Kimmo Huosionmaa
The problem with academical lecturer is that they sometimes use too many academic worlds, what nobody actually does understand. Then somebody always says, that the lecturer is hiding behind those terms, what is not very often used in the normal communication between people. The title of superior is the very good thing when some people will want to say “shut up” to another people.
When somebody says, that he or she is the leader of hundreds of workers, would that good weapon in many competitions. The unsharp introduction method sometimes makes the lecture very impressive and also telling a couple of jokes will make that lecture very nice to hear. This is of course just an opposite way if we compile this method with doctoral thesis defense. But it will make that lecture like some show, what is given to the people in some bar. It will make that lecture feel like some karaoke show, there are lots of talks, but a little number of important things, what supports the society or business life.
If some people mentioned that thing, will that cause the thoughts in the audience's head, that those people are powerful because they can offer the job for those people? And the academical title will give support to that person. If somebody uses academical titles, many people think that those people are so smart and well educated, that they even can’t make mistakes. The academical title is always the good argument when somebody wants to crush another person’s opinions.
But in the normal life is sometimes usual, that some people will hide behind their titles. Finland is the Republic of the titles is sometimes very well on the surface of the normal social life. In the television is very often introduced the person who is in the leading position of the business and social life. The academical title is the very nice thing when this person wants to introduce the political opinions of other people. And of course, the well-known friends boosts trust to that person. Religion is one part of political life, and that’s why religion is a good thing to support the person’s own opinions.
They normally tell the people their own position in some companies. But when the document carries on, there is one thing missing. The thing what, I sometimes miss in the document is, what kind of training those people have. They will very often say that they had studied in the University. But they never tell the people what kind of professionals they are. And this is the very strange thing. If I think those document programs very sharp, we must say that those people are also the very good advertisement for their schools. So why those people would not tell cameras who they really are? In the world of the business is sometimes seen the very sad thing, where bosses say that they have very many henchmen. But they ever say, what will give that position to them.
Comments
Post a Comment