Kimmo Huosionmaa
https://sites.google.com/view/conspiraciesandcomissions/etusivu
When we are talking about conspiracies, we want to think that those theories are the hoax. But in real life, there are many things, what will rise those theories, and one of those things is of course media. Media is a very strong tool in the hand of people, who controls it. And when we are talking about some of the most well-known actions, what will find in history, we must say that those cases might be clear, if they were ordinary crimes. But what causes the real mess in those cases, is that there were many commissions, what mission was to find the truth. And as we might see, those commissions have a different kind of opinions about those cases.
And then we will see, what the public media does. It takes the report what feels the most comfortable in that situation, and after that, all parts of the truth are hiding. People who have different opinions will be yell to silent, and they will stamp as mentally ill. If somebody has the different kind of opinions than reporter has this time, the media is full of stories how silly somebody is, and how he or she slipped of the army. I sometimes ask what have those things to do with some conspiracy theories?
In this case, I use Kennedy's murder as an example a case where two commissions took two different kinds of question, who murders John F. Kennedy? The most notable thing with those commissions is that the first commission "The Warren Commission" what was set by Lyndon B. Johnson was sitting just after that case, and some people think that they were afraid the bullets. That commission spokesman was the member of the Supreme Court of the United States of America Earl Warren, and that's why that commission is called as "Warren's commission".
The second commission, The United States House of Representatives Select Committee on Assassinations (HCSA) what set in 1970's had editorialized that there MIGHT BE conspiracy behind Kennedy's assassination. Some people think that that commission's work had the strong attitude to show people there were a conspiracy behind Kennedy's case And those words are what was under the microscope in media. In this time all commission work was under very sharp monitoring, and somebody in the media took an attitude, that the second commission was not agreed with the report.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_on_Assassinations
Somebody was thinking that in Warren's report words "The public must be satisfied that Oswald was the assassin; that he did not have confederates who are still at large" were mentioned as a command what people must believe that report, but we must remember, that the commission was set one week after the murder of Kennedy, so they might be very afraid, and one thing rises above all. Members of that commission had very strong authority in America's society, so that was a very strong booster for that commission report trustworthiness.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_Commission
And people want to believe, that judges of the supreme court are above every political question and they don't have opinions on this kind of questions like national rights etc or they have nothing to hide in their past. There is one sarcastic assertion about judge Warren. That assertion was that particular judge took a part of some black person abuse, but there is that kind of asserts around all judges. But those are only philosophical thinking's and I can say that I ever could proof that Warren was kicked some black person to die in his youngish.
So those assertions can leave at their own price. Many prisoners are talking about those stories, and if somebody will sit in the death row, he might do anything to get out of that place. So it's easy to start to tell stories about the judges who had to make crimes, to buy freedom from that place. And that decreases those testimonies rank in the court system. But this is a case where is written many books and many stories have been told.
Comments
Post a Comment