The new fusion system is always fundamental. But the problem is that nobody has experience with fusion reactors.

The new fusion system is always fundamental. But the problem is that nobody has experience with fusion reactors. 

Fusion systems are good-looking things. Always when the new fusion test system is coming to the publicity. They are promising a big advantage. But then the systems are left without a final breakthrough. The self-sustaining fusion reaction has not been successful. 

The problem is that the temperature of the system is so high. And the magnets that are keeping the plasma levitating turning hot. The magnets are pressing plasma to high pressure. And microwave and laser systems are stressing it.

The problem with the fusion reactor is that. The pressure in the reactor is lower than in the nucleus of the Sun. So the lower pressure must compensate by raising the temperature of the fuel higher than the nucleus of the Sun. And that thing is the problem. The structures of the reactor are facing extreme thermal stress. 

The fusion system bases the idea of the torus-shaped reactor or accelerator where the plasma is hovering without contact with the wall of the system. If the plasma will contact the wall that thing melts the reactor right away. The fusion reactor is not itself make radioactive material. But the problem is that the high-temperature plasma would destroy if its leaks outside the reactor chamber. 

The fusion system is the most promising of the futuristic systems. Fusion energy is used in hydrogen bombs. But the commercial and peaceful use of this energy source is not successful. Fusion requires so much energy. That in weapons it is normally made by using the fission bomb.

But in fusion reactors. There is needed some other system that ignites the fuel. The laser rays or microwaves are the most promising things along with ionized fuel. In ionized reactors, two different polar rays will put to travel in opposite directions. The friction will raise the temperature along with electromagnetic stress to the levels that make the fusion possible.  

In some visions, the sodium and chloride ions that are forming salt in nature. Would put to impact in the reactor chamber. In that process, those ions are sprayed into the reactor chamber. By using particle accelerators. And then to those ions will stress the high-power laser and microwave radiation. In that process, the system would melt those atoms together and make the hot sodium-chlorine process. But normally the particles that are impacting in fusion reactors are lighter. 

Fusion energy is promising. But nobody knows when the first commercial reactors are starting to produce electricity. 

While we are waiting for fusion energy we should think about the latest fission technology. In some visions, the fission reactors of the future use thorium-based fuel. They would have a modular structure which means the single reactor units are smaller. But there are more nuclear reactors in the plant. And those systems would be underground which protects them against things like terror strikes. 

And that's why the people who are making decisions about energy strategies should invest also in things like thorium-fission reactors and a new type of location of nuclear reactors. In the new visions, the nuclear reactors will bury kilometers depth underground to the artificial caves. That thing would make them safer. 

https://bigthink.com/hard-science/nuclear-fusion-reactor/

Criminals don't care about laws

Image source Internet

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In Finland is propounded the law, what denies example loading receipts of explosives from the net. Here is one very dangerous problem with this kind of acts. That kind of actions where some document uploading from the internet becomes a crime might become a weapon for censorship.  And the ministers should understand that terrorism doesn't stop by making laws. Only Criminals doesn't care anything about lawbook and laws, and they continue their actions even those kind of laws will be made.


That's why that is so difficult to change weapon laws in the USA. The people who defend free carrying for weapons say, that criminals don't care about laws. And if some weapons will take away from people, there will become a situation, where criminals will get the freedom to shoot innocent people, who are not able to defend themselves because their guns are collected away.


https://www.mtv.fi/uutiset/rikos/artikkeli/terrorismin-itseopiskelusta-halutaan-tehda-rangaistavaa/6649700#gs.9VqnpAI

In the real world, there is possible to use terrorism as a wooden horse, what can hide the real threat for the democracy or anti-crime work. In real life, only free information guarantees that the government might get the real information about actions against the public security. And does that law consist pictures of toxic waste dumping and another kind of actions, because all water system might be poisoned by dioxide?


Or probably the aircraft security is more effective if those security guards don't know about risks of antimagnetic weapons? But when we are talking about dangerous material, there might be found some PDF's in the net with receipts how to make some explosives. There is one risk in that kind of material. Those PDF's might equipped with tracking applet, what uncovers that computer, where that material has been uploaded.


There is also a possibility to write those pages information down by using paper and pen, but those tracking devices will notice if somebody waists time too long with those pages, what might be so-called honeypots or "trap servers", what will track any computer across the web, if that system takes screenshots or the user stands too long in those pages. If somebody studies terrorist methodology under some other person supervision, that person must have the serious reason for that. But here we must say that if security personnel doesn't know methods, what criminals use, they can't prevent those attacks, and they can't find equipment what terrorists might use in those attacks.