Showing posts with label international law. Show all posts
Showing posts with label international law. Show all posts

Sunday, May 13, 2018

Modern conflicts are problematic things.



MQ-9 Reaper launches  the AGM-114 Hellfire missile
(Picture I)
https://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.fi/p/modern-conflicts-are-problematic-things_1.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

There was news, that the United States or someone in the government has told lies to people about the situation and reasons, why U.S forces have been used weapons in that area. The reason for the lies might be otherwise caused the very fast analyzes of intelligence data. And if the analyzes are made with hurry, the situation would be very different than what is the base of the solution to use force. But otherwise, the western leaders might want to secure that area because of they afraid that growing influence of China might cause the risk for security operations in that area.


Of course, the military base in Middle-East allows China to begin long-range missions for their air force in the global operations area. The problem of China have been that they don’t have had military bases for supporting their global operations. This means that if some long-range bomber would get damages in turbines, that aircraft needs emergency landing sites or it would be in trouble. In this kind of operations, the long-range bombers and other strike planes would fly from the mainland. And the support aircraft, what are mainly airborne tankers would operate from those bases.


When we are thinking about the fate of Libyan and Iraqi dictators, we must say that nobody misses them. They self-caused the situation, that attack to those countries were able to make. And the open breakings of human rights justified those air strikes. The situation in the global political field is very complicated, what means that the analyzes before actions must be done very carefully. Of course, there have been used inhumane weapons in Syria, and one of the most feared weapons is FAE or thermobaric explosives, what would destroy victims lugs and inner organs.


But the reason why those weapons are used is that the has radius of pressure effect can be defined very sharp. And the kill ratio of that weapon type is about 100 if the targeted person would be in killing radius. Today the British Ministry of defense have prosecuted that they have used AGM-114 N "Hellfire" missiles with their drones, what are equipped with FAE-warheads. But those type of anti-personnel weapons is used also by Russian troops.


The thermobaric explosives are effective against normal buildings and vehicles, but the smooth and aerodynamic shape of the target would decrease the effect of the pressure wave. This weapon is very effective against living force, but as we know that many nations have those FAE weapons in their stockpile. They are quite lightweight and that's why the bazookas have sometimes that kind of warheads. They are also shown their effect against underwater tunnels, where would be pumped mixture of acetylene and oxygen. After that, there would be thrown a couple of torches, and that would destroy entire tunnel system. FAE ammunition is problematic, because of their possible leaks, what makes them ineffective in the real situation.


Those weapons are inhumane like all other weapons on the Earth are. War is the inhumane thing and this is the sad but true in real life. The war on terrorism is the thing, what have always before justified using any weapons, what military leaders want to use. This kind of war has been marketed to the people as the "police action" against non-uniform combatants. And in this case, the international contracts like Geneva-contract are not sustained. Also, use of chemical weapons has been before justified as the legal action, if they are used against guerrilla or "nonuniformed combatants", who are classified as criminals.


We must remember that the Geneva-contract is protecting combatants only in the international conflicts, and in national conflicts like civil wars are combatants without the protection of the law, and when we are looking this thing very cold-blooded, are the military forces justified to execute every guerrilla, what they find. And this is the problem with international law. Those laws are made for protecting the winners, and many modern conflicts are leaving without their jurisdiction. There have been situations that two states were in the conflict that way, that they were supporting guerrillas on opponents area, what have caused bloodshed and traumatic situations were human rights have systematically broken. But the international community has been unable to stop those actions because those situations are classified as "domestic conflicts".

Sources:

http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/uk-drones-syria-using-controversial-vacuum-bombs-478492745

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GmRASCHJe2Q

Picture I

http://www.avionslegendaires.net/wp-content/uploads/images/avion_militaire/Gmq9-index.jpg



Saturday, January 13, 2018

Using chemical weapons is against international law


British Soldiers in gas exercise
with their Vickers machine gun
(Picture 1)


Kimmo Huosionmaa

There was suspected gas-attack in the Middle-East, and the gas what was used is probably chlorine. This is normal procedure when someone wants to create chemical weapons. The development of those chemicals is against international law, but the chlorine is and other that kind of chemicals are problematic because they are needed for cleaning the water of swimming pools. Production of the chlorine is very easy and cheap. The electrolytic process will break the salt molecules, and then there will release the chlorine and sodium, and the production of that gas, what was used already in the First World War.



The use of chemical agents in the war is very effective, but the problem with those weapons is, that they have no effect against military personnel. The military personnel has normally the protective clothes and the gas masks, and of course, they can get atropine what protects them against the nerve-agents like VX. The gas strike is normally the strike, where is used two types of chemical, the conventional chemical gas like chlorine or phosgene and the same time the enemy will target by nerve-agents.  The gas mask protects against the most chemical agents, what will destroy lungs, and the protective suit protects normally against mustard gas. But the nerve agent will kill the person because it can infect the target straight thru the protective gear and the dose what comes thru the skin will kill the target in the seconds.



The idea of this strike is that the atropine must be taken by nail, and in the gas, the strike will have more killing effect if the protective suit will be broken. But nowadays there would be systems, what protects the personnel from the gas. The most effective way to protect the person from nerve gasses is to give the military personnel same kind of atropine capsule, what is used in the cure for drug addiction and alcoholism. Those capsules look like Antabuse-capsules, but they will release atropine in the blood vessels.


Those capsules are created against the poison of sea snakes, what has the same effect than nerve gasses. Also, the modified insulin-pumps are tested against those feared chemicals. Those insulin-pumps are the same kind of things that are used by persons, who have diabetes but who want to hobby sports. Those pumps are equipped with the gas detectors, and they will give the atropine to the blood immediately after the gas is delivered to the area. The reason, why the military forces have dropped gas-weapons out the arsenal is probably that those weapons will not leave marks for killing to the bodies.


And if the army will lay down after the chemical attack, and then the soldiers will raise up and start to fight in the middle of attackers, would the result be devastating. Also, the chemicals could be flying by the wind to the attacker's own lines, and that would cause own casualties. The gas weapon is only the terror weapon, what is effective only against civilians. There have been made investigations, where the nerve gas molecule is tried to connect to the iron atom, what allows the control of the gas with magnet fields.


That might be one of the worst scenarios, what the international law ever faced. The developing of those weapons is strictly prohibited, but CIA and some other intelligence services have been investigated the snake poison in the poison bullets and poisoned arrows, what can be shoot with the same kind of guns, what are used to sleep the animals. And of course the air-guns are interested those intelligence and espionage personnel, and the sea-snakes poison can be shoot to the target used very sharp nail and airgun. The poison is very lethal, and it can kill the target in the seconds.

Sources


http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-42675657

Picture 1

https://i.pinimg.com/474x/9d/03/7d/9d037d7c92f96e54e5d8670a00e5c8a4.jpg

New autonomous task units are entering service.

"The deal will create much-needed competition for the Department of War acquisition process. (Representational image)" (Interestin...