Skip to main content

Big Bang and beyond.

   

 Big Bang and beyond.



So what kind of case the Big Bang was? Was it the release of the subatomic particles from the erupting black hole? In that scenario, energy started to flow away from that Black Hole because it was higher energetic than its environment. 

And energy is flowing to the lower energy areas. The question is: did the Big Bang release material to the universe. Did it turn the existing material into another? And which way did energy flow travel if that thing happened? 

The thing is that energy is always traveling to the lower energetic areas. So the energy balance between the matter and the environment determines which way energy flows. 

If the environment is lower energetic than material energy travels from the material to the environment. And if the material is lower energetic than its environment energy travels to the material. Energy flow continues until the energy levels between particles. The environment is the same. 

Another thing could be that the Big Bang was the energy eruption that pumped energy to the particles that were already existed in the universe. In that case, the energy load from the Big Bang simply turned some particles of dark matter into matter that has formed, as we know it.

The thing is that if we would be formed of dark matter. We would see an empty bubble in the point of our universe. The thing is that we don't know which thing was the Big Bang, except it released the material in the universe. But was it released material or just changed the type of particles to another. 

So there is the third version of the Big Bang theory. And that is that. The energy level of the material that existed near the epicenter of the Big Bang loosed energy. That means the Big Bang formed the empty bubble in the universe. If the big bang released energy flow that pushed the universe empty. That thing could cause that the matter near that bubble lost its energy. 

And then part of the energy of the dark matter traveled in that bubble. Then that thing caused that the energy level of those particles decreased, and the size of those particles changed. That thing could explain. The reason why the form of visible material of the universe looks like a ball. 

What if we would live in a young universe? How long it would take to travel across the universe? The thing is that. If we would live in the young universe there be more scattering and quantum fields so the speed of light would be lower than in the modern universe. Another thing is that the size of particles would be different. And that means there is the possibility that travel across the young and smaller universe takes as long as it takes today. 

The thing is that the energy level of the young universe is higher than the universe that we are seeing. Another thing is that there was more crossing radiation and the material is releasing energy slower the level of single particles than it does now. But the universe itself as an entirety transmitted energy faster outside it than it does today. Today the temperature of the universe is three kelvin. 

And the cosmic background is one of the reasons why the universe is expanding. When the edge of the universe is traveling outside the energy level of the universe is turning lower. That expansion causes that it's not possible to get the energy stability between material and its environment as long the expansion continues. The energy flow from material to the environment is the thing that causes the end of the universe. But if the universe starts to come down its energy level starts to rise. 

And sooner or later the energy is starting to flow back to particles. The thing that determines the direction of the energy flow is the energy level. Energy always travels to low energetic areas as I wrote earlier?


https://thoughtandmachines.blogspot.com/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MIT's tractor beam can make the new types of SASER systems possible

   "This chip-based "tractor-beam," which uses an intensely focused beam of light to capture and manipulate biological particles without damaging the cells, could help biologists study the mechanisms of diseases."(Interesting Engineering, MIT’s Star Wars-inspired ‘tractor beam’ uses light to capture, manipulate cells) MIT's tractor beam can make the new types of SASER systems possible. The tractor beam just hovers the nanoparticle in air or medium, and then the laser or some other electromagnetic system transports oscillation into those particles. The ability to make cells and other particles hover in the system makes it possible to create particles whose energy level or resonance frequencies are accurately calculated things.  That thing makes it possible to create things that transmit wave movement accurately and cleanly. This is one version of the use of a tractor beam. Modern tractor beams are like acoustic tweezers where sound waves lock the object in its cr

The new observations tell that the thunderstorms form gamma-rays. That could make gamma-ray lasers possible.

  "An illustration of NASA’s research plane ER-2 flying over thunderstorms. Credit: University of Bergen / Mount Visual (CC BY 4.0), edited" (ScitechDaily, Surprising Discovery: NASA’s Retrofitted U2 Spy Plane Reveals Tropical Lightning Storms Are Radioactive) The new observations tell that the thunderstorms form gamma-rays. That could make gamma-ray lasers possible. The process has been observed by the NASA (Lockheed) ER-2 research plane, which is a modified U-2 spy plane. The gamma-ray formation in thunderstorms. Where lightning and electric fields release electrons that impact the air molecules and water droplets is an interesting thing. That thing opens the route to solving many mysteries.  "The general physics behind how thunderstorms create high-energy flashes of gamma radiation is not a mystery. As thunderstorms develop, swirling drafts drive water droplets, hail, and ice into a mixture that creates an electric charge much like rubbing a balloon on your shirt. Pos

Chinese innovations and space lasers are interesting combinations.

Above: "Tiangong is China's operational space station located in low Earth orbit. (Image credit: Alejomiranda via Getty Images)" (Scpace.com, China's space station, Tiangong: A complete guide) Chinese are close to making nuclear-powered spacecraft.  Almost every day, we can read about Chinese technical advances. So are, the Chinese more innovative than Western people? Or is there some kind of difference in culture and morale between Western and Chinese societies? The Chinese superiority in hypersonic technology is one of the things that tells something about the Chinese way of making things.  In China, the mission means. And the only thing that means is mission. That means that things like budgets and safety orders are far different from Western standards. If some project serves the Chinese communist party and PLA (People's Liberation Army) that guarantees unlimited resources for those projects. Chinese authorities must not care about the public opinion.  If we th