Writing about confederate rebel in 1861

https://sites.google.com/view/confederaterebel/etusivu

Capillary turbines might be key to clean energy

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The clean energy is the very modern term, and that will consist one small thing, what can produce clean energy for all people over the world. The system is a capillary turbine, what can be installed inside the long tube, what sucks the air thru it. Sometimes that kind of plant is planned to build in India, but I don't know is that project still in under construction. The idea of this came from Nicola Tesla, who invented the way how to make free energy by just putting the turbine in the smokestack. And that would give energy for all the town. 

The capillary turbine is so simple way to produce electricity because its basis in technology what already exists. That kind of powerplant will look like the smokestack, where is a turbine inside. The air what rises in the tube will roll the turbine wheel, what is connected to the generator. This system might also be installed on the offshore oil rig, and that way the system can separate hydrogen from oxygen by electrolyzes. 

In the last scenario, the offshore oil rig just drops a tube in the depth, and the water will rise to turbogenerator. But if we want to build a power plant that doesn't need any kind of fuel, we must just build the group of the towers, what sucks air thru them, and after that, the turbine wheel will start to rotate. Those systems may someday give us the free electricity. In my opinion of those systems is that they might give us free and clean electricity to power lines. 

That kind of system might also put ships to move. The problem of it is the water pressure must be quite strong, and that's why the system will not able to use in big ships in the shallow waters, but if there is enough depth, will that system give enough power to move even big ships with water pressure. When we will drop the tube in the depth of 2000 meters, water will rise from depth with the pressure of 2000 metric kilograms. And that might give ship capacity to create power for it electric systems if it sails with sheets. That makes the use of oil unnecessary until the ship comes to near of the harbor. 

Somebody might test the use of capillary phenomenon to make electricity for airships. Those airships just drop the capillary tube to the surface of the ocean, and then will the water start to move across the turbine. Those extremely long endurance communication platforms need very much electric power for their systems, and normally those airships can get extra power by using solar panels, but that power system has its limits because this kind of airships can't operate in the Arctic winter and those vehicles are mentioned for the long enduring patrolling at polar areas and support scientist and other patrolling people in those very big areas. 

That is because those areas are compelling for chemical dumping, and that's why those areas need very long enduring air vehicle, what has the capacity to carry medical equipment and improved communication and surveillance equipment in those areas. Those missions are normally very boring, and the patrolling could be let for robots, what have the capacity to carry medical team or some other support team to those areas, there are no police stations and no emergency hospitals, so the medical team must have medical operation room with them, when they will go to help some scientists in the South Pole or Canadian forests. 

How to across the speed of the light in theory

Picture source
http://thenightsky.org/aarhus.html

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The question of moving objects is actually the very philosophic thing. It depends the way of thinking if we see is the object moving. Another way we might think, that the object stands still, and universe outside it moves. In real life we might compare that way of thinking the situation, where a fish swims against the river if the flow of that river grows so powerful, that those fishes can’t swim against it, they might stay stable, when the river moves around them.


WARP- motor is a machine, what sucks ions from the Universe, and after that, it pups those ions thru nuclear accelerator, what makes spacecraft moving. That kind of motors works also in nuclear submarines. And there was once an idea to use nuclear submarines to travel other planets. In this idea, the nuclear submarine will use the WARP drive to move under the ocean surface, and when it needs runway this ship will accelerate itself in oceans, and after that, it could rise to the orbiter and even to another planet. But this is, of course, theoretical concept. It is so-called "study"-project" where scientist and engineers think what kind of equipment they might need in that kind of project, what consists the concept of interplanetary spacecraft.  Question how fast that magneto-dynamic propulsion is depended level of the voltages what that spacecraft systems can create.


This example simulates, how relative is the world “move” in real life. Because the speed is the relevant thing, in theory, we can build a machine, what can break the cosmic speed limit the speed of light. When people want to across that “light wall” they can do it theoretically very simple way, they need a spacecraft and nuclear accelerator.



The accelerator shots ionic gas against a spacecraft with speed of light. And that spacecraft will fly against that nucleoside, and that makes theoretical situation possible, where spacecraft can reach speed two times faster than light is. That kind of speed is not able to reach bu normal spacecraft, but if those situations are able to make in laboratories, where two nuclear accelerators will launch a spacecraft against the nuclear ray, what shot from another accelerator. That ship what can use this kind of technology. because the accelerator must be put forward of that spacecraft, and backward can use ion or some other exotic propulsion.


Those ions might able to move across the spacecraft by making an accelerator to the outer core of that spaceship. That kind of spacecraft might look like cigars because magnets in their core will pump ions backward. So here is a question are those cigar-shaped UFO:s actually those theoretical spaceships models, what are made in some test areas like the AREA-51?

But I don't know, what would happen then. In theoretically that test might be doing right now. They can drive small probe against the nuclear ray of CERN, but if this test goes wrong, it might cause very bad damages, or that impact energy can destroy an entire planet. But that kind of things might do in outside of the Earth atmosphere. And if that thing works it might able us to travel in the time. And that's why that kind of test can make us a chance to sent probes to the future.

https://sites.google.com/view/acrossthecosmicspeedlimit/etusivu

What is the situation when you should think that you an adult?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

What is the situation when you should think that you an adult? That is a question, what I sometimes think. The question of when people are old is very old. There is no straight answer to those things, but when you don't anymore scream by hate when your friends leave you outside from restaurant-evening shows that you have grown as an adult person.


Adult persons know, that there is always find a man or woman who doesn't like them.  And they don't afraid their bosses if somebody calls them in the stand. They know that if the boss believes their customer's worlds that might cause separation from that company, but that will not happen every time when the customer asks the boss to support them. And sometimes those bosses lies about separations. They don't always kick people off the company, even if the customer wants them to do that.


What means to be the adult is ever mentioned in any texts, what are published in the media. Being adult in some professions like computing means that we don't hack other systems, and I remember, when I was a young man. I thought that all computer work is some kind of hacking and the world of the Internet is some kind of "Wargames"-movie.


But today I don't think that. When people are young they live very hectic life. All things what they want should happen here right now. They can't wait for anything because they ever must wait. Young people are so sensitive because all things happen for the first time, and that's why they will act like they act. Adult people learn to wait, and they know that the buss will come sooner or later, without making phone calls to the company.


Those phone calls will make a very strong impression to that person's fellows, but that doesn't bring the bus to the stand any faster if the man is calling phone calls to the company.  Patience is a feature, what older people have, and that's why army sniper men who have success are the little bit older than other soldiers. They have the patience to wait for important targets like enemy's officers to their scope.


That kind of persons was used in the Vietnam War as a "Phoenix"- program's operators to eliminate well known Vietcong leaders. That's why elder people are more dangerous than young. They have greater experience of life than young people, and that's why they will make compliments until they have an effect on that company and the target of compliments.


That eliminates change, that this particular person starts some revenge campaigns against that person. People must realize, that if they can't prove their worlds, will that person stand on his or her site. And that might make troubles to complementarian. Also when the person makes a decision to make compliments, he must realize, that the target of that action must not be informed before the reclamation is made. That is because those people might get mad about that compliment.

Risks of modern computing

Kimmo Huosionmaa

What is a threat to quantum computers? Those machines are so fast to handle calculations that, they can break almost every code in the world, and that makes ultra-fast computers very dangerous in wrong hands. The problem with secrecy and confidentially in the net is that every secrecy system is made with computers, what is possible in that time. And that’s why all security solutions need to be updated simultaneously.

If those algorithm is getting old, the information what it hires will become available for hackers. And modern computers might be very fast. If their processors will be used in liquid nitrogen, they will become superconducting. That means there will be no resistance in the system, and that’s why those computers are really fast. Same way ultra-small components make possible to make very powerful small size computers.

A nanotechnology is a powerful tool for computer technology. It allows the engineers to build an atomic size component. The nano technical transistor might consist of three atoms, what formulates stand, collector, and emitter in atom size. And of course, the artificial intelligence is a strong component in computing. If we can create an artificial intelligence, what can generate own ideas, and what can use imagination and have feelings, that makes computers dangerous because feelings make them feel hate.


But the most dangerous things of artificial intelligence is that they will be conscious of themselves. That might happen a situation, where machines will rebel. The power of the robots is that they have no feelings and that's why they are ideal to work in military use. But if robots have feelings they might become very dangerous. Have you ever imagine, what if some engineer uploads program, what simulates feelings in some Predator UCAV's (Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle) main computer? Can you imagine, if that computer-controlled killing machine will feel anger against some target? This situation might be so terrible, that I don't think it with pleasure.


Normal computers don't have imagination, but if we connect neuron cells to the microprocessor, the computer might become surprisingly working tool. In those test will the neurons connect to microprocessors, and the reason for that kind of test is to test computers, what can really think. Those neurocomputers can do same things than living organisms. The problem of those machines in to feed those cells, what communicates with the inorganic microchip with electric signals. That will make computers a skill to produce new things. And those things are of course interested in the people, who make UCAVs.


Those intelligent UCAV's might equip with the computer, what microchip is boosted with dragonfly's or other bugs neuron cells, what might give their extreme air combat capacity, what normal UCAVs doesn't have. The normal computer makes only moves, what are programmed in that system, and when enemy learns those  UCAV's movements, they would become easy to drop. But those biologically boosted microchips can able to give those robots a capacity to make surprising actions. And if that technology goes to wrong hands, could that cause terrible things.

Problems about referendum

Kimmo Huosionmaa

When politicians will make referendums for some things they might believe, that they are very nice people. It looks good, when political leaders ask people of the nation, what they want. And this is, of course, a part of democracy. But the problem with that kind of political leadership is that people would probably not know everything about the thing, what the referendum concerns, and if people don't know or think all parts of that thing, they will make decisions with feeling.


When we are talking about feelings, they are a big part of people life. And do you know why Brexit was possible? Media or reporters found only bad things about EU, and after that, they made possible, that the United Kingdom will separate from the European Union. Populists know what kind of promises they must give to the people. They promise money or something concrete like new hospitals to people, and of course, universities and study grants are very bad expenditure for the society, because those things make bad thing to the political leaders, who want to plead average person feelings and if payment of academic year is high and study grants low, they will give more services to people.

The problem with the journalists is that they are normal people, who see what the hosts want to show them. This is a normal question about democracy and journalism. If somebody is very plausible when he or she gives a performance, that might confirm reporters that information what will give to them is absolutely right. And that makes the manipulation of the press possible.

If the reporter writes something to media, the people automatically think that information is given by the real expert, who have all information about that thing. And that will make that information very dangerous. If the performer shows fictional or false information and claims that he or she has some kind of education of that thing, the text what reporter makes might be false.

And what makes that kind of information more effective for that reporter? If that performer is cute or so-called "teddy bear" the reporter might not show criticism in that situation. And populists know what makes people confirm that information is absolutely true? If the slides will be boosted with titles like "Ph.D." or name of well-known enterprise leader, they might have a great effect on people.

Or if we think little bit sharper, there is only one person, who the performer need to confess. That is a reporter, who makes that text. Readers of media are not in the place, where performance is given, and they can't know who the performer really is. And that makes possible to conduct false information to the media, by the reporter who knows what he or she sees.

Are we humans a part of artificial Intelligence

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Robotics and artificial intelligence are the elements of the next-generation military and civil mechanics. But have you ever thought this kind of thing in philosophic focus? When we are talking about philosophy, we sometimes forget that philosopher must not prove anything, only rhetorics of the presentation is important, and other things, what will happen are, what philosophers imagination can produce.

There are philosophers who believe that we are computer programs inside the great supercomputer. But in here I must say that the word "believe" doesn't mean same for philosophers normal people. "Believe" is a rhetorical term for philosophers and it means that he or she defends the side, what he or she ordered to take. Not that philosopher actually believes those things, what that person defends.


I sometimes think if we are cyborgs like some Terminator, but we will never find out is this question true. Of course, I know that I'm a human, not the machine, but when I think about philosophic texts, I can say that normal people can't ever find out are they human or machines? The reason why I say that is even if we will go to a doctor and say that we are robots, that highly trained specialist might say to us, that we probably will need some kind of therapy, and that person will send us to the mental hospital.


Some movies is an idea, that some pilot or astronaut will make a crash and his tissues will replace as parts of a machine. And that is an idea of the movie "Six million dollar man", but when I saw the trailer of that movie, I thought that CIA could arrange that kind of accident, where a test plane will fall from the sky, to make its pilot as a cyborg.


If we think that philosophical question very hard, we can say that we actually know only things, what doctor will tell us? But today I want to make long text, and that's why I'm writing it in here, and we will go the little bit longer in our thinking. How we ever can be sure, that we can get real information from doctors.


They might lie to us, or those X-ray pictures of our body might be changed. That might be the very good idea of some kind of movies, where guns are blazing and dark dressed military officials run around the scenes but are you ever thought, that artificial intelligence might able transfer to our brains using modified electric shock machines to transfer it's code to human brains.


In theoretically is possible to modify human brains electric function with that machine, which is used in many mental institutes. This action might happen that artificial intelligence transfers its program code to electric waves, what are made like EEG-waves in human brains. This makes possible that some artificial intelligence transfers it's code to human brains.


Sometimes I have read some comic books about a situation, where "the bad guy" tries to make other people like himself. And in that action, he will connect his brains to other person's brains with electric shock equipment. In this action must the sender use that electric shock equipment to manipulate some person with his own EEG.

In that action must that person remember, that he or she must use the amplifier to make those EEG-signals stronger, and that way that person might test is possible to control other people with this kind of equipment. The system also needs to equip with the rectifier, because that makes impossible for target person to strike back to those targets.

What kind of danger is civilian shape combat helicopter?

Kimmo Huosionmaa



Do you remember 1980’s movie “Airwolf”? The reason, why I write about that old TV-serine, is that there is a very big danger of that kind of weapons. “Airwolf” represents another kind of STEALTH- helicopter. Those helicopters are undercover military hardware, what looks normal helicopters, what TV- or other media uses, but that equipment uses effective covered weapon systems, what makes those things nasty surprise for normal scout helicopters and light airplanes. Those civilian shape helicopters might be useful in paramilitary operations, where targets are drug dealers or another kind of “nongovernmental” targets. In real combat, they might have little effect, because of their limits with weapon systems.


That fictional Airwolf”-helicopter is a normal commercial helicopter, what is equipped with machine guns and probably 40 mm grenade launchers. Also, light missiles like "dragon" and RBS-56 "Bill"  and other anti-tank weapons can be used. And possibly they can carry Stinger or other compact missiles to get improved capacity to destroy air targets. Those helicopters might be actually autogiro, what can obtain more speed than normal helicopters. That kind of helicopters can equip with multi-sensor packages and automatic fire control computers, what automatically launch weapons until the target is certainly able to destroyed by that helicopters weapons. Those autogiro-systems are quite simple.


The only thing what is needed is a connector, what separates the main rotor from the engine, and after that, the jet engines in helicopter body will start. Those engines might be the same type, what is used in cruise missiles, so they are quite cheap. That type of machines is very dangerous if they are not expected. They can attack against drug smuggling airplanes or another kind of targets. And if they are made as robots, they might be operated across the Ocean from thousands of kilometers. That means those helicopters have code sealed doors, what will not allow their service crews to go into that vehicle. So they will be remotely operated from thousands of kilometers away from the operational zone. The idea of those helicopters is same then some merchant cruisers. People can’ t imagine that those civilian look helicopter can carry weapon systems. They can come near the target, and then those helicopters can suddenly open fire.


If you think that possible 50. Caliber machine guns with “Rufus”  bullets are toys, I think that those weapons can cause very bad damages for any kind of soft and medium armored targets. And if those 40 mm. grenade launchers will equip with HEAT and Fuel Air Explosive ammunition, that might cause the very strong effect to the target. That makes those civilian shape helicopters so dangerous. Those helicopters might have no role in normal war, but in undercover operations, they can be successful

https://sites.google.com/view/undercovercombat/etusivu

There is something wrong in Hollywood

Picture is a part of  book cover
Greene murder case
(Gummerus)

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Now Hollywood stars have come out in the thing, what is a nightmare for many workers all around the world. This is a question of sexual harassment and using position to make that thing secret. I wonder does this criminal activity continues if that thing doesn't happen in Hollywood? This case shows, how many people use his or her position to cover up those things.

But in this particular case was one lucky thing, that person who came out is a famous person too, and here I sit and think how many cleaners or some other person, who doesn't have money of who is not famous, is sexually or other ways disturbed in that person's workplace? In those cases, the victim might have no dare to go to tell those things to the police.


And here I ask how many rapes have been contracted with money, to make victims of that crime silent? Many people think that nice guy from Hollywood or movie world is nice guys in real life. That would make criminal prosecution process very hard. And those guys can use their publicity as a shield against that prosecution. This is a key logic in many rape cases, what has been kept secret in the life of Hollywood.


The case what brought those things to publicity was one case, where famous actor Marlon Brando claimed to raped his front actress in one film. That case opened the public eye, that in there is something wrong in the film industry. Can an actor and director really slip off prosecutions because they paid the actress for that scene? And are the claims of real murders in movies true? There is no single evidence, that somebody was really murdered in Hollywood normal or Pornographic movies, but the rumors of so-called "snuff" movies are still living.


That term means dirty pornography, what have been sometimes found from some person Internet. Some of that evidence has been links what could easily to remove. So question is, why those people have left those links to a browser, and why they have used companies computer in that action? Those guys could easily slip off by using their own computer, but lucky for investigators that they were the little bit too stupid. So were those links actually a setup, that those people could kick off their companies?


But in the original mean of "snuff" is strictly forbidden violent porn movies and one of the most well-known murder case "Black Dahlia" is sometimes linked with those very sick underground porn. The case of rape in the film made somebody think, that there might be the real background of those rumors, that in some movies people were really killed. But that is not mentioned, was the film "action" or "porn" movies?


And some soldiers have claimed to sell killing movies what are photographed in the Second World war, Korea Vietnam, Afghanistan or Iraqi war. Those rumors do not pertain only American troops. Also, French foreign legion and other mercenaries who were worked in the Far East Africa and members of the South African army and Soviet army have been suspected in that kind of actions. Those rumors began actually in World War One, where soldiers common hobby was to photograph bodies of the killed enemy, and almost every army's soldiers have been suspected that they were taken pictures of killings. And there is the real background of those rumors, at least the German military and Waffen-SS troops took films about their mass executions, but I don't know if those films ever been sold to anybody.


People want to believe good for people, who they see on screen. And if a very famous man rapes somebody, he might say, that other person lies about this thing. They say sometimes that the victim of the crime is someway mentally ill, and they know that will have very strong effect in people mind. Those "the bold and the beautiful" persons might say that those, maybe Mexican victims are "gold miners" who just want to get money from those very wealthy persons. This happens in cases, where the result of the crime is a child. Or those famous people sometimes offer an abortion for solutions of slipping from that crime.

The prosecutions against President of the United States are not very common thing

Picture source  Internet 

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The problem with this Trump case does the president of United States  Donald Trump know about that money, what came from the Russian government, and can special prosecutor Mueller proof that support from another state as it will cause judgment to the president. The problem with Trump is that he was used his position in this case, and that will cause some troubles for his defense.


Predicated support for Trump's election campaign is channeled from Russian companies bank accounts. That means that there will not find the straight connection that money came from the Russian government. But the major procedure in this kind of actions is, that that kind of money will be first transfer to some company's accounts, and then they will be given to that politician's election campaign.


So if this kind of rumors that Trump took money from Russians is true, there will not be found any signs that money came from the Russian government. They might use series of corporations, what hides the role of the government, and there might find some signs what will show that  Gazprom is somehow handler of that money. But this is only speculation and I really hope that this investigation is unnecessary. But the prosecution is the very bad mark for Trump's career.


The President of the United States is the most powerful man on earth. And that kind of people will always follow some kind of conspiracy theories. That is very usual when we are talking about leaders in governmental and business life. And those rumors will sometimes be investigated by law enforcement officers.


If Trump didn't react like he did in the beginning of that investigation, this process will ever begin. And disturbing those investigations made this process possible. It's not the very common thing that the president of any nation will be investigated by law enforcement, and this shows how strength society that nation is, and Mueller's investigation shows to the people, that nobody is above the law.


And what makes the very bad thing for Trump is friendship with Putin. Many Americans think that Russia is their archenemy, and that's why posturing with the president of Russia Vladimir Putin is very troublesome for Trump's reputation. People think that Putin is some kind of new Juri Andropov, and that's why they probably don't like that Trump was his friend. Those things what happened before Trump's presidency might look small, but they have big frames in the court. And the question is what did Trump took money from another government.

Every case in the world is always two sides

Kimmo Huosionmaa

In the case of declaration of independence of the nation is always two parts, the independence movement, and another part, who doesn’t want the independence for some areas. Sometimes those people are not very often seen sight in media because their emotions are not so high than that independence movement. The problem with independence movements is that they appeal more feelings than a mind. That's why those political movements get so much room in the media. And what brings publicity brings votes. Some journalists like to make big stories about those movements because they are so colorful.


People are so sensitive and real, and they can speak spontaneously for their supporters. And what is the better picture in the media than a picture, where a supporter of independence cries when the flag of that new state rises up? The media is a very effective tool when people want to get publicity in their matter. And some journalists want to make big news for some movements, because they have no strong political opinions and antipathy against the government, that they will support everybody who is against the governments all around the world.


They want to believe, that everyone in the world hates governments and NATO. When we are talking about media's attitude about independence movements, we can see that those movements can get very much very positive publicity in the news where that movements power and popularity are very strongly highlighted. And that’s was the same style of the information what was given people in “Brexit case”. The media saw only positive things about Great Britain's separation from the EU.


And that’s why I think that kind of publicity might be supported by Russians because they might want to crash NATO. Publicity brings supporters to all parties, and when those leaders come to the front of people and sing some national hymns of some area, they might look like teddy bears. They want to stand in the front of people and show their patriotism to everybody. But they forget that in those street parliaments stands only the most eager part of the people, and that is a weakness of those politicians. Popular politics are very good to manipulate people, and they always can say right word in the right place.

And if police arrests somebody in the front of their flag, those politicians say "nobody has right to hit a people of that area", and that thing happens if those arrests are for crimes like breaking windows or something else. They always change those things to political persecution. All speeding ticket what they get is given by political reasons. And after that, they will get more people to listen to their song about the greater independent nation, what will live without evil central government.  Those street parliaments are sometimes threatened other people with violence if they will not support their idea of independence of some areas.

What cats really can do for government?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/whatcatscansee/etusivu

Have you ever seen a movie “Cat’s eyes”?  Do you know that movie has a real background in CIA’s laboratory?  “Acoustic Kitty” was CIA's attempt to create the advanced biological weapon. That program was officially mentioned to train cats for looking for enemy's weapons and other military stuff. But in some confessions are mentioned that those cats were trained also for eliminating enemy soldiers and other targets with biting their throat or blood vessels cut. The story behind in this rumor bases, that cats are also very easy to train for same missions what are normally made by dogs.


Training a cat is same style action than training dogs, but there is one difference between cats and dogs. Cat doesn’t scream, and that’s why trainer must teach it a signal position if that operator want’s to use it for patrol animal. Cat has some advantages what the dogs don't have. They can go places that are too small for dogs, and their small size and capacity to climb to trees makes them ideal for searching bombs and snipers, and if those cats are properly trained, they can surprise that man, and bite the shooter to the throat or first, to make that person harmless.


Those cats might equip with small radios, what works in infrasound or ultrasound frequency, that human can’t hear those commands. When we are talking about those cats, the problem with original “acoustic cat” was need of surgery, to put those animals to work. In this program, operators use systems that are fitted to collars, and they are not actually necessary. If those animals are equipped with satellite communicators and GPS system, they can be controlled from another side of the world.


If an operator has a visual contact with the cat, he does need only a megaphone, what has the capacity to use infrasound or ultrasound. The orders for that animals could give by speech or with special sound files what can be made by a midi system. If an animal has a radio and digital camera on its collar, can operator control those animals like biorobots? When we are talking about this kind of animals, we must realize that those animals can use in the very dangerous way to eliminate any person who those operators want to die.

Problems culminating in Catalonia now

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The movement about the independence of Catalonia is going to their last change. The leader of that movement urges people for resistance against the central government of Madrid and will cause terrible condition if somebody misunderstands that urge. That kind of comments is dangerous,  because somebody might get the hand on his hand, and those actions will be like putting the fire under powder sack.


The problem of those people who are leaders of that movement is that there is a text in a law of Spain, that people who revolts might be judged to jail for 30 years. The reason why this text in the law book is very problematic in this situation is that the leaders of that movement might become example what will happen to those people, who revolts against the central government of Spain.


The declaration of independence might be very bad thing for the Spanish government because that country is very authoritarian, that kind of actions for separating some parts of that country will separate themselves as an independent state. Those actions are so open challenges to the central government.


Laws of the Spain are the basis on time when that nation was under control of General Franco, and that’s why Spain is a quite authoritarian country. Even if Spain did not take part of Second World War, the country was faced bloody civil war in 1930’s. The cause of that civil war was that Spain and general Franco didn’t take a part of the Second World War. And the fascistic government was in power of that country until early 1980’s. And that time is still seen in this time as attitudes of Spanish authorities.

What the modern computer techology can do for STEALTH suites?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

https://sites.google.com/view/stealthsuites/etusivu

STEALTH is a key to modern military technology. Modern STEALTH technology makes objects invincible in radar, infrared and even for the human eye. That technology is always combined with airplanes, but those systems are coming to all kind of equipment. Modern technology gives a chance to make even humans unseen for enemy soldiers. The technology what is used in STEALTH clothes is actually very simple. Some of those clothes can buy from hunter's store and this is a treat, what security authorities must recognize.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK2eUCo7i6o

The clothes are covered with small tiny screens, and a camera system of those clothes gives the picture of the man’s background to those screens. That suite sometimes consists the facemask, what also has got a screen, and front of the sniper's scope is also a screen, what makes his perception almost impossible, and sometimes there is a net of water tubes in the suit, what lowers an infrared signature. That kind of equipment needs computers to operate, but those computers are actually modified mobile telephones, what are small but powerful for handling data.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rqi3jpBSyCc

That kind of next-generation STEALTH  suites are looking like some kind of samurai armor, and they might be cover small bites of very thin carbon glass, what is created for spacecraft, and the mission of that equipment is to protect that soldier small-caliber handguns and other projectiles. The mission of carbon glass has also protected those screens for damages. That kind of suite is a key element in the “Predator” movies. In that movie is another kind of stuff, what might be interesting for tomorrow's military personnel. Those hand-lasers and helmet laser are probably the little bit different than we normally think.


The laser itself is in backpack of that soldier, and light cables conduct the laser ray to the optical system. The system is controlled by HUD-mask and same kind of system, what Stephen Hawking uses when he communicates with other people. This kind of systems will be probably in hands of special forces after 10 to 15 years. Those intelligent computer controlled systems have been seen in action in Libya and Syria, where special forces snipers and pilots, who were shot down hired under active STEALTH robes.

That kind of suites was impossible to make 20 years ago, but in the modern world of military technology, those suits will be bought in the hands of military personnel. First, they will become to use by special forces, but then that equipment will release to hands of normal troops. The route is the same kind of like an assault rifle in the 1940's. First, they were used by special forces, but soon that equipment was released in the hands of normal troops. The question about this technology is about price. But mentioned, those suits are free to buy from the Internet, and using that equipment can anybody make themselves as an invisible.

What the fictionally attack by aliens might look like

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The fiction of attack of aliens is a common part of SciFi books and another kind of stuff. The attacker is normally shown as a very advanced but evil race, what uses huge machines to break the human race. But when we are seeing those films, we must ask would those Martians really act like that? Are they really so easy to kill, then in some classical books? In this text, I’m going to write what kind of civilization might be dangerous to us. And what kind of equipment that civilization might have.


The attacker might use a different kind of technology as a very devastating way. That technology will be nanotechnology or nano-machines, what will attack humans.  That attacker might look like the standard cluster bomb, what dispenses small tinderbox shape objects, what creates billions of nano-machines. Those units are so-called “production units” what can manufacture those nano-machines from carbon. The nano-machines can actually make human a puddle.


When we will return to one classic fiction of those war machines of the book, what is written by H.G Wells, and that book is of course “War of the worlds”, we might think what kind of machines those aliens might have. And if they have those “crazy hats on”, those aliens might be more intelligent and advance, what anybody can imagine. Those attacks by aliens are fiction, but if we think about those aliens they might also have very advanced biotechnology. I always asked how that man could imagine all those equipment, what those aliens had? Where he got his ideas from those marvelous machines? When I sometimes read that book, I sometimes imagine, that those war machines were actually cyborgs, what must eat, because inside them steel core was artificially muscles, what is made living tissue, what was needed to feed.


And those aliens with nasty hats might be some kind of bio-robots. In this fiction, those humanoids have the society, where all physical work will be done with zombies, handicapped aliens, what body will be remotely controlled by another alien, who might sit in mothership far away from danger. And those results of extreme bio manipulated robots, what might not have brains at all, and they could be remotely controlled by implanted microchips. That’s why they couldn’t act when they lost their hats.


Those zombies would be very useful in that kind of operations, where attackers must go to a hemisphere, what is full of bacteria. And one thing came to in my mind, those civilization's might able to build gigantic cyborgs. Machines that have the metallic core, but inside it could be living tissue, what is boosted with hydraulic systems. They might also fly, and that cyborg’s manipulator hands are hanging under it.


That kind of systems might have biologically produced tubes, what are like animals blood vessels.  Those cyborg robots might be very advanced and powerful weapons, what uses lasers to eliminate the enemies. That means at those cyborgs must eat sometimes. This kind of fictional war machines are one kind of animals, what have the steel core and inside it is flesh and nervous system.  Why I’m writing about this? Yesterday's  science fiction is today’s reality.

https://sites.google.com/view/fictionallyalienattack/etusivu

Star Trek and material transfer without the spacecraft http://startrekandwormhole.webnode.fi/

http://startrekandwormhole.webnode.fi/

Automation of automobiles makes hacking very dangerous

http://robotcars.webnode.fi/

Writing about North-Korean nukes

https://luonnonihmeitakaikillamausteilla.wordpress.com/2017/10/28/writing-about-north-korean-nukes/

First chargers have been risen in Trump Case

Kimmo Huosionmaa

If some democratic states president will get charges of misuse his power it is a very serious thing, and even if the president of the United States of America Donald Trump will not in the chair of prosecuted in the court hall, this case is very serious for this man and his closest people. Those prosecutions are involving the thing, what means real troubles to Donald Trump. That is taken cash from Russia, and that's why FBI started to investigate those rumors. And after that Donald Trump made the worst mistake what a man can make.


He suspended those investigators, and after that, he made a crime, what is called exploitation of position. And another crime is disturbing a criminal investigation. Those crimes are very serious, and if Trump will proof as a guilty, he will lose his position. And if he took a money from Russian government he might get charges for spying and treason of the state. Those crimes are much more serious, what Bill Clinton made when he was on charges of sexual harassment. Even Richard Nixon was not in charge of spying for another state. He just ordered secret service for eavesdrop his competitor.  People don't seem to understand, spying and making a treason of state are very serious charges even for normal people.


But if the president is in charge of that kind of crimes, he will be in very bad trouble. That kind of prosecutions are not anything, what can rise easily, even if they are targeted to normal people, but even if somebody claims that the president made those crimes, and some authorities started to investigate those things, they must have very strong evidence even for investigations. The worst mistake what Trump made, was starting to kick off investigators in that case. And that action made people think that those rumors of some secret contracts between presidents Putin and Trump might have the real background.


Question is that, did president Donald Trump really know himself about that support, what came from Moscow or did those campaign members work alone? And what kind of support Trump's campaign got from Russia? Was it a money or did those Russian fellows give his campaign also technical advisings like "how to build interesting homepages" and pieces of advice how media operations must be done, that they have the greatest effect possible on the people mind. So if Trump took that kind of help from another country and the prosecutors can prove that, will be in a very bad situation.

About independence of states and situation in Spain

Picture Sky News

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Independence of the state is not so easy to take as a people think. When some state want's to be independent, it must make diplomatic relationships with other states. And that means that the new state must be confessed by other states. This a fact in international politics. If some state has not been confessed that state would not able to make relationships with other states, and if somebody has it passport that person can't travel with that.


That is a rule in international politics. The reason for this kind of actions is those other ways some other country might want to support financial or even giving them a military training to make some state dissipate. The last thing is very dangerous because armed independence movements will normally classifieds as a terrorist organization. But why some other states are supporting those movements?


Sometimes the reason for the support for some independence movements is not so altruistic than we might want to think. Reason for supporting that kind of movement is sometimes only attempting to take a control that areas natural resources. When we are talking about this Catalonian independence movement, we must realize that is very unrealistic objective, because normal people think that Spain is quite a democratic state.


That's why Catalonia might not able to believe to get support from the EU.  What makes that particular movement so popular, is that Catalonia has better social situation than other Spain, and that's why some Catalonians think that they should not pay so much taxes if Catalonia will become independent. Sometimes I think that behind this independence movement of Catalonia might be Putin and Kreml. Russians might think that this kind of actors like Catalonian independence movement can dissipate NATO, and that's why they might get support to that kind of groups.


But there is another aspect of independence movements if they are working openly, will their members easy to locate and track.  That's why some of those group might be honeypots for people, who want to take a violence in their life. Those movements are good places to show the will to make terror-actions against some target or offer drug money to that kind of politicians. So sometimes I think that some drug dealers might get financial support for those movements because that's the way they will want to buy diplomatic status or have mercy from their crimes.

About independence movements and why they are so popular?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The area-parliament of Catalonia is talking about independence very seriously. And today we are making questions about those things, and the question is why those movements become so popular, that they are giving a declaration of independence. But we must realize that those movements are not a new phenomenon in the politics. There are always been movements, what are willing to cut the relationships to another country, but they did not become public until now. The internet has been given also for little groups change to get publicity.


When we are talking what might happen ten or fifteen years ago, those movements will not get their voices in the mind of the people. Those men and women who talked about independence that decade ago marked as political clowns. But when the government started to use violence against those people, they became in the front of the public eye. Violence just made people fear the police, and that drives them to give their support to those independence movements.


But what makes those movements so effective in the political field. They are led by young actors, who know how to utilize social media and the Internet. When we are talking about political violence, those parties or movement represented every action what police does, and where that movements symbols seen as a strike against their movement. It's very good symbol for them when policeman hits protesters in the front of that areas flag.


The politicians who want to give the declaration of independence for that area will say to people, "those cops are using the violence against that flag". It's same where riot started, or what was the reason for violence. The only thing that has an influence in people mind, is a picture where policeman strikes peaceful protester with a baton. It's very same to every people has that protester got a gun or knife couple of seconds before. They just see a picture where heavily equipped police stand in the front of that protester. And the only thing that has an influence is what people see.


Violence is a terrible weapon against political movements. If somebody dies in those fights between police and protesters, will those political movements get martyrs? And that might conduct the situation, where that independence movement starts to radicalize its politics. That is not the very nice road. Sometimes those movements will start to use violence against the government, and the evolution will get all-state into violence. The terror is thing what nobody wants, and violence is a strong reason to ban that movement from political field and make it membership illegal. If some movement takes fire bottles to their hands it gives the government the reason to begin massive police actions against it.

Why government want's to embarrass some doctors?

Kimmo Huosionmaa

We have a law in Finland that all unemployed people must be activated to apply for a job. They must go to courses where employment agency's workers teach them how to make job applications and CVs. And those courses are not voluntary even if you are a doctoral examination from the University. Why some governments do the thing, that they will give doctors the courses, where they will teach how to make a CV? Do those bureaucrats really think that those people can't write CVs and job applications?


Do you want to embarrass some kind of scientists?  Do you know how dangerous is this kind of action? Let’s think about the situation where the doctor who makes psychological profiles to customers want’s to do some evil things. What can he or she do to people, who have problems with drugs? He might go to that person and offer that person alcohol, and ask that person to do jobs for that doctor.

https://www.hs.fi/mielipide/art-2000005424287.html

Here is used many times world “person” for avoiding the misunderstanding and connections fo persons in real life. If that kind of doctor want’s to manipulate that person, the results might be far away from good. Somebody thinks that if the doctor is graduated as a doctor of techniques he or she might be harmless. But do you think that kind of people are so harmless as people think? If those people want, they might build a subliminal loudspeaker system, what might cause uncontrollable situations in normal life.

Or what do you think about real estate agent who uses this kind of equipment to advance his or her business? I have heard that some unthinkable persons might play tapes to some high school classes, where are records of phone sex sessions. The result of that experiment is unknown. But this kind of thoughts is coming in my mind when we are talking about misuse of science. I don’t know does everybody even know, what means the word “manipulation”.

Master manipulator does that thing like nobody ever notices that he or she controls other people. They don't work like some U.S marine drill instructors. Manipulators can give a good suggestion of themselves. They can follow people appearances and body movements and then fits the words to make those people speech comfortable.

If master manipulator works, the target who is under manipulation doesn’t even notice that he or she is under manipulators control. The methodology of the manipulator is always same. He or she makes themselves necessary part of the team. After that, this person will begin to curry flavor strongest parts of the team. The argument what that person uses is that the team needs command system. It makes the strongest persons of the team feel good because they can get a good position in the new group.

And of course, there is always somebody, who will drop out of the team because that makes the membership of that group more valuable. And kicks off make those team members afraid that they will lose their position the team. That kind of actions makes enemies for team members, what makes the team tighter because that makes members of the team afraid even to walk on the streets.

https://www.hs.fi/mielipide/art-2000005424287.html

Do you know, what means "Lady Butterfly" in psychology?

Picture:Wikipedia

Kimmo Huosionmaa

Do you know, what means term “Lady Butterfly” in psychology? That means the psychological condition, where a person falls in love with some public person. This psychological effect could make a person dangerous, if he or she is in psychosis or that person has some kind of psychiatric disorders.

If a person has a mental disorder, he or she might think that killing that targets husband or wife that person could get married with a target of that person’s love. Some investigators think that “Lady Butterfly”- the effect has played the key role in murders what are targeted to public persons.

I mean that reason for the shooting of John Lennon might be that shooter was fallen in love with Yoko Ono, John  Lennon’s wife. Some investigators also think that this particular effect took a part of the shooting of John Fitzgerald Kennedy in Dallas 1963. They think that if Oswald was a shooter, he might be fallen in love of Jaqueline Kennedy, and if somebody knew that, he might provocate Oswald to make that thing, what he did that day.

This “Lady Butterfly”- the effect is very common in the world of young people, and normally it is harmless. But is person can’t handle his or her emotions or uses some kind of drugs this effect might grow devastating. If somebody provokes that kind of person like telling stories how some public person will be looked at his or her side might result be devastating, and that is a reason why some people have professional confidentiality

In normal life, people can handle their emotions, and they can live with this kind of feelings, but if the person’s mental life is disturbed, the result of provocation would be very dangerous for the community. All behavior models in the society are made for wealthy people. Those models don't notify that some people use drugs or they have some neurological problems like tumors in the brain tissue. And that might cause that some people can’t control their behavior and actions. That thing might cause the terrible situation for society.

Robots are coming more and more common in the battlefield

X47B takes fuel from "Omega tanker"
(Northrop) 

Kimmo Huosionmaa

The news below shows clearly which way the military aviation is going to. Robot airplanes will replace manned pilots in many missions. If Northrop will put outset of robot air refueling system for UCAV:s, there might be more plans to make lethal military power more lethal for any operator in military forces. I think that Navy has been already tested robot versions of P-8 “Poseidon” ASW aircraft and other tactical systems like command posts.

https://www.defensenews.com/air/2017/10/25/northrop-pulls-out-of-mq-25-drone-competition/

The automatization of those long enduring platforms makes those long-term missions more comfortable for all operators of the navy. Because that set offer is Northrop we might think that there will be also robot-version of B-2 and B-52 bombers.  That will be the very dramatic thing for nuclear forces because robot planes can be airborne even months if their technology endures for that flight. And almost every other airplane can be operated as a robot very easy way.

The operators must just change programs in airplanes computers to the same kind of programs, what are used in “Predator” drones. Those drones might look like manned airplanes with chairs and cockpits, but there will no need for pilots. The use of this kind of airplane might be in assault roles in the situation like Afghanistan.

Those operators are sitting on the chair in some room, and if their working day ends in the middle of flights, operators just go home and evening shift will take a hand of those robots, like in some factories. Like some media persons say that is the very unfair way to fight against the enemy. Bur war is the very unfair thing, and the military commanders choice between own men or some enemies when they are calculating victims, their choice will be that better to kill enemies than making own casualties.

And there is one thing, what supports the use of unmanned combat vehicles in those operations is that drone operator has less psychiatric problems than men who fought in those mountains. If we are talking about real war, the question is who shoots first, and war is not any game with honor.

Robot aircraft have many advantages for piloted vehicles. If U.S military losses drones in some missions, the losses might never become public, because there will be not human victims, and that’s why those robot operations are easy to cover. And the most important thing about creating robot warplanes is that their pilot doesn’t need very expensive training, and all of those drone operations might be undercover.   

https://www.defensenews.com/air/2017/10/25/northrop-pulls-out-of-mq-25-drone-competition/