no right actions and the solutions for the situation in the Korean peninsula would not have the solution in the short period.


There were set no timetables when those advantages between the relationship of the USA and North-Korea, but this meeting in Singapore was the very nice sign, and we always want to believe the best of the advantage in that area. But there is a long trip to go until the relationship between Koreas would be stabilized, and of course, the internal situation in North Korea is very different than in the western world.


But as we know this kind of diplomacy might encourage the leaders of North Korea to make also internal political advantages to that country. And those questions are very difficult for every nation in the world. But when we are thinking about the role of those leaders, in that meeting, we might say, that North Korea is facing the new kind of political solutions, and probably in someday the Koreas would be living together.


Of course, North Korea has its internal problems but when we are looking to the history, the same kind of problems had also the Soviet Union, and nobody didn't ever say any negative things about the relationship for that nation, what had similar prison camps like North Korea. And here might some person ask, "what is the difference between relationships between the western world and North Korea and the western world and the Soviet Union. Everybody knew about prison camps in the Soviet Union and the relationships for that country were ever judged in any country.


And if Trump would walk away from this meeting, we might hear again, how childish that man is. Now the North Korean leader would get the propaganda victory about this meeting, but as we know that the nuclear weapon is the very good thing for stabilizing the situation in every part of the World. And as we know, Trump had another choice, what would be nice to see, and that is the showing finger to that meeting, and again the bad boy would be Trump. So this man cannot do anything right if we are looking at the articles, what has been written recently.


The relationships between the USA and North Korea must be normalized, and this is the key question in this situation. In the same time, the USA cannot forget its allies, because the situation in the South China Sea is going to be tight. And the purpose of the artificial islands in that area is to offer military bases for China combat aircraft and naval vessels. This means that also the USA needs allies in that area, what offers the bases for the aircraft and other military units. And if the relationships between the USA and South Korea would be worse, the airbases and naval support bases would not in use if the conflict would begin in that area. Those bases are needed for emergency landing sites for the damaged aircraft, and the problem is that not a single modern aircraft could be given to China, even in the wreck condition.


China has tested the laser weapons, and those things are now in operational condition. The information of that was taken from the China's Africa's military base, what have targeted those weapons to the  United States fighters. And because the incident happened in far away from China motherland, that would show, that the laser weapons of that country have become in the operational system. This conclusion, that the lasers of the Chinese military forces are now becoming operational is made because nobody knows why somebody would be brought weapon system, what is under development to the overseas base.

Sources:

http://www.businessinsider.com/china-laser-weapons-2018-5?r=UK&IR=T&IR=T

https://thediplomat.com/2018/05/possible-use-of-blinding-laser-weapon-near-chinas-djibouti-base-spurs-us-warning-to-aviators/

Picture I

http://assets4.bigthink.com/system/tinymce_assets/4161/original/north_korea_dark.jpg?1481542875


https://luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2018/06/12/in-this-situation-there-is-no-right-actions/

About situation in Ukraine

7K720 Iskander missile
(NATO SS-26 "Stone")
(Picture 1)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Vladimir Putin and the situation in Ukraine are not been very often in a stand at public media. Reason for that is there is nothing going on in that place, what is called as the Crimean peninsula. This place is in very important strategic location when we are thinking about a transportation of Caucasian oil and gas by tubes to European markets. If the Caucasian oil and gas will replace Russian products, that would mean the decrease of Russians economic and political influence. And in the real world, that means that Russia cannot cut those deliveries for having political acceptance for other actions. If the nation doesn't use Russian oil and gas, the threat would give only by the military forces. And it looks like bad in the international politics. Open threading by weapons will cause the public opinion turn against Russia.

And there have been ideas of massive United Nations peacekeeping operations in Ukraine, but the reason of Russian military power the passion for this kind of operations is much lower than in Afghanistan and Iraq. Russian nuclear force is the very frightening thing, what will make think twice, if somebody wants to operate in Ukraine with United Nations mandate. Russian interest is that situation in Ukraine will forget as fas as possible. Also, many European countries will want to normalize their relationship with Russian leaders.


If we think that the USA would come in this situation with military forces, we must say, that this scenario is very improbable, because this nation has been in the war since 2001, and that would be not very good for the reputation of that country. The prize of that war is very high, and the operation in Afghanistan and Iraq have cost more than the Second World War. Also, the losses of human lives in those wars have been very high, and the people of USA have tired about the war.


The war between the USA and Russia would be the World War III, what might mean nuclear holocaust, where the big part of the human population will be killed. This is the reason, why the solution to this problem is not able to find the military way. The problem with this crisis is that Russian military has got power to stand in that area, and those troops are highly protected by nuclear weapons, what has installed on highly mobile battlefield systems warships.


Those weapons are extremely difficult to detect, and they have the capacity to destroy the entire city. If those truck-mounted weapons would detect, they are quite easy to destroy by tactical fighters, helicopters or commando-strike. But the detection is the problem. The weapon itself can be destroyed by anti-tank weapons or bombs. If the core of the bomb will be broken, radioactive plutonium will be delivered to the ground.  But of course, nuclear weapons have the very hard defense and strikes can be shielded by the security-fire by the security team. So this makes those weapons extreme difficult targets for military forces. The system goes, that tactical nuclear weapons will be used in the first strike, and those weapons are supported by strategic nuclear weapons And if Russian conventional forces would get in trouble those weapons will be used in this kind of situation.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9K720_Iskander

Picture 1
https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQLGxFjm2f_Q1B794FLy3bk9rbb5tBXSPfDpZFFLlDs_S8lpHxlww

Writing about the boring thing (Why somebody hated Alexander the Great?)

Alexander the Great
336-323 B.C
Picture 1

About boring thing

Kimmo Huosionmaa
When we are making analyzes of the some Alexander the Great's national politics in the antique world, somebody thinks that is boring. But when we are concentrating on the military politics of ancient Macedonia, will that give us the key, how the conflicts were creating in that time. In this kind of situation, we must realize, that this great military leader was looking for his enemies far away, but he should look them inside his palace.


I don't know how many true battles has this iconic creature ever win, and how much of his glory has been made by other leaders and their poets and historians. The things what happened in the battles are only one thing about the life of this man, who died of poisoning at the age of 33 at Babylon.


In that time the truth about the battles was, what the writers or their payroll payers wanted, and if some writer had different opinions about those leaders, their head would cut off by the sword. So in the real life, the real Alexander the Great had very little connection between the person, who was as the main character of the books, what were written about him. When we are thinking about life and death of this war leader, we must say, that this man had very good preparations for his mission.


The priests were told him that he was the choice of the gods, and of course, there were many things, what gave Alexander the self-esteem to accomplish his mission. But when this man came back from his war, he has faced the situation, that his enemies were conquered his palace. One reason, why this man was probably murdered, was his way to use alcohol.


When he was drunk, this man was violent and could use his sword against his friends. That feeds the anger against Alexander. While he was young, this man saw very much violence, when his father killed one family member. And his way to drink caused the situation, where Alexander lost his memory. The guards might also kill his friends, and claimed that Alexander was guilty about those things, by giving orders to make those things or taking the sword by himself and striking his friends.


And that made him unstable against his friends, and agitators used those killings against his personality. There were many more people in those parties, and maybe Alexander and his friends were violent against them. And maybe somebody invented that the chef will be the next one who would be sacrificed and this man gave lethal poison to the king. So were the parties the reason, why that man was killed by poisonous vegetable like ricin. What is painless and very lethal poison, what will find in the plant, what has the same name than that poison.  This poison denies the work of mitochondria, and it might cause death in very small doses.

Sources

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great

Picture 1

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cb/AlexanderTheGreat_Bust.jpg/300px-AlexanderTheGreat_Bust.jpg

What is the problem with the question of Jerusalem?

 Bulgarian Air Force Sukhoi SU-25UBK_Lofting
 (Wikipedia)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The result of the confession Jerusalem as the capital of Israel was what people should expect.When we are facing the real political life, and it connects to religion, we might see something, what happened in United Nations, when the President of The United States confesses Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. Almost every other states in the world were against that decision, and the result was crushing for that action. So what is the point of the situation of Jerusalem, what was conquered by Israel Troops in 1967, and after that occupied by same government?

One reason for this conflict is the weapons what are dumped to the Middle East, and of course, the salesmen of the weapons wants that their products are the most effective in this operational area. And that is the reason, why Apache and MI-24 helicopters and tactical support planes like F-16 and SU-25 are very much in the television. Even if SU-25 "Frogfoot" seems little old fashion, it is easy to modify with "smart weapons kit" as a modern close support aircraft, and Israel has modified also MI-21 "Fishbeds" to operate with smart bombs, laser-guided missiles like "Maverick" and "Hellfire" and the most modern missiles like AIM-120 AMRAAM" if the weapon hard-points were changed. And there is of course capacity to operate with the Russian missiles. The SU-25 offers a cheap choice for expensive NATO-planes.

http://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/mig21/

The reason why Israel dares to do that occupation is, that its government gets very much military aid from Washington, and this makes those rulers so brave with their actions against Palestine people. But as we might see there are many truths of that area and the occupation of the Palestine areas makes Israeli government very unpopular in that area. And the main role of the Israeli community is the hardcore militarism and one of the most important export articles of the country is military equipment. The reason why Washington gives support for Israel is that this nation is weak, and its capability for making war with the other nations depends on the support what Washington gives to it.

And that is very important because this denies Israel to slip into the hands of Russia. And of course, the reason for friendship between Israel and the USA is very simple. The USA can use Israel as the bridge-station if it wants to make the invasion into Middle-East. Another part of this strategy is wealthy states in the Gulf area, what have weak military forces. Those states must give military bases for the United States Air Force, and even if the tactical aircraft can operate from carriers, the airborne tanker aircraft and heavy cargo planes need the fixed runways.


Those aircraft are the necessary part of giving airborne refueling capacity for strategic bombers and the tanks and other protection and technical support units of that airbase. In this strategy, the airborne refueling aircraft gives operational support also for the United States global nuclear task force, and also those military bases will act as the emergency landing sites for B-1 and B-52 bombers. Also, this strategic set is mentioned for denying Russia take control of all oil production in the Middle East. The problem of that area is that the USA and its allies have the technological advantage, but Russia and its allies control the oil fields. Of course, Russian technology is also good and in the last sentence, I meant technology, what is used by local actors. The Russian military also wants to advantage its global strike capacity, and it's airplanes need same kind of support than the USA:s airplanes. So this guarantees the Russian interest to the Middle East.


The problem is that Russia controls the route of the gas to Europe, and it wants to connect the European energy solution for Russian gas, and that's why the situation in Syria is very suitable for Russian interests. If the Middle East is the unstable area, the Russian oils and gas will become more interesting opportunity for Europe, and of course, if those contracts are cheap enough, the advantage of the Russian political and social environment might be without notice. And I think that European leaders won't want to connect European energy solutions the goodwill of Turkey or some other Islamic states. If Russia takes control of the coastline of Georgia, the gas line from the Middle East to Europe will be under Russian control. And it will give political advantages for Vladimir Putin and Kreml.

https://luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2017/12/22/what-is-the-problem-with-the-question-of-jerusalem/

The political terminology and the new era of populism

The Statue of Liberty
(Wikipedia)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In Austria is the power of the nation changed to the new party, what has ever been in the governmental power on this country, and of course, this party is stamped as radical right-wing nationalists. The reason for this kind of writing is that those new parties have not good or close relationships with the press or other media. And because the new parties are always marked as the populist or radical actors in the political field, the new power of the government might feel as uncomfortable for the political media, what has been used strong worlds with that movement.


And when this particular movement or party is in command of the state, it will feel not so good, like some "old fellow" who have been in the prime role in the politics for years. The old parties and old politicians have always had good relations with the press, and in the old times, the marketing of the parties was in the hands of the press. In this time those actors will use social media to collect the information of the political opinions of the people, and then start to make the speeches, what is mentioned for satisfying the people.


Collecting that data can be used same methods than collecting other marketing information, but this time the product is the politician and the opinions of that person. If we want to be very clever, we might use "rake method" to collect that information. In this method, there will be established many Websites on the net, that involves a different kind of information. And then the surveillance official will check what sites give the most positive feedback, and by that information, the politicians can begin to make their speeches to the people. And this will be the new era of the populism.


If those politicians had money, they got the visibility in the pages of the press. And that's why the good relations for the media people was very important. But then somebody wrote the book of the Internet-marketing. In this marketing system, what bases the virtual platforms anybody can get the same volume of marketing, and the thing that gives the reason for reading those homepages is how interesting those pages felt by readers.


The social media is the new thing in the political field, and it is the thing, what can bring lots of votes for the politicians, but it also can destroy everything, if the politician is not careful, when this person writes his opinions to the Facebook and other media. At this time must politician or other writer understand, that nobody fixes those texts if that person will make mistakes. And even if those persons will pull those texts off the net, will they be delivered by another people around the social network.


The arguments against the social media are that the media and the writers of Facebook or another social media have no skills or level when they write something, but the problem is that they have bigger contact surface and the social media writings are more easy to get than some newspaper.  When the people sit on their chairs in the lunch hour, they can take those homepages very easily than some person gets the newspaper.


The use of social media is that they will use as the combined way. In the blogs will be written long stories, and then those Web-addresses will deliver on the Twitter and other social media pages. And the problem of the social media is of course that the children of the families deliver there some pictures of their homes. If the parents have the alcohol- or other problem, they won't probably want to show their home to another people.


In a couple of years ago, there were massive campaigns in the media to deny social media, and in those campaigns, some well-known people shut down their social media accounts. In those campaigns, there were reporters, who bought the social media writers passwords and took the part of the media harassment. The problem of the social media is that it denies the media-houses, and then the marketing money will go to the firms like Facebook.


And if the users make the texts and another content, they are very cheap to produce. And of course, the users of the social media give the information for marketing corporations about the interests of the users, and also what is their political opinions.  And this information can be used as the political field for giving the tips to the politicians, what kind of speeches they will wish to keep to the people.

What is the reason for crises of European Union?

Eiffel tower

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The European Union is in crises, and the reason for this is populist movement what has been grown in the political field. The reason for the success of those movements has caused because of the freshness of those movements. They all have been quite new parties, and those movements have given new choice for people when they must elect their candidate to the parliament. And why those new movements have got this success. Why old fashion political leaders talked to religious people. Those people were easy to account, and they were homogenize group. That's why the promises were easy to focus to those people who visited in the church.


Religion is not so big thing to younger people, and that's why young voters are separated from old fashion politics. New political movements offer a new choice for the people, and those movements promise some concrete things to the people of nations. Offer what they give is security. Those movements promise that if the European Union builds a wall between it and another world, the people of the union will be safe from terrorists. They forget that if EU builds a wall around it, the cause of that action will be same, what happened to the Roman Empire when it built the wall of Hadrian. Enemies of Rome just escaped another side of the wall, and they could continue their actions against Rome, and that caused as it part of the collapse of the empire.


Why those populistic movements are so popular? They can speak to people, and tell them, what they want to hear. When Greece went to the crisis, the politicians told people, that if there is not the Union, they won't have to pay that money to Greece, and of course, the question was always a big money. Those politicians said, that if that Union will be broke, the people would get something new, like growing social security and more jobs in frontier guards. But when we are talking about medias relationship to politics, we must realize that those new movements are of course something strange in the political field.


New political parties are always defamed by media because actors of the media have already contacts with old political parties. And new actors are a good target for trolling. But why new political movements have risen so fast, even they have not had so-called "official" medias support. The reason is that they use Internet-marketing to collect votes, and basic social media and homepages are very effective tool for marketing platform. That environment can give very much volume to low price marketing. The argument against the new party is sometimes, that they have the only couple of percent supporters, and if someone will give his or her vote to that movement, will the vote get lost.


And new parties have very low marketing budgets if they compile with old political parties. But Internet marketing gives those new parties new channel to their thoughts to mind of the people. And this is the new way to make politics. Today politics must be very careful, what they write on Facebook and other social media. And the social media causes a situation, where the political actor must always be in interplay with people. And that will be a new challenge to democracy. It's not enough that politic leader meets people in some market square. In the Internet politician have a change to meet masses of the people.


This is a question of political culture. Politician must meet masses to get votes in the election day, and the only need is to put people mind that they give that particular number in the ballot. But social media is a very dangerous place for political actors, because there politicians must be very scarp. If they will give answers in drunk that might destroy their career in political field immediately. And if they have something to hide, those things might rise up in Facebook and other social media.

Source of the picture: http://whentogo.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/04/best_time_to_go_to_the_eiffel_tower.jpg

Clothes and violence

Political graffiti (Source: Internet)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Normal mistakes what man or woman makes if they lie is that they are like windmills. They always speak so loudly and moves hands like some crabs that those people look like something else than normal. Sometimes they speak like this "did we met at Dave's bar didn't we, what sometimes means that speaker is dominating part of the relationship. Or sometimes those people are only married because their communities want that. And it will make very nasty situations in peoples lives because sometimes happens that living under some roof will so stressing, that those people will not continue that marriage-life and they are always away from each other.


When some people wait for attack wears he or she normally some skirt or vest what is a mark for attackers who is their friend or co-operative. Sometimes I have seen violent gang co-operatives in public situations and always they have worn some special clothes, what means that this person is a member or protected by some gang.


This kind of dressing is sometimes so deep in this person behaviors, that this person doesn't even see when he or she wears gang clothes, and that will shine in all of that person public performances. If a person is higher in some gang than "normal member" he will get positive feedback of actions what he has made in some gangs, will those clothes be more important to that guy than some regular member of some gang?


When a member of violent gang rises in hierarchy he or she will learn a new way to make things. That person must only say that somebody must do something and this will create a very nasty behavior to that people. He learns to give orders, and that will be a very bad thing because somebody doesn't like a way to speak other people.


Here is the thing that comes to my mind when people asks about money. If you get very much money means that you have a big salary. This means that that kind of people sometimes forgets what means money for people who get 1000 euros per month. If a man gets 3000 euros every month does he have resources to buy very expensive clothes?


And that makes this kind of person sometimes shine in a gang with expensive running shoes another kind of stuff, what are normally expensive and only luxuries what are unnecessarily for every people who will get less money. So wealthy people don't always understand what means word "expensive". They think that somebody puts 3000 euros for some bar touring.