Why radicalism is not the real answer to problems of the state?

Picture: Internet

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/whyradicalismisnotanswer/etusivu

The reason why traditional parties are back in popularity is that those "new age" parties can't reclaim the promises, what they have given to voters. The power of populistic movements is that they promise something concrete to the people, but as it happened many times before those promises have been over limited when they are compared with resources of the state.

When some group begins to control the state, the limits will come from national funds. Those funds are the thing, what the government uses for paying its own payments to own citizens and of course to the other states. This fund is capital, what government uses if it must reclaim its money back from markets, and if there is too much money in the markets, it will collapse the value of money, if that money comes to markets.

That brings very strong disappointing for voters, who wanted to get those things, what those parties have been promised. And when those promises leave in the level of promises, will voters leave that party. When we are talking about radicalism in political control, we must say that radical movements are often driven their state to destruction. Example of that advantage is Bolshevik-revolution in Russia 1917 and rise of Nazi-government in Germany in 1930's.

Those movements were very radical, and that radical policy drove those states to war and then authoritarian government-controlling policy destroyed the economics of The Soviet Union, but the economics were a reason, why, Adolf Hitler attacked to Polland in 1939. The reason for the attack was that nazi-party took their popularity by promising work for the people, and they, of course, made many workplaces, but those workplaces were in the police force and military industry.

And of course, those workplaces were grown in public sectors, like building new houses for a new government. That made very bad losses for cash of the state, and then Hitler decided to attack against Poland because they wanted to rob that states money and national treasures. When economic situation is bad, will the people want new workplaces, but if those workplaces are only in the public sector, the economic situation will not able to fix. Only real marketing is an answer to the bad economic situation because public workplaces are only money holes for the government.

Comments

Chinese innovations and space lasers are interesting combinations.

Above: "Tiangong is China's operational space station located in low Earth orbit. (Image credit: Alejomiranda via Getty Images)" (Scpace.com, China's space station, Tiangong: A complete guide) Chinese are close to making nuclear-powered spacecraft. Almost every day, we can read about Chinese technical advances. So are, the Chinese more innovative than Western people? Or is there some kind of difference in culture and morale between Western and Chinese societies? The Chinese superiority in hypersonic technology is one of the things that tells something about the Chinese way of making things. In China, the mission means. And the only thing that means is mission. That means that things like budgets and safety orders are far different from Western standards. If some project serves the Chinese communist party and PLA (People's Liberation Army) that guarantees unlimited resources for those projects. Chinese authorities must not care about the public opinion. If we th

Iron Dome is one of the most effective air defense systems.

The Iron Dome is a missile defense system whose missiles operate with highly sophisticated and effective artificial intelligence. The power of this missile defense base is in selective fire. The system calculates the incoming missile's trajectory. And it shoots only missiles that will hit the inhabited area. The system saves missiles and focuses defense on areas that mean something. The system shares the incoming missiles in, maybe two groups. Another is harmless and another is harmful. Things like killer drones are also problematic because their trajectories are harder to calculate than ballistic missiles. The thing that makes drones dangerous is that they can make masks for ballistic missiles. And even if those drones are slow, all of them must be shot down. The thing is that the cooperation between drone swarms and ballistic missiles is the next danger in conflict areas. In the film, you can see how drones make light images of the skies. The killer drones can also carry LED li

The innovative shield that protects OSIRIS-APEX can also protect the new hypersonic aircraft.

"NASA’s OSIRIS-APEX spacecraft successfully completed its closest solar pass, protected by innovative engineering solutions and showing improvements in onboard instruments. Credit: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center/CI Lab" (ScitechDaily, Innovative Engineering Shields NASA’s OSIRIS-APEX During Close Encounter With the Sun) The OSIRIS-APEX probe travels close to the sun. The mission plan is to research the sun. And especially find things that can warn about solar storms. Solar storms are things that can danger satellites at the Earth orbiter. And the purpose of OSIRIS-APEX is to find the method of how to predict those solar storms. Another thing is that the OSIRIS-APEX tests the systems and materials that protect this probe against heat and plasma impacts. The same technology. The researchers created for OSIRIS-APEX can used in the materials and structures. That protects satellites against nuclear explosions. That means this kind of system delivers information on how to prot

Interesting and futuristic innovations

Search This Blog