About 3D-printed weapons

Picture I

https://kirjabloggaus.blogspot.com/

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The United States Of America has legalized the 3D-printed weapons. Manufacturing the 3D-printed weapons is quite expensive, and there is needed 3D-printer, what can produce steel parts. That thing is a modified MIG-welding machine, and it's quite expensive. Also, the system needs the CAD-models of every single part of the gun, and then the system must be sharp enough, that the parts would be fitted together. This is why normal people must not be worried about this technology, and that kind of systems are actually so expensive, that lone gunmaker would not have change or willing to pay the prize about that machine.


When we are thinking about the tests, where the guns are made by using 3D-printers, the parts of the weapon have been scanned by using laser scanners for taking precise right form and dimensions of every part of that weapon. So this is the very expensive project, and that's why would be easier to produce illegal weapons by using conventional methods. That's why those weapons, what are made by using 3D-printers  are not very common in the hands of hobbyists and other persons.


But those expensive manufacturing tools can be bought by the actors like drug cartels and Mafia, but those organizations have their channels, where they can get weapons. And also some motorcycle clubs may have the interest to buy the 3D-printing system, what can manufacture weapons. As you see, manufacturing the machine parts is not so easy, as people normally believe. The dimensions and form of the part must be made exactly right, or the gun or another machine would not work. Of course is possible that somebody would draw the gun parts by using CAD-programs or scans them to the net by using laser-scanners.


And there is an application for the mobile telephone, what can be used for that thing, but the scanning must happen in the right way, and the telephone should not shake during the process. Of course, there is need the model, what can be used for that action. This is the question of the 3D-printed weapons. If somebody would want this stuff, that person would get it, but that would need highly professionalism to make working weapons or other machines. But there are organizations, what are willing to pay for those skills.

Picture I

http://wssfirearms.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/2009_0909owen0097.jpg

Why we afraid artificial intelligence and new killer-drones?

(Picture I)

https://vapaaverkkojulkaiseminen.blogspot.com/p/why-we-afraid-artificial-intelligence.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

This is a writing about the paradoxes of war and militarism. The militarism and war are things, what is strictly out from normal people head, and there are many things, why is not very tolerated to speak about the military systems. One of them is that the national security is limiting the comments about those things. And when we are looking very sharply to the militarism and army, we are seeing that our religion has been against violence in 2000 years, and we still fight together by using weapons.


And even if we are against violence, many people are getting their salary from military forces their equipment, and the weapons industry around them. War is good business for the weapon dealers, who offers more and more lethal and advanced weapons, what suits for many missions. Also, support equipment like GPS systems is a very good article, because the owner of those satellites can cut the location signals of those weapons, and that's why they cannot use against the deliverer of GPS-system, and that ties the clients more effectively to the influence of another actor in the field of international politics and strategies. Strategies have always depended on the politics, and that's why the political support for weapon trade is extremely important.

We must say that using killer-drones would create the military, where doesn't serve a single man. But here we must know, that if there would be autonomous killer robots, what replaces the places of the military personnel, we would come to the situation, that there would be no work for the men, who serve in those military forces. And one of the first group. what would be lost their jobs, are the fighter pilots, who serve in the war against terrorism. Those missions can be done by using drones, what just fly to the target, and then drop their weapons.


The human's advantage in comparing with robots is that human would make surprising movements for those aircraft. And that's why human pilots still win the drones, and this is the thing, what keeps those pilots in the cockpits. When we are thinking that the use of missiles and drones is somehow cowardly action, we must say, that the leaders of the terrorist organizations and military forces would not be in any danger in those operations. If some Tornado or Sukhoi-pilot would drop the bombs from the high altitude like 10 000 meters, there would not have the single missile, what could harm that aircraft, if the opponent is some kind of Isis-terrorist.


The smart bombs, what have satellite guidance are extremely sharp, and in those operations, they could destroy targets very effectively.  The civilians are not suitable to comment those things, because that would be harmful to the reputation of military forces. If those pilots would be replaced with the artificial intelligence, there would not be heroes in another side, what is, of course, our side. But when we are going to speak about the fighters, we could act like some children at the sandbox, who are asking each other, whose car is the best?


In this case, when we are talking about multipurpose-fighter contracts, we can ask the question, what is the best, 4th,5th or 6th. generation fighter or multirole aircraft? And in this case, people have the right to talk, which one is the best, Super-Hornet, Gripen or SU-27? And if the writings have no influence or expertise, why those people would not have right to write about those things? Of course, somebody says, that I'm writing this for revenge because I didn't have promotion in the 100th. anniversary of the  Finnish defense forces, and that's why I' writing about this thing.  But people have right to their opinions.

Sources:

https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/kotimaa/artikkeli/siviilin-ei-kannata-tehda-paatelmia-havittajakaupan-huutelijat-harmittavat-puolustusministeri-niinistoa/6936626#gs.wCcrRNM

Picture I

http://nationalinterest.org/files/styles/main_image_on_posts/public/main_images/testflyging_av_forste_norske_f-35_-_22492943335_14_0.jpg?itok=1NsSjsUW

Racism is the good stick horse for criminals

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/racismandnormalcriminals/etusivu

Racism is the good way to isolate people from their normal social life in the beginning of the gang career. When the gang member doesn't fear enough,  he will become a threat for those members of the gang, because when this person "sings" many members of violent gangs will go to jail for violence and drug dealing. We know that almost every people in the world hate Nazis and other the armed extremist movements, but in the real world, there is only normal criminals, what are hiding behind those movements. We know that mafia’s killers sometimes use the Nazism as the defense in the courtroom. Nazism and racism is also the good thing for close the mouth of the gang members and especially young members of the gangs will isolate from normal social relationships and schools by racism. Racism is the good thing to blame if the police don’t work like people want. If the caller is the white or black person and policeman gives service, what is not satisfying the caller,  the reason for that is the ethnic group of the officials. The reason for that the person who is blamed for attack or something else doesn’t take to the jail by officials is always the ethnic group of the suspect.


And if somebody will be busted, the reason for the busting is always racism. The black people blame that white policemen are racist and white people tell that black policemen are playing brothers with other black people.  Also, the pilot jacket and combat boots are the very good dress when somebody wants to burn the bar from the neighborhood. And everybody who is the skeptic with that and wants to make some investigations, because this violent attacker used ski mask and gloves and the victim didn’t saw the skin is racist if the police don’t go straight away to the neighborhood’s skinhead home and arrest this person immediately. Even if all neighborhood knows this particular person and his political interests.

Pancor Jackhammer shotgun
(Internet Photo)

If the policeman doesn’t believe that some 15 years old person carries the shotgun and shoots other houses, this policeman is some kind of nazi. In many cases, the neighbor will blame others for the racism because the noisy hip-hop music will disturb some white family. And in some cases, the noisy rock roll will disturb neighborhood black family, who were visited the police last weekend. The reason for this kind of behavior is that there is very difficult to see anything wrong with the person’s own behavior or actions. So the reason for the phone call is always racism and of course, nobody will ever confess anything, and the neighbor is always the only person, who makes the voice in the neighborhood.  This kind of actions is not often political manifests. They are done by some other bar entrepreneur, who wants to kick off the competitor from his area. Of course, if the business is unprofitable can some owner burn that place by self and then get the insurance money from the insurance company.


Normal white people will blame black gangs for this action, but if the entrepreneur is black must this person invent some other criminal than the white entrepreneur. Everybody can paint swastika to the wall and yell “Heil Hitler” when this person will throw the Molotov cocktails to the pizzerias.  In real life, the Nazism is very dangerous ideology, because those people are so-called “perfect criminals” for blaming the violence on the streets. When somebody burns the pizzeria or attacks against some people, is always the good idea to blame some Nazis for those actions, and racists are perfect targets for any kind of propaganda. If we see the cases where some street gang leaders are put in the jail for narcotics trade, or some young person have been shot by police, the reason is always racism. The law enforcement is racist because it makes arrests to some crack houses or shoots the person, who points the gun at the policeman.


Then there will be massive protests, where law enforcement will be stamped as the racist and all personnel, who don’t believe that some crack dealer is innocent is racist. How many times some rap-artist has kicked off the restaurant for bad behavior, and then this person blames the security as the racist. In this text, the word “rap artist” means the guy, who dresses like some movie rapper, and everything that is done to this person is racism. I don’t understand why some people see always everything that is going on as the racial question? I know that everybody doesn’t like this writing, but in the case of violence and another kind of criminal activities, the point what newspapers use is that every arrest where black people are arrested by drug selling or another kind of things is racist. When we are talking about ethnic groups, there are people, who believe that some racial or professional background makes people nice.


That is not true. Every people are individual, and some black guys are really nice, but when we are talking about gangs like some “51st. Street gang” or Hell’s Angels, we must say that there are not many nice guys in those gangs. The gangs are always the problem, are their members black or white, and do you know why those gangs are racist? They are racist because those gangs are using racism in their connection and integration process for their members. When some guy becomes the prospect of the gang, would the gang members burn his house or attack against him with baseball clubs, and then they will blame some “Nazis” or “black people" about that attack. After this, those gang members will go to revenge of this action, and the mean of this action is to make enemies of the new gang member. This will separate this person from school and normal social life. And it is the road to the violence and murders, but when somebody will come to the gang, might this person risk for all the gang, because if this person doesn't make crimes self, can this person make deal with the prosecutors and take those gangsters to the prison,